European leaders to join Zelenskiy for Washington talks as Trump presses peace deal
reuters.com -- Sunday, August 17, 2025, 7:57:30 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Categories: U.S.–Russia Relations, Foreign Policy & International Relations, U.S.–NATO Relations
LONDON/BERLIN, Aug 17 (Reuters) - European leaders including from Germany, France and Britain will accompany Volodymyr Zelenskiy to meet Donald Trump in Washington, they said on Sunday, seeking to bolster him as the U.S. president presses Ukraine to accept a quick peace.
Ahead of the Washington talks on Monday, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, French President Emmanuel Macron and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer were hosting a meeting of allies on Sunday to shore up Zelenskiy's position, hoping in particular to lock down robust security guarantees for Ukraine that would include a U.S. role.
President Trump is leaning on Ukraine to strike an agreement after meeting Vladimir Putin on Friday in Alaska. According to sources, the U.S. and Russian leaders discussed proposals for Russia to relinquish tiny pockets of occupied Ukraine in exchange for Ukraine ceding a swathe of fortified land in the east and freezing the front lines elsewhere.
At face value, some of Putin's demands would be hugely difficult for Ukraine to accept, setting the stage for potentially fraught talks about ending Europe's deadliest war in 80 years, which has killed or wounded more than 1 million people.
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen will also travel to Washington, as will Finland's President Alexander Stubb, whose access to Trump included rounds of golf in Florida earlier this year. Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, who is an admirer of many of Trump's policies, will also go to Washington, her office said.
European allies are keen to avoid a repeat of Zelenskiy's last Oval Office meeting, in February. That went disastrously, with Trump and Vice President JD Vance giving the Ukrainian leader a strong public dressing-down.
"The talks will address, among other things, security guarantees, territorial issues, and continued support for Ukraine in its defence against Russian aggression," the German government said in a statement about the Washington trip.
"This includes maintaining pressure on sanctions."
Macron, Merz and Starmer will host a virtual meeting of the "coalition of the willing" - a grouping of allies of Kyiv - from 1300 GMT on Sunday. Von der Leyen will host Zelenskiy in Brussels from where the two leaders will also dial in.
European powers want to help set up a trilateral meeting between Trump, Putin and Zelenskiy to make sure Ukraine has a seat at the table to shape its future.
They also want security guarantees for Ukraine with U.S. involvement, and the ability to crank up pressure on Moscow if needed.
"They will spell out what they consider essential in terms of security guarantees: what they can do themselves, what falls to the coalition of volunteers, and also what they expect from the United States," a European government official said. "Indeed, they expect a very robust commitment."
'VERY BIG POWER'
Trump said on Friday that Ukraine should make a deal to end the war with Russia because "Russia is a very big power, and they're not".
After the Alaska summit with Putin, Trump phoned Zelenskiy and told him that the Kremlin chief had offered to freeze most front lines if Kyiv ceded all of Donetsk, the industrial region that is one of Moscow's main targets, a source familiar with the matter said.
Zelenskiy rejected the demand, the source said. Russia already controls a fifth of Ukraine, including about three-quarters of Donetsk province, which it first entered in 2014.
Trump also said he agreed with Putin that a peace deal should be sought without the prior ceasefire that Ukraine and its European allies have called for. That was a reversal of his position before the summit, when he said he would not be happy unless a ceasefire was agreed on.
Zelenskiy said Russia's unwillingness to pause the fighting would complicate efforts to forge a lasting peace. "Stopping the killing is a key element of stopping the war," he said on X.
Russia launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 and has been gradually advancing for months.
In his statement after the Alaska summit, Putin signalled no movement in Russia's long-held demands, which also include a veto on Kyiv's desired membership in the NATO alliance.
He also warned Ukraine and its European allies not to "create any obstacles. That they will not attempt to disrupt the emerging progress through provocation or behind-the-scenes intrigue."
Reporting by Andrew MacAskill, Tom Balmforth, Andreas Rinke, Layli Foroudi, Max Hunder, Julia Payne, Joshua McElwee, Dave Graham; Writing by Matthias Williams Editing by Frances Kerry
Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles., opens new tab
Sign Our PetitionThe recent discussions among European leaders and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy in Washington serve as a reminder of both the complexity and the urgency of geopolitical dynamics in the context of Russia's invasion of Ukraine. As European leaders gather to support Zelenskiy, it is imperative to reflect on the history of foreign intervention, the consequences of appeasement, and the moral obligation to uphold sovereignty and human rights. The ongoing conflict is not just a matter of territorial disputes; it is an emblem of the broader struggle against authoritarianism, and it highlights the critical role of international solidarity.
Historically, the West's response to Russia's aggressive expansionism has often been characterized by indecision and a tendency to prioritize diplomatic comforts over the principles of justice and self-determination. The conclusion of the Cold War was marked by a fleeting moment of optimism regarding democratic governance in Eastern Europe. However, the failure to firmly integrate former Soviet states into Western political and economic structures has left many of these nations vulnerable to Russian influence. The current situation in Ukraine is a direct result of this neglect, as the country has faced relentless aggression from a regime that seeks to re-establish its sphere of influence. The urgency of the talks in Washington underscores the need for a robust, principled approach that prioritizes both Ukraine's sovereignty and the broader democratic aspirations of former Soviet states.
In this light, it is particularly concerning that Trump is advocating for a quick peace deal that might involve significant concessions from Ukraine. While the desire for peace is universally shared, any agreement that compromises Ukraine's territorial integrity or its right to self-determination would be a grave injustice. History has taught us that peace at any cost often leads to further conflict down the line. The "Munich Agreement" of 1938 serves as a stark reminder of the dangers of appeasement, as it allowed Nazi Germany to annex parts of Czechoslovakia, ultimately leading to World War II. The moral imperative to support Ukraine is not merely about geopolitical strategy; it is a matter of standing against tyranny and advocating for the rights of oppressed peoples.
Moreover, the role of European leaders in these discussions cannot be overlooked. The commitment to providing security guarantees for Ukraine reflects a recognition of the need for collective action against authoritarian regimes. The notion of a "coalition of the willing" represents a hopeful step toward a more unified and principled stance against aggression. However, it also raises questions about the efficacy and sincerity of such coalitions. Will the European powers follow through with substantive commitments, or will they retreat into the shadows of inaction, leaving Ukraine to fend for itself? The stakes are too high for hesitation, and the international community must demonstrate unwavering support for Ukraine's right to defend itself.
In addition, the ongoing war in Ukraine is not just a regional issue; it has far-reaching implications for global stability and the fight against autocracy. The conflict has galvanized a renewed sense of purpose among democracies around the world, highlighting the interconnectedness of struggles for freedom and justice. As the world watches the discussions in Washington unfold, it is essential to connect the dots between Ukraine's fight and other global movements for liberation and equality. Solidarity with Ukraine must be rooted in a broader commitment to dismantling the systems of oppression that manifest in various forms across the globe.
Ultimately, the upcoming talks in Washington must be framed within a larger narrative of justice and resistance against tyranny. As European leaders and Zelenskiy seek to secure Ukraine's future, they must approach negotiations with an unwavering commitment to the principles of sovereignty, democracy, and human rights. The choices made in this moment will not only shape the fate of Ukraine but also serve as a precedent for how the international community responds to aggression in the future. It is a critical moment for both moral clarity and strategic resolve—a moment that demands our collective action and solidarity in the face of oppression.
The recent developments surrounding the meeting of European leaders with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy in Washington highlight a critical juncture in the ongoing conflict between Ukraine and Russia. The backdrop of these discussions is essential; we are witnessing not only a military struggle but also a geopolitical contest that has implications for global alliances and the principles of sovereignty and self-determination. In this complex landscape, the role of the United States, historically a key player in international conflicts, is particularly significant as it seeks to exert its influence in negotiations that could shape the future of Eastern Europe.
The European leaders’ participation underscores a growing recognition of the need for a unified response to aggression from Russia. The motivations driving these nations—Germany, France, and the UK—are rooted in a history of conflict in Europe, often resulting from unchecked expansionist policies. The devastation of World War II and the subsequent Cold War have left an indelible mark on European political consciousness. As such, the objectives of Ukraine's allies in securing robust security guarantees and support are not merely tactical; they are existential, reflecting a collective memory of the consequences of failing to stand up to authoritarian regimes.
However, the approach taken by President Trump, who is pressing for a rapid peace deal, raises concerns. The notion of trading territory for peace, particularly when it involves compromising the sovereignty of Ukraine, is fraught with moral and ethical implications. It suggests a transactional view of diplomacy that disregards the lived realities of the millions affected by the war. Historical precedents, such as the uneasy peace agreements made in the past, demonstrate that such compromises often lead to further instability and can embolden aggressors rather than deter them. It is essential for Americans to recognize the potential pitfalls of this approach and to advocate for a peace process that prioritizes the rights and voices of those directly impacted by the conflict.
As citizens, we have the power to influence our government’s stance on international conflicts. Engaging in discussions about foreign policy, supporting organizations that advocate for human rights and sovereignty, and urging lawmakers to prioritize diplomatic solutions that involve the perspectives of all stakeholders—including those of the Ukrainian people—are critical actions we can take. Furthermore, leveraging social media and community organizing to raise awareness about the complexities of the Ukraine-Russia conflict can help foster a more informed public discourse. We can encourage our peers to scrutinize the motivations behind political maneuvers while holding our leaders accountable for their choices in foreign policy.
Educational efforts are also vital in shaping a more nuanced understanding of international relations. By promoting discussions that delve into the history of U.S. involvement in foreign conflicts and the principles of self-determination, we can cultivate a more informed citizenry. Workshops, forums, and educational campaigns can empower individuals to engage thoughtfully with the topic, allowing them to articulate their positions more effectively in conversations with individuals who may hold opposing views. This is not just about winning arguments; it is about fostering a deeper understanding of the stakes involved in global politics, reinforcing the idea that the pursuit of peace and justice should be guided by values rather than expediency.
In conclusion, the meeting between Zelenskiy and European leaders with Trump is not merely a diplomatic event but a critical moment that encapsulates larger questions of sovereignty, security, and morality in international relations. As we navigate this complex landscape, it is imperative that we advocate for a peace process that respects the rights of nations and their peoples. By engaging in informed discussions, holding our leaders accountable, and promoting educational initiatives, we can contribute to a more just and equitable approach to foreign policy that recognizes the dignity and autonomy of all nations involved.
The ongoing situation in Ukraine and the discussions between European leaders and U.S. officials, including the nuances of proposed peace deals, necessitate an active response from individuals who care about peace, security, and human rights. Here are specific actions you can take to contribute to a more favorable resolution for Ukraine and its people.
### Personal Actions to Take:
1. **Educate Yourself and Others:** - Read about the historical context of the Ukraine-Russia conflict to understand the stakes involved. - Share informative articles and materials on social media platforms to raise awareness.
2. **Support Ukrainian Organizations:** - Donate to humanitarian organizations providing aid to Ukraine, such as Direct Relief, UNICEF, or local NGOs. - Volunteer with organizations that support Ukrainian refugees in your area.
3. **Advocate for Peaceful Solutions:** - Participate in local peace marches or rallies supporting Ukraine and advocating for diplomatic resolutions to the conflict.
4. **Engage Politically:** - Write to your elected representatives urging them to support robust security guarantees for Ukraine and to push for a peaceful resolution. - Sign petitions that call for a strong stance against aggression while supporting the rights and sovereignty of Ukraine.
### Specific Actions:
1. **Petitions:** - **Petition for Humanitarian Aid and Support for Ukraine:** - You can find relevant petitions on platforms like Change.org or Avaaz. For example, search for petitions titled "Support Humanitarian Aid for Ukraine" or "Call for Strong Security Guarantees for Ukraine." - **Suggested Petition:** - Change.org petition titled "Demand Strong U.S. Support for Ukraine" — sign and share it within your networks.
2. **Contacting Elected Officials:** - Identify your representatives in Congress via [congress.gov](https://www.congress.gov/members) and write to them. Here’s a framework for your message: - **Subject:** Support for Ukraine’s Sovereignty - **Message:** - Introduce yourself as a constituent and express your concern over the ongoing conflict. - Urge them to advocate for strong security guarantees for Ukraine and an end to hostilities through diplomatic negotiations. - Request that they support continued humanitarian assistance for those affected by the war. - **Example Contacts:** - Senator [Your Senator's Name] - Email: [senatorname@email.com] - USPS: [Senator's Office Address] - Representative [Your Representative's Name] - Email: [representativename@email.com] - USPS: [Representative's Office Address]
3. **Joining or Organizing Local Advocacy Groups:** - Research and join local community organizations focused on foreign policy or peace advocacy. - If one doesn’t exist, consider starting a group to discuss and promote awareness around the Ukraine conflict.
4. **Social Media Engagement:** - Use platforms like Twitter or Facebook to engage with policymakers by tagging them and sharing your views on the importance of supporting Ukraine. - Follow and engage with organizations actively working on the ground in Ukraine to amplify their voices and needs.
5. **Write Opinion Pieces:** - Consider writing op-eds or letters to the editor for local newspapers discussing the importance of supporting Ukraine and advocating for peace. - Share personal stories or highlight humanitarian impacts to connect emotionally with readers.
### What to Say:
- Emphasize the need for a peaceful resolution that prioritizes Ukraine's sovereignty and territorial integrity. - Highlight the ongoing humanitarian crisis and the importance of international support in addressing the needs of displaced persons and war victims. - Call for a strong commitment from the U.S. and European allies towards security guarantees for Ukraine, ensuring their right to defend themselves against aggression.
By taking these steps, you can contribute to a global movement advocating for peace, justice, and support for those impacted by conflict. Every voice matters, and collective action can lead to significant change.