Ukraine's Zelensky can end war with Russia 'almost immediately': Trump | News Room Odisha
newsroomodisha.com -- Sunday, August 17, 2025, 10:57:06 PM Eastern Daylight Time
Categories: U.S.–Russia Relations, Foreign Policy & International Relations, U.S.–NATO Relations
Washington: US President Donald Trump has urged Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky could chose to end the war with Russia "almost immediately", however, retaking Russian-occupied territory of Crimea or joining NATO are off the table.
"President Zelensky of Ukraine can end the war with Russia almost immediately, if he wants to, or he can continue to fight," Trump said on Sunday on his Truth Social platform.
"No getting back Obama given Crimea (12 years ago, without a shot being fired!)...and NO GOING INTO NATO BY UKRAINE. Some things never change!!!"
On the eve of highly consequential talks with Zelensky and a large delegation of European leaders, President Trump has previewed the message he will deliver to his White House visitors: Zelensky must agree to some of Russia's conditions for the war in Ukraine to end.
The post underscored the pressure Zelensky will face on Monday as Trump works to end the conflict.
The two conditions he listed -- that Ukraine cede Crimea, which Russia illegally annexed in 2014, and that it agree never to join NATO -- are among the conditions Russian President Vladimir Putin has set for ending the war.
European leaders visiting the White House with Zelensky on Monday are concerned the meeting will amount to Trump pressuring the Ukrainian leader to accept the conditions Putin put forward in their Alaska summit last week.
They hope to glean more information from Trump on what Russia might concede as part of a peace deal, including what role the US would play in providing security guarantees going forward.
"Big day at the White House tomorrow. Never had so many European Leaders at one time. My great honour to host them!!!" Trump posted after his message to Zelensky.
The European delegation: French President Emmanuel Macron, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, Finland President Alexander Stubb and NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte will all join Zelensky for the visit to the White House on Monday.
Trump met Putin in Alaska on Friday but the talks failed to yield any breakthrough on a ceasefire -- though White House envoy Steve Witkoff said both leaders had agreed to provide "robust security guarantees" to Ukraine.
European Commission Chief Ursula von der Leyen hailed the news, but Zelensky, speaking alongside her at a news conference in Brussels, rejected the idea of Russia offering his country security guarantees.
"What President Trump said about security guarantees is much more important to me than Putin's thoughts, because Putin will not give any security guarantees," he said.
Zelensky later said on social media that the US offer regarding security guarantees was "historic".
French President Emmanuel Macron, who will take part in the Washington meeting along with von der Leyen and others, said European leaders would ask about the extent of the security guarantees offered to Ukraine in any peace agreement.
Of Moscow's position, he said: "There is only one state proposing a peace that would be a capitulation: Russia."
Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova called that an "abject lie" in a statement on Telegram later on Sunday.
Moscow had been proposing a "peaceful resolution" of the conflict for seven years under the terms of the Minsk Accords, she said.
Macron, she added, was trying to convince Ukraine that it could win on the battlefield even when he knew that that was "impossible".
Trump, who pivoted after the Alaska meeting to say he was now seeking a peace deal rather than a ceasefire, on Sunday posted "BIG PROGRESS ON RUSSIA. STAY TUNED!" on his Truth Social platform, without elaborating.
Trump's sudden focus on a peace deal aligns with the stance long taken by Putin, one which Ukraine and its European allies have criticised as Putin's way to buy time while trying to make battlefield gains.
Zelensky also said he saw "no sign" the Kremlin leader was prepared to meet him and Trump for a three-way summit, as had been floated by the US President.
The leaders heading to Washington on Monday to appear alongside Zelensky call themselves the "coalition of the willing".
On Sunday, all the European leaders held a video meeting to prepare their joint position.
Speaking to US broadcaster CNN, Witkoff said: "I'm hopeful that we have a productive meeting on Monday, we get to real consensus, we're able to come back to the Russians and push this peace deal forward and get it done."
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, speaking to NBC on Sunday, warned of "consequences" -- including the potential imposition of new sanctions on Russia -- if no peace deal was reached on Ukraine.
European leaders have expressed unease from the outset over Trump's outreach to Putin, who has demanded Ukraine abandon its ambitions to join the EU or NATO. They were excluded from Trump's summit with Putin.
Witkoff, in his CNN interview, said the process of offering "game-changing" security guarantees would involve territorial "concessions".
According to an official briefed on a call Trump held with Zelensky and European leaders as he flew back from Alaska, the US leader supported a Putin proposal that Russia take full control of two eastern Ukrainian regions in exchange for freezing the frontline in two others.
Putin "de facto demands that Ukraine leave Donbas", an area consisting of the Donetsk and Lugansk regions in eastern Ukraine, which Russia currently only partly controls, the source said.
In exchange, Russian forces would halt their offensive in the Black Sea port region of Kherson and Zaporizhzhia in southern Ukraine, where the main cities are still under Ukrainian control.
Several months into its full-scale invasion of Ukraine, Russia in September 2022 claimed to have annexed all four Ukrainian regions even though its troops still do not fully control any of them.
On the ground in Ukraine, the conflict rages on, with both Kyiv and Moscow launching attack drones.
Ukrainian authorities reported early Monday that 13 people were wounded in Russian strikes on Kharkiv and the Sumy region.
Sign Our PetitionThe recent comments made by former President Donald Trump regarding the ongoing conflict in Ukraine reveal a troubling undercurrent in American foreign policy that echoes historical patterns of appeasement and compromise at the expense of sovereignty and human rights. Trump's assertion that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky could "end the war with Russia almost immediately" by conceding to Russian demands is not only simplistic but also dismissive of the complex realities on the ground. It reflects a broader narrative that has historically undermined the agency of nations facing external aggression, particularly when such aggression stems from a powerful neighbor like Russia.
To understand the implications of Trump's remarks, it is essential to contextualize the situation in Ukraine within the larger framework of post-Soviet geopolitics. The annexation of Crimea by Russia in 2014 was not merely a land grab; it represented a blatant violation of international law and an affront to the principle of self-determination. The ongoing conflict has resulted in thousands of deaths and has displaced millions, creating a humanitarian crisis that cannot simply be resolved through capitulation. The historical memory of Ukraine’s struggle for independence from Soviet domination underscores the resilience and determination of its people, who have fought hard to assert their sovereignty against Russian imperial ambitions.
Moreover, Trump's insistence that Ukraine should not seek NATO membership echoes a long-standing hesitance among certain political factions in the United States to fully support the principle of collective security. NATO's existence is rooted in the idea that an attack on one ally is an attack on all, a concept that has helped to maintain relative peace in Europe since the end of the Cold War. By suggesting that Ukraine forgo its aspirations for NATO membership, Trump is effectively arguing for a return to a status quo that favors Russian interests at the expense of Ukrainian security. This sentiment not only undermines the principles of NATO but also emboldens authoritarian regimes that seek to expand their influence through military aggression.
The pressure that Zelensky may face from Trump and other Western leaders during their discussions is indicative of a troubling trend: the prioritization of diplomatic expediency over justice and accountability. Historical parallels can be drawn to the Munich Agreement of 1938, where Western powers allowed Nazi Germany to annex parts of Czechoslovakia in hopes of avoiding war, only to see the situation escalate into a catastrophic conflict. The lesson from such historical missteps is clear; appeasing aggressors often leads to further aggression. Zelensky's rejection of Putin's proposed security guarantees, and his focus on seeking genuine support from allies, reflects a commitment to ensure that Ukraine's sovereignty is not sacrificed at the altar of political convenience.
As the international community grapples with the complexities of the Ukraine crisis, it is crucial to recognize the importance of standing in solidarity with those fighting for their rights and freedoms. The narrative surrounding the conflict must shift from one of compromise and negotiation with aggressors to one of unwavering support for self-determination and human rights. The struggles of Ukraine are emblematic of broader global fights against autocracy and imperialism, and they serve as a reminder of the necessity of standing firm against tyranny. By advocating for robust support for Ukraine, including military aid and diplomatic recognition, the global community can send a powerful message that the principles of sovereignty and democracy cannot be bartered away in the name of peace.
In conclusion, Trump's comments highlight a critical juncture in U.S. foreign policy that warrants careful scrutiny. A simplistic call for Zelensky to end the conflict by conceding to Russian demands not only undermines Ukraine's sovereignty but also risks emboldening authoritarian regimes worldwide. The lessons of history teach us that genuine peace cannot be achieved through the appeasement of aggressors, and it is imperative that the international community rallies behind Ukraine in its fight for freedom and self-determination. As citizens and advocates for justice, we must engage in informed dialogue about these issues, pushing back against narratives that prioritize political convenience over the rights and dignity of nations.
The recent comments by former President Donald Trump, suggesting that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky could end the ongoing war with Russia "almost immediately," raise critical questions about diplomacy, sovereignty, and the broader implications for international relations. Trump's assertion, which implies that Ukraine should concede key territories and refrain from joining NATO to achieve peace, reveals a troubling willingness to prioritize geopolitical expediency over the fundamental rights of nations. Historically, the annexation of Crimea by Russia in 2014 has been widely recognized as a violation of international law, a stance that is crucial to understanding the current predicament. The situation underscores the need for a nuanced approach to foreign policy that respects sovereignty while promoting lasting peace.
The historical context of the Ukraine-Russia conflict is essential for understanding the stakes involved. Since the fall of the Soviet Union, Ukraine has navigated a complex relationship with both Western nations and Russia. The annexation of Crimea and the ongoing conflict in Eastern Ukraine have not only strained relations but have also highlighted the precarious nature of national borders and the rights of nations to self-determination. Forcing Ukraine into negotiations that require territorial concessions would not only undermine Ukrainian sovereignty but could also set a dangerous precedent for other nations facing similar threats. This is particularly relevant in light of the lessons learned from past conflicts, where appeasement often led to further aggression rather than peace.
In light of Trump's statements, it is crucial for American citizens and policymakers to engage in informed discussions about the implications of such rhetoric. Advocacy for a strong, principled stance supporting Ukraine's sovereignty and territorial integrity is essential. As the U.S. engages with other global powers, it must prioritize diplomatic solutions that uphold international law and the principles of self-determination. This can be facilitated through grassroots movements, public forums, and support for organizations that promote peace and stability in Eastern Europe. By mobilizing public support for a principled foreign policy, citizens can exert pressure on their representatives to resist any inclination to appease aggressors like Putin.
Moreover, it is vital to recognize the potential consequences of Trump’s suggestions on NATO and European security. If Ukraine were to abandon its NATO aspirations and cede territory, the implications could extend far beyond Ukraine's borders. A perceived weakness in the face of aggression could embolden other authoritarian regimes to challenge the existing international order. It is crucial for the U.S. and its allies to reinforce their commitment to collective security and support for countries like Ukraine that are under threat. Engaging in discussions about robust security guarantees—not only from the U.S. but also from NATO partners—can help deter future aggression and reassure nations that their sovereignty will be defended.
Lastly, educational outreach is key to fostering a deeper understanding of these complex issues among the American populace. Citizens should be encouraged to explore the historical precedents of territorial disputes, the role of international coalitions like NATO, and the principles of justice that underpin our foreign policy. By equipping individuals with knowledge, they can effectively advocate for policies that align with democratic values and respect for international norms. Engaging in constructive dialogue with those who may hold different views—particularly right-wing individuals who might be swayed by narratives of appeasement—can help bridge divides and promote a more informed public discourse.
In conclusion, the current discourse surrounding the war in Ukraine, especially in the wake of Trump's comments, requires a thoughtful and principled response. Upholding Ukraine's right to self-determination, advocating for robust security measures, and fostering informed dialogue will be essential in navigating this complex geopolitical landscape. By taking action and engaging in education around these critical issues, Americans can contribute meaningfully to the conversation and advocate for a foreign policy that respects sovereignty and promotes lasting peace.
Analyzing the current geopolitical situation surrounding the Ukraine conflict, particularly in light of recent statements from former President Trump, provides an opportunity for individuals to engage in grassroots activism. Here are several actionable steps that can be taken to advocate for Ukraine's sovereignty and support a peaceful resolution to the conflict:
### Ideas for Personal Action:
1. **Educate Yourself and Others:** - Stay informed about the Ukraine conflict, NATO, and international law regarding territorial integrity. - Share informative articles, podcasts, and videos with your community to raise awareness about the situation in Ukraine.
2. **Contact Elected Officials:** - Write to your local, state, and federal representatives to express your views on the importance of supporting Ukraine's sovereignty and opposing any pressure to cede territory. - **Sample Email Template:** ``` Subject: Support for Ukraine's Sovereignty
Dear [Representative's Name],
I am writing to express my strong support for Ukraine's sovereignty and territorial integrity. The recent statements suggesting that Ukraine should cede Crimea or refrain from joining NATO are concerning and could undermine international law.
I urge you to advocate for a strong, unified response to support Ukraine in its fight for freedom and democracy. Ensuring that Ukraine receives the necessary military and humanitarian support is essential for the region's stability.
Thank you for your attention to this critical matter.
Sincerely, [Your Name] [Your Address] [Your Email] ``` - **Contact Information for Key Officials:** - **Your Representative:** Find your local representative's contact information through [House.gov](https://www.house.gov/) - **Senate Contacts:** Find your senators' contact information through [Senate.gov](https://www.senate.gov/)
3. **Petition for Support:** - Start or sign petitions advocating for increased military and humanitarian aid to Ukraine. - **Example Petitions:** - **Change.org:** Search for active petitions related to Ukraine and consider starting your own. - **MoveOn.org:** Often has petitions regarding international issues; check for relevant campaigns.
4. **Support Humanitarian Organizations:** - Donate to organizations providing aid to Ukraine, such as: - **United Nations Refugee Agency (UNHCR):** [UNHCR Donation Page](https://www.unhcr.org/donations) - **International Rescue Committee (IRC):** [IRC Donation Page](https://www.rescue.org/) - **Doctors Without Borders:** [MSF Donation Page](https://www.doctorswithoutborders.org/donate)
5. **Participate in Local Activism:** - Join or attend local rallies or discussions focused on supporting Ukraine. Look for events organized by community groups or NGOs that focus on international peace and security. - Use platforms like Facebook Events or Meetup to find gatherings in your area.
6. **Engage with Media:** - Write letters to the editor of local newspapers or submit op-eds expressing your views on the conflict and the importance of U.S. support for Ukraine. - Engage with media outlets on social media platforms to raise awareness and advocate for informed reporting on the issue.
7. **Promote Diplomatic Solutions:** - Advocate for diplomatic efforts to resolve the conflict that prioritize Ukraine’s sovereignty and for the U.S. to take a strong stance against any coercive peace negotiations. - Engage with peace organizations or forums that focus on conflict resolution to learn more and contribute to discussions.
By taking these steps, individuals can contribute to a collective effort to support Ukraine and uphold international laws regarding territorial integrity. Every action, no matter how small, can lead to greater awareness and ultimately influence policy decisions related to the ongoing conflict.