Truth and Resistance Dove Logo
Know what you should know!

Home     Categories     Search     Subscribe

Zelensky, European leaders head to US for talks on peace deal terms | International

bssnews.net -- Monday, August 18, 2025, 12:28:22 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Categories: Foreign Policy & International Relations, U.S.–Russia Relations, U.S.–NATO Relations
Zelensky, European leaders head to US for talks on peace deal terms | International

WASHINGTON, Aug 18, 2025 (BSS/AFP) - US President Donald Trump said

reclaiming Crimea or entering NATO were off the table for Ukraine, as

President Volodymyr Zelensky arrived in Washington for Monday's talks aimed

at ending the war with Russia.

Zelensky, who has repeatedly rejected territorial concessions, will meet

Trump in Washington on Monday, accompanied by European Commission chief

Ursula von der Leyen and other leaders.

The meeting comes on the heels of a summit between Trump and Russia's

Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Friday, which failed to yield a ceasefire

breakthrough but produced promises from both leaders to provide "robust

security guarantees" to Ukraine.

Zelensky was not invited to the Alaska meeting, after which Trump pivoted to

the long-held Russian position that a ceasefire was not needed before a final

peace deal.

"President Zelenskyy of Ukraine can end the war with Russia almost

immediately, if he wants to, or he can continue to fight," Trump posted on

his social media platform. "Remember how it started. No getting back Obama

given Crimea (12 years ago, without a shot being fired!), and NO GOING INTO

NATO BY UKRAINE. Some things never change!!!"

Trump and Zelensky are expected to meet one-on-one before being joined by a

cohort of European leaders Monday, according to the White House schedule.

Along with von der Leyen, NATO chief Mark Rutte and the leaders of Britain,

Finland, France, Germany and Italy will be present.

It will be the first time Zelensky visits Washington since a bust-up with

Trump and Vice President JD Vance in February when the two men berated the

Ukrainian leader for being "ungrateful."

On Sunday night, after arriving in Washington, Zelensky said: "We all share a

strong desire to end this war quickly and reliably."

- Security guarantees -

Since the Oval Office row in February, Trump has grown more critical of Putin

and shown some signs of frustration as Russia repeatedly stalled on peace

talks.

But Washington has not placed extra sanctions on Moscow and the lavish

welcome offered to Putin in Alaska on his first visit to the West since he

invaded Ukraine in 2022 was seen as a diplomatic coup for Russia.

Speaking in Brussels on the eve of his visit to the United States, Zelensky

said he was keen to hear more about what Putin and Trump discussed in Alaska.

He also hailed Washington's offer of security guarantees to Ukraine as

"historic."

Trump said he spoke to Putin about the possibility of a NATO-style collective

defense guarantee for Ukraine.

The promise would be outside of the framework of the Western military

alliance which Ukraine wants to join and which is seen as an existential

threat by Russia.

French President Emmanuel Macron said European leaders would ask Trump "to

what extent" Washington is ready to contribute to security guarantees for

Ukraine.

- Discussion on land -

Trump's envoy Steve Witkoff said Moscow had made "some concessions" regarding

five Ukrainian regions that Russia fully or partially controls, and said that

"there is an important discussion with regard to Donetsk and what would

happen there.

"That discussion is going to specifically be detailed on Monday," he said,

without giving details.

Russia annexed Crimea in 2014 following a sham referendum and did the same in

2022 for four Ukrainian regions -- Donetsk, Kherson, Lugansk and Zaporizhzhia

-- even though its forces have not fully captured them.

A source briefed on a phone call between Trump and European leaders on

Saturday told AFP that the US leader was "inclined to support" a Russian

demand to be given territory it has not yet captured in the Donbas, an area

that includes the Donetsk and Lugansk regions and which has seen the

deadliest battles of the war.

In exchange, the source cited Trump as saying, Moscow would agree to "freeze"

the front line in the Kherson and Zaporizhzhia, where Russian forces hold

swathes of territory but not the regional capitals.

Russia has until now insisted that Ukraine pull its forces out of all four

regions as a precondition to any deal.

- 'Capitulation' -

There is concern in Europe that Washington could pressure Ukraine to accept

Russia's terms.

"For peace to prevail, pressure must be applied to the aggressor, not the

victim of aggression," Polish Foreign Minister Radoslaw Sikorski said Sunday.

Macron said: "There is only one state proposing a peace that would be a

capitulation: Russia."

Zelensky has repeatedly pushed back against ceding territory, but said he is

ready to discuss the issue in the context of a trilateral summit with Trump

and Putin.

Trump has raised the possibility of such a meeting, but Russia has played

down the prospect.

Moscow's forces have been advancing gradually but steadily in Ukraine,

particularly in the Donetsk region.

Moscow is often accused by Ukraine and its allies of playing for time to make

additional gains.

Expand

Sign Our Petition


Opinion:

The ongoing conflict between Ukraine and Russia, a legacy of centuries of territorial disputes and national identity struggles, has reached a critical juncture as President Volodymyr Zelensky meets with U.S. President Donald Trump and European leaders in Washington. At the heart of these discussions lies the complex issue of territorial integrity and national sovereignty, particularly regarding the status of Crimea, which Russia annexed in 2014. Trump's insistence that reclaiming Crimea is off the table reflects a broader geopolitical trend that prioritizes short-term diplomatic maneuvers over long-term justice for nations that have been victims of colonial-era aggression and modern imperialism. For those who advocate for a world order that respects self-determination, this stance is both troubling and emblematic of a history that continues to repeat itself.

Zelensky's firm rejection of territorial concessions is a crucial point in the negotiations and speaks to the historical injustices faced by Ukraine. The loss of Crimea not only represents a significant geographical and cultural loss for Ukraine but also symbolizes the broader struggle against Russian expansionism. Historically, this struggle is reminiscent of other nations that have fought against imperial domination, such as various African nations during the decolonization movements of the mid-20th century. Just as those nations sought to reclaim their sovereignty from colonial powers, Ukraine's struggle against Russian influence is about asserting its right to exist as an independent nation. Advocates for social justice should draw parallels between these struggles, reminding us that every nation’s fight for self-determination deserves respect and support.

The dynamics of the current talks also highlight the tensions within Western alliances and the implications of U.S. foreign policy. Trump's recent summit with Putin in Alaska, where he reportedly leaned towards the Russian perspective that a ceasefire was not a prerequisite for negotiations, poses questions about U.S. commitment to democratic values and international law. The lack of additional sanctions on Moscow, despite its ongoing aggression, raises concerns about the efficacy of Western diplomacy and whether it serves the interests of those who seek justice and security. It is critical for advocates of social justice to challenge narratives that prioritize geopolitical stability over the rights of individuals and nations; any peace deal that ignores the voices of the Ukrainian people risks perpetuating cycles of violence and oppression.

Moreover, the presence of European leaders at the talks underscores the collective responsibility of the West in addressing the implications of the conflict. The historical context of NATO's eastward expansion is fraught with tension, as it has often been perceived by Russia as a direct threat to its sphere of influence. As leaders like French President Emmanuel Macron press for clarity on the U.S. stance regarding security guarantees, it is incumbent upon progressives to advocate for a strategy that not only bolsters Ukraine's security but also promotes a peaceful resolution that respects the rights of all involved. The rhetoric surrounding NATO should be approached with caution; the historical implications of military alliances underscore the need for diplomatic solutions rooted in mutual respect and understanding rather than militaristic posturing.

In conclusion, the discussions taking place in Washington are emblematic of broader historical and social struggles that extend beyond the immediate conflict between Ukraine and Russia. As advocates for social justice, it is vital to connect the dots between Ukraine's fight for sovereignty and the lessons learned from past struggles against imperialism. The emphasis on a peace deal that bears the semblance of fairness and justice is essential, not just for Ukraine but for the international community at large. By engaging in these conversations and advocating for a world where territorial integrity and national self-determination are upheld, we can contribute to a more equitable global order that recognizes the rights and dignity of all nations.

Action:

The recent negotiations involving President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine and various European leaders with President Donald Trump underscore the complexity and severity of the ongoing conflict in Ukraine. The backdrop of this diplomatic engagement reveals not only the immediate stakes for Ukraine but also the historical and geopolitical ramifications that resonate deeply in global politics. Trump's insistence that reclaiming Crimea and NATO membership are off the table for Ukraine reflects a broader pattern of American foreign policy that has often prioritized strategic interests over principled support for democracy and human rights. This is a critical moment for Americans to reflect on the implications of such stances and consider ways to advocate for a more principled approach to international relations.

Historically, the annexation of Crimea by Russia in 2014 was a significant turning point that not only violated Ukraine's sovereignty but also challenged international norms regarding territorial integrity. The response from the West, primarily through sanctions and diplomatic isolation of Russia, has been tepid at best. Furthermore, the dynamics of negotiation have often sidelined the voices of those most affected by the conflict — the Ukrainian people. As Zelensky grapples with the realities of peace negotiations, the insistence on territorial concessions and a lack of commitment to NATO membership raises concerns about the long-term security and autonomy of Ukraine as a sovereign nation. This situation emphasizes the need for a more robust and principled engagement from the international community, particularly from the United States.

In light of this, what can concerned Americans do to influence a more favorable and supportive U.S. foreign policy? Engaging in grassroots advocacy is vital. Americans can push for a more assertive stance on Ukraine's sovereignty by contacting their representatives and urging them to support legislation that prioritizes the protection of Ukraine against Russian aggression. This could involve advocating for military aid, strengthening economic sanctions on Russia, and supporting humanitarian efforts to assist those displaced by the conflict. Furthermore, raising awareness about the importance of international solidarity with Ukraine can foster a more informed public discourse, encouraging citizens to participate actively in democracy at home while considering the global implications of U.S. actions abroad.

Educational initiatives are also essential in this context. Creating forums and discussions around the historical complexities of U.S.-Russia relations and the implications of the Ukraine conflict can help demystify the ongoing situation for the average citizen. Schools, community centers, and online platforms can host events that delve into the historical significance of Crimea, NATO's role in Eastern Europe, and the broader implications of geopolitical alliances. By enhancing public understanding, we can cultivate a more engaged citizenry that is capable of holding leaders accountable for their foreign policy decisions.

Lastly, it is crucial to challenge the narrative that places blame solely on Ukraine for the ongoing conflict. Trump’s statements suggesting that Zelensky could end the war "almost immediately" are not only misleading but also dangerous. They undermine the reality that any resolution must prioritize Ukraine’s sovereignty and the voice of its people rather than capitulating to Russian demands. Conversations with right-wing counterparts should focus on reframing the discourse around the conflict to highlight the importance of supporting democratic governments and resisting authoritarian aggression. By emphasizing the need for principled support for Ukraine, we can present a compelling case for a more ethical foreign policy that aligns with American values of democracy and freedom.

In conclusion, the current U.S.-Ukraine diplomatic engagement highlights critical issues regarding international norms, sovereignty, and the responsibilities of powerful nations in conflict resolution. As Americans, it is incumbent upon us to advocate for a foreign policy that upholds democratic principles and supports nations under threat. By engaging in advocacy, education, and informed discourse, we can play a significant role in shaping a future that prioritizes peace and justice on the global stage.

To Do:

In light of the recent developments concerning the Ukraine conflict as detailed in the article, there are several actions we can take as individuals to advocate for peace, support Ukraine, and influence our leaders. Below is a detailed list of ideas, actions, and resources that can be utilized effectively.

### What Can We Personally Do About This?

1. **Advocate for Peaceful Resolutions**: Engage in dialogues that promote peaceful negotiations over military solutions. Encourage your community to participate in local peace forums or discussions.

2. **Support Humanitarian Aid**: Contribute to organizations providing humanitarian aid to Ukraine. As the conflict continues, these resources are critical for those affected.

3. **Educate Yourself and Others**: Stay informed about the situation in Ukraine and share knowledge with friends and family. Awareness can help create a more informed public discourse.

4. **Hold Leaders Accountable**: Write to your representatives and express your views on the importance of a diplomatic approach to the conflict.

### Exact Actions We Can Take

1. **Sign Petitions**: - **Petition for Increased Humanitarian Aid**: Participate in online petitions urging governments to increase humanitarian assistance to Ukraine. Websites like Change.org often have relevant petitions. - **Example**: Search for petitions like “Support Ukraine with Humanitarian Aid” on platforms like Change.org or MoveOn.org.

2. **Contact Elected Officials**: - Write to your local and national representatives to express your concerns regarding military aid and the need for diplomatic resolutions. Below are key figures you can reach out to: - **President Joe Biden** - Email: public@who.eop.gov - Mailing Address: The White House, 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20500 - **Senator Chris Murphy (CT)** (a key voice on foreign relations) - Email: murphy.senate.gov/contact - Mailing Address: 30 Lewis Street, Suite 110, Hartford, CT 06103 - **Representative Adam Schiff (CA)** (House Intelligence Committee) - Email: adam.schiff@mail.house.gov - Mailing Address: 2112 Rayburn House Office Building, Washington, DC 20515

3. **Organize or Join Local Peace Rallies**: Look for or start local events that advocate for peace in Ukraine. Use platforms like Facebook Events or Meetup to connect with like-minded individuals.

4. **Engage with Advocacy Groups**: - Organizations such as the Ukrainian American National Association or Amnesty International often have action alerts and campaigns you can participate in. - **Example Contact**: - Ukrainian American National Association - Email: info@uana.org - Mailing Address: 2200 Route 10, Suite 3, Parsippany, NJ 07054

5. **Social Media Advocacy**: Use your social media platforms to share accurate information about the conflict and the importance of a peaceful resolution. Create or share graphics that educate others about the humanitarian crisis.

### What to Say

When contacting officials or participating in discussions, consider crafting a message along these lines:

- **For Elected Officials**: - “Dear [Name of Official], I am writing to express my concern regarding the ongoing conflict in Ukraine. I urge you to prioritize diplomatic efforts and humanitarian aid over military solutions. The people of Ukraine deserve our support, and a peaceful resolution is paramount to ensuring their safety and sovereignty. Please consider advocating for increased humanitarian assistance and a clear path towards peace in your discussions with international leaders. Thank you for your attention to this urgent matter. Sincerely, [Your Name]”

- **For Petitions**: - “I support this petition for increased humanitarian aid to Ukraine. The ongoing conflict has devastated countless lives, and immediate action is necessary to provide relief and support for those affected.”

By taking these actions and articulating your views clearly, you can contribute to a broader movement advocating for peace and support for Ukraine. Your voice matters, and collective action can influence policy and humanitarian efforts.


Sign Our Petition



10 Related Article(s):

Merz hopes Putin will launch direct talks with Ukraine after Alaska meeting

Opinion: Trump meets like-minded Putin, while the West watches

The one thing Trump wants out of his meeting with Putin

Healey hopes Trump-Putin summit could be 'first step' on road to peace

Trump Putin Meeting In Alaska | Not Here To Negotiate For Ukraine, Says Trump | Zelensky | N18G

Trump says he wants a Ukraine ceasefire rapidly

WH Spokesman: Trump 'Ended 7 Wars, More to Follow'

Global Dialogue: Macron Engages Leaders Post-Trump-Putin Summit | Politics

Zelensky must be at future peace talks, Starmer says after Trump-Putin summit

Putin Displayed Unyielding Resolve in High-Stakes Alaska Talks - BJP Leader


Updated very often
All Opinions and Actions are (C)opyright 2025 - TruthAndResistance.com