No Zelensky, no Brussels, no problem: Here's how Putin and Trump's Alaska power move will play out, by Dmitry Suslov - Russia News Now

Opinion:

The recent announcement of an impending summit between Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump in Alaska raises significant concerns regarding the geopolitical landscape and the implications for international relations, particularly in relation to the ongoing war in Ukraine. The historical context of U.S.-Russia relations is marred by periods of tension and brief moments of rapprochement. This summit represents not just a strategic meeting of two powerful figures but also a shift in diplomatic norms that could undermine the role of global institutions and alliances that have historically been vital to maintaining peace and security.

The choice of Alaska as the meeting place is laden with symbolism. This state, once part of the Russian Empire, embodies a complex history of territorial disputes and cultural exchanges between the U.S. and Russia. The geographical proximity of Alaska to Russia is noteworthy, suggesting that the discussions could pivot towards more than just a bilateral relationship but also the implications for Arctic geopolitics. Given climate change's accelerating impact on this region, the summit could set the stage for future negotiations over resources and territorial claims that may well disregard the interests of Indigenous populations, whose voices are often marginalized in these broader geopolitical narratives.

Moreover, the absence of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and European Union leaders from these discussions is particularly alarming. It signals a power dynamic where major decisions regarding Ukraine’s future and the war that has caused immense suffering are made without the input of those most directly affected. This exclusion mirrors historical instances where imperial powers have carved up regions without regard for local populations, such as the Sykes-Picot Agreement in 1916, which divided up the Middle East. Such a summit could potentially perpetuate a cycle of disregard for national sovereignty and self-determination that has plagued international relations for decades.

On a domestic level, the implications of this summit cannot be overlooked. Trump’s overtures towards Putin could have significant ramifications for U.S. political discourse, potentially emboldening right-wing populism that often undermines democratic norms in favor of authoritarian leanings. This shift may resonate with certain segments of the U.S. electorate who see Trump’s approach as a welcome departure from the more traditional diplomatic strategies of the Biden administration, which prioritized multilateralism and alliances such as NATO. However, this could also galvanize increasingly progressive movements that advocate for a return to a foreign policy rooted in human rights, diplomacy, and multilateral engagement rather than transactional relationships with authoritarian leaders.

Furthermore, we must consider the broader implications of U.S.-Russia relations on global security. A rapprochement between Trump and Putin, especially in the context of the Ukraine conflict, could embolden not only Russia but also other authoritarian regimes around the world. This could lead to a resurgence of aggressive nationalism and militarism that undermines international treaties and agreements aimed at promoting peace and cooperation. It is essential, therefore, to remain vigilant and advocate for a foreign policy that prioritizes human rights and democratic values, engaging with allies and international organizations to address the root causes of conflict rather than merely the symptoms.

In conclusion, the upcoming Alaska summit between Trump and Putin is not merely a diplomatic meeting; it embodies a potential realignment of power dynamics that could have lasting effects on international relations, especially regarding the Ukraine conflict. As history has shown, decisions made in the absence of affected parties often lead to adverse outcomes for those populations. It is crucial for citizens and global advocates alike to remain informed and engaged in these discussions, pushing back against any narrative that seeks to marginalize the voices of those directly impacted by geopolitical decisions. The future of global cooperation, peace, and justice hinges on our collective ability to hold powerful leaders accountable and advocate for a foreign policy that genuinely reflects the values of democracy and human rights.

Action:

The recent announcement of a summit between Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump in Alaska has ignited discussions about the shifting dynamics of international relations, particularly concerning the ongoing conflict in Ukraine. This meeting, the first of its kind since the Biden administration and the first official visit by a Russian president to the United States in over a decade, signifies a noteworthy pivot in U.S.-Russia relations. Historically, Alaska's proximity to Russia, separated only by the Bering Strait, underscores the enduring complexities of geopolitical negotiations and the significance of regional diplomacy. However, the exclusion of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and European Union leaders from these talks raises critical questions about the implications for Ukraine and broader European security.

What stands out in the context of this summit is the powerful message it sends regarding the decision-making processes that will impact Ukraine's fate. The fact that discussions about Ukraine's future are occurring without the direct involvement of its president or key European stakeholders reflects a troubling trend towards unilateral decision-making in international diplomacy. This approach not only sidelines the voices of those most affected by the conflict but also diminishes the established norms of multilateralism that have been a hallmark of post-World War II diplomacy. The notion that major powers can dictate terms to smaller nations undermines the principles of sovereignty and self-determination, which have been central to international law and order.

For Americans looking to engage with this situation, it becomes imperative to advocate for a more inclusive approach to foreign policy, one that recognizes the importance of involving all relevant stakeholders, particularly those directly impacted by conflict. This could be achieved through grassroots movements that demand greater transparency and accountability in foreign affairs. Civil society organizations can play a pivotal role by raising awareness about the importance of multilateralism and the necessity of including voices from countries like Ukraine in discussions about their future. By fostering dialogue and collaboration, we can work towards a more equitable and just international system.

Historically, U.S. foreign policy has oscillated between isolationism and interventionism, often sidelining the interests of smaller nations in favor of strategic partnerships with larger powers. The current shift towards a more transactional approach, as exemplified by Trump's willingness to engage with Putin, could have long-lasting ramifications for international stability. By prioritizing personal diplomacy over established diplomatic norms, there is a risk of exacerbating existing tensions and potentially igniting new conflicts. It is crucial for Americans to critically assess these developments and consider the potential consequences of prioritizing power dynamics over principled diplomacy.

Moreover, educational initiatives aimed at increasing public understanding of U.S.-Russia relations and their broader implications are essential. This could involve community forums, public lectures, and educational programs that explore the historical context of U.S.-Russia interactions, the importance of multilateralism, and the principles of non-interference and self-determination. By equipping citizens with a nuanced understanding of these issues, we can foster a more informed electorate that is better prepared to advocate for a foreign policy that reflects democratic values and prioritizes human rights. In the face of an uncertain geopolitical landscape, it is essential for Americans to remain engaged and advocate for a future that prioritizes collaboration, dialogue, and respect for the voices of those affected by international decisions.

To Do:

In light of the developments presented in the article regarding the upcoming Alaska summit between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin, there are several steps that concerned individuals can take to advocate for a more responsible and equitable foreign policy. Here’s a detailed list of ideas and actions:

### Ideas for Action

1. **Raise Awareness**: Educate friends and family about the implications of the summit and the potential risks of sidelining European allies and Ukraine.

2. **Engage with Local Representatives**: Build pressure on local and state representatives to voice their concerns regarding the summit and the potential for U.S.-Russia relations to impact global stability.

3. **Support Advocacy Groups**: Contribute to organizations that focus on promoting peace, diplomacy, and human rights, particularly in Eastern Europe.

4. **Participate in Peaceful Protests**: Join or organize demonstrations to express opposition to any agreements that might undermine Ukraine's sovereignty or disregard European interests.

5. **Promote Informed Voting**: Encourage community members to consider foreign policy positions when voting in local and national elections.

### Specific Actions to Take

1. **Petition for Diplomatic Engagement**: - **Action**: Create or sign a petition advocating for the inclusion of Ukrainian representatives in discussions regarding their future. - **Example**: Use platforms like Change.org or MoveOn.org to draft and promote petitions.

2. **Contact Elected Officials**: - **Who to Write to**: - Your Senators and House Representative. Find their contact information through [congress.gov](https://www.congress.gov/members/find-your-member). - **Sample Email Addresses**: Typically structured as: - For Senators: [firstname_lastname@senate.gov] - For House Representatives: [firstname.lastname@mail.house.gov] - **Suggested Message Content**: - Express your concerns about the summit and urge them to advocate for inclusive diplomatic discussions that involve Ukraine and European allies. - Example: "Dear [Senator/Representative Name], I am writing to express my concern regarding the upcoming summit between Presidents Trump and Putin. The exclusion of key stakeholders from this discussion undermines our commitment to democratic values and international stability. I urge you to advocate for a foreign policy that prioritizes collaboration with our allies and supports Ukraine's sovereignty."

3. **Support Activist Organizations**: - **Organizations to Consider**: - Amnesty International: [www.amnesty.org](https://www.amnesty.org) (for human rights advocacy) - The International Crisis Group: [www.crisisgroup.org](https://www.crisisgroup.org) (for conflict prevention) - **Action**: Donate, volunteer, or participate in campaigns organized by these organizations.

4. **Utilize Social Media**: - **Action**: Use platforms like Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram to share information on the summit and advocate for transparency and accountability in international relations. - **Example Post**: "As the Alaska summit approaches, it’s crucial we stand for inclusive diplomacy. Let's ensure that Ukrainian voices are heard! #DiplomacyNotIsolation"

5. **Engage in Community Discussions**: - **Action**: Organize or participate in community forums to discuss the implications of U.S.-Russia relations and the need for a more inclusive approach to diplomacy.

By taking these actions, individuals can play a vital role in shaping the discourse around U.S.-Russia relations and advocating for policies that prioritize democracy, human rights, and international cooperation.