After Alaska summit, Zelenskyy to meet Trump in Washington on Monday
zeebiz.com -- Saturday, August 16, 2025, 10:59:13 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Categories: U.S.–Russia Relations, Foreign Policy & International Relations, U.S.–NATO Relations

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said he will meet US President Donald Trump in Washington on Monday, which comes after Trump held a high-stakes summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska.
According to the White House, Trump had a "lengthy call" with Zelenskyy on his way back to Washington, and later spoke to NATO leaders about the discussions.
Taking to X, Zelenskyy thanked Trump for the invitation and said they had a long and substantive conversation. "President Trump informed about his meeting with the Russian leader and the main points of their discussion. It is important that America's strength has an impact on the development of the situation," he wrote.
Also Read:US-Russia trade shows 20% growth under Trump administration: Putin
Trilateral talks on table
After the Alaska summit, which took place on August 15, Trump said both Putin and Zelenskyy want him to be part of the discussions and he "will be there." Reacting to his remarks, Zelenskyy backed the idea of a trilateral meeting between Ukraine, the US, and Russia.
"Ukraine emphasises that key issues can be discussed at the level of leaders, and a trilateral format is suitable for this. On Monday, I will meet with President Trump in Washington, DC, to discuss all of the details regarding ending the killing and the war. I am grateful for the invitation," he added.
According to a foreign media report, Trump told Zelenskyy a "fast pace deal was better than a ceasefire." European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, French President Emmanuel Macron and NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte were also on the call.
Also Read:Trump-Putin Alaska summit ends without Ukraine deal despite 'productive' talks | Key takeaways
Peace deal over ceasefire
Trump has shifted his stance, saying an overall peace agreement -- and not a ceasefire -- should be the next step in ending the 3 1/2-year-old war. His reversal, aligning with Putin's long-held position, came in a social media post on Saturday, hours after the summit concluded without a breakthrough.
"It was determined by all that the best way to end the horrific war between Russia and Ukraine is to go directly to a Peace Agreement, which would end the war, and not a mere Ceasefire Agreement, which often times do not hold up," Trump posted.
European leaders, while welcoming Trump's engagement, did not explicitly endorse the peace-over-ceasefire approach. In a statement, they said they "welcomed President Trump's efforts to stop the killing in Ukraine, end Russia's war of aggression, and achieve just and lasting peace."
Sign Our PetitionThe recent developments surrounding Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy's meeting with U.S. President Donald Trump, following Trump's high-stakes summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin, provides fertile ground for a critical analysis of U.S. foreign policy, NATO dynamics, and the implications for democracy and human rights on an international scale. The geopolitical chess game that has ensued since the 2014 annexation of Crimea and the ongoing war in Eastern Ukraine reveals not only the complexities of international diplomacy but also the stark realities faced by ordinary citizens caught in conflict.
Historically, the U.S. has positioned itself as a champion of democracy and human rights, often intervening in global conflicts under this banner. However, the Trump administration's approach has raised eyebrows, particularly its apparent willingness to entertain a peace agreement with Russia that may overlook the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Ukraine. This move can be contextualized within a broader pattern of transactional diplomacy that prioritizes short-term gains over long-term stability and ethical considerations. The pivot from a ceasefire to a peace agreement, as suggested by Trump, aligns with Putin’s narrative and raises concerns about the potential sidelining of Ukraine’s interests in favor of a strategic compromise that may not address the underlying issues of the conflict.
Zelenskyy's willingness to engage in trilateral discussions with Trump and Putin reflects a desperate search for peace amid a protracted and bloody conflict that has claimed thousands of lives and displaced millions. However, the dynamics of such negotiations warrant scrutiny. While Zelenskyy is keen on ending the violence, it is crucial to question whose terms are being prioritized. The historical precedent of powerful nations imposing their will on smaller states—often under the guise of diplomacy—should serve as a cautionary tale. The specter of realpolitik looms large, as discussions of peace may overshadow the need for accountability and justice for the victims of war.
The call for a peace agreement over a ceasefire also invites a critique of the implications for social justice and humanitarian efforts. A ceasefire, although temporary, can provide immediate relief to civilians and create a space for humanitarian aid and rebuilding efforts. In contrast, a peace agreement, particularly one that may not be fully inclusive of all stakeholders, can allow for the continuation of power dynamics that favor aggressors over victims. History has shown that without addressing the root causes of conflict—such as economic disparity, political exclusion, and human rights violations—peace agreements can lead to fragile and unsustainable resolutions that fail to foster genuine reconciliation.
Finally, this situation calls for a re-examination of the role of international institutions like NATO and the European Union in conflict resolution. European leaders have welcomed Trump's engagement, yet their hesitance to fully endorse the peace-over-ceasefire approach indicates an underlying tension between the desire for stability and the need for principled diplomacy. This moment presents an opportunity for advocates of social justice and human rights to urge a more assertive stance from international bodies, pushing for policies that prioritize the voices and rights of the most affected populations. As the world watches the outcome of this summit, it is imperative to remember that true peace must be built on justice and accountability—principles that can no longer be sidelined in the quest for geopolitical stability.
The recent meeting between Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and former President Donald Trump in Washington, following Trump's summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska, underscores a critical juncture in the ongoing conflict in Ukraine. As we reflect on this event, it is essential to recognize not just the immediate political implications but also the historical context that has shaped U.S.-Russia-Ukraine relations. This convergence of leaders highlights the complexity of international diplomacy, where the delicate balance of power, national interests, and humanitarian concerns intersect.
Historically, Ukraine has been at the crossroads of East-West tensions, particularly since gaining independence from the Soviet Union in 1991. The annexation of Crimea by Russia in 2014 and the subsequent conflict in Eastern Ukraine have further complicated the landscape. The United States has traditionally positioned itself as an ally to Ukraine, offering military support and economic aid to counter Russian aggression. However, Trump's recent shift toward advocating for a peace agreement as opposed to a mere ceasefire raises significant questions about the consistency of American foreign policy and its impact on Ukraine's sovereignty. This pivot could suggest a willingness to overlook the nuances of Ukraine's fight for independence and democratic governance in favor of a more expedient diplomatic solution, aligning more closely with Putin's longstanding preference for a peace agreement.
This situation calls for a critical examination of the potential consequences of prioritizing expediency over a comprehensive understanding of the conflict. While peace is undoubtedly desirable, it must not come at the cost of undermining Ukraine's territorial integrity or its right to self-determination. Advocating for a peace agreement can sound appealing, but it must be approached with caution, ensuring that any arrangement genuinely addresses the grievances and aspirations of the Ukrainian people rather than merely satisfying the geopolitical interests of larger powers. This is a crucial point to raise in discussions with those who may overlook the implications of such diplomatic maneuvers.
As engaged citizens, there are several actionable steps we can take to foster a more robust dialogue around this issue. First, we can educate ourselves and our communities about the historical context of the Ukraine conflict and the implications of U.S. foreign policy decisions. This includes understanding the dynamics of power between the U.S., NATO, Russia, and Ukraine, as well as the personal narratives of those affected by the war. Hosting community discussions, workshops, or speaker series can help raise awareness and generate informed conversations. Additionally, urging our representatives to support legislation that prioritizes human rights and the sovereignty of nations can amplify our collective voice in influencing policy.
Finally, it is vital to utilize social media platforms and other communication channels to raise awareness about the realities of the war in Ukraine and the importance of a thoughtful approach to peace. Engaging with narratives that emphasize empathy and understanding can counteract the oversimplified rhetoric that often dominates public discourse. We can highlight the voices of Ukrainian citizens, activists, and experts who advocate for a peace process that respects their agency and aspirations. By fostering a more nuanced understanding of these issues, we can challenge the status quo and advocate for a foreign policy that genuinely supports democratic values and the principles of self-determination.
In summary, as we engage with discussions surrounding the recent summit and the broader context of U.S.-Russia-Ukraine relations, it is crucial to approach these topics with an informed, compassionate, and historically grounded perspective. By doing so, we not only contribute to a more robust public discourse but also advocate for policies that align with our values of justice, dignity, and respect for the rights of nations.
In light of the recent developments surrounding the meetings between Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and U.S. President Donald Trump, there are several actions we can take to advocate for a just resolution to the ongoing conflict in Ukraine. Here are some concrete steps individuals can consider:
### 1. **Educate Yourself and Others** - **Action:** Stay informed about the geopolitical dynamics of the Ukraine conflict and the implications of U.S. foreign policy. - **Example:** Read reputable sources, such as The Guardian, Al Jazeera, and The New York Times, to gain a comprehensive understanding of the situation. Share insightful articles and discussions on social media to raise awareness among your network.
### 2. **Engage with Elected Officials** - **Action:** Contact your local representatives to express your views on the U.S. approach to the Ukraine crisis. - **Example:** Write to your congressional representative. You can find their contact information on the official U.S. House of Representatives website. Use the following template: ``` Subject: Urgent Action Needed for a Peaceful Resolution in Ukraine
Dear [Representative's Name],
I am writing to express my concern regarding the ongoing conflict in Ukraine and the recent discussions between President Trump and President Zelenskyy. While diplomacy is essential, I urge you to advocate for a comprehensive peace agreement that prioritizes human rights and the safety of civilians over mere political posturing.
Please ensure that the U.S. takes a strong stand for a peaceful resolution that involves the voices of the Ukrainian people and does not compromise their sovereignty.
Thank you for your attention to this critical issue.
Sincerely, [Your Name] [Your Address] ```
### 3. **Support Humanitarian Organizations** - **Action:** Donate to or volunteer with organizations that are providing aid to those affected by the conflict. - **Example:** Consider donating to organizations like Doctors Without Borders (Médecins Sans Frontières), the International Rescue Committee, or local NGOs that are active in providing assistance to Ukrainian refugees.
### 4. **Sign and Share Petitions** - **Action:** Find and support petitions that call for a peaceful resolution to the conflict and the protection of human rights. - **Example:** Platforms like Change.org often have petitions you can sign. One related petition could be titled "Support a Peaceful Resolution in Ukraine." Share it on social media to gather more support.
### 5. **Organize or Participate in Local Events** - **Action:** Attend or organize community discussions or rallies focused on raising awareness about the Ukraine situation. - **Example:** Check local community centers or university campuses for events focused on global peace efforts. If there are none, consider organizing a local discussion group or a demonstration advocating for peace in Ukraine.
### 6. **Promote Peaceful Dialogue** - **Action:** Engage in discussions that emphasize the importance of dialogue over military solutions. - **Example:** Start conversations within your community or online about the need for diplomatic solutions, sharing insights on how dialogue can lead to lasting peace. Use platforms like social media or community forums to advocate for this approach.
### 7. **Contact International Representatives** - **Action:** Reach out to international bodies or representatives involved in the Ukraine crisis. - **Example:** Write to the United Nations or European Union representatives with a message advocating for a peaceful resolution. You can find relevant contacts through their official websites. For instance: - **United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres**: - Email: sg@un.org - Message Template: ``` Subject: Call for Peace in Ukraine
Dear Mr. Guterres,
I urge you to advocate for a peaceful resolution to the conflict in Ukraine, emphasizing the need for dialogue and the involvement of all stakeholders, particularly the Ukrainian people. The world is watching, and we need strong leadership to ensure justice and peace.
Thank you for your attention.
Sincerely, [Your Name] ```
### 8. **Utilize Social Media** - **Action:** Use social media platforms to amplify voices calling for peace and justice in Ukraine. - **Example:** Create posts that share credible information, using hashtags like #PeaceInUkraine or #EndTheWar. Tag relevant organizations and public figures to increase visibility.
By engaging in these actions, we can contribute to a movement that prioritizes peace and human rights in international discussions, ensuring that the voices of those affected by the conflict are heard and considered in the quest for resolution.