Zelenskyy, European leaders head for US amid Trump push for deal
dailysabah.com -- Sunday, August 17, 2025, 8:58:33 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Categories: U.S.–Russia Relations, Foreign Policy & International Relations, U.S.–NATO Relations
Leaders of Germany, France and Britain said Sunday they will join Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in Washington for talks with Donald Trump, seeking to bolster him as the U.S. president presses Ukraine to accept a quick peace deal.
A day before the talks with Trump, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, French President Emmanuel Macron and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer were hosting a meeting of allies on Sunday to shore up Zelenskyy's position, hoping in particular to lock down robust security guarantees for Ukraine that would include a U.S. role.
President Trump is leaning on Zelenskyy to strike an agreement after he met Kremlin chief Vladimir Putin on Friday in Alaska. According to sources, the U.S. and Russian leaders discussed proposals for Russia to relinquish tiny pockets of occupied Ukraine in exchange for Ukraine ceding a swathe of fortified land in the east and freezing the front lines elsewhere.
At face value, some of Putin's demands would be hugely difficult for Ukraine to accept, setting the stage for potentially fraught talks about ending Europe's deadliest war in 80 years, which has dragged on for 3 1/2 years and killed or wounded more than 1 million people.
European allies are keen to help Zelenskyy avoid a repeat of his last Oval Office meeting, in February. That went disastrously, with Trump and Vice President JD Vance giving the Ukrainian leader a public dressing-down, accusing him of being ungrateful and disrespectful.
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen will also travel to Washington, as will Finland's President Alexander Stubb, whose access to Trump included rounds of golf in Florida earlier this year and Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, who is an admirer of many of Trump's policies.
"The talks will address, among other things, security guarantees, territorial issues, and continued support for Ukraine in its defence against Russian aggression," the German government said in a statement about the Washington trip.
"This includes maintaining pressure on sanctions."
Macron, Merz and Starmer will host a virtual meeting of the "coalition of the willing" - a grouping of allies of Kyiv - from 1 p.m. GMT on Sunday. Von der Leyen is hosting Zelenskyy in Brussels, from where the two leaders will also dial in.
European powers want to help set up a trilateral meeting between Trump, Putin and Zelenskyy to make sure Ukraine has a seat at the table to shape its future.
They also want security guarantees for Ukraine, including U.S. involvement and the ability to ramp up pressure on Moscow if needed.
"They will spell out what they consider essential in terms of security guarantees: what they can do themselves, what falls to the coalition of volunteers, and also what they expect from the United States," a European government official said. "Indeed, they expect a very robust commitment."
For his part, Putin briefed his close ally, Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko, about the Alaska talks, and also spoke with Kazakhstan's President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev. Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov held calls on Saturday with his Turkish and Hungarian counterparts.
Hungary has been a holdout in the European Union against the bloc's efforts to isolate Putin since he sent troops into Ukraine in a full-scale invasion in February 2022. Turkey has tried to maintain open diplomatic channels with both Ukraine and Russia.
Trump said on Friday that Ukraine should make a deal to end the war because "Russia is a very big power, and they're not."
After the Alaska summit, Trump phoned Zelenskyy and told him that the Kremlin chief had offered to freeze most front lines if Ukraine ceded all of Donetsk, the industrial region that is one of Moscow's main targets, a source familiar with the matter said.
Zelenskyy rejected the demand, the source said. Russia already controls a fifth of Ukraine, including about three-quarters of Donetsk province, which it first entered in 2014.
Trump also said he agreed with Putin that a peace deal should be sought without the prior cease-fire that Ukraine and its European allies have called for. That was a reversal of his position before the summit, when he said he would not be happy unless a cease-fire was agreed on.
Zelenskyy said Russia's unwillingness to pause the fighting would complicate efforts to forge a lasting peace. "Stopping the killing is a key element of stopping the war," he said on X.
Russia has made steady advances for months, although in recent days, Ukraine said it had cleared some territory where Russian troops had broken through.
In his statement after the Alaska summit, Putin signalled no movement in Russia's long-held demands, which also include a veto on Kyiv's desired membership in the NATO alliance.
He also warned Ukraine and its European allies not to "create any obstacles. That they will not attempt to disrupt the emerging progress through provocation or behind-the-scenes intrigue."
Sign Our PetitionThe ongoing conflict in Ukraine has morphed into a complex geopolitical struggle that reverberates through historical contexts, particularly the legacies of imperialism and nationalism in Eastern Europe. As President Zelenskyy meets with European leaders and former President Trump to discuss a possible peace deal, the stakes are not merely about territorial compromises but reflect the larger fight against authoritarianism and for democratic sovereignty. Importantly, the backdrop against which these discussions are occurring is not just about Ukraine’s future; it speaks to a broader struggle against the persistence of imperial ambitions, notably from Russia, and the need for a unified, democratic response from Europe and the United States.
Historically, Ukraine has been a site of power struggles, often caught between larger forces. The dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991 marked a significant turning point, allowing Ukraine to declare independence. However, the subsequent decades have seen Russia’s attempts to reassert its influence, culminating in the 2014 annexation of Crimea and the ongoing war in the Donbas region. This historical lens is crucial, as it highlights the importance of maintaining Ukraine’s sovereignty against external pressures. The proposed negotiations between Trump and Putin, with Zelenskyy in attendance, risk undermining Ukraine’s agency, potentially coercing it into concessions that could jeopardize its territorial integrity and democratic aspirations.
The recent dynamics involving Trump and European leaders signal a realignment of international diplomatic approaches. The urgency expressed by Germany, France, and the UK to bolster Zelenskyy reflects an understanding that Ukraine must not be a pawn in negotiations between great powers. The concept of “security guarantees” being discussed is not merely transactional; it speaks to a commitment to uphold Ukraine's right to self-determination. The historical precedent of appeasement, particularly in the lead-up to World War II, serves as a cautionary tale about the consequences of compromising the independence of smaller nations under external duress. Those advocating for peace must remember that meaningful dialogue should not come at the expense of Ukraine's sovereignty.
Moreover, the ongoing conflict in Ukraine must be contextualized within the broader struggles for social justice and human rights. The war has resulted in significant human suffering, with over a million casualties—a stark reminder of the human cost of geopolitical gamesmanship. The plight of the Ukrainian people can resonate with various global struggles against oppression, whether it’s the fight for democracy in Belarus, ongoing conflicts in the Middle East, or struggles against authoritarianism in regions like Latin America. Advocates for peace must leverage these connections, emphasizing that a genuine resolution to the conflict should prioritize humanitarian considerations and the voices of those directly affected by the war.
As the leaders prepare for talks, there is a pressing need to articulate what “security” truly means in this context. It is not just about military might or territorial claims; it encompasses the fundamental rights of people to live in peace, free from the threat of violence or coercion. The European leaders’ collective approach to securing Zelenskyy’s position should be underpinned by a commitment to uphold human rights and democratic norms, which are increasingly under threat not only from Russia but also from rising authoritarianism globally. This dialogue could serve as a pivotal moment to reaffirm a commitment to multilateralism and cooperative security that respects the autonomy of nations rather than dictating their futures from a position of power.
In conclusion, as the geopolitical landscape continues to shift, it is essential to advocate for a peace process that prioritizes justice and respect for national sovereignty. Engaging in meaningful negotiations that genuinely reflect the needs and aspirations of the Ukrainian people can set a precedent for future international relations, demonstrating that diplomacy can be rooted in solidarity and mutual respect rather than coercion. For those on the left, this moment serves as an opportunity to challenge narratives that seek to normalize the sidelining of countries like Ukraine and to push for a robust international commitment to peace, democracy, and human rights. By framing the discussion around these principles, advocates can effectively counter arguments that trivialize the complexities of the conflict and the importance of upholding democratic values in international diplomacy.
The ongoing conflict in Ukraine has become a focal point of international relations, and the recent meetings involving Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and European leaders with Donald Trump highlight the complexities of diplomacy in times of war. This scenario illustrates the precarious balancing act that Ukraine must perform as it navigates pressures from both its Western allies and Russia. The insistence of Trump on a quick peace deal raises significant concerns about the implications for Ukrainian sovereignty and the potential consequences of yielding to Kremlin demands. History has shown us that hasty compromises can lead to long-standing repercussions, particularly for nations with a history of domination by larger powers.
Historically, Ukraine has been caught between the influences of Russia and the West. The annexation of Crimea in 2014 and the subsequent conflict in Eastern Ukraine have shown how fragile Ukraine’s independence can be when faced with aggressive neighboring states. The current dynamics are reminiscent of the 1938 Munich Agreement, where Western powers attempted to appease Adolf Hitler at the expense of Czechoslovakia. This historical parallel serves as a cautionary tale—any agreement that compromises Ukraine's territorial integrity could set a dangerous precedent and embolden authoritarian regimes globally, undermining efforts for democratic governance and human rights. Therefore, it is essential to approach any proposed peace deal with a critical eye, demanding guarantees that prioritize the interests of the Ukrainian people over geopolitical maneuvering.
As citizens of a democratic society, we have a role to play in shaping the narrative surrounding this issue. Engaging with our political representatives to express support for robust security guarantees for Ukraine is vital. We can advocate for policies that emphasize long-term strategic support rather than short-term deals that may jeopardize the nation's sovereignty. This includes urging Congress to maintain a strong commitment to military and humanitarian aid for Ukraine, ensuring that they are equipped to defend their territory while also providing for the humanitarian needs of those affected by the conflict. Grassroots movements and local organizations can mobilize public opinion, emphasizing the importance of standing with Ukraine against aggression, and ensuring that our voices are heard in Washington.
Moreover, it is essential to foster public discourse that counters harmful narratives often propagated by those who prioritize transactional politics over principled stands on human rights and democracy. By educating ourselves and our communities about the complexities of the geopolitical landscape, we can challenge simplistic narratives that suggest appeasement is a viable solution. Hosting educational events, discussions, and forums that involve experts in international relations can help raise awareness about the implications of the war and the importance of supporting Ukraine's fight for self-determination.
The upcoming trilateral meeting between Trump, Zelenskyy, and Putin will undoubtedly shape the future of Ukraine. Therefore, it is crucial to demand transparency from our leaders regarding the discussions that take place during these talks. Advocacy for a well-informed public, equipped with knowledge of both historical and contemporary contexts, is necessary to hold our leaders accountable. We must stress that a deal reached without Ukrainian consent and consideration for their territorial integrity is not a legitimate peace but rather a capitulation to aggression. As engaged citizens, we can influence the narrative and push for a foreign policy that upholds the values of democracy, sovereignty, and international law, ensuring that the voices of those most affected by these decisions are not sidelined in the pursuit of political expediency.
In light of the ongoing geopolitical situation concerning Ukraine, it is vital for individuals who care about international peace, human rights, and the upholding of democratic principles to take proactive measures. Below is a detailed list of ideas and actions that can be taken to support Ukraine and advocate for a thoughtful approach to negotiations.
### Personal Actions to Support Ukraine
1. **Educate Yourself and Others:** - Stay informed about the situation in Ukraine by reading reputable news sources and analysis on international relations. - Organize or participate in community discussions or forums about the conflict to raise awareness.
2. **Advocate for Strong U.S. Support for Ukraine:** - Write to your elected representatives advocating for continued support for Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity. - Express the importance of including Ukrainian voices in peace negotiations.
3. **Petition for Continued Military and Humanitarian Support:** - Join or create petitions that call for Congress to approve ongoing military aid to Ukraine. - Example petition: [Change.org Petition](https://www.change.org/) - Search for petitions focused on Ukraine and military assistance.
4. **Contact Key Legislators:** - Write to your local representatives, senators, and relevant committees. Here are some key individuals you can reach out to: - **Senator Bob Menendez** Chair of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee Email: senator@menendez.senate.gov Mailing Address: 528 Hart Senate Office Building, Washington, DC 20510 - **Senator Jim Risch** Ranking Member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee Email: senator@risch.senate.gov Mailing Address: 483 Russell Senate Office Building, Washington, DC 20510
5. **Support Humanitarian Organizations:** - Contribute to organizations that provide aid to Ukraine, such as: - **Doctors Without Borders**: [donate here](https://www.doctorswithoutborders.org/) - **International Rescue Committee**: [donate here](https://www.rescue.org/)
6. **Engage in Social Media Advocacy:** - Use platforms like Twitter or Instagram to amplify messages of support for Ukraine. Tag influential politicians and organizations to raise visibility for Ukraine's plight. - Share educational content and articles that inform others about the conflict.
7. **Participate in Local Activism:** - Join or support local rallies or events advocating for Ukraine. This could include marches, vigils, or informational meetings. - Collaborate with local Ukrainian organizations or cultural groups to foster community support.
8. **Write Opinion Pieces:** - Submit letters to the editor or opinion pieces to local newspapers urging thoughtful intervention and support for Ukraine. - Outline the humanitarian aspects of the conflict and emphasize the need for diplomatic solutions that prioritize Ukrainian sovereignty.
9. **Promote Peaceful Solutions:** - Advocate for diplomatic solutions that emphasize Ukrainian agency in negotiations with Russia. Encourage grassroots movements that promote peace and dialogue. - Support initiatives that emphasize international law and human rights in the resolution of the conflict.
10. **Keep the Conversation Alive:** - Make the issue of Ukraine a regular topic of conversation with friends, family, and colleagues to keep awareness high and foster a sense of collective responsibility.
### What to Say in Your Correspondence
When writing letters or emails to officials, consider including the following points:
- Express your concern for the ongoing conflict in Ukraine and its humanitarian impact. - Advocate for continued and robust U.S. support for Ukraine, emphasizing military aid and humanitarian assistance. - Stress the importance of including Ukraine in peace negotiations, ensuring their sovereignty and territorial integrity are prioritized. - Urge your representatives to take a stand against any proposed agreements that would undermine Ukraine's position or force unjust concessions.
By taking these actions, individuals can contribute to a more supportive and constructive international response to the situation in Ukraine. Every voice matters in advocating for a peaceful resolution that respects the rights and dignity of all involved.