Opinion: Trump meets like-minded Putin, while the West watches
theglobeandmail.com -- Friday, August 15, 2025, 5:38:17 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Categories: Foreign Policy & International Relations, U.S.–Russia Relations, U.S.–NATO Relations
For most of the past 80 years, there was something called "the West": a group of democratic, relatively open countries that traded with each other, built networks and believed similar things about what the world should be. The like-minded.
That's gone. The U.S., the West's main backer, has effectively dissolved the association. In Alaska on Friday, there will be a meeting of the new "like-minded" pair: U.S. President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin.
The two will discuss the fate of Ukraine, which neither of them really see as a country with agency of its own.
Before Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022, Mr. Putin wrote an essay on the "historical unity" of Russians and Ukrainians that argued Ukraine's borders are illegitimate concoctions and that it can only have "sovereignty" in partnership with Russia. Mr. Trump, in his pithy style, told Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in February that he had "no cards" to determine how the war should end.
Analysis: Trump and Putin in Alaska is a study in contrasts
Now, Mr. Trump sounds a little different. On Thursday, in the Oval Office, he insisted that the Alaska meeting will be followed by a more important meeting that includes Mr. Zelensky. But Mr. Trump has shown more interest in hearing Mr. Putin's view.
It's no wonder that European leaders haven't put much trust in Mr. Trump's warning earlier this week that Mr. Putin would face "severe consequences" if he blocks a ceasefire.
That became clear when German Chancellor Friedrich Merz pulled together a virtual meeting with Mr. Trump that included Mr. Zelensky and several European leaders in an attempt to steer Mr. Trump away from bargaining away Ukrainian territory or post-ceasefire security.
Prime Minister Mark Carney took part in a second virtual meeting that day of other leaders of the so-called "coalition of the willing" of Ukraine supporters with U.S. Vice-President JD Vance.
The once like-minded West now has to try to squeeze a last-minute word into American ears in the hope Mr. Trump doesn't cough up concessions to a Russian President who invaded a European nation.
The concerns go wider. Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk wanted to ensure Mr. Trump doesn't agree to a request from Mr. Putin to reduce NATO troops in Eastern Europe, and in particular, Poland.
"That's why it is so important that we build such a strong and united group of states, both in relation to Russia, but also in relation to other allies, like the United States," Mr. Tusk told reporters Wednesday, according to Reuters.
That's a European leader worried that Mr. Trump will casually concede a weakening of the security of NATO allies that have felt vulnerable since Russia's invasion of Ukraine.
Opinion: A stronger Ukraine would be the only acceptable outcome of the Alaska summit
Mr. Trump does have some valid complaints about the equity of NATO security and support for Ukraine, in that the U.S, has paid more for both than its allies.
But it isn't just money. Mr. Trump wants to be able to claim he ended the war. But he has always been too willing to accept the Russian rationale for peace - and the idea that Russia should keep Ukrainian territory in exchange for a ceasefire.
And the U.S. President has been peculiarly willing to treat with Mr. Putin, displaying admiration, treating the Russian leader rather than the leaders of his allies, as his equal. Mr. Trump has airily overlooked or excused Mr. Putin's war-making in his quest for a ceasefire.
Even in June, after Mr. Trump had already expressed frustration with Mr. Putin's unwillingness to reach a ceasefire deal, the U.S. President showed up at the G7 meeting in Kananaskis, Alta., complaining that it was a mistake to kick Russia out of the then-G8 in 2014, after the country's annexation of Crimea.
That rambling complaint included the notion that Mr. Putin's feelings has been hurt - the U.S. President claimed his Russian counterpart has been "insulted" - but that Mr. Trump still had a special relationship with him.
"Putin speaks to me. He doesn't speak to anybody else," Mr. Trump said at the time.
Now Mr. Putin has an invitation. To a summit, on U.S. soil, and plans for a joint news conference.
Let's hope that this time, Mr. Trump will really press Mr. Putin. European leaders, and Mr. Zelensky, will be hoping that he doesn't succumb to the Russian President's claims that parts of Ukraine was never really Ukrainian, anyway. Mr. Trump usually seems to see Mr. Putin as like-minded.
Sign Our PetitionThe recent meeting between former U.S. President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska signals a significant shift in the geopolitical landscape, one that has historical roots in the post-World War II era and raises profound concerns about the current global order. The notion of “the West,” historically characterized by its commitment to democratic values and collective security, appears to be fraying. This meeting underscores a departure from the foundational principles that have guided Western diplomacy for decades, showcasing an unsettling trend wherein the dynamics of power are increasingly being negotiated between autocratic leaders, often at the expense of democratic nations, such as Ukraine.
Historically, the alliance of Western countries emerged from a shared commitment to democracy, human rights, and economic cooperation, especially in the aftermath of the atrocities of World War II. The establishment of institutions like NATO and the European Union was intended to create a bulwark against authoritarianism and aggression. However, in recent years, we have witnessed a chilling erosion of these values, particularly as leaders like Trump express an affinity for authoritarian figures like Putin. The meeting in Alaska is emblematic of this troubling trend, as it reflects a willingness to prioritize personal diplomacy over established alliances and norms, putting the sovereignty of nations like Ukraine at risk.
The implications of this meeting extend beyond the immediate concerns of U.S.-Russia relations; they resonate deeply with ongoing social struggles against imperialism and authoritarianism. The Ukrainian conflict is not merely a geopolitical dispute; it is a battle for national identity, self-determination, and resistance against imperialist encroachments. Putin's assertion of “historical unity” between Russia and Ukraine not only undermines Ukrainian sovereignty but also echoes colonial narratives used to justify the subjugation of nations. The West's response—or lack thereof—to these narratives must be rooted in historical awareness and a commitment to supporting those who resist such imperialist ideologies.
Moreover, Trump's cavalier remarks regarding Ukraine’s agency, such as telling President Zelensky that he had “no cards” to influence the war's outcome, reflect a broader disregard for democratic principles and the right of nations to self-determine their futures. This dismissal of Ukraine's agency is dangerous, as it emboldens authoritarian leaders who seek to undermine democracies worldwide. It is crucial for citizens to recognize that the stakes are not just about Ukraine; they speak to the very essence of what democracy means in an interconnected world. The growing collaboration between leaders like Trump and Putin is a direct challenge to the democratic values that have been championed for generations.
European leaders, exemplified by figures like Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk, are right to express concern over the potential concessions Trump may make regarding NATO and Eastern European security. The vulnerability felt by these nations, particularly in the wake of Russia’s aggressive actions, highlights the fragility of the security architecture that has been in place since the Cold War. The idea that a single American leader could unilaterally alter the landscape of European security underscores the necessity for a collective response grounded in solidarity and mutual defense, rather than a transactional approach to diplomacy that could undermine decades of progress.
In conclusion, the meeting between Trump and Putin in Alaska serves as a wake-up call for those who value democracy, human rights, and international law. It is imperative that discussions around foreign policy and international relations are informed by a historical understanding of the implications of authoritarianism and imperialism. As the world grapples with these challenges, it is essential to advocate for a united front that prioritizes the interests of vulnerable democracies and reinforces the values that have historically defined the West. Engaging in these conversations not only counters the narratives of authoritarianism but also reaffirms our commitment to a just and equitable global order.
The recent meeting between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin in Alaska illustrates a significant shift in global political dynamics, particularly as it pertains to the West's relationship with authoritarian regimes. Historically, the West—comprising nations with democratic ideals and open markets—has been united in its opposition to tyranny and aggression. This coalition, which has upheld international norms since World War II, is now fraying, with the U.S. leading the charge in this division under Trump’s unconventional approach. The implications of this shift are profound, not just for U.S. foreign policy but for the stability of global democracy itself.
At the heart of the issue is the fate of Ukraine, a sovereign nation that has been caught in the crosshairs of great power politics. Putin's assertion that Ukraine lacks legitimate sovereignty is a dangerous narrative that seeks to erase the agency of a nation-state and its people. This perspective is reminiscent of historical attempts by imperial powers to justify expansionist policies. The West, particularly the U.S., has traditionally stood against such ideologies, advocating instead for self-determination and respect for borders established in international law. Yet, Trump's apparent willingness to entertain Putin's views raises alarms about the future direction of American foreign policy and its commitment to uphold these principles.
For Americans concerned about these developments, there are several actions that can be taken to counteract the erosion of democratic values and the potential normalization of authoritarianism. First, it is crucial for citizens to engage in informed dialogue about foreign policy. By educating ourselves and our communities about the historical context and the consequences of appeasing authoritarian leaders, we can build a collective understanding that resists simplistic narratives. Town halls, community forums, and educational campaigns can serve as platforms for discussion, ensuring that the principles of democracy are central to public discourse.
Moreover, grassroots mobilization is key. Supporting organizations that advocate for human rights, democracy, and international law can amplify our voices against the tides of authoritarianism. Writing letters to elected representatives, participating in advocacy days, and joining local chapters of international NGOs can help push for policies that align with democratic values. Furthermore, as citizens, we must hold our leaders accountable—whether they are Democrats or Republicans—by demanding a foreign policy that prioritizes human rights and the stability of democratic institutions over short-term political gains.
In addition to grassroots efforts, building coalitions with like-minded individuals and organizations both domestically and internationally can strengthen the push back against authoritarianism. Engaging with European allies, as mentioned in the article, is essential. We must advocate for a united front that ensures the interests of vulnerable nations are represented and defended. This includes supporting NATO's efforts to reinforce security in Eastern Europe and standing firm against Russian aggression. By fostering transatlantic partnerships, we can collectively resist the pressures of populism and isolationism that seek to undermine global cooperation.
Ultimately, the meeting between Trump and Putin serves as a stark reminder of the fragility of democratic ideals in the face of rising authoritarianism. It challenges us to reflect on our role as citizens in safeguarding these values. By actively participating in the political process, advocating for human rights, and fostering international solidarity, we can counter the damaging narratives that threaten to erode the foundations of democracy. The time for action is now, as history has shown us that complacency in the face of tyranny can have far-reaching consequences.
In light of the recent developments surrounding the meeting between President Trump and President Putin, there are several avenues through which individuals can engage and advocate for a stronger, more unified response to protect Ukraine's sovereignty and uphold international democratic norms. Here’s a detailed list of actions we can take:
### What Can We Personally Do About This?
1. **Stay Informed and Educate Others**: Understanding the geopolitical landscape and the implications of U.S. foreign policy is crucial. Share reliable news articles, podcasts, and books that discuss the situation in Ukraine and the significance of NATO.
2. **Engage in Local Activism**: Join local organizations or groups that advocate for international democracy and human rights. Participating in community discussions or forums can help raise awareness.
3. **Support Ukrainian Initiatives**: Contribute to or volunteer with organizations that provide assistance to Ukraine, be it humanitarian aid, medical supplies, or political support.
4. **Advocate for Political Action**: Urge your representatives to take a firm stance on supporting Ukraine and maintaining NATO commitments.
5. **Communicate with Elected Officials**: Make your voice heard by contacting your representatives and expressing your views on U.S. foreign policy regarding Ukraine and Russia.
### Exact Actions We Can Personally Take
1. **Sign Petitions**: - **Petition for Supporting Ukraine**: Sign or create petitions on platforms like Change.org advocating for increased military and humanitarian aid to Ukraine. - Example: [Change.org Petition for Ukraine Aid](https://www.change.org/p/stand-with-ukraine-provide-military-and-humanitarian-aid)
2. **Contact Elected Officials**: - **Write to Your Senators and Representatives**: Express your concerns about the Trump-Putin meeting and urge them to take a strong stance on Ukraine. - **Sample Email** to send: ``` Subject: Support for Ukraine and NATO
Dear [Representative's Name],
I am writing to express my deep concern regarding the recent meeting between President Trump and President Putin, particularly in relation to the ongoing conflict in Ukraine. It is imperative that the U.S. maintains a strong commitment to supporting Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity.
I urge you to advocate for robust military and humanitarian aid to Ukraine and to ensure that NATO remains united and strong against any threats.
Thank you for your attention to this critical issue.
Sincerely, [Your Name] [Your Address] [Your Email] ```
- **Contact Information for Key Officials**: - **Senator Chuck Schumer (D-NY)** - Majority Leader - Email: schumer.senate.gov/contact/email-chuck - Office Address: 322 Hart Senate Office Building, Washington, DC 20510 - **Senator Mitch McConnell (R-KY)** - Minority Leader - Email: mcconnell.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/contact - Office Address: 361-A Russell Senate Office Building, Washington, DC 20510
3. **Participate in Rallies or Events**: Look for local or national events that support Ukraine or international democracy. Websites like Meetup.com or local community boards often list such gatherings.
4. **Use Social Media for Advocacy**: Utilize platforms like Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram to raise awareness about Ukraine. Share articles, post updates, and encourage your friends to engage in discussions about the importance of international solidarity.
5. **Support NGOs**: Donate to organizations that are providing direct support to Ukraine, such as: - **GlobalGiving**: Supports multiple projects in Ukraine. - **Doctors Without Borders**: They often assist in conflict zones.
6. **Engage with Local Representatives**: Schedule meetings or town hall discussions with your local representatives to discuss the importance of supporting Ukraine and maintaining a strong NATO presence in Eastern Europe.
### Conclusion
Taking collective action on these fronts can help amplify the voices advocating for a firm stance on Ukraine's sovereignty and reinforce the importance of international alliances. Each action, no matter how small, contributes to a larger effort to promote peace and stability in the region.