Democrats unite in effort to counter Trump's push for red-state redistricting
syracuse.com -- Sunday, August 17, 2025, 4:24:32 PM Eastern Daylight Time
Categories: State Politics & Governors, Republican Party Politics, Public Opinion & Polling
It's not just Donald Trump's mantra anymore. As the Republican president pushes states to redraw their congressional districts to the GOP's advantage, Democrats have shown they are willing to go beyond words of outrage and use whatever power they do have to win.
Democrats in the Texas Legislature started it off by delaying, for now, Republican efforts to expand the GOP majority in the state's delegation and help preserve party control of the U.S. House through new districts in time for the 2026 midterm elections.
Then multiple Democratic governors promised new districts in their own states to neutralize potential Republican gains in Washington. Their counter has been buoyed by national fundraising, media blitzes and public demonstrations, including rallies Saturday around the country.
"For everyone that's been asking, 'Where are the Democrats?' -- well, here they are," said U.S. Rep. Jasmine Crockett of Texas, one of several Democrats who could be ousted under her state's new maps. "For everyone who's been asking, 'Where is the fight?' - well, here it is."
There is no guarantee Democrats can prevent the Republican-powered redistricting, just as Democrats on Capitol Hill have not been able to stop Trump's moves. But it's a notable turn for a party that, by its own leaders' admissions, has honored conventional rules and bypassed bare-knuckled tactics.
So far, progressive and establishment Democrats are aligned, uniting what has often been a fragmented opposition since Republicans led by Trump took control of the federal government with their election sweep in November. Leaders on the left say the approach gives them a more effective way to confront him. They can challenge his redistricting ploy with tangible moves as they also push back against the Republicans' tax and spending law and press the case that he is shredding American democracy.
"We've been imploring Democrats where they have power on the state and local level to flex that power," said Maurice Mitchell, who leads the Working Families Party at the left flank of mainstream U.S. politics. "There's been this overwrought talk about fighters and largely performative actions to suggest that they're in the fight."
This time, he said, Democrats are "taking real risks in protecting all of our rights" against "an authoritarian president who only understands the fight."
Texas made sense for Republicans as the place to start a redistricting scuffle. They dominate the Statehouse, and Gov. Greg Abbott is a Trump loyalist.
But when the president's allies announced a new political map intended to send five more Republicans to the U.S. House, state Democratic representatives fled Texas, denying the GOP the numbers to conduct business in the Legislature and approve the reworked districts.
Those legislators surfaced in Illinois, New York, California and elsewhere, joined by governors, senators, state party chairs, other states' legislators and activists. All promised action. The response was Trumpian.
Govs. Gavin Newsom of California, JB Pritzker of Illinois and Kathy Hochul of New York welcomed Texas Democrats and pledged retaliatory redistricting. Pritzker mocked Abbott as a lackey who says "yes, sir" to Trump orders. Hochul dismissed Texas Republicans as "lawbreaking cowboys." Newsom's press office directed all-caps social media posts at Trump, mimicking his signature sign off: "THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER."
U.S. Rep. Al Green, another Texas Democrat who could lose his seat, called Trump "egomaniacal." Yet many Democrats also claimed moral high ground, comparing their cause to the Civil Rights Movement.
State Rep. Ramon Romero Jr., invoked another Texas Democrat, President Lyndon Johnson, who was "willing to stand up and fight" for civil rights laws in the 1960s. Then, with Texas bravado, Romero reached further into history: "We're asking for help, maybe just as they did back in the days of the Alamo."
A recent Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research poll found that about 15% of Democrats' own voters described the party using words like "weak" or "apathetic." An additional 10% called it "ineffective" or "disorganized."
Beto O'Rourke, a former Texas congressman who is raising money to support Texas Democrats, has encouraged Democratic-run statehouses to redraw districts now rather than wait for GOP states to act. On Friday, California Democrats released a plan that would give the party an additional five U.S. House seats. It would require voter approval in a November election.
"Maximize Democratic Party advantage," O'Rourke said at a recent rally. "You may say to yourself, 'Well, those aren't the rules.' There are no refs in this game. F--- the rules. ... Whatever it takes."
Democratic National Committee Chairman Ken Martin acknowledged the shift.
"This is not the Democratic Party of your grandfather, which would bring a pencil to a knife fight," he said.
Andrew O'Neill, an executive at the progressive group Indivisible, contrasted that response with the record-long speeches by U.S. Sen. Cory Booker, D-N.J. and the Democratic leader of the U.S. House, New York Rep. Hakeem Jeffries, in eviscerating Trump and his package of tax breaks and spending cuts. The left "had its hair on fire" cheering those moments, O'Neill recalled, but were "left even more frustrated in the aftermath."
Trump still secured tax cuts for the wealthy, accelerated deportations and cut safety net programs, just as some of his controversial nominees were confirmed over vocal Democratic opposition.
"Now," O'Neill said, "there is some marriage of the rhetoric we've been seeing since Trump's inauguration with some actual action."
O'Neill looked back wistfully to the decision by Senate Democrats not to eliminate the filibuster "when our side had the trifecta," so a simple majority could pass major legislation. Democratic President Joe Biden's attorney general, Merrick Garland, he said, was too timid in prosecuting Trump and top associates over the Capitol riot.
In 2016, Democratic President Barack Obama opted against hardball as the Senate's Republican leader, Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, refused to consider Obama's nomination of Garland to the Supreme Court.
"These unspoken rules of propriety, especially on the Democratic side, have created the conditions" that enabled Trump, Mitchell said.
Even on redistricting, Democrats would have to ignore their previous good-government efforts and bypass independent commissions that draw boundaries in several states, including California.
Party leaders and activists rationalize that the broader fights tie together piecemeal skirmishes that may not, by themselves, sway voters.
Arguing that Trump diminishes democracy stirs people who already support Democrats, O'Neill said. By contrast, he said, the GOP "power grab," can be connected to unpopular policies that affect voters' lives.
Green noted that Trump's big package bill cleared the Senate "by one vote" and the House by a few, demonstrating why redistricting matters.
U.S. Rep. Greg Casar of Texas said Democrats must make unseemly, short-term power plays so they can later pass legislation that "bans gerrymandering nationwide ... bans super PACs (political action committees) and gets rid of that kind of big money and special interest that helped get us to this place." U.S. Rep. Lloyd Doggett, D-Texas, added that a Democratic majority would wield subpoena power over Trump's administration.
In the meantime, said U.S. Rep. Julie Johnson, D-Texas, voters are grasping a stark reality.
"They say, 'Well, I don't know. Politics doesn't affect me,'" she said of constituents she meets. "I say, 'Honey, it does' If you don't do politics, politics will do you.'"
Sign Our PetitionThe ongoing battle over redistricting in the United States is a critical issue that underscores the intersection of political power, representation, and democratic integrity. The recent push by Donald Trump and his allies to redraw congressional districts in favor of the Republican Party exemplifies a larger trend of partisan gerrymandering that has plagued American democracy for decades. Historically, redistricting has often been a tool used by the party in power to entrench its influence, creating a landscape where electoral outcomes are predetermined by the manipulation of district boundaries. In this context, the Democrats' recent efforts to counteract these maneuvers represent not just a political response but a challenge to the very principles of fair representation and democratic engagement.
The Democratic response, particularly in Texas, reflects a renewed understanding among party leaders of the stakes involved in this redistricting fight. By delaying Republican efforts and mobilizing at the grassroots level, Democratic lawmakers are demonstrating a realization that passive resistance is insufficient in the face of aggressive partisan tactics. This is a significant shift from past strategies that emphasized decorum and adherence to procedural norms, often to the detriment of their political power. The decision by Texas Democrats to flee the state to deny a quorum signals a willingness to engage in direct action—a tactic that could become a model for other states facing similar challenges. This approach not only highlights the urgency of the moment but also connects to historical instances where civil disobedience and bold political maneuvers have been necessary to challenge entrenched systems of power.
The Democratic unity around this issue is particularly noteworthy, as it brings together factions within the party that have often been at odds. Progressives and establishment Democrats alike are recognizing that the preservation of democratic norms and the protection of voting rights require a collective effort. The call to action from leaders like Maurice Mitchell of the Working Families Party emphasizes the importance of not just rhetorical resistance but also tangible actions that can safeguard the rights of citizens. This aligns with ongoing social movements advocating for electoral reform, such as the push for ranked-choice voting and efforts to dismantle voter suppression tactics, which disproportionately affect marginalized communities. By framing the redistricting fight as a broader struggle for democracy, Democrats can galvanize support from a diverse coalition of voters who understand that political representation is intrinsically linked to social justice.
As Trump and his allies seek to manipulate the political landscape for partisan gain, it's essential to recognize that this battle is not merely about district maps but about who has a voice in the political process. The implications of gerrymandering extend far beyond congressional representation; they have profound effects on local governance, resource allocation, and community empowerment. When districts are drawn to favor one party over another, entire communities can be marginalized, their needs overlooked in favor of political expediency. This reality underscores the importance of advocating for independent redistricting commissions and other reforms that can help ensure that voters choose their representatives, rather than representatives choosing their voters.
Ultimately, the Democrats' recent actions in response to Trump's redistricting push serve as a reminder of the ongoing struggle for equitable representation in American democracy. As the political landscape evolves, it is crucial for progressives to remain vigilant and proactive in defending the rights of all citizens to have their voices heard. By framing this fight as a fundamental issue of social justice, Democrats can not only counter Republican strategies but also inspire a broader movement for systemic change. The stakes are high, and the path forward will require courage, creativity, and an unwavering commitment to the principles of democracy and equality that lie at the heart of the American political experiment.
The ongoing struggle over redistricting in the United States highlights the intensified battle for political power that has emerged in the wake of Donald Trump's presidency. The article illustrates how the Republican Party, emboldened by its control over many state legislatures, is pushing for redistricting that could further entrench their power in Congress. As Democrats rally to counteract this, it is crucial to understand the historical and political contexts that shape these tactics. The redistricting process, often referred to as gerrymandering, has long been a tool for parties to manipulate electoral outcomes to their advantage. However, the stakes have never been higher than now, with the potential for the redrawing of congressional districts to influence the balance of power in the nation for critical years to come.
Historically, the redistricting process is typically conducted every ten years following the census. However, the political maneuvering surrounding it has become increasingly contentious. Following the 2010 census, for instance, many Republican-led states executed aggressive redistricting efforts that allowed them to solidify their congressional majorities. In contrast, the Democrats often found themselves on the defensive, adhering to a more traditional view of electoral ethics that prioritized fair representation. This article highlights a significant shift in strategy as Democrats begin to embrace more aggressive tactics in their fight against the perceived authoritarianism of the Trump era. The unity within the party, as represented by figures like Rep. Jasmine Crockett and Maurice Mitchell of the Working Families Party, signals a readiness to challenge the status quo and advocate for a more equitable political landscape.
As Americans who value democratic principles and representation, it is vital to engage in these discussions and challenges at both local and national levels. First and foremost, individuals can empower themselves and others by advocating for transparency in the redistricting process. Support for independent redistricting commissions, which have been shown to create fairer district maps, can help mitigate partisan gerrymandering. Engaging in grassroots organizing, attending town halls, and communicating with state representatives about the importance of fair representation is essential. The recent mobilization of Democrats around the country demonstrates the power of collective action; citizens can replicate this by attending rallies, joining advocacy groups, or even running for local office.
Moreover, educating ourselves and our communities about the implications of redistricting is crucial. Understanding how district lines can influence policy decisions, resource allocation, and community representation can motivate more people to take action. Conversations that highlight the historical context of gerrymandering and its impact on marginalized communities can foster a deeper understanding of the stakes involved. By framing the narrative around the fight for fair representation, it becomes easier to challenge the justifications provided by those who support partisan redistricting efforts. We can work to dispel the myth that this is merely a political game; rather, it is a fundamental issue of democratic integrity that affects every American.
Furthermore, as the article suggests, the potential for collaboration between progressive and establishment Democrats may pave the way for broader coalitions aimed at countering the Republican agenda. This unity can serve as a model for how diverse groups within the political spectrum can come together around shared values and goals. Encouraging open dialogue among different factions can lead to innovative strategies for confronting challenges, thereby strengthening the overall movement for democratic reform. It is essential to recognize that this fight is not just about party politics; it is about safeguarding the democratic rights of all citizens.
In conclusion, the redistricting battle exemplifies the larger ideological struggle occurring within American politics. As Republicans leverage their power to redraw district lines in their favor, Democrats are finally rising to the challenge by utilizing their own influence where possible. For citizens, understanding the gravity of this moment and taking action is critical. Whether through advocacy, education, or coalition-building, it is essential to engage in the fight for fair representation and democracy in the face of a political environment that increasingly rewards authoritarian tactics. The call to action is clear: we must stand firm and united in our commitment to a more just and equitable political system for all.
To effectively address the current situation surrounding redistricting efforts and the broader political landscape, individuals can take several concrete actions. Here’s a detailed list of ideas to mobilize personal efforts that can contribute to a more equitable political system.
### 1. **Engage in Local Politics** - **Attend Town Hall Meetings**: Participate in local town halls to voice your concerns about redistricting and to encourage local representatives to prioritize fair mapping. - **Join Local Advocacy Groups**: Connect with organizations focused on voting rights and fair representation, such as the League of Women Voters.
### 2. **Petition for Fair Redistricting** - **Start or Sign Petitions**: Use platforms like Change.org or MoveOn.org to start or sign petitions advocating for independent redistricting commissions. - **Example Petition**: Search for petitions related to redistricting in your state on these platforms and sign them. - **Organize a Petition Drive**: Gather signatures in your community to show support for fair redistricting processes.
### 3. **Contact Elected Officials** - **Write to State Legislators**: Express your concern about redistricting efforts that may favor one party over another. Here’s how to reach out: - **For Texas**: - **Governor Greg Abbott** - Email: [contact@governor.state.tx.us](mailto:contact@governor.state.tx.us) - Mailing Address: Office of the Governor, P.O. Box 12428, Austin, TX 78711-2428 - **State Senator or Representative**: Find your local representatives through [Texas Legislature Online](https://capitol.texas.gov/). - **Example Message**: ``` Dear [Representative's Name], I am writing to express my concern regarding the ongoing redistricting efforts in Texas. I urge you to prioritize fair and equitable mapping that represents all constituents, rather than manipulating districts for political gain. Thank you for your attention to this critical issue. Sincerely, [Your Name] [Your Address] ```
### 4. **Participate in Demonstrations and Rallies** - **Join Local Rallies**: Participate in organized demonstrations that advocate for fair representation and against partisan gerrymandering. - **Organize a Local Event**: If there are no scheduled events, consider organizing a community gathering or protest to raise awareness about redistricting issues.
### 5. **Utilize Social Media for Advocacy** - **Promote Awareness**: Use social media platforms to share information about redistricting and its implications for democracy. Create posts that encourage your friends and followers to engage in activism. - **Contact Leaders**: Tag and message local and national leaders on platforms like Twitter and Instagram, urging them to stand against gerrymandering.
### 6. **Educate Yourself and Others** - **Research Redistricting**: Stay informed about the redistricting process and its impact on elections. Resources like the Brennan Center for Justice provide in-depth analysis and reports. - **Host Educational Workshops**: Organize community workshops to inform others about the importance of fair redistricting and how they can get involved.
### 7. **Support Progressive Candidates** - **Donate to Campaigns**: Contribute to candidates who prioritize fair representation and oppose gerrymandering. Research their platforms and support those who align with your values. - **Help with Campaigns**: Volunteer for local campaigns that emphasize electoral reform and fairness in representation.
### 8. **Engage with National Organizations** - **Contact Organizations**: Reach out to organizations like the ACLU or Common Cause to learn about their initiatives on redistricting and how you can support their work. - **ACLU National Office**: - Email: [info@aclu.org](mailto:info@aclu.org) - Address: 125 Broad St, New York, NY 10004
By taking these steps, individuals can actively participate in the movement for fair redistricting and contribute to a more democratic political process. Each action, no matter how small, can create a ripple effect that leads to significant change.