In Trump's redistricting push, Democrats find an aggressive identity and progressives are on board | Chattanooga Times Free Press
timesfreepress.com -- Saturday, August 16, 2025, 8:15:48 PM Eastern Daylight Time
Categories: State Politics & Governors, Republican Party Politics, Public Opinion & Polling
ATLANTA (AP) -- Fight! Fight! Fight!
It's not just Donald Trump's mantra anymore. As the Republican president pushes states to redraw their congressional districts to the GOP's advantage, Democrats have shown they are willing to go beyond words of outrage and use whatever power they do have to win.
Democrats in the Texas Legislature started it off by delaying, for now, Republican efforts to expand the GOP majority in the state's delegation and help preserve party control of the U.S. House through new districts in time for the 2026 midterm elections.
Then multiple Democratic governors promised new districts in their own states to neutralize potential Republican gains in Washington. Their counter has been buoyed by national fundraising, media blitzes and public demonstrations, including rallies scheduled around the country Saturday.
"For everyone that's been asking, 'Where are the Democrats?' -- well, here they are," said U.S. Rep. Jasmine Crockett of Texas, one of several Democrats who could be ousted under her state's new maps. "For everyone who's been asking, 'Where is the fight?' - well, here it is."
There is no guarantee Democrats can prevent the Republican-powered redistricting, just as Democrats on Capitol Hill have not been able to stop Trump's moves. But it's a notable turn for a party that, by its own leaders' admissions, has honored conventional rules and bypassed bare-knuckled tactics.
So far, progressive and establishment Democrats are aligned, uniting what has often been a fragmented opposition since Republicans led by Trump took control of the federal government with their election sweep in November. Leaders on the left say the approach gives them a more effective way to confront him. They can challenge his redistricting ploy with tangible moves as they also push back against the Republicans' tax and spending law and press the case that he is shredding American democracy.
"We've been imploring Democrats where they have power on the state and local level to flex that power," said Maurice Mitchell, who leads the Working Families Party at the left flank of mainstream U.S. politics. "There's been this overwrought talk about fighters and largely performative actions to suggest that they're in the fight."
This time, he said, Democrats are "taking real risks in protecting all of our rights" against "an authoritarian president who only understands the fight."
Pairing fiery talk with action
Texas made sense for Republicans as the place to start a redistricting scuffle. They dominate the Statehouse, and Gov. Greg Abbott is a Trump loyalist.
But when the president's allies announced a new political map intended to send five more Republicans to the U.S. House, state Democratic representatives fled Texas, denying the GOP the numbers to conduct business in the Legislature and approve the reworked districts.
Those legislators surfaced in Illinois, New York, California and elsewhere, joined by governors, senators, state party chairs, other states' legislators and activists. All promised action. The response was Trumpian.
Govs. Gavin Newsom of California, JB Pritzker of Illinois and Kathy Hochul of New York welcomed Texas Democrats and pledged retaliatory redistricting. Pritzker mocked Abbott as a lackey who says "yes, sir" to Trump orders. Hochul dismissed Texas Republicans as "lawbreaking cowboys." Newsom's press office directed all-caps social media posts at Trump, mimicking his signature sign off: "THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER."
U.S. Rep. Al Green, another Texas Democrat who could lose his seat, called Trump "egomaniacal." Yet many Democrats also claimed moral high ground, comparing their cause to the Civil Rights Movement.
State Rep. Ramon Romero Jr., invoked another Texas Democrat, President Lyndon Johnson, who was "willing to stand up and fight" for civil rights laws in the 1960s. Then, with Texas bravado, Romero reached further into history: "We're asking for help, maybe just as they did back in the days of the Alamo."
'Whatever it takes'
A recent Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research poll found that about 15% of Democrats' own voters described the party using words like "weak" or "apathetic." An additional 10% called it "ineffective" or "disorganized."
Beto O'Rourke, a former Texas congressman who is raising money to support Texas Democrats, has encouraged Democratic-run statehouses to redraw districts now rather than wait for GOP states to act. On Friday, California Democrats released a plan that would give the party an additional five U.S. House seats. It would require voter approval in a November election.
"Maximize Democratic Party advantage," O'Rourke said at a recent rally. "You may say to yourself, 'Well, those aren't the rules.' There are no refs in this game. F--- the rules. ... Whatever it takes."
Democratic National Committee Chairman Ken Martin acknowledged the shift.
"This is not the Democratic Party of your grandfather, which would bring a pencil to a knife fight," he said.
Andrew O'Neill, an executive at the progressive group Indivisible, contrasted that response with the record-long speeches by U.S. Sen. Cory Booker, D-N.J. and the Democratic leader of the U.S. House, New York Rep. Hakeem Jeffries, in eviscerating Trump and his package of tax breaks and spending cuts. The left "had its hair on fire" cheering those moments, O'Neill recalled, but were "left even more frustrated in the aftermath."
Trump still secured tax cuts for the wealthy, accelerated deportations and cut safety net programs, just as some of his controversial nominees were confirmed over vocal Democratic opposition.
"Now," O'Neill said, "there is some marriage of the rhetoric we've been seeing since Trump's inauguration with some actual action."
O'Neill looked back wistfully to the decision by Senate Democrats not to eliminate the filibuster "when our side had the trifecta," so a simple majority could pass major legislation. Democratic President Joe Biden's attorney general, Merrick Garland, he said, was too timid in prosecuting Trump and top associates over the Capitol riot.
In 2016, Democratic President Barack Obama opted against hardball as the Senate's Republican leader, Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, refused to consider Obama's nomination of Garland to the Supreme Court.
"These unspoken rules of propriety, especially on the Democratic side, have created the conditions" that enabled Trump, Mitchell said.
Fighting on all fronts
Even on redistricting, Democrats would have to ignore their previous good-government efforts and bypass independent commissions that draw boundaries in several states, including California.
Party leaders and activists rationalize that the broader fights tie together piecemeal skirmishes that may not, by themselves, sway voters.
Arguing that Trump diminishes democracy stirs people who already support Democrats, O'Neill said. By contrast, he said, the GOP "power grab," can be connected to unpopular policies that affect voters' lives.
Green noted that Trump's big package bill cleared the Senate "by one vote" and the House by a few, demonstrating why redistricting matters.
U.S. Rep. Greg Casar of Texas said Democrats must make unseemly, short-term power plays so they can later pass legislation that "bans gerrymandering nationwide ... bans super PACs (political action committees) and gets rid of that kind of big money and special interest that helped get us to this place." U.S. Rep. Lloyd Doggett, D-Texas, added that a Democratic majority would wield subpoena power over Trump's administration.
In the meantime, said U.S. Rep. Julie Johnson, D-Texas, voters are grasping a stark reality.
"They say, 'Well, I don't know. Politics doesn't affect me,'" she said of constituents she meets. "I say, 'Honey, it does' If you don't do politics, politics will do you.'"
Sign Our PetitionThe recent article from the Chattanooga Times Free Press highlights a significant moment in the ongoing political struggle over redistricting and the broader implications for American democracy. The aggressive tactics employed by the Republican Party under Donald Trump's direction to redraw congressional districts in their favor underscore the stakes involved in such maneuvers—not only for party power dynamics but for the fundamental principles of representation and fairness in the electoral process. As we analyze these developments, it is essential to connect them to a historical context of gerrymandering and political strategy, as well as to understand the implications for social justice and democratic integrity.
Historically, gerrymandering has been a tool employed by both major parties, often leading to the entrenchment of incumbents and the dilution of voter power. This practice dates back to the early 19th century when Elbridge Gerry, a Massachusetts governor, signed a bill that created oddly shaped districts to benefit his party. Over the years, the manipulation of district boundaries has evolved into a sophisticated strategy, often disproportionately impacting communities of color and marginalized groups. The current Republican push for redistricting is not merely an attempt to enhance electoral prospects; it is a continuation of a long-standing practice that threatens the democratic principle of equal representation. This historical backdrop is vital for understanding why the Democratic response, as highlighted in the article, is seen as a necessary and urgent countermeasure.
The article points to a notable shift within the Democratic Party, where leaders have begun to embrace a more confrontational approach to counteract Republican dominance. This shift is significant, particularly in light of recent political history where Democrats have often prioritized bipartisanship and adherence to established norms. The collaborative efforts between progressive and establishment Democrats in Texas to thwart GOP redistricting efforts represent a critical turning point. As U.S. Rep. Jasmine Crockett and others have noted, this newfound willingness to fight back denotes a departure from the passivity that has characterized much of the party's recent behavior. It signals an understanding that in an era marked by increasing polarization and authoritarian tendencies, a robust and united opposition is essential to safeguard democratic values.
Furthermore, the response from Democratic leaders is also indicative of a broader awakening among progressives who have long felt that the party needed to take bolder actions. The call from figures like Maurice Mitchell of the Working Families Party for Democrats to "flex that power" reflects a growing recognition that the stakes of political engagement extend beyond winning elections; they encompass the protection of civil rights and the preservation of democratic institutions. This aligns with ongoing social struggles, particularly those related to voting rights, which have come under intense scrutiny in recent years. The fight against voter suppression tactics, often employed by Republicans under the guise of "election integrity," is a crucial battleground where redistricting plays a pivotal role.
Moreover, the situation in Texas serves as a microcosm of the broader national struggle to uphold democratic norms. The state's Democratic representatives' decision to flee the session to deny Republicans a quorum is a dramatic act of resistance that underscores the lengths to which elected officials must go to protect their constituents' rights. This is reminiscent of historic acts of civil disobedience and defiance against unjust laws. It illustrates a critical lesson in political strategy: that sometimes, the most effective means of resistance is not merely to voice dissent but to take decisive action that disrupts the status quo. The ongoing protests and public demonstrations scheduled in response to these redistricting efforts are a testament to the grassroots mobilization necessary for meaningful political change.
In conclusion, the current battle over redistricting is more than a political chess game; it is a fundamental struggle for the future of American democracy. The aggressive tactics employed by the Republican Party, coupled with the Democratic response, highlight the urgent need to confront systemic injustices that threaten equitable representation. As the Democratic Party unites to push back against these maneuvers, it is crucial for supporters to recognize the broader implications for social justice and democratic governance. The lessons drawn from this moment remind us that active engagement, solidarity across factions, and unwavering commitment to democratic principles are essential in the fight for a more just society. Understanding these dynamics equips us with the tools necessary to engage in meaningful discussions about the future of our democracy with those who may hold differing views.
The current political landscape in the United States is characterized by an escalating battle over redistricting, with the stakes higher than ever. As described in the article, the Republican Party, emboldened by the Trump administration, is aggressively pursuing a strategy of redrawing congressional districts to solidify its power. However, what stands out is the response from Democrats, particularly at the state level, who are beginning to adopt a more combative stance against these maneuvers. This shift represents not only a tactical evolution for the party but also a larger reflection of the increasing polarization in American politics, where traditional norms are being challenged.
Historically, redistricting has been a tool for both parties, but the current climate has intensified the urgency and stakes involved. The GOP's approach is reminiscent of past strategies where parties in power have sought to manipulate district lines to their advantage, often referred to as gerrymandering. This practice undermines the democratic principle of fair representation, as it allows those in power to choose their voters instead of the other way around. The Democrats' recognition of this threat and their willingness to counteract it marks a significant departure from their previous, more passive approach to such tactics. The alignment of progressive and establishment Democrats indicates a rare moment of unity in a party that has often struggled to find common ground.
As Americans concerned about the integrity of democracy, we must engage actively in this redistricting fight. First and foremost, advocacy for independent redistricting commissions is crucial. These commissions, which take the power of drawing district lines away from partisan legislatures, have been shown to create fairer electoral maps. Citizens can pressure their state legislators to adopt such measures, emphasizing that fair representation is a fundamental right. Furthermore, grassroots organizing plays a pivotal role. Community members can mobilize, participate in town halls, and educate their neighbors about the implications of gerrymandering and the importance of equitable representation.
Moreover, political engagement should extend beyond advocacy for fair redistricting. As highlighted by figures like Maurice Mitchell, it is essential for citizens to support candidates who demonstrate a willingness to fight for democratic principles and who prioritize the rights of all constituents over partisan gain. Voter education is paramount, as many citizens remain unaware of how redistricting affects their political power and representation. Initiatives to inform voters about their rights and the implications of districting can empower them to take action, whether through voting, petitioning, or even running for office themselves.
In addition, supporting organizations focused on electoral reform can amplify our collective voices. Groups that challenge gerrymandering and advocate for democratic reforms are critical allies in this fight. Donations, volunteer work, and participation in their initiatives can contribute to a more robust movement against the entrenched powers that seek to undermine democracy. We must also hold elected officials accountable, demanding transparency and integrity in the redistricting process and beyond. Engaging in conversations with those who may hold differing political views can foster understanding and a shared commitment to democratic ideals, which can transcend partisan lines.
Ultimately, the redistricting battle is not merely a fight over political maps; it is a fight for the very soul of American democracy. As citizens, we have a responsibility to confront these challenges head-on. By advocating for fair representation, engaging in grassroots organizing, supporting electoral reform, and fostering a culture of accountability, we can ensure that democracy is not just preserved but strengthened. In doing so, we can create a political landscape that reflects the will of the people rather than the interests of a select few, thus laying the groundwork for a more just and equitable society.
In light of the ongoing redistricting battle and the necessary mobilization to combat unfair practices, there are several concrete actions individuals can take to support fair representation and political accountability. Here’s a detailed list of ideas for personal involvement:
### Personal Actions to Take
1. **Engage in Local Politics:** - Attend local city council meetings or state legislature sessions to voice your concerns about redistricting. - Connect with local representatives to express your support for fair districting practices.
2. **Join Local Advocacy Groups:** - Become involved with organizations that focus on voting rights and fair representation, such as the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) or the League of Women Voters.
3. **Participate in Rallies and Demonstrations:** - Take part in organized rallies opposing gerrymandering and advocate for fair voting practices. Look for local events through social media platforms or community boards.
### Specific Actions
1. **Petitions:** - Start or sign petitions advocating for independent redistricting commissions. Websites like Change.org or MoveOn.org often have petitions you can join. - Example petition: “Support Fair Redistricting in [Your State]” - Share it widely on social media to gather signatures. 2. **Writing to Elected Officials:** - **State Legislators:** - Identify your state representatives using the National Association of Secretaries of State website. - Write a letter or email expressing your stance on redistricting. - Example: - "Dear [Representative’s Name], I am writing to urge you to support fair and transparent redistricting processes that prioritize the voices of all constituents over partisan politics." - **Example Contacts:** - [Representative Name] - [State House/Senate] - Email: [Insert Email Address] - Mailing Address: [Insert USPS Address]
3. **Advocate for Policy Changes:** - Write to governors and state officials urging them to establish independent commissions for redistricting. - Example letters can be sent to governors who might be open to reform, such as: - Governor [Name] - Office of the Governor - Email: [Insert Email Address] - Mailing Address: [Insert USPS Address]
4. **Utilize Social Media:** - Use platforms like Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram to raise awareness about gerrymandering and redistricting issues. Share educational resources and events related to voting rights. - Create a hashtag campaign to draw attention to the issue, e.g., #FairDistrictsNow.
5. **Educate Yourself and Others:** - Attend workshops, webinars, or community events focused on understanding gerrymandering and activism for voting rights. - Share articles, videos, and other resources to educate your community on the importance of fair representation.
6. **Support Progressive Candidates:** - Contribute to or volunteer for candidates who prioritize fair redistricting and voting rights. Platforms like ActBlue can help you donate to progressive campaigns.
7. **Collaborate with Local Media:** - Write op-eds or letters to the editor for your local newspaper addressing the importance of fair districting and how it affects your community.
### What to Say
- **In Letters/Emails:** - Clearly state your position on redistricting and why it matters to you and your community. - Emphasize the importance of fair representation and protecting democratic ideals.
- **In Conversations:** - Advocate for collective action and the need for transparency in the redistricting process. - Encourage friends and family to get involved and stay informed about local and national developments regarding redistricting.
By taking these actions, individuals can collectively push back against unfair redistricting practices and work towards a more equitable political landscape.