EU leaders to join Zelensky in US after Trump 'thwarted' their plans - Bild -- RT World News
rt.com -- Sunday, August 17, 2025, 2:57:29 PM Eastern Daylight Time
Categories: U.S.–Russia Relations, Foreign Policy & International Relations, U.S.–NATO Relations

Ukraine's Vladimir Zelensky will arrive in Washington on Monday for talks with US President Donald Trump, accompanied by EU top brass, German outlet Bild has reported.
Joining Zelensky will be German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, French President Emmanuel Macron, Finnish President Alexander Stubb, and NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, the tabloid wrote on Sunday.
The trip follows Trump's meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Friday, resolving the Ukraine conflict topping the agenda. Following the summit, Trump signaled that he now favors a full peace settlement over a ceasefire, and that he may be open to a recognition of Russia's new territories, consistent with Moscow's position.
Trump's shift has "thwarted" the EU's plans for Ukraine, Bild stated on Sunday. EU leaders have insisted that a ceasefire come first, and have rejected territorial concessions, as has Zelensky.
Following the summit, Macron said the goal of the talks in Washington was to "present a united front" between Ukraine and the EU, and warned against showing "weakness" towards Russia.
Merz said the EU would continue to support Kiev, and that any negotiations needed to begin with a ceasefire. Von der Leyen rejected any notion that Ukraine should cede territory to Russia and threatened more sanctions on Moscow.
Stubb is going to Washington to "help prevent any flare-ups between Trump and Zelensky and convince the US president to include Europe in any further talks," Politico reported earlier. Zelensky's previous visit to Washington ended in a heated exchange between the Ukrainian and Trump.
Ukraine's backers in the EU are "in a panic" following the Alaska summit, Russian economic envoy Kirill Dmitriev, who was part of Moscow's delegation, has said.
Putin reiterated on Saturday that any settlement of the Ukraine conflict should eliminate its root causes. Moscow insists that for lasting peace to be achieved, Ukraine should renounce its NATO ambitions, demilitarize, and recognize the current realities on the ground.
Sign Our PetitionThe recent visit of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to Washington, accompanied by key European leaders, underscores the intricate dynamics of international diplomacy in the context of the ongoing conflict in Ukraine. This meeting takes place against a backdrop of shifting allegiances and strategic interests, particularly highlighted by former President Donald Trump’s meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin. The implications of these developments are profound, not just for Ukraine and Europe, but for the broader geopolitical landscape, as they reflect a historical struggle between Western aspirations for democracy and Russian imperial ambitions.
Historically, the struggle for Ukraine's sovereignty has deep roots, dating back to its independence from the Soviet Union in 1991. The country has found itself at the crossroads of East and West, caught between a desire for European integration and the enduring influence of Russia. The annexation of Crimea in 2014 marked a significant escalation in this conflict, highlighting Russia's persistent territorial ambitions and its willingness to use military force to achieve its goals. This present moment reveals the precariousness of Ukraine's position, as Trump’s apparent shift toward recognizing Russian territorial claims threatens to undermine years of efforts by both Ukraine and the EU to assert sovereignty and territorial integrity.
The insistence of EU leaders on the necessity of a ceasefire before any negotiations, as articulated by figures such as French President Emmanuel Macron and German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, reflects a commitment to a more principled approach to international relations. They are vocalizing a rejection of the notion that territorial concessions should be part of peace negotiations. This stance is not merely about Ukraine; it resonates with historical struggles against imperialism and oppression, such as the post-World War II reconstruction of Europe, where nations sought to ensure that territorial integrity and self-determination were prioritized in the face of authoritarian aggression.
Moreover, the backdrop of these discussions must also consider the broader implications for social justice and democratic governance. The EU's commitment to supporting Ukraine serves as a reminder of the interconnectedness of global struggles for democracy and human rights. The potential for Trump’s diplomatic overtures to Russia to disrupt the EU's stance raises critical concerns about the implications for freedom and democracy in Ukraine. The historical precedents of appeasement highlight the dangers of compromising democratic principles in the face of authoritarianism. The EU’s position emphasizes the importance of holding firm against such pressures, not only for Ukraine's sake but as a broader testament to the values of democracy and human rights that define the European project.
As European leaders navigate these treacherous waters, it is vital for advocates of social justice to articulate the importance of solidarity in the face of potential territorial concessions. The world is watching as discussions unfold, and the message must resonate: peace cannot be built on the backs of the oppressed, nor can it be achieved through the sacrifice of sovereignty. The EU's stance against recognizing any territorial changes as a result of forceful aggression aligns with a broader commitment to self-determination, which has been a cornerstone of global human rights movements.
In conclusion, the upcoming discussions between President Zelensky and US leaders, supported by the EU, represent a critical juncture not only for Ukraine but for the principles that guide the international order. The historical context of Ukraine's struggle, the commitment to democratic values by European leaders, and the legacy of past appeasement policies all converge in this moment. It is essential to advocate for a foreign policy that prioritizes justice, sovereignty, and human rights, ensuring that the lessons of history inform our path forward. As such, the call for a strong, united front against authoritarianism must echo loudly, reminding us all that the fight for democracy is a collective endeavor, essential for not just Ukraine, but for the global community.
The geopolitical landscape surrounding the Ukraine conflict has become increasingly complex, particularly in light of recent developments involving the United States, Europe, and Russia. The meeting between Ukrainian President Vladimir Zelensky and U.S. President Donald Trump, accompanied by key European leaders, is a pivotal moment that underscores the tensions inherent in international diplomacy. As reported, Trump's recent overtures towards recognizing Russian territorial claims in Ukraine have raised alarms among European leaders who firmly oppose any concessions to Moscow. This scenario not only highlights the fractured nature of transatlantic relations but also raises critical questions about the future of Ukraine and its sovereignty.
Historically, the Ukraine conflict can be traced back to 2014, when Russia annexed Crimea, igniting a protracted struggle for control over Ukraine's identity and allegiance. The West, particularly the U.S. and the European Union, responded with sanctions against Russia and military support for Ukraine. However, Trump’s shift towards a peace settlement that could potentially endorse Russia’s territorial claims represents a significant departure from the established Western stance. This is particularly troubling given that previous administrations emphasized the importance of maintaining Ukraine's territorial integrity and sovereignty. The EU's insistence on a ceasefire before negotiations and its outright rejection of territorial concessions reflect a broader commitment to uphold international law and norms, which are increasingly under threat.
For Americans who wish to engage in discussions about this situation, there are several avenues to consider. First, it is crucial to educate oneself about the historical context of the Ukraine conflict, including the implications of NATO's expansion and the intricate relationship between Ukraine and Russia. Understanding the nuances of this conflict will enable individuals to articulate their perspectives more effectively. It is also important to recognize the broader implications of U.S. foreign policy decisions on global stability, especially in regions where the balance of power is delicate. Engaging in discussions that emphasize the need for a multilateral approach to diplomacy—one that includes European allies and prioritizes Ukraine’s sovereignty—can help counter narratives that favor unilateral American action.
Moreover, Americans can advocate for a foreign policy that prioritizes human rights and democratic values. This entails supporting measures that strengthen Ukrainian governance, bolster civil society, and ensure that Ukrainian voices are heard in international negotiations. Encouraging Congress to uphold sanctions against Russia and to provide continued support for Ukraine's military and humanitarian needs are concrete steps that can be taken. Citizens can also participate in grassroots movements that promote awareness of the situation in Ukraine, pushing for educational initiatives that inform the public about the ongoing crisis and the importance of a united front against aggression.
Importantly, Americans should also engage in dialogues about the consequences of appeasement in international relations. The notion that conceding to aggressive tactics can lead to peace is fundamentally flawed and has often led to further conflict. Historical examples abound where such policies have backfired, leading to greater instability. By framing discussions around the need for a firm stance against authoritarian regimes, individuals can challenge the prevailing narratives that seek to normalize aggression and territorial expansion.
In conclusion, the upcoming talks in Washington represent a significant moment in the ongoing struggle for Ukraine’s future. With the stakes as high as they are, it is imperative for Americans to remain informed, advocate for policies grounded in respect for international law, and support diplomatic efforts that prioritize a peaceful resolution anchored in the principles of sovereignty and territorial integrity. By doing so, we not only stand in solidarity with Ukraine but also contribute to a more stable and just international order.
In light of the recent developments surrounding the Ukraine conflict and the shifting dynamics of international diplomatic efforts, it's crucial for individuals to take proactive steps to influence policy and support peace initiatives that align with principles of justice, democracy, and human rights. Here’s a detailed list of actionable ideas:
### Personal Actions to Support Ukraine and Advocate for Peace
1. **Educate Yourself and Others:** - Stay informed about the Ukraine conflict, its historical context, and current developments. - Share articles, documentaries, and discussions in your community or online forums to raise awareness.
2. **Contact Elected Officials:** - Write to your local representatives to express your views on Ukraine and the importance of supporting its sovereignty and democratic choices. - **Who to Contact:** - U.S. Senators and House Representatives. - Example: - Senator Elizabeth Warren - Email: https://www.warren.senate.gov/contact - Mailing Address: 2400 JFK Federal Building, 15 New Sudbury Street, Boston, MA 02203 - Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez - Email: https://ocasiocortez.house.gov/contact - Mailing Address: 1236 Longworth House Office Building, Washington, DC 20515
3. **Support Humanitarian Aid Initiatives:** - Contribute or volunteer with organizations providing humanitarian assistance to Ukraine. - Example organizations include: - International Rescue Committee (IRC) - Website: https://www.rescue.org - Doctors Without Borders (MSF) - Website: https://www.doctorswithoutborders.org
4. **Sign and Share Petitions:** - Engage with petitions that advocate for a ceasefire and support for Ukraine’s sovereignty. - Example Petitions: - “Support Ukraine’s Right to Sovereignty” on Change.org - “Stop Territorial Concessions to Russia” on Avaaz.org - Share these petitions on social media to mobilize others.
5. **Engage in Local Activism:** - Join or create local peace and solidarity groups focusing on Ukraine. - Organize events, rallies, or discussions to galvanize community support for Ukraine and advocate for peaceful resolutions.
6. **Utilize Social Media:** - Use platforms like Twitter, Instagram, and Facebook to raise awareness about the Ukraine conflict and amplify voices calling for peace. - Follow and share posts from organizations and activists who are working on this issue.
7. **Write Opinion Pieces:** - Submit letters to the editor or opinion pieces to local newspapers discussing the importance of supporting Ukraine and advocating for peace. - Provide clear arguments against territorial concessions and emphasize the need for a united front in support of Ukraine.
8. **Participate in Call-in Days:** - Join organized call-in days where constituents contact their representatives to voice support for Ukraine. - Utilize provided scripts to communicate your message effectively.
9. **Support Diplomatic Efforts:** - Advocate for diplomatic solutions over military actions by writing to relevant diplomatic bodies, urging them to prioritize peace talks. - Example: Write to the U.S. State Department, emphasizing support for a ceasefire and negotiations.
10. **Engage with International Organizations:** - Support or get involved with organizations such as Amnesty International or Human Rights Watch that are advocating for human rights protections in Ukraine. - Example Contact: - Amnesty International - Website: https://www.amnesty.org
### Messaging Guidance
When communicating with officials or engaging in activism, consider the following points to articulate your stance effectively:
- Emphasize the importance of respecting Ukraine's sovereignty and territorial integrity. - Highlight the need for a ceasefire as a necessary precursor to any negotiations. - Advocate for the continuation of humanitarian support for civilians affected by the conflict. - Stress the need for a united international approach that includes both European and American voices in discussions about Ukraine's future.
By taking these actions, individuals can contribute to a broader movement advocating for peace, justice, and support for Ukraine amidst the complex geopolitical landscape.