European leaders to join Zelensky in US for Ukraine talks with Trump | International
bssnews.net -- Sunday, August 17, 2025, 7:56:48 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Categories: U.S.–Russia Relations, Foreign Policy & International Relations, U.S.–NATO Relations
BRUSSELS, Belgium, Aug 17, 2025 (BSS/AFP) - European leaders will join
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky during his visit to Washington on
Monday seeking an end to Moscow's invasion, after President Donald Trump
dropped his push for a ceasefire following an Alaska summit with Russian
leader Vladimir Putin.
Securing a ceasefire in Ukraine, more than three years after the Kremlin
ordered the invasion, had been one of Trump's core demands before the summit,
to which Ukraine and its European allies were not invited.
But after the meeting yielded no breakthrough, Trump ruled out an immediate
ceasefire in Ukraine -- a move that would appear to favour Putin, who has
long argued for negotiations on a final peace deal.
Ukraine and its European allies have criticised Putin's stance as a way to
buy time and press Russia's battlefield advances.
The leaders heading to Washington on Monday to try and bend Trump's ear on
the matter include German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, French President
Emmanuel Macron, NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte and European Commission
President Ursula von der Leyen.
Ahead of the visit, von der Leyen said on X she would welcome Zelensky for a
meeting in Brussels on Sunday which other European leaders would join by
video, before accompanying the Ukrainian leader on his US trip at his
"request" and with "other European leaders".
The German government, which confirmed Merz was going, said it would try to
emphasise "interest in a swift peace agreement in Ukraine".
Trump had briefed Zelensky and European leaders on his flight back from
Alaska to Washington, saying afterwards that "it was determined by all that
the best way to end the horrific war between Russia and Ukraine is to go
directly to a peace agreement which would end the war".
Ceasefire agreements "often times do not hold up," Trump argued on his Truth
Social platform.
But Zelensky has appeared unconvinced by the change of tack, saying on
Saturday that it "complicates the situation".
If Moscow lacks "the will to carry out a simple order to stop the strikes, it
may take a lot of effort to get Russia to have the will to implement
(something) far greater -- peaceful coexistence with its neighbours for
decades," he said on social media.
European leaders for their part have expressed unease over Trump's outreach
to Putin from the outset.
- 'Harsh reality' -
Trump expressed support during his call with Zelensky and European leaders
for a proposal by Putin to take full control of two eastern Ukrainian regions
that Russia largely controls in exchange for freezing the frontline in two
others, an official briefed on the talks told AFP.
Putin "de facto demands that Ukraine leave Donbas," an area consisting of the
Donetsk and Lugansk regions in eastern Ukraine, the source said.
In exchange, Russian forces would halt their offensive in the Black Sea port
region of Kherson and Zaporizhzhia in southern Ukraine, where the main cities
are still under Ukrainian control.
Several months into its full-scale invasion of Ukraine, Russia in September
2022 claimed to have annexed all four Ukrainian regions even though its
troops still do not fully control any of them.
"The Ukrainian president refused to leave Donbas," the source said.
Trump notably also said the United States was prepared to provide Ukraine
security guarantees, an assurance Merz hailed as "significant progress".
But there was a scathing assessment of the summit outcome from the European
Union's top diplomat Kaja Kallas, who accused Putin of seeking to "drag out
negotiations" with no commitment to end the bloodshed.
"The harsh reality is that Russia has no intention of ending this war any
time soon," Kallas said.
- Zelensky back in White House -
The diplomatic focus now switches to Zelensky's talks at the White House on
Monday with the European leaders in tow.
The Ukrainian president's last Oval Office visit in February ended in an
extraordinary shouting match, with Trump and Vice President JD Vance publicly
berating Zelensky for not showing enough gratitude for US aid.
In an interview with broadcaster Fox News after his sit-down with Putin,
Trump had suggested that the onus was now on Zelensky to secure a peace deal
as they work towards an eventual trilateral summit with Putin.
"It's really up to President Zelensky to get it done," Trump said.
Meanwhile, the conflict in Ukraine rages on, with both Kyiv and Moscow
launching attack drones at each other Sunday.
In his post-summit statement in Alaska, Putin had warned Ukraine and European
countries not to engage in any "behind-the-scenes intrigues" that could
disrupt what he called "this emerging progress".
Sign Our PetitionThe recent news regarding European leaders joining Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in Washington for critical discussions about the ongoing war in Ukraine highlights the complex geopolitical tensions and the historical roots of this conflict. The urgency of the situation is underscored by the fact that the war has persisted for more than three years, resulting in significant human suffering, economic disruption, and a realignment of international alliances. This moment not only encapsulates the current dynamics between Ukraine and Russia but also illuminates the broader implications of U.S. foreign policy, particularly under the erratic leadership of former President Donald Trump.
Historically, the conflict in Ukraine can be traced back to deep-rooted issues regarding national identity, sovereignty, and the legacies of imperialism. The collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991 set the stage for Ukraine's independence, but it also left unresolved tensions around ethnic Russian populations in Ukraine and the geopolitical ambitions of Russia. The annexation of Crimea in 2014 and the ensuing war in the Donbas region were not just territorial disputes; they tapped into historical grievances and the quest for autonomy. By considering this historical context, we can better understand the stakes of the current negotiations and the potential for a lasting resolution to the conflict.
The current situation is particularly alarming given Trump's recent discussions with Putin, which reveal a willingness to entertain compromises that could undermine Ukrainian sovereignty. His proposal to recognize Russian control over eastern Ukrainian regions in exchange for a ceasefire raises fundamental questions about the nature of peace and justice in conflict resolution. Ceasefire agreements can often be mere band-aids over deeper wounds, and Trump's dismissive attitude toward them reflects a troubling trend towards transactional politics that prioritizes expediency over principle. This perspective can be detrimental not only to the people of Ukraine but also to the integrity of international norms that uphold sovereignty and territorial integrity.
Zelensky's skepticism regarding Trump's approach is noteworthy and reflects the sentiments of many who have closely followed the war. His assertion that a mere ceasefire may be insufficient given Russia's historical pattern of aggression is a call to recognize the complexities of negotiating peace with an adversary that has repeatedly violated agreements. This skepticism is echoed by European leaders, who are acutely aware of the potential for a simplistic resolution to exacerbate rather than alleviate tensions. The commitment to a meaningful peace agreement must involve not only halting hostilities but also addressing the underlying issues of power, identity, and historical grievances that have fueled the conflict.
This moment serves as a reminder of the ongoing social struggles that accompany wartime situations. The humanitarian crisis in Ukraine, with millions displaced and countless lives disrupted, is a stark manifestation of the broader implications of geopolitical maneuvers. As discussions unfold in Washington, it is essential to emphasize the voices of those most affected by the conflict—Ukrainian civilians, refugees, and marginalized communities. A genuine peace process must prioritize their needs and experiences, ensuring that any agreements reached do not sacrifice their rights and dignity at the altar of political expediency. Ultimately, the path forward requires a commitment to justice, solidarity, and a recognition that lasting peace can only be achieved through the acknowledgment of historical truths and a genuine engagement with the complexities of the present.
The ongoing conflict in Ukraine has highlighted not only the complexities of international diplomacy but also the profound implications of U.S. leadership—or the lack thereof—on the global stage. The recent summit involving President Donald Trump, European leaders, and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky illustrates the tensions and contradictions that characterize the current geopolitical landscape. Trump's abrupt shift in policy concerning a ceasefire—with a newfound emphasis on reaching a peace agreement—raises critical questions about the motivations behind such a stance. By examining the historical context of U.S.-Russia relations, the implications for Ukraine, and the broader role of European allies, it becomes clear that Americans must actively engage in the discourse surrounding this conflict and advocate for a more nuanced understanding of international relations.
Historically, the relationship between Russia and the West has been fraught with tension, particularly since the end of the Cold War. The expansion of NATO and the EU into Eastern Europe has been perceived by Russia as a direct threat to its sphere of influence, resulting in a series of confrontations, including the annexation of Crimea in 2014 and the ongoing conflict in Eastern Ukraine. The current war, now entering its third year, has seen significant loss of life and displacement of millions. It is essential for Americans to recognize that the roots of this conflict are deeply embedded in a legacy of power struggles, insecurity, and failed diplomacy. By understanding the historical context, we can better articulate the necessity of a comprehensive and just resolution to this conflict that avoids the pitfalls of past negotiations.
As President Trump indicated during his recent discussions, the notion of seeking a peace agreement rather than a ceasefire reflects a strategy that could potentially favor Russia's territorial ambitions in Ukraine. The proposal to formalize Russian control over eastern regions in exchange for a cessation of hostilities undermines Ukraine's sovereignty and risks legitimizing aggressive expansionism. In rejecting the idea of a ceasefire, Trump echoes a sentiment that has been criticized by Zelensky and European leaders, who fear that such an approach plays into Putin's hands, allowing him to regroup and strengthen his position. For Americans, it is imperative to challenge this narrative by emphasizing the importance of supporting Ukraine's right to defend its territory and the need for a robust international response to Russian aggression.
In light of this complex situation, what can Americans do to influence the discourse surrounding U.S. foreign policy? Firstly, it is essential to engage in informed discussions that advocate for a diplomatic framework prioritizing human rights, sovereignty, and international law. This includes calling for continued military and humanitarian support for Ukraine, while also pushing for a multilateral approach that involves European allies in shaping the response to Russian aggression. Grassroots movements and advocacy groups can mobilize public support for policies that emphasize diplomacy, accountability, and the protection of democratic values. By fostering conversations that highlight the consequences of appeasement and the necessity of a united front against authoritarianism, Americans can contribute to a more engaged and informed electorate.
Moreover, educational initiatives play a crucial role in shaping public understanding of the complexities of international conflicts. Promoting awareness about the history of U.S.-Russia relations, the implications of foreign policy decisions, and the significance of international alliances can empower citizens to take an active role in advocacy. Workshops, community discussions, and leveraging social media platforms can serve as valuable tools for disseminating information and encouraging civic engagement. By equipping themselves and their communities with knowledge, Americans can better articulate their positions and challenge narratives that undermine the principles of democracy and self-determination.
In conclusion, the evolving situation in Ukraine and the shifting dynamics of international diplomacy necessitate a thoughtful and engaged response from Americans. By examining the historical context, advocating for a cohesive strategy that respects Ukraine's sovereignty, and fostering educational initiatives, citizens can play a pivotal role in shaping the future of U.S. foreign policy. As the world watches the unfolding events, it is crucial for Americans to stand firmly in support of democratic values and to resist the normalization of aggression. Engaging in constructive dialogue and advocating for principled action not only benefits Ukraine but also reinforces the broader struggle for justice and human rights on a global scale.
In light of the recent geopolitical developments regarding Ukraine, here are several actionable steps that individuals can take to advocate for a peaceful resolution to the conflict, support Ukraine, and hold leaders accountable for their decisions.
### What Can We Personally Do About This?
1. **Educate Yourself and Others**: Stay informed about the situation in Ukraine, the implications of international diplomacy, and the nuances of the conflict. Share your knowledge with friends, family, and your local community.
2. **Engage with Local Representatives**: Reach out to your elected officials and express your stance on the conflict, emphasizing the need for a robust, principled approach to support Ukraine and seek a genuine peace process.
3. **Support Humanitarian Aid**: Contribute to or volunteer for organizations providing humanitarian assistance to those affected by the war in Ukraine. This can include food, shelter, medical care, and support for refugees.
4. **Participate in Peaceful Protests and Rallies**: Join or organize events that advocate for peace in Ukraine and support for Ukrainian sovereignty.
### Exact Actions to Take
#### 1. **Contact Elected Officials**
- **What to Say**: Express your support for Ukraine and urge your representatives to prioritize diplomatic efforts that respect Ukraine's sovereignty. Advocate for humanitarian assistance and oppose any measures that might undermine Ukraine's territorial integrity. - **Who to Write**: - **Your U.S. Senators**: Use the [U.S. Senate website](https://www.senate.gov/senators/senators-contact.htm) to find their contact information. - **Your U.S. Representative**: Use the [House of Representatives website](https://www.house.gov/representatives/find-your-representative) to find their contact information. - **Example Message**: ``` Dear [Senator/Representative Name],
I am writing to express my deep concern regarding the ongoing conflict in Ukraine and the recent statements made by former President Trump regarding potential peace negotiations. It is imperative that the U.S. continues to support Ukraine's sovereignty and territorial integrity.
I urge you to advocate for a strong diplomatic stance that prioritizes a just peace and supports humanitarian efforts for those affected by the war. It is essential that we stand with our allies and ensure that any negotiations respect the rights and wishes of the Ukrainian people.
Thank you for your attention to this critical matter.
Sincerely, [Your Name] [Your Address] [Your Email] ```
#### 2. **Petitions and Advocacy Groups**
- **Sign Petitions**: - **Change.org**: Search for petitions related to Ukraine that call for increased support and humanitarian aid. You can also create your own petition to gather support for specific actions. - **Example Petition**: "Support Ukraine's Right to Sovereignty and Territorial Integrity" on platforms like Change.org.
- **Contact Organizations**: Reach out to organizations like: - **Ukrainian Congress Committee of America**: info@uccdc.org - **Human Rights Watch**: hrw.org/contact
#### 3. **Support Humanitarian Initiatives**
- **Donate or Volunteer**: Contribute to organizations like: - **GlobalGiving**: Provides direct support to Ukrainian humanitarian efforts. Visit their website to donate. - **UNHCR (United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees)**: Support refugee assistance efforts by donating on their website.
- **Community Fundraisers**: Organize or participate in local events to raise funds for Ukraine. This could include bake sales, charity runs, or benefit concerts.
#### 4. **Participate in Local Advocacy and Awareness Campaigns**
- **Host Informational Sessions**: Organize community discussions or webinars with experts on the Ukraine situation to raise awareness and mobilize support.
- **Join Advocacy Groups**: Connect with local chapters of national organizations that focus on foreign policy and humanitarian aid, such as: - **Amnesty International**: https://www.amnesty.org/ - **Peace Action**: https://peaceaction.org/
By taking these steps, individuals can contribute to the dialogue surrounding the conflict in Ukraine, advocate for a principled approach to peace, and support those in need during this difficult time.