Truth and Resistance Dove Logo
Know what you should know!

Home     Categories     Search     Subscribe

Trump and Putin to meet over Ukraine peace at Alaska summit

lmfm.ie -- Friday, August 15, 2025, 1:56:09 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Categories: U.S.–Russia Relations, Foreign Policy & International Relations, U.S.–NATO Relations
Trump and Putin to meet over Ukraine peace at Alaska summit

The meeting of the Russian and U.S. leaders at a Cold War-era air force base in Alaska will be their first face-to-face talks since Trump returned to the White House

Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin hold talks in Alaska today, with the U.S. president's hopes of sealing a ceasefire agreement on Ukraine uncertain but with a last gasp offer from Putin of a possible nuclear deal that could help both men save face.

The meeting of the Russian and U.S. leaders at a Cold War-era air force base in Alaska will be their first face-to-face talks since Trump returned to the White House and comes amid Ukrainian and European fears that Trump might sell Kyiv out.

The White House said the meeting will take place at 11 a.m Alaska time (7pm Irish time).

Trump, who once said he would end Russia's war in Ukraine within 24 hours, said on Thursday the three-and-a-half-year conflict had proven a tougher nut to crack than he had thought.

He said if his talks with Putin went well, setting up a subsequent three-way summit with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy - who was not invited to Friday's meeting - would be even more important than his encounter with Putin.

Trump is pressing for a truce to bolster his credentials as a global peacemaker worthy of the Nobel Peace Prize, something he has made clear is important to him.

Ukraine and its European allies were heartened by their conference call on Wednesday in which, they said, Trump agreed Ukraine must be involved in any talks about ceding land. Zelenskiy said Trump had also supported the idea of security guarantees in a post-war settlement, although the U.S. president has made no public mention of them.

Wednesday's call eased their fears of a Trump-Putin deal that would leave Ukraine under pressure to make territorial and other concessions.

Putin, whose war economy is showing signs of strain, needs Trump to help Russia break out of its straitjacket of ever-tightening Western sanctions, or at the very least not to hit Moscow with more sanctions, something Trump has threatened.

The day before the summit, the Kremlin leader held out the prospect of something else he knows Trump wants - a new nuclear arms control agreement to replace the last surviving one, which is due to expire in February next year.

Trump said on the eve of the summit that he thought Putin would do a deal on Ukraine, but he has blown hot and cold on the chances of a breakthrough. Putin, meanwhile, praised what he called "sincere efforts" by the U.S. to end the war.

A source close to the Kremlin told Reuters it looked as if the two sides had been able to find some unspecified common ground beforehand.

"Apparently, some terms will be agreed upon tomorrow (Friday) because Trump cannot be refused, and we are not in a position to refuse (due to sanctions pressure)," said the source, who spoke on condition of anonymity because of the matter's sensitivity.

Putin has set stringent conditions for a full ceasefire, but one compromise could be a phased truce in the air war, although both sides have accused the other of flouting a previous accord.

Analysts say Putin could try to look like he's giving Trump what he wants while remaining free to escalate in Ukraine if he wants to.

"If they (the Russians) are able to put a deal on the table that creates some kind of a ceasefire but that leaves Russia in control of those escalatory dynamics, does not create any kind of genuine deterrence on the ground or in the skies over Ukraine... that would be a wonderful outcome from Putin's perspective," said Sam Greene, director of Democratic Resilience at the Center for European Policy Analysis.

Zelenskiy has accused Putin of bluffing and playing for time to avoid U.S. secondary sanctions and has ruled out handing Moscow any territory.

Trump has said land transfers between Russia and Ukraine could be a possible way of breaking the logjam.

Putin, whose forces control nearly one fifth of Ukraine, wants Trump to start reviving the two countries' shrunken economic, political and business ties and, ideally, not to make that process contingent on progress on Ukraine.

But it is unclear whether Putin is willing to compromise on Ukraine. In power for a quarter of a century, the Kremlin chief has staked his legacy on coming out of the war with something he can sell to his people as a victory.

Chief among his war aims is complete Russian control over the Donbas industrial region in eastern Ukraine, which comprises the Donetsk and Luhansk regions. Despite steady advances, around 25% of Donetsk remains beyond Russian control.

Putin also wants full control of Ukraine's Kherson and Zaporizhzhia regions; NATO membership to be taken off the table for Kyiv; and limits on the size of Ukraine's armed forces.

Ukraine has said these terms are unacceptable and tantamount to asking it to capitulate.

Expand

Sign Our Petition


Opinion:

The recent summit between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin at a Cold War-era military airbase in Alaska serves as a stark reminder of the complex geopolitical landscape shaped by historical conflicts and the ongoing war in Ukraine. This meeting, the first of its kind since Trump’s return to the presidency, is laden with implications not only for U.S.-Russia relations but also for the broader dynamics of international diplomacy. It is essential to recognize how the historical context of U.S.-Russia relations informs our understanding of current events, particularly in light of the persistent struggles for sovereignty and justice faced by the people of Ukraine.

Historically, the United States and Russia have oscillated between periods of intense rivalry and tentative cooperation, with the Cold War casting a long shadow over their interactions. The legacy of this era is evident in the way both nations perceive security and power on the global stage. Trump's previous era in office was marked by a controversial leniency toward Russia, raising questions about American foreign policy priorities and the implications for nations caught in the middle, such as Ukraine. The ongoing conflict in Ukraine is rooted in historical grievances, including the country’s struggle for independence and its aspirations for closer ties with the European Union. The potential for a peace agreement brokered by two leaders with divergent interests may leave Ukraine vulnerable, highlighting the need for its inclusion in any discussions concerning its future.

As Trump seeks to position himself as a peacemaker, it is crucial to examine the underlying power dynamics at play. The concerns voiced by Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy regarding the potential for a Trump-Putin deal that could compromise Ukraine's territorial integrity reflect broader anxieties about the autonomy of small nations in the face of great power politics. The notion of "selling out" Ukraine is not merely a political fear; it is a visceral concern rooted in the lived experiences of people who have faced the devastating impacts of war and displacement. The historical context of Ukraine’s struggles emphasizes the importance of ensuring that its voice is not only heard but prioritized in negotiations that directly affect its sovereignty.

Moreover, the geopolitical consequences of a potential nuclear arms control agreement underscore the complexities of contemporary diplomacy. The Cold War's legacy continues to shape the discourse on nuclear weapons, with both Trump and Putin recognizing the need for strategic stability even as they pursue their national interests. This situation raises ethical questions about who benefits from such agreements and who bears the burden of military escalation. For many, the prospect of peace must be weighed against the realities of military-industrial complexes and the potential for further militarization in a world already fraught with tension.

The summit also serves as a reminder of the interconnectedness of domestic and foreign policy. Trump’s desire for a Nobel Peace Prize and the political capital it could yield may overshadow the lived experiences of those in conflict zones. This highlights the need for a more nuanced approach to peace negotiations that prioritizes human rights and social justice, rather than merely political expediency. Engaging with the historical narratives of those affected by war and oppression is vital for creating a more equitable and just future in international relations.

In conclusion, the meeting between Trump and Putin represents a critical juncture in U.S.-Russia relations, with ramifications that extend far beyond the immediate political landscape. As the world watches, it is imperative to advocate for a peace process that is inclusive and representative of the voices that matter most—those of the Ukrainian people. Understanding the historical context and ongoing social struggles informs our analysis of such events and emphasizes the importance of a democratic, equitable approach to peacebuilding. As citizens and advocates, we must hold our leaders accountable for prioritizing the dignity and rights of those affected by conflict while navigating the treacherous waters of international politics.

Action:

The recent meeting between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin in Alaska, centered around the ongoing conflict in Ukraine, invites a critical examination of diplomatic strategies and the implications of great power negotiations on global and regional stability. This summit is particularly notable as it marks the first face-to-face dialogue between the two leaders since Trump's return to the presidency. As Americans, it is crucial to understand the historical context of U.S.-Russia relations, the dynamics at play in Ukraine, and the broader ramifications of the decisions made during this meeting.

Historically, U.S.-Russia relations have oscillated between cooperation and confrontation, with the Cold War period setting a precedent for mistrust and competition. The dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991 brought an initial thaw in relations, but the subsequent eastward expansion of NATO and U.S. interventions in conflicts around the globe have reignited tensions. The situation in Ukraine, precipitated by Russia’s annexation of Crimea in 2014 and the conflict in the Donbas region, has been a flashpoint for these tensions. As Trump and Putin convene, it is essential to consider how past U.S. foreign policies have contributed to current geopolitical strife. The approach to Ukraine's sovereignty and territorial integrity will be pivotal in shaping not only the immediate outcomes of this summit but also the long-term stability of Eastern Europe.

As the summit unfolds, there are clear implications for Ukraine and its allies. Concerns loom large over Trump’s potential willingness to compromise Ukraine's territorial integrity in exchange for a ceasefire that primarily serves his political ambitions. The idea that Trump might negotiate without Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy present is troubling; it underscores a pattern of sidelining the voices and rights of smaller nations in favor of great power negotiations. For Americans, this highlights a crucial point: supporting Ukraine's sovereignty is not just a foreign policy issue but a matter of standing against the broader trend of authoritarianism and imperialism. It is imperative for citizens to advocate for a U.S. foreign policy that prioritizes the voices of those directly affected by these negotiations.

Given the stakes, there are various actions that Americans can take to influence the outcome of such diplomatic endeavors. First, engaging in grassroots activism and supporting organizations that advocate for human rights and democratic governance in Ukraine can amplify the voices of those impacted by the conflict. Moreover, pressuring elected officials to prioritize diplomatic solutions that respect Ukraine's sovereignty will send a message that American citizens care about global justice and stability. Writing to representatives, participating in town halls, and utilizing social media platforms are effective ways to raise awareness and advocate for a robust, principled approach to U.S. foreign policy.

Furthermore, it's essential to educate ourselves and our communities about the nuances of international relations, especially in the context of nuclear proliferation and arms control. The potential for a new nuclear arms control agreement between the U.S. and Russia, as hinted by Putin, is a matter of global significance that requires public scrutiny and informed dialogue. By understanding the complexities of these treaties and their implications for global peace, Americans can contribute to a more informed electorate that demands accountability and transparency from their leaders.

In conclusion, the Alaska summit between Trump and Putin presents a critical moment not only for U.S.-Russia relations but also for the future of Ukraine and the broader international community. As citizens, we must remain vigilant and proactive in our engagement with these issues. By advocating for policies that uphold democratic ideals and support international law, we can work towards a more just and peaceful world. Engaging deeply with these topics and holding our leaders accountable is essential for ensuring that American foreign policy reflects the values of justice, sovereignty, and cooperation.

To Do:

The meeting between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin is a critical moment in international relations, particularly concerning the ongoing conflict in Ukraine. As concerned citizens, it is essential that we take proactive steps to influence the outcome of such high-stakes negotiations. Below is a detailed list of actions that individuals can take to advocate for a resolution that prioritizes peace, security, and the sovereignty of nations like Ukraine.

### Personal Actions to Take

1. **Educate Yourself and Others** - Stay informed about the developments in the Ukraine conflict and the implications of the U.S.-Russia negotiations. Share credible information within your community, fostering a broader understanding of the stakes involved.

2. **Engage with Local and National Representatives** - Contact your elected officials to express your concerns about the negotiations and to advocate for Ukraine's sovereignty and security.

3. **Participate in Petitions** - Support or initiate petitions that call for a diplomatic approach that includes all relevant stakeholders, especially Ukrainian representatives in peace talks. - Example: Start or join a petition on platforms like Change.org or Care2 that demands a fair and transparent peace process involving Ukraine.

4. **Write Letters to Officials** - Draft letters to express your views regarding the importance of including Ukraine in negotiations and ensuring that any agreements respect its territorial integrity.

### Specific Contacts

1. **Elected Officials** - **Your U.S. Senator**: Visit [senate.gov](https://www.senate.gov/) to find contact information for your state’s senators. - **Your U.S. Representative**: Check [house.gov](https://www.house.gov/) to locate your representative and their contact details.

- **Example Letter Template**: ``` [Your Name] [Your Address] [City, State, Zip Code] [Email Address] [Date]

The Honorable [Senator/Representative Name] [Office Address] [City, State, Zip Code]

Dear [Senator/Representative Name],

I am writing to express my concerns about the upcoming negotiations between President Trump and President Putin regarding the situation in Ukraine. It is imperative that any agreement reached prioritizes the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Ukraine. The inclusion of Ukrainian leadership in these discussions is crucial for a lasting peace.

I urge you to advocate for a diplomatic approach that respects the voices and rights of all parties involved.

Thank you for your attention to this critical matter.

Sincerely, [Your Name] ```

2. **International Organizations** - Consider writing to the United Nations or other international bodies to express your concerns regarding peace negotiations.

- **Example Contact**: - **United Nations** - Mail: United Nations Headquarters, 405 East 42nd Street, New York, NY 10017 - Email: [info@un.org](mailto:info@un.org)

3. **Support NGOs and Advocacy Groups** - Engage with organizations that focus on peace, human rights, and international relations, such as: - **Amnesty International**: [amnesty.org](https://www.amnesty.org) - **Human Rights Watch**: [hrw.org](https://www.hrw.org)

- You can support their campaigns, participate in their events, or even volunteer.

4. **Raise Awareness on Social Media** - Use platforms like Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram to advocate for peace and inclusion of Ukraine in discussions. Use hashtags related to the conflict to increase visibility. - Share articles, infographics, and updates about the importance of Ukraine's participation in peace talks.

### What to Say - Emphasize the necessity of including Ukraine in discussions about its future. - Advocate for peace negotiations that do not compromise the territorial integrity of Ukraine. - Highlight the importance of international law and human rights in resolving conflicts.

By taking these actions, individuals can play a significant role in shaping the discourse around the U.S.-Russia negotiations and advocating for a peaceful resolution that respects the rights and sovereignty of Ukraine.


Sign Our Petition



10 Related Article(s):

Muslim & NATO Nations BOIL Over Netanyahu Minister's Israel Dare: 'If You Recognise Palestine...'

Putin-Trump summit: What each side wants | Fox 11 Tri Cities Fox 41 Yakima

No Zelensky, no Brussels, no problem: Here's how Putin and Trump's Alaska power move will play out, by Dmitry Suslov - Russia News Now

Trump and Putin to spar Ukraine peace and arms control at Alaska summit By Reuters

What's at stake at the Trump-Putin Ukraine peace summit?

Trump and Putin to spar Ukraine peace and arms control at Alaska summit

Putin heads to Alaska in heavily armoured limo

The Geopolitical Chessboard: Ceasefire Talks and Territorial Tensions | Law-Order

Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin to spar over Ukraine peace and arms control at Alaska summit

Moscow Stands Firm on Ukraine as Putin-Trump Summit Looms | Sada Elbalad


Updated very often
All Opinions and Actions are (C)opyright 2025 - TruthAndResistance.com