Zelensky, flanked by Europe, heads to Washington as Trump presses for Russia deal
straitstimes.com -- Monday, August 18, 2025, 2:55:56 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Categories: U.S.–Russia Relations, Foreign Policy & International Relations, U.S.–NATO Relations
KYIV - Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky and Europe's leaders will meet Mr Donald Trump in Washington on Aug 18 to map out a peace deal amid fears the US president could try to pressure Kyiv into accepting a settlement favourable to Moscow.
The European leaders of Britain, Germany, France, Italy, Finland and Nato hope to shore up Mr Zelensky at a crucial diplomatic moment in the war and prevent any repetition of the bad-tempered Oval Office encounter between Mr Trump and Ukraine's leader in February.
Mr Trump will meet first with Mr Zelensky at 1.15pm (1.15am on Aug 19, Singapore time) in the Oval Office and then with all the European leaders together in the White House's East Room at 3pm, the White House said.
After rolling out the red carpet for Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Aug 15, Mr Trump said an agreement should be struck to end the 42-month-long war that has killed tens of thousands and displaced millions.
"Russia is a very big power, and they're not," Mr Trump said of Ukraine afterwards.
However, Mr Zelensky has already all but rejected the outline of Mr Putin's proposals at that meeting, including for Ukraine to give up the rest of its eastern Donetsk region, of which it currently controls a quarter.
"We need real negotiations, which means we can start where the frontline is now," Mr Zelensky said in Brussels on Aug 17, adding that Ukraine's Constitution made it impossible for him to give away territory.
More concerning for him is the fact that Mr Trump, who previously favoured Kyiv's proposal for an immediate ceasefire to conduct deeper peace talks, reversed course after the summit and indicated support for Russia's favoured approach of negotiating a comprehensive deal while fighting rumbles on.
"I am grateful to the President of the United States for the invitation. We all equally want to end this war swiftly and reliably," Mr Zelensky said on the Telegram messaging app after arriving in Washington late on Aug 17. "Russia must end this war - the war it started. And I hope that our shared strength with America and with our European friends will compel Russia to real peace."
The outline of Mr Putin's proposals appears impossible for Mr Zelensky to accept. Ukrainian forces are deeply dug into the Donetsk region, whose towns and hills serve as a crucial defensive zone to stymie Russian attacks.
As part of any peace deal, Kyiv wants security guarantees sufficient to deter Russia, which took Ukraine's Crimean peninsula in 2014 and launched a full invasion in 2022, from attacking again.
Fearing that they would be shut out of the conversation after a summit to which they were not invited, European leaders held a call with Mr Zelensky on Aug 17 to align on a common strategy for the meeting with Mr Trump on Aug 18.
The presence of six allies to back Mr Zelensky may alleviate painful memories of Mr Zelensky's last Oval Office visit.
"It's important for the Europeans to be there: (Trump) respects them, he behaves differently in their presence," Mr Oleksandr Merezhko, a Ukrainian lawmaker from Mr Zelensky's ruling party, told Reuters.
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, speaking to CBS, dismissed the idea that the European leaders were coming to Washington to protect Mr Zelensky.
"They're not coming here tomorrow to keep Mr Zelensky from being bullied. They're coming here tomorrow because we've been working with the Europeans," he said. "We invited them to come."
Relations between Kyiv and Washington, once extremely close, have been rocky since Mr Trump took office in January.
However, Ukraine's pressing need for US weapons and intelligence sharing, some of which have no viable alternative, has forced Mr Zelensky and his allies on the continent to appease Mr Trump, even when his statements appear contradictory to their objectives.
On the battlefield, Russia has been slowly grinding forward, pressing home its advantages in men and firepower. Mr Putin says he is ready to continue fighting until his military objectives are achieved.
Ukraine hopes that the changing technological nature of the war and its ability to inflict massive casualties on Moscow will allow it to hold out, supported by European financial and military aid even if relations with Washington collapse. REUTERS
Sign Our PetitionThe recent meeting in Washington between Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, European leaders, and former President Donald Trump underscores the intricate geopolitical dynamics surrounding the ongoing conflict in Ukraine. This situation is not only a matter of immediate diplomatic engagement but also reflects deeper historical and political narratives that have shaped Eastern Europe since the end of the Cold War. The potential for a peace deal, especially one that leans toward appeasing Russia, raises serious concerns about the implications for Ukrainian sovereignty and the broader principles of international law and self-determination.
Historically, Ukraine's struggle for independence and territorial integrity has been fraught with challenges, particularly from its powerful neighbor, Russia. Following the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991, Ukraine emerged as an independent nation, but its history is marred by foreign intervention and attempts at dominance. The annexation of Crimea in 2014 and the ongoing conflict in Eastern Ukraine have further complicated its quest for stability. The current situation is a reflection of long-standing tensions rooted in national identity, territorial disputes, and external influences. Trump's recent comments, suggesting that a peace deal should favor Russian interests, echo a troubling pattern of dismissing the agency of smaller nations in favor of geopolitical expediency.
Zelensky's staunch refusal to concede territory reflects not just a commitment to Ukrainian sovereignty, but also a broader rejection of a diplomatic approach that prioritizes the demands of a belligerent power over the rights and voices of those directly affected by the conflict. The historical precedent here cannot be overlooked: appeasement strategies have often led to greater conflicts and suffering. The failure to learn from history, particularly regarding the consequences of sacrificing smaller nations for the sake of convenience or perceived stability, raises important questions about the moral responsibilities of larger powers like the United States and its allies.
The involvement of European leaders in this dialogue is crucial, as it signifies a collective commitment to uphold the principles of international law, particularly the right to territorial integrity. Their presence at the summit serves as a reminder that Ukraine's fate cannot be decided in isolation, nor should it be subject to the whims of a single leader whose historical record exhibits a tendency to prioritize personal diplomacy over established norms. The coordinated effort to support Zelensky is also indicative of a broader recognition that the conflict in Ukraine is not merely a bilateral issue, but one that has significant implications for European security and the post-World War II order.
In the context of ongoing social struggles, the situation in Ukraine provides a vital lens through which to examine issues of justice, equity, and the impact of imperialistic policies. The plight of ordinary Ukrainians—who have borne the brunt of a war that has resulted in tens of thousands of deaths and millions displaced—serves as a stark reminder of the human cost of geopolitical maneuvering. As citizens engage in discussions about the complexities of international relations, it is imperative to highlight that peace negotiations must prioritize the voices of those affected by conflict and ensure that any resolution respects the rights and sovereignty of nations. This perspective not only advocates for a just resolution to the war but also aligns with a broader commitment to social justice and the principle that every nation deserves the right to self-determination without external coercion.
In conclusion, the upcoming discussions in Washington represent a critical juncture for Ukraine, one that extends beyond mere political outcomes to encompass moral imperatives and the historical lessons of international relations. As advocates for peace and justice engage in these conversations, they must emphasize the importance of upholding the principles of sovereignty and self-determination while remaining vigilant against the risks of appeasement. The stakes are high, not only for Ukraine but for the integrity of the international order and the future of global cooperation in the face of aggression. This moment calls for a robust defense of democratic values and a commitment to ensuring that the voices of those most affected by conflict are heard and respected.
The unfolding geopolitical landscape surrounding Ukraine has reached a critical juncture, with President Volodymyr Zelensky's visit to Washington amid Donald Trump's push for a peace deal. This moment is laden with historical significance, particularly as it reflects the complex interplay between American foreign policy and the intricate dynamics of European security. Since Russia's annexation of Crimea in 2014 and the commencement of its full-scale invasion in 2022, Ukraine has found itself at the epicenter of a confrontation that has profound implications for global stability. Zelensky's mission to secure support from both the United States and European allies is essential, not only for Ukraine’s sovereignty but also for the broader democratic values that underpin the transatlantic alliance.
Historically, the United States has positioned itself as a champion of democracy and a bulwark against authoritarianism. However, Trump's previous dealings with Ukraine raise alarm bells about the potential for a deal that could undermine Ukraine's territorial integrity. The specter of a settlement that favors Russia could echo the Munich Agreement of 1938, where Western powers allowed Nazi Germany to annex parts of Czechoslovakia, a decision that ultimately led to grave consequences. It is crucial for Americans to recognize the dangers of appeasement in international relations and to advocate for a robust response to any initiatives that would compromise Ukraine’s sovereignty. A commitment to upholding international law and supporting the self-determination of nations is essential to prevent the erosion of democratic norms globally.
As citizens of a democracy, Americans have a pivotal role to play in influencing foreign policy. Engaging with representatives to express concern over any proposals that may emerge from the Trump-Zelensky meeting is vital. Grassroots activism can help ensure that U.S. support for Ukraine remains steadfast and unwavering. Advocacy groups and community organizations can mobilize public opinion to keep the pressure on policymakers to advocate for a peace process that respects Ukraine's territorial integrity and provides ironclad security guarantees against further Russian aggression. By fostering dialogue and raising awareness about the implications of appeasing authoritarian regimes, Americans can contribute to a collective effort that prioritizes justice and international stability.
Moreover, it is essential to recognize that the security of Ukraine directly impacts European stability. The presence of European leaders at the summit underscores the collective understanding that a weakened Ukraine could lead to a broader crisis on the continent. Historical precedents, such as the rise of fascism in the 20th century, illustrate how the failure to support nations under threat can lead to a cascading effect of instability. Americans should advocate for a transatlantic approach to security that emphasizes cooperation between the U.S. and European allies, reinforcing the message that the defense of democracy and freedom is a shared responsibility. This could involve promoting increased military assistance, economic support, and humanitarian aid to bolster Ukraine’s resilience against Russian aggression.
Ultimately, the stakes in Washington are not merely about Ukraine; they are about the principles that define international relations. The potential for a backroom deal that sacrifices Ukraine’s interests raises profound ethical questions about the responsibilities of powerful nations. In an era where global democracy is under siege, it is imperative for Americans to champion a foreign policy that reflects values of justice, solidarity, and respect for sovereignty. The outcome of the negotiations between Zelensky and Trump has the potential to shape the future trajectory of international relations, making it essential for the American public to remain engaged, informed, and active in advocating for a world where democracy prevails over tyranny. Only through collective action can we ensure that the lessons of history are not forgotten, and that the future remains secure for nations striving for freedom and self-determination.
The recent developments surrounding Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky's visit to Washington amidst negotiations for a peace deal with Russia call for a proactive response from concerned citizens. Here’s a detailed list of actions we can take to support Ukraine and advocate for a just resolution in this situation.
### What Can We Personally Do About This?
1. **Raise Awareness**: Share information about the situation in Ukraine and the implications of any potential peace deals that could favor Russia over Ukraine’s sovereignty. 2. **Support Humanitarian Efforts**: Contribute to organizations providing aid and assistance to those affected by the war, such as refugees and internally displaced persons.
3. **Engage in Advocacy**: Contact representatives and government officials to advocate for policies that support Ukraine’s right to defend its territory and sovereignty.
### Exact Actions We Can Personally Take
#### 1. **Contact Government Representatives**
- **Write to Your Senators and Representatives** - **What to Say**: Express your support for Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity. Urge them to support legislation that reinforces military and humanitarian aid to Ukraine and calls for a diplomatic approach that prioritizes Ukraine’s needs. - **Example Contacts**: - **Senator Elizabeth Warren** (D-MA) - Email: https://www.warren.senate.gov/contact - Mailing Address: 2400 JFK Building, 15 Sudbury St, Boston, MA 02203 - **Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez** (D-NY) - Email: https://ocasio-cortez.house.gov/contact - Mailing Address: 1236 Longworth H.O.B., Washington, D.C. 20515
#### 2. **Sign and Share Petitions**
- **Petition Example**: - **"Support Ukraine's Sovereignty and Territorial Integrity"** on platforms like Change.org or MoveOn.org. - **Action**: Sign and share the petition widely on social media to gather public support.
#### 3. **Join or Support Advocacy Groups**
- **Organizations to Support**: - **Ukrainian Congress Committee of America**: Advocate for the rights and needs of Ukrainians. - **Human Rights Watch**: Support their efforts in documenting rights abuses and advocating for humanitarian aid.
#### 4. **Participate in Local Protests or Rallies**
- **Find Local Events**: Use social media platforms or community boards to find local demonstrations supporting Ukraine. Participate and bring awareness to the cause.
#### 5. **Educate Yourself and Others**
- **Host Informational Sessions**: Organize discussions or webinars that delve into the complexities of the Ukraine-Russia conflict, emphasizing the importance of protecting Ukraine’s sovereignty. - **Disseminate Information**: Share credible articles, videos, and documentaries that highlight the realities on the ground in Ukraine and the implications of international negotiations.
### Additional Steps
- **Engage with Media**: Write letters to the editor in your local newspapers expressing your views on the importance of supporting Ukraine. - **Use Social Media**: Post regularly about Ukraine, using hashtags such as #StandWithUkraine and #UkrainianSovereignty to raise visibility.
By taking these actions, we can collectively voice our support for Ukraine and advocate for a just resolution that respects the nation’s sovereignty and territorial integrity. It’s crucial to remain engaged and proactive in these discussions, pushing for policies that reflect a commitment to human rights and international law.