Europeans to back Zelenskiy in Washington as Trump presses Ukraine deal
theprint.in -- Sunday, August 17, 2025, 3:28:55 PM Eastern Daylight Time
Categories: U.S.–Russia Relations, Foreign Policy & International Relations, U.S.–NATO Relations
Trump on Sunday promised "BIG PROGRESS ON RUSSIA" in a social media post without specifying what this might be.
Sources briefed on Moscow's thinking told Reuters the U.S. and Russian leaders have discussed proposals for Russia to relinquish tiny pockets of occupied Ukraine in exchange for Kyiv ceding a swathe of fortified land in the east and freezing the front lines elsewhere.
Top Trump officials hinted the fate of Ukraine's eastern Donbas region - which incorporates Donetsk and Luhansk and which is already mostly under Russian control - was on the line, while some sort of defensive pact was also on the table.
"We were able to win the following concession, that the United States could offer Article 5-like protection," Trump envoy Steve Witkoff told CNN's "State of the Union" on Sunday, suggesting this would be in lieu of Ukraine seeking NATO membership. He said it was "the first time we had ever heard the Russians agree to that."
Article 5 of NATO's founding treaty enshrines the principle of collective defense, the notion that an attack on a single member is considered an attack on them all.
That pledge may not be enough to sway leaders in Kyiv to sign over Donbas. Ukraine's borders were already meant to have been guaranteed when Ukraine surrendered a Soviet-era nuclear arsenal in 1994, and it proved to be little deterrent when Russia absorbed Crimea in 2014 and then launched its full-scale invasion in 2022. The war has now dragged on for 3-1/2 years and killed or wounded more than 1 million people.
German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, French President Emmanuel Macron, and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer hosted a meeting of allies on Sunday to bolster Zelenskiy's hand, hoping in particular to lock down robust security guarantees for Ukraine that would include a U.S. role.
The Europeans are keen to help Zelenskiy avoid a repeat of his last Oval Office meeting in February. That went disastrously, with Trump and Vice President JD Vance giving the Ukrainian leader a public dressing-down, accusing him of being ungrateful and disrespectful.
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen will also travel to Washington, as will Finland's President Alexander Stubb, whose access to Trump included rounds of golf in Florida earlier this year, and Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, who is an admirer of many of Trump's policies.
European leaders at the Sunday meeting projected unity, welcoming U.S. talk of a security guarantee but stressing no discussions over territory could take place without Kyiv's involvement and clear arrangements to safeguard the rest of Ukraine's land.
Some called for an immediate ceasefire, something Trump originally said he was trying to secure during his summit with Putin. Trump later changed course and agreed with the Russians that peace negotiations could come without a ceasefire, an idea that was dismissed by some of Ukraine's European allies.
"You cannot negotiate peace under falling bombs," Poland's foreign ministry said in a statement.
A joint communique released by Britain, France and Germany after the meeting said their leaders were ready "to deploy a reassurance force once hostilities have ceased, and to help secure Ukraine's skies and seas and regenerate Ukraine's armed forces."
Some European countries, led by Britain and France, have been working since last year on such a plan, but other countries in the region remain reluctant to become involved militarily, underlining how fraught peace discussions are even among Kyiv's allies.
Zelenskiy said on social media platform X there had been "clear support for Ukraine's independence and sovereignty" at the meeting. "Everyone agrees that borders must not be changed by force."
He added that any prospective security guarantees "must really be very practical, delivering protection on land, in the air, and at sea, and must be developed with Europe's participation."
Rubio said both Russia and Ukraine would need to make concessions to reach a peace deal and that security guarantees for Ukraine would be discussed on Monday. He also said there would have to be additional consequences for Russia if no deal was reached.
"I'm not saying we're on the verge of a peace deal, but I am saying that we saw movement, enough movement to justify a follow-up meeting with Zelenskiy and the Europeans, enough movement for us to dedicate even more time to this," Rubio told broadcaster CBS.
For his part, Putin briefed his close ally, Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko, about the Alaska talks, and also spoke with Kazakhstan's President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev.
Trump said on Friday that Ukraine should make a deal to end the war because "Russia is a very big power, and they're not."
After the Alaska summit, Trump phoned Zelenskiy and told him the Kremlin chief had offered to freeze most front lines if Ukraine ceded all of Donetsk, a source familiar with the matter said. Zelenskiy rejected the demand.
(Reporting by Andrew MacAskill, Tom Balmforth, Andreas Rinke, Layli Foroudi, Max Hunder, Julia Payne, Joshua McElwee, Dave Graham, David Ljunggren, Sudip Kar-Gupta, Jan Strupczewski and Trevor Hunnicutt; Writing by Matthias Williams and Raphael Satter; Editing by Colleen Jenkins, Frances Kerry, Rod Nickel and Chris Reese)
Sign Our PetitionThe ongoing situation in Ukraine, especially against the backdrop of recent discussions involving former President Trump, serves as a stark reminder of the complexities of geopolitics and the historical legacies of colonialism and imperialism. The war, which has resulted in the loss of over a million lives, is not merely a contemporary conflict but rather a culmination of decades of tensions rooted in historical grievances. For one, the 1994 Budapest Memorandum, wherein Ukraine relinquished its nuclear arsenal in exchange for security assurances, highlights the vulnerabilities that arise when powerful nations make deals that can swiftly become meaningless in the face of aggression. It illustrates the precariousness of international agreements—particularly those involving nuclear disarmament—that supposedly ensure sovereignty and territorial integrity.
In the current discourse, Trump’s promises of “BIG PROGRESS ON RUSSIA” and proposals for territorial concessions raise critical ethical concerns. The suggestion that Ukraine might concede parts of its territory, particularly the Donbas region, undermines the principles of self-determination and national sovereignty. This notion resonates deeply within historical contexts where powerful countries have dictated the fates of weaker nations, often leading to a cycle of conflict and instability. The American and Russian discussions regarding a potential “defensive pact” in lieu of Ukraine’s NATO membership reflect a troubling trend of prioritizing strategic interests over humanitarian considerations. When nations engage in negotiations that may involve ceding territory, they often disregard the voices and aspirations of those most affected by such decisions—namely the Ukrainian people themselves.
The European leadership’s proactive stance in supporting Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy is a critical counterbalance to Trump’s approach. Leaders like German Chancellor Friedrich Merz and French President Emmanuel Macron are advocating for robust security guarantees while emphasizing the importance of involving Kyiv in all discussions regarding its territorial integrity. This is an essential lesson in solidarity and collective security, one that recognizes the importance of listening to and supporting vulnerable nations rather than engaging in negotiations behind their backs. The unity projected by European leaders stands in stark contrast to the divisive rhetoric often employed by Trump, who has previously criticized Zelenskiy publicly, undermining Ukraine's position on the world stage.
Moreover, the historical precedent set by the annexation of Crimea in 2014 continues to loom large over current negotiations. The failure of international assurances to prevent such aggression has left Ukraine in a precarious situation, where the prospect of further territorial losses hangs in the balance. In this regard, the historical context of imperialism becomes critical. The ongoing conflict can be viewed through the lens of the broader struggles against colonial legacy and the fight for national sovereignty, echoing the sentiments of nations that have faced similar pressures throughout history. The urgency of seeking a ceasefire, as some European leaders have advocated, underscores the moral imperative to prioritize human life and stability over territorial negotiations that could further entrench suffering and loss.
Finally, as the discussions unfold, it is imperative for all involved to remember that any proposals for peace or territorial concessions must not only be informed by strategic interests but must also reflect the voices of the Ukrainian populace. A just resolution can only be achieved when the rights and desires of those most impacted by conflict are at the forefront of diplomatic considerations. Engaging with the complexities of this issue requires not only a commitment to equity and justice but also a recognition of the interconnectedness of historical struggles against imperialism and the right to self-determination. As the world watches these negotiations unfold, it is essential to advocate for approaches that foster genuine peace and justice, rather than those that prioritize the expediency of powerful nations at the expense of the vulnerable.
The unfolding situation concerning Ukraine, especially in light of recent developments involving former President Trump and European leaders, underscores a critical juncture in international relations and the ongoing conflict that has already claimed countless lives and displaced millions. The negotiations about territorial concessions and the potential for a U.S.-Russia agreement reveal a troubling pattern that has recurrently emerged in international diplomacy: the pragmatism that can sometimes overshadow the moral imperatives of sovereignty and self-determination. As Americans, it is essential to recognize the historical context of this conflict and the implications these discussions have on global stability and human rights.
Historically, Ukraine's geopolitical struggle is deeply rooted in a complex tapestry of historical ties with Russia, the legacy of Soviet influence, and the post-Cold War expansion of NATO. The 1994 Budapest Memorandum, which guaranteed Ukraine's borders in exchange for relinquishing its nuclear arsenal, stands as a poignant reminder of the promises made by global powers. The violation of these assurances by Russia, particularly in the annexation of Crimea and the ongoing conflict in the Donbas region, highlights the fragility of security guarantees when they are not supported by tangible actions. The current negotiations proposed by Trump, which hint at a possible trade of land for security assurances, raise alarms about the willingness of U.S. leadership to compromise Ukrainian sovereignty in pursuit of a so-called "peace deal."
European leaders' efforts to support Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy amid these negotiations are commendable, yet they also reflect the underlying challenges facing the West in terms of a unified stance on security and territorial integrity. The fact that discussions about land concessions are taking place without Kyiv's full agreement is deeply troubling, as it undermines the agency of the Ukrainian people in deciding their own fate. It is crucial for Americans to advocate for policies that reinforce Ukraine's sovereignty, ensuring that any negotiations respect the country's territorial integrity and the will of its citizens. This is not merely an issue of international diplomacy but one of basic human rights and self-determination.
In response to these developments, Americans can take several actions to bolster support for Ukraine. First and foremost, engaging in grassroots advocacy to raise awareness about the importance of unwavering support for Ukraine is vital. This can involve contacting representatives to express opposition to any negotiations that would involve territorial concessions without the explicit consent of Ukraine. Additionally, supporting organizations that provide humanitarian aid to those affected by the war is crucial, as the humanitarian crisis continues to worsen. Every action counts, whether it is participating in local rallies, writing letters to the editor, or utilizing social media to amplify the narrative around Ukraine's fight for freedom.
Moreover, it is imperative to educate ourselves and others about the implications of U.S. foreign policy decisions. Understanding the long-term consequences of appeasing authoritarian regimes can help foster a more informed public discourse. By holding leaders accountable and demanding a foreign policy that prioritizes human rights and the sanctity of international law, we can help create a more just and equitable world. Engaging in discussions that focus on the importance of upholding international agreements, such as the Budapest Memorandum, can also serve as a reminder of the consequences of failing to honor commitments made to sovereign nations.
Ultimately, the fate of Ukraine is also a reflection of the broader values we uphold as a nation. By advocating for a foreign policy rooted in justice and respect for sovereignty, Americans can contribute to a more stable and peaceful international community. This is not merely a question of politics but one of moral responsibility. As we watch the negotiations unfold, it is essential to remain vigilant, informed, and proactive in ensuring that the voices of those in Ukraine are heard and respected, as their struggle is ultimately a fight for the fundamental principles of freedom and self-determination that resonate universally.
The current geopolitical landscape surrounding Ukraine and its conflict with Russia is complex and fraught with human consequences. As concerned individuals, especially those motivated by a desire for peace, solidarity, and justice, there are several concrete actions we can take to make our voices heard and support Ukraine’s sovereignty and the welfare of its citizens.
### What We Can Personally Do
1. **Educate Ourselves and Others**: Understanding the nuances of international relations, especially regarding Ukraine, is crucial. Share informative articles, participate in discussions, and attend community forums to raise awareness.
2. **Support Humanitarian Aid**: Contribute to organizations providing support to those affected by the conflict. This can be monetary contributions or donating supplies, such as clothing, food, or medical aid.
3. **Engage in Advocacy**: Write to elected officials and advocate for strong support for Ukraine, emphasizing the importance of maintaining its territorial integrity and providing necessary aid.
4. **Participate in Petitions**: Sign and share petitions that call for action from government representatives or international organizations to ensure continued support for Ukraine.
### Exact Actions We Can Take
1. **Writing to Elected Officials**: - **What to Say**: Express your concerns about the potential negotiations that may compromise Ukraine’s territorial integrity. Urge your representatives to support Ukraine’s sovereignty and advocate for humanitarian aid. - **Who to Write To**: - **Your U.S. Senators**: - **Example**: Senator Chuck Schumer (D-NY) - Email: schumer.senate.gov/contact/email-chuck - Mailing Address: 780 Third Avenue, Suite 2301, New York, NY 10017 - **Example**: Senator Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) - Email: gillibrand.senate.gov/contact/contact-gillibrand - Mailing Address: 780 Third Avenue, Suite 2601, New York, NY 10017 - **Your U.S. Representative**: Find your representative via https://www.house.gov/representatives/find-your-representative and contact them similarly.
2. **Petitions to Sign**: - **Petition for Humanitarian Support**: - **Petition Link**: [Change.org - Support Ukraine Aid](https://www.change.org/p/support-ukraine-humanitarian-aid) - **What to Say**: Share your reason for supporting increased humanitarian aid and encouraging your peers to do the same. - **Petition for U.S. Government Action**: - **Petition Link**: [MoveOn.org - Support Ukraine’s Sovereignty](https://act.moveon.org/sign/support-ukraine-sovereignty) - **What to Say**: Highlight the importance of U.S. commitment to international laws and territorial integrity.
3. **Engaging with Local Organizations**: - Reach out to local groups that support Ukraine, such as Ukrainian cultural organizations or peace advocacy groups. Volunteer your time or resources.
4. **Participating in Public Demonstrations**: - Join rallies or public demonstrations supporting Ukraine. Search for local events through social media platforms or community boards.
5. **Utilizing Social Media**: - Use platforms like Twitter, Instagram, and Facebook to spread awareness about the situation in Ukraine. Share reliable news sources, infographics about the conflict, and calls to action.
6. **Contacting International Representatives**: - Reach out to international bodies that influence foreign policy, such as the United Nations or European Union, urging them to take a strong stance in support of Ukraine. - **Example for the UN**: - **Website**: [UN Contact](https://www.un.org/en/contact-us) - **What to Say**: Demand that the UN prioritize diplomatic solutions that respect Ukraine’s borders and sovereignty.
### Conclusion
Each of us holds the power to effect change through our actions and voices. By educating ourselves, engaging with our elected officials, and actively participating in advocacy, we can contribute to a more just and peaceful resolution to the ongoing conflict in Ukraine. Let’s stand in solidarity with those affected and promote a narrative that prioritizes peace, security, and humanitarian support.