In Trump's redistricting push, Democrats find an aggressive identity and progressives are on board - Boston News, Weather, Sports | WHDH 7News
whdh.com -- Saturday, August 16, 2025, 10:21:33 PM Eastern Daylight Time
Categories: State Politics & Governors, Republican Party Politics, Public Opinion & Polling
ATLANTA (AP) -- Fight! Fight! Fight!
It's not just Donald Trump's mantra anymore. As the Republican president pushes states to redraw their congressional districts to the GOP's advantage, Democrats have shown they are willing to go beyond words of outrage and use whatever power they do have to win.
Democrats in the Texas Legislature started it off by delaying, for now, Republican efforts to expand the GOP majority in the state's delegation and help preserve party control of the U.S. House through new districts in time for the 2026 midterm elections.
Then multiple Democratic governors promised new districts in their own states to neutralize potential Republican gains in Washington. Their counter has been buoyed by national fundraising, media blitzes and public demonstrations, including rallies Saturday around the country.
"For everyone that's been asking, 'Where are the Democrats?' -- well, here they are," said U.S. Rep. Jasmine Crockett of Texas, one of several Democrats who could be ousted under her state's new maps. "For everyone who's been asking, 'Where is the fight?' - well, here it is."
There is no guarantee Democrats can prevent the Republican-powered redistricting, just as Democrats on Capitol Hill have not been able to stop Trump's moves. But it's a notable turn for a party that, by its own leaders' admissions, has honored conventional rules and bypassed bare-knuckled tactics.
So far, progressive and establishment Democrats are aligned, uniting what has often been a fragmented opposition since Republicans led by Trump took control of the federal government with their election sweep in November. Leaders on the left say the approach gives them a more effective way to confront him. They can challenge his redistricting ploy with tangible moves as they also push back against the Republicans' tax and spending law and press the case that he is shredding American democracy.
"We've been imploring Democrats where they have power on the state and local level to flex that power," said Maurice Mitchell, who leads the Working Families Party at the left flank of mainstream U.S. politics. "There's been this overwrought talk about fighters and largely performative actions to suggest that they're in the fight."
This time, he said, Democrats are "taking real risks in protecting all of our rights" against "an authoritarian president who only understands the fight."
Pairing fiery talk with action
Texas made sense for Republicans as the place to start a redistricting scuffle. They dominate the Statehouse, and Gov. Greg Abbott is a Trump loyalist.
But when the president's allies announced a new political map intended to send five more Republicans to the U.S. House, state Democratic representatives fled Texas, denying the GOP the numbers to conduct business in the Legislature and approve the reworked districts.
Those legislators surfaced in Illinois, New York, California and elsewhere, joined by governors, senators, state party chairs, other states' legislators and activists. All promised action. The response was Trumpian.
Govs. Gavin Newsom of California, JB Pritzker of Illinois and Kathy Hochul of New York welcomed Texas Democrats and pledged retaliatory redistricting. Pritzker mocked Abbott as a lackey who says "yes, sir" to Trump orders. Hochul dismissed Texas Republicans as "lawbreaking cowboys." Newsom's press office directed all-caps social media posts at Trump, mimicking his signature sign off: "THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER."
U.S. Rep. Al Green, another Texas Democrat who could lose his seat, called Trump "egomaniacal." Yet many Democrats also claimed moral high ground, comparing their cause to the Civil Rights Movement.
State Rep. Ramon Romero Jr., invoked another Texas Democrat, President Lyndon Johnson, who was "willing to stand up and fight" for civil rights laws in the 1960s. Then, with Texas bravado, Romero reached further into history: "We're asking for help, maybe just as they did back in the days of the Alamo."
'Whatever it takes'
A recent Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research poll found that about 15% of Democrats' own voters described the party using words like "weak" or "apathetic." An additional 10% called it "ineffective" or "disorganized."
Beto O'Rourke, a former Texas congressman who is raising money to support Texas Democrats, has encouraged Democratic-run statehouses to redraw districts now rather than wait for GOP states to act. On Friday, California Democrats released a plan that would give the party an additional five U.S. House seats. It would require voter approval in a November election.
"Maximize Democratic Party advantage," O'Rourke said at a recent rally. "You may say to yourself, 'Well, those aren't the rules.' There are no refs in this game. F -- the rules. ... Whatever it takes."
Democratic National Committee Chairman Ken Martin acknowledged the shift.
"This is not the Democratic Party of your grandfather, which would bring a pencil to a knife fight," he said.
Andrew O'Neill, an executive at the progressive group Indivisible, contrasted that response with the record-long speeches by U.S. Sen. Cory Booker, D-N.J. and the Democratic leader of the U.S. House, New York Rep. Hakeem Jeffries, in eviscerating Trump and his package of tax breaks and spending cuts. The left "had its hair on fire" cheering those moments, O'Neill recalled, but were "left even more frustrated in the aftermath."
Trump still secured tax cuts for the wealthy, accelerated deportations and cut safety net programs, just as some of his controversial nominees were confirmed over vocal Democratic opposition.
"Now," O'Neill said, "there is some marriage of the rhetoric we've been seeing since Trump's inauguration with some actual action."
O'Neill looked back wistfully to the decision by Senate Democrats not to eliminate the filibuster "when our side had the trifecta," so a simple majority could pass major legislation. Democratic President Joe Biden's attorney general, Merrick Garland, he said, was too timid in prosecuting Trump and top associates over the Capitol riot.
In 2016, Democratic President Barack Obama opted against hardball as the Senate's Republican leader, Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, refused to consider Obama's nomination of Garland to the Supreme Court.
"These unspoken rules of propriety, especially on the Democratic side, have created the conditions" that enabled Trump, Mitchell said.
Fighting on all fronts
Even on redistricting, Democrats would have to ignore their previous good-government efforts and bypass independent commissions that draw boundaries in several states, including California.
Party leaders and activists rationalize that the broader fights tie together piecemeal skirmishes that may not, by themselves, sway voters.
Arguing that Trump diminishes democracy stirs people who already support Democrats, O'Neill said. By contrast, he said, the GOP "power grab," can be connected to unpopular policies that affect voters' lives.
Green noted that Trump's big package bill cleared the Senate "by one vote" and the House by a few, demonstrating why redistricting matters.
U.S. Rep. Greg Casar of Texas said Democrats must make unseemly, short-term power plays so they can later pass legislation that "bans gerrymandering nationwide ... bans super PACs (political action committees) and gets rid of that kind of big money and special interest that helped get us to this place." U.S. Rep. Lloyd Doggett, D-Texas, added that a Democratic majority would wield subpoena power over Trump's administration.
In the meantime, said U.S. Rep. Julie Johnson, D-Texas, voters are grasping a stark reality.
"They say, 'Well, I don't know. Politics doesn't affect me,'" she said of constituents she meets. "I say, 'Honey, it does' If you don't do politics, politics will do you.'"
(Copyright (c) 2024 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.)
Join our Newsletter for the latest news right to your inbox Email address Submit
Sign Our PetitionThe recent developments surrounding redistricting efforts in Texas and beyond illuminate a pivotal moment in American politics, particularly in the context of a Republican agenda increasingly marked by aggressive power grabs. Donald Trump’s push for Republican-dominated redistricting reflects a broader strategy aimed at entrenching political power through manipulation of electoral maps. The consequences of such redistricting efforts are profound; they not only threaten the balance of power within the U.S. Congress but also undermine the democratic principle of fair representation. Historically, redistricting has served as a tool for both parties, but the current Republican approach suggests a more systematic effort to suppress opposition voices and entrench minority rule—an alarming trend that progressive forces are beginning to confront with greater resolve.
Democratic lawmakers in Texas, particularly under the leadership of fierce advocates like U.S. Rep. Jasmine Crockett, are choosing to respond to this aggression not merely with rhetoric but with strategic action. Their decision to delay the Republican redistricting efforts by fleeing the state legislature is emblematic of a shift from complacency to a more combative political posture. This tactic is not without historical precedent; throughout American history, marginalized groups have often resorted to unconventional methods to assert their rights in the face of systemic oppression. The Democratic response reflects a recognition that, in a political climate where norms are increasingly disregarded, traditional avenues of negotiation may yield little success. Instead, they are embracing a more confrontational strategy that aligns with the urgent need to protect democratic processes.
The implications of this struggle extend beyond the immediate political landscape; they are deeply intertwined with ongoing social movements that advocate for equity and justice. The collaboration between progressive and establishment Democrats signifies a rare moment of unity in a party that has often been divided along ideological lines. As organizations such as the Working Families Party call for a more aggressive stance, they highlight the necessity of mobilizing grassroots support to challenge authoritarian tendencies. This moment also aligns with broader movements advocating for racial and economic justice, as redistricting decisions disproportionately affect communities of color and low-income populations. By equipping themselves with the tools of protest and direct action, Democrats are not merely fighting for their electoral survival; they are standing up for the rights of those who have historically been marginalized in the political process.
Moreover, the role of public demonstrations and media engagement in this struggle cannot be understated. Such rallies serve not only to galvanize support but also to raise public awareness about the dangers of gerrymandering and the erosion of democratic norms. The fact that these events are gaining traction nationwide speaks to the increasing recognition among citizens that their representation is at stake. It is essential for the left to seize this moment to educate the broader public on the significance of fair districting practices and the dangers posed by partisan manipulation. The consequences of failing to address these issues extend far beyond the next election; they threaten the very foundation of democracy and the rights of future generations.
In conclusion, the response of Democrats in Texas and beyond to the Republican redistricting push marks a critical juncture in American political history. It underscores the importance of a united front in the face of authoritarianism and highlights the necessity of utilizing every available tool to safeguard democracy. As the stakes rise, it is imperative for all progressives to support these efforts, reminding ourselves and others that the fight for equitable representation is not just a political battle—it is a moral imperative. By framing this struggle within the context of historical injustices and ongoing social movements, we can cultivate a deeper understanding of why this fight matters and inspire collective action to resist the forces that seek to undermine our democratic ideals.
The article highlights a pivotal moment in the ongoing political battle over redistricting, with Donald Trump's push for Republican dominance forcing Democrats to adapt and adopt a more aggressive stance. Historically, redistricting has been a contentious issue in American politics, often resulting in gerrymandering—manipulating electoral district boundaries to favor one party over another. This practice has deep roots, tracing back to the early 19th century with figures like Elbridge Gerry, after whom the term "gerrymandering" was coined. The importance of fair representation cannot be overstated, especially in a democracy that prides itself on the principle of one person, one vote. As we face the 2026 midterm elections, the struggle for equitable representation continues, and it is crucial for Americans to engage with this issue actively.
In the current political landscape, the Democrats' response to Republican-led redistricting efforts marks a significant shift from past tactics characterized by avoidance and compliance to a more confrontational approach. The willingness of Democratic legislators in Texas to flee the state to deny Republicans a quorum for redistricting showcases a strategic use of their limited power. Such actions serve as a reminder that in a democracy, those in the minority can still wield influence through creative resistance. By rallying public support and organizing demonstrations, Democrats are not just engaging in a battle for power but are also framing the conversation around the very future of democracy in America. This is a moment for progressives to unite, illustrating that when push comes to shove, the stakes are too high to remain passive.
As citizens, we can amplify this momentum by actively engaging in local and state politics. The redistricting process may seem distant from everyday life, but it directly affects the representation of our communities. Americans can organize grassroots campaigns, advocate for fair redistricting practices, and hold their elected officials accountable. By pushing for independent commissions to oversee redistricting, we can ensure that maps are drawn fairly, with the interests of the people at heart, rather than partisan gain. This type of civic engagement can help dismantle the normalization of gerrymandering and reinforce the principle of democratic representation.
Furthermore, educational outreach about the impacts of redistricting is essential. Many citizens may not fully grasp how gerrymandering distorts electoral outcomes and disenfranchises voters. We can utilize social media campaigns, community workshops, and collaborations with local advocacy groups to inform and mobilize the public. By making the issue relatable—connecting the dots between unfair redistricting and local issues such as education funding, healthcare access, and infrastructure—we can foster a more informed electorate that demands change. The knowledge that redistricting shapes local realities can galvanize community action and create a sense of urgency around this critical issue.
Finally, it’s essential to recognize the broader implications of the fight against gerrymandering within the context of rising authoritarianism in American politics. The article notes that Democratic leaders are increasingly framing their actions as a defense against an authoritarian president. This is not merely a partisan struggle; it is a battle for the soul of democracy itself. By engaging in this discourse, we can challenge right-wing narratives that downplay the importance of fair representation. We can assert that defending democracy involves more than just voting every few years; it means standing up against attempts to manipulate the system for political gain. Through concerted action, education, and advocacy, we can build a movement that not only resists current threats but also lays the groundwork for a more equitable and participatory democracy.
In light of the current political landscape regarding redistricting and the actions being taken by both Democratic and Republican leaders, there are several avenues for individuals to engage and take action. Here’s a detailed list of ideas and actions that can be pursued:
### What We Can Personally Do
1. **Stay Informed**: Keep up with the latest developments in your state’s redistricting process and how it may impact local and national elections.
2. **Engage with Local Activism**: Join local grassroots organizations advocating for fair redistricting and voting rights.
3. **Communicate with Elected Officials**: Regularly reach out to your local representatives to express your stance on redistricting and voting rights.
4. **Participate in Public Demonstrations**: Attend rallies and protests advocating for fair electoral processes.
5. **Mobilize Your Community**: Organize discussions or workshops in your community to raise awareness on redistricting issues and mobilize collective action.
### Exact Actions to Take
1. **Sign Petitions**: - **Petition for Fair Redistricting**: Look for online petitions on platforms like Change.org or MoveOn.org that advocate for fair redistricting. For instance, you might find petitions calling for independent commissions to manage redistricting. - **Example**: Search for petitions such as “Support Independent Redistricting Commissions” on sites like [Change.org](https://www.change.org).
2. **Contact Elected Officials**: - **Write to Your State Legislators**: Express your concerns regarding redistricting and advocate for fair practices. Here’s how to do it effectively: - **Find Your State Legislators**: Visit [Ballotpedia](https://ballotpedia.org) or your state’s official legislative website to find contact information. - **What to Say**: In your message, emphasize the importance of fair representation and the detrimental effects of gerrymandering on democracy.
- **Example Contacts**: - **Senator Elizabeth Warren (MA)**: - Email: [warren.senate.gov/contact](https://www.warren.senate.gov/contact) - Mailing address: 2400 JFK Federal Building, 15 New Sudbury Street, Boston, MA 02203 - **Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (NY)**: - Email: [ocasio-cortez.house.gov/contact](https://ocasio-cortez.house.gov/contact) - Mailing address: 2182 Rayburn House Office Building, Washington, D.C. 20515
3. **Participate in Local Government Meetings**: - Attend city council or state legislative meetings where redistricting is being discussed. Make your voice heard by providing public comments or testimony.
4. **Educate Others**: - Host community gatherings or online forums to educate others about the redistricting process and its implications for democracy. Utilize resources from organizations like the League of Women Voters.
5. **Support Relevant Organizations**: - Donate or volunteer for organizations that are focused on voting rights and fair redistricting, such as: - **Common Cause**: They advocate for fair elections and can be found at [commoncause.org](https://www.commoncause.org). - **League of Women Voters**: They work to promote informed and active participation in government. More information is available at [lwv.org](https://www.lwv.org).
6. **Utilize Social Media**: - Use platforms like Twitter and Facebook to spread awareness about redistricting issues. Share articles, engage in discussions, and encourage your friends and followers to take action.
7. **Join or Form Advocacy Groups**: - Connect with like-minded individuals to form or join advocacy groups focused on civic engagement and electoral reform in your community.
### Conclusion
By actively participating in these actions, individuals can play a crucial role in advocating for fair redistricting and ensuring that democratic processes are upheld. It's essential to remember that collective action can lead to significant change, and each voice contributes to the larger conversation about representation and democracy.