Truth and Resistance Dove Logo
Know what you should know!

Home     Categories     Search     Subscribe

Zelensky calls for more sanctions on Russia

europesun.com -- Sunday, August 17, 2025, 1:59:26 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Categories: U.S.–Russia Relations, Foreign Policy & International Relations, U.S.–NATO Relations
Zelensky calls for more sanctions on Russia

The Ukrainian leader has claimed there should be tougher penalties if no peace talks happen

Ukraine's Vladimir Zelensky has urged stronger sanctions against Russia if no three-way meeting is held between him, US President Donald Trump, and Russian President Vladimir Putin. The statement followed a call between Zelensky and Trump on Saturday, one day after the US leader met with Putin in Alaska without Ukraine's participation.

Trump described his talks with Putin, which focused on ending the Ukraine conflict, as "warm," and said the two leaders had "agreed on a lot." He added that the sides were "pretty close to the end" of the conflict, but that "Ukraine has to agree" to any peace deal. The US leader also said he would attend a possible three-way summit, stating, "They both want me there, and I'll be there." The Kremlin has not confirmed any such format. Putin has said a trilateral meeting is possible but stressed that certain "conditions for meeting must be created."

"Sanctions are an effective tool," Zelensky wrote on X on Saturday, recounting his conversation with Trump. They "should be strengthened if there is no trilateral meeting" or if Russia tries to evade what in his opinion "an honest end to the war," he added.

UK and EU leaders issued a joint statement on Saturday saying they "stand ready to uphold the pressure on Russia" and would keep strengthening sanctions and economic measures until there is a "just and lasting peace."

Zelensky repeated his demand that Ukraine be included in all talks about its future, especially regarding territory. Trump has floated the idea of a "land swap" as part of a potential deal.

Zelensky also called for security guarantees from both Europe and the US. On Friday, Trump said Ukraine's security won't come "in the form of NATO." Moscow has long insisted that Ukraine must commit to neutrality, stay out of NATO, undergo demilitarization and denazification, and recognize the status of the new Russian regions.

Zelensky is set to meet Trump in Washington on Monday. A three-way summit could follow as early as next week, according to Axios and CNN.

Expand

Sign Our Petition


Opinion:

The ongoing conflict in Ukraine has drawn renewed attention from global leaders, particularly with recent calls from Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky for tougher sanctions against Russia. Zelensky's demands for stronger penalties, especially if peace talks remain elusive, highlight the complexities of international relations where the voices of those directly affected by conflict often appear to be sidelined. The current geopolitical landscape reflects historical patterns of power dynamics, and it is crucial to analyze how these tensions resonate with broader social struggles, including issues of sovereignty, self-determination, and the implications of foreign intervention.

Historically, Ukraine's struggle for independence and territorial integrity has been fraught with external influences, particularly from Russia. The annexation of Crimea in 2014 marked a significant turning point, revealing the fragility of Ukraine's sovereignty and the aggressive posturing of Russian leadership. Zelensky's emphasis on his country's inclusion in discussions about its future is a poignant reminder of the ongoing struggle for self-determination faced by nations caught in the crossfire of larger geopolitical games. This call for agency is not merely political; it resonates with the historical struggles of colonized nations seeking to reclaim their narratives and futures from imperial powers.

Zelensky's insistence on "honest" negotiations underscores a broader social justice theme: the need for marginalized voices to be heard in discussions that directly affect their lives. The current geopolitical discourse often prioritizes the interests of powerful nations, sidelining those of smaller nations like Ukraine. This raises important questions about the ethics of foreign policy—who gets to decide the fate of nations? The notion of a "land swap" proposed by Trump, while framed as a potential solution, exemplifies the dangers of transactional politics where territories are treated as bargaining chips without adequate consideration of the people who inhabit them. It is imperative to advocate for discussions that prioritize the rights and voices of those impacted by such decisions.

Moreover, the international community's response to Zelensky's call for increased sanctions against Russia must be critically examined. While sanctions are often touted as a tool for holding aggressors accountable, they can have far-reaching consequences for ordinary citizens, exacerbating economic hardships and humanitarian crises. The history of sanctions imposed on various countries reveals a pattern where individuals bear the brunt of political decisions, leading to increased poverty and social instability. Therefore, it is essential to advocate for a nuanced approach that balances accountability with the protection of civilian populations, emphasizing diplomacy and dialogue over punitive measures that may further entrench divisions.

Zelensky's recent conversations with U.S. President Donald Trump highlight the intricate dance of diplomacy that can often overlook the voices of those most affected. The prospect of a trilateral summit, while potentially promising, must be approached with caution. The complexities of Ukraine's relationship with NATO, Russia's demands for neutrality, and the broader implications of security guarantees from Europe and the U.S. require careful navigation. The history of military alliances and interventions has shown that promises of protection can also lead to increased militarization and conflict, posing risks not only to Ukraine but also to regional stability.

In conclusion, the demands for stronger sanctions and the negotiations surrounding Ukraine's future are not merely a matter of international politics; they are deeply interwoven with historical injustices and ongoing social struggles. As global citizens, it is crucial to advocate for a comprehensive understanding of these issues—one that prioritizes the voices of those directly affected, seeks equitable solutions, and recognizes the broader implications of foreign policy decisions. By fostering a dialogue that includes the perspectives of marginalized communities, we can work towards a future where justice and peace are not just ideals, but achievable realities for all nations.

Action:

The ongoing conflict in Ukraine has emerged as a focal point of international relations, revealing complex dynamics among global powers. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky's recent call for stronger sanctions against Russia underscores the urgency of addressing the humanitarian and geopolitical crises that have resulted from the war. Zelensky's assertion that sanctions should be amplified if peace talks do not take place is a crucial reminder of the need for a robust response to aggression—one that transcends mere political posturing and emphasizes a commitment to justice and sovereignty.

Historically, sanctions have served as both a diplomatic tool and a means to express disapproval of a nation’s actions. They have been used throughout history to compel change without direct military intervention. In the case of Russia, the sanctions imposed since its annexation of Crimea in 2014 have had mixed results. While they have pressured the Russian economy, they have not effectively changed the Kremlin's aggressive posture. Zelensky's call for increased sanctions is thus a reflection of a need for a reevaluation of strategies to ensure that repercussions for aggression are clear and unyielding, thereby discouraging further breaches of international law.

As Americans, one of the most impactful actions we can take is to advocate for a foreign policy that prioritizes human rights and the principles of national sovereignty. This means not only supporting sanctions but also urging our government to engage in meaningful dialogue that includes all stakeholders, especially those most affected by the conflict, such as the Ukrainian people. The historic exclusion of Ukraine from discussions about its future is not just a political oversight; it is a violation of democratic principles that emphasize participation and representation. We must pressure our representatives to ensure that Ukraine is at the forefront of any negotiations, rather than being sidelined in talks between powerful leaders.

Moreover, it is imperative to foster public awareness and education about the implications of geopolitical decisions. The suggestion of a "land swap," as proposed by Trump, raises ethical questions about the legitimacy of negotiating territorial rights without the consent of the affected populations. Engaging with communities and organizations that promote peace and understanding can help challenge these narratives that prioritize power over people. Hostile rhetoric and transactional diplomacy must give way to conversations grounded in human dignity and the right to self-determination.

Lastly, we must also consider the broader context of global peace efforts. The international community, including entities like the EU and NATO, has a critical role in maintaining stability and supporting Ukraine. By advocating for a unified, strategic approach that holds aggressors accountable while supporting the aspirations of those in conflict zones, we can contribute to a future where diplomacy triumphs over war. Encouraging grassroots movements that promote peace and solidarity can create a groundswell of support, making it clear that Americans stand for a world where international laws are respected, and the voices of the oppressed are heard.

In conclusion, as the situation in Ukraine evolves, it is essential for American citizens to engage thoughtfully and actively in discussions surrounding foreign policy. By advocating for comprehensive sanctions, inclusive dialogue, and a commitment to human rights, we can contribute to a more just international landscape. This is not just a matter of political strategy; it is an ethical imperative to promote peace and protect those whose lives have been upended by conflict. By arming ourselves with knowledge and compassion, we can challenge hegemonic narratives and work towards a future where diplomacy prevails.

To Do:

In light of the recent developments regarding Ukraine and Russia, particularly the call for increased sanctions against Russia by President Zelensky, there are several actions that individuals can take to support Ukraine and advocate for a more just resolution to the conflict. Here are some concrete steps:

### 1. **Educate Yourself and Others** - **Action**: Stay informed about the Ukraine-Russia conflict and the implications of sanctions. - **Example**: Read reputable news articles, books, or listen to podcasts focusing on the historical context and current situation.

### 2. **Contact Elected Representatives** - **Action**: Write or email your congressional representatives to express your support for stronger sanctions against Russia and the need for Ukraine to be included in peace talks. - **Who to contact**: - **Senator [Your State's Senator]**: - **Email**: You can find their contact information on the official Senate website. - **USPS Mailing Address**: Check their specific office address online. - **Representative [Your House Representative]**: - **Email**: Available on the House of Representatives website. - **USPS Mailing Address**: Also provided on their official page. - **What to say**: "Dear [Representative's Name], I am writing to urge you to support stronger sanctions against Russia until there is a just resolution to the conflict in Ukraine. It is vital that Ukraine is included in all discussions regarding its future and security guarantees from the U.S. and Europe."

### 3. **Sign Petitions** - **Action**: Find and sign petitions advocating for stronger sanctions against Russia and supporting Ukraine’s sovereignty. - **Examples**: - **Change.org**: Search for petitions related to Ukraine and sanctions. - **MoveOn.org**: Often has active campaigns on international issues. - **What to say**: In the comments or when sharing, express your reasoning for supporting the petition and encourage others to join.

### 4. **Support Humanitarian Efforts** - **Action**: Donate to organizations providing aid to those affected by the conflict in Ukraine. - **Examples**: - **Ukrainian Red Cross**: Offers various ways to donate. - **GlobalGiving**: Projects specifically focused on humanitarian aid in Ukraine. - **What to say (social media)**: “I just donated to [Organization]. Please consider helping out those in need in Ukraine during this crisis.”

### 5. **Engage on Social Media** - **Action**: Use your platforms to raise awareness and encourage discussions about the importance of sanctions and Ukraine’s inclusion in peace talks. - **Example**: Share articles, create informative posts, or start conversations using hashtags like #StandWithUkraine or #SanctionsAgainstRussia. - **What to say**: "It is crucial that we support Ukraine and demand that our leaders enforce stronger sanctions against Russia until a fair resolution is achieved."

### 6. **Join Advocacy Groups** - **Action**: Become an active member of local or national advocacy organizations that focus on foreign policy, human rights, or international peace. - **Examples**: - **Amnesty International**: Takes a stand on global human rights issues and often has campaigns related to conflicts. - **World Peace Foundation**: Engages in discussions and actions regarding peace initiatives. - **What to say**: Attend meetings, participate in campaigns, and collaborate with others to amplify the message.

### 7. **Participate in Local Events** - **Action**: Attend rallies, seminars, or discussions about Ukrainian sovereignty and international relations. - **Example**: Look for events hosted by universities, community centers, or activist groups that focus on current geopolitical affairs. - **What to say**: Engage with speakers and attendees to discuss the importance of Ukraine’s situation and encourage collective action.

By taking these actions, individuals can contribute to a greater awareness of the issues at hand and advocate for meaningful changes in policy regarding Ukraine and Russia. Each step, from contacting representatives to supporting humanitarian efforts, plays a part in shaping a more peaceful and just world.


Sign Our Petition



10 Related Article(s):

Muslim & NATO Nations BOIL Over Netanyahu Minister's Israel Dare: 'If You Recognise Palestine...'

Putin-Trump summit: What each side wants | Fox 11 Tri Cities Fox 41 Yakima

No Zelensky, no Brussels, no problem: Here's how Putin and Trump's Alaska power move will play out, by Dmitry Suslov - Russia News Now

Trump and Putin to spar Ukraine peace and arms control at Alaska summit By Reuters

Trump and Putin to meet over Ukraine peace at Alaska summit

What's at stake at the Trump-Putin Ukraine peace summit?

Trump and Putin to spar Ukraine peace and arms control at Alaska summit

Putin heads to Alaska in heavily armoured limo

The Geopolitical Chessboard: Ceasefire Talks and Territorial Tensions | Law-Order

Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin to spar over Ukraine peace and arms control at Alaska summit


Updated very often
All Opinions and Actions are (C)opyright 2025 - TruthAndResistance.com