European leaders to join Ukraine's Zelenskyy for meeting with Trump - Sentinel Colorado
sentinelcolorado.com -- Sunday, August 17, 2025, 8:48:31 PM Eastern Daylight Time
Categories: U.S.–NATO Relations, Foreign Policy & International Relations, U.S.–Russia Relations
KYIV, Ukraine | European and NATO leaders announced Sunday they will join President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in Washington to present a united front in talks with President Donald Trump on ending Russia's war in Ukraine and firming up U.S. security guarantees now on the negotiating table.
Leaders from Britain, France, Germany, Italy and Finland are rallying around the Ukrainian president after his exclusion from Trump's summit on Friday with Russian President Vladimir Putin. Their pledge to be at Zelenskyy's side at the White House on Monday is an apparent effort to ensure the meeting goes better than the last one in February, when Trump berated Zelenskyy in a heated Oval Office encounter.
"The Europeans are very afraid of the Oval Office scene being repeated and so they want to support Mr. Zelenskyy to the hilt," said retired French Gen. Dominique Trinquand, a former head of France's military mission at the United Nations.
"It's a power struggle and a position of strength that might work with Trump," he said.
Putin agreed at his summit in Alaska with Trump that the U.S. and its European allies could offer Ukraine a security guarantee resembling NATO's collective defense mandate as part of an eventual deal to end the 3 1/2-year war, special U.S. envoy Steve Witkoff said in an interview Sunday on CNN's "State of the Union."
It "was the first time we had ever heard the Russians agree to that," said Witkoff, who called it "game-changing."
Later, French President Emmanuel Macron said the European delegation will ask Trump to back plans they drafted to beef-up Ukraine's armed forces -- already Europe's largest outside of Russia -- with more training and equipment to secure any peace.
"We need a credible format for the Ukrainian army, that's the first point, and say -- we Europeans and Americans -- how we'll train them, equip them, and finance this effort in the long-term," the French leader said.
The European-drafted plans also envision an allied force in Ukraine away from the front lines to reassure Kyiv that peace will hold and to dissuade another Russian invasion, Macron said. He spoke after a nearly two-hour video call Sunday with nations in Europe and further afield -- including Canada, Australia and Japan -- that are involved in the so-called "coalition of the willing."
The "several thousand men on the ground in Ukraine in the zone of peace" would signal that "our fates are linked," Macron said.
"This is what we must discuss with the Americans: Who is ready to do what?" Macron said. "Otherwise, I think the Ukrainians simply cannot accept commitments that are theoretical."
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said earlier at a news conference in Brussels with Zelenskyy that "we welcome President Trump's willingness to contribute to Article 5-like security guarantees for Ukraine. And the 'coalition of the willing' -- including the European Union -- is ready to do its share."
Macron said the substance of security guarantees will be more important than whether they are given an Article 5-type label.
"A theoretical article isn't enough, the question is one of substance," he said. "We must start out by saying that the first of the security guarantees for Ukraine is a strong Ukrainian army."
Along with Von der Leyen and Macron, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, Italian Premier Giorgia Meloni and Finnish President Alexander Stubb also said they'll will take part in Monday's talks, as will secretary-general of the NATO military alliance, Mark Rutte.
The European leaders' support could help ease concerns in Kyiv and in other European capitals that Ukraine risks being railroaded into a peace deal.
Neil Melvin, director of international security at the London-based Royal United Services Institute, said European leaders are trying to "shape this fast-evolving agenda." After the Alaska summit, the idea of a ceasefire appears all-but-abandoned, with the narrative shifting toward Putin's agenda of ensuring Ukraine does not join NATO or even the EU.
U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said on NBC's "Meet the Press" on Sunday that a possible ceasefire is "not off the table" but that the best way to end the war would be through a "full peace deal."
Putin has implied that he sees Europe as a hindrance to negotiations. He has also resisted meeting Zelenskyy in person, saying that such a meeting can only take place once the groundwork for a peace deal has been laid.
Speaking to the press after his meeting with Trump, the Russian leader raised the idea that Kyiv and other European capitals could "create obstacles" to derail potential progress with "behind-the-scenes intrigue."
For now, Zelenskyy offers the Europeans the "only way" to get into the discussions about the future of Ukraine and European security, says RUSI's Melvin.
However, the sheer number of European leaders potentially in attendance means the group will have to be "mindful" not to give "contradictory" messages, Melvin said.
"The risk is they look heavy-handed and are ganging up on Trump," he added. "Trump won't want to be put in a corner."
Although details remain hazy on what Article 5-like security guarantees from the U.S. and Europe would entail for Ukraine, it could mirror NATO membership terms, in which an attack on one member of the alliance is seen as an attack on all.
Zelenskyy continues to stress the importance of both U.S. and European involvement in any negotiations.
"A security guarantee is a strong army. Only Ukraine can provide that. Only Europe can finance this army, and weapons for this army can be provided by our domestic production and European production. But there are certain things that are in short supply and are only available in the United States," he said at the press conference Sunday alongside Von der Leyen.
Zelenskyy also pushed back against Trump's assertion -- which aligned with Putin's preference -- that the two sides should negotiate a complete end to the war, rather than first securing a ceasefire. Zelenskyy said a ceasefire would provide breathing room to review Putin's demands.
"It's impossible to do this under the pressure of weapons," he said. "Putin does not want to stop the killing, but he must do it."
-- Leicester reported from Le Pecq, France. Associated Press writers Pan Pylas in London, and Katie Marie Davies in Manchester, England, contributed to this report.
Sign Our PetitionThe recent news regarding European leaders' upcoming meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and former President Donald Trump underscores a significant geopolitical moment that demands careful examination. This gathering, aimed at solidifying U.S. security guarantees for Ukraine in the face of ongoing Russian aggression, illustrates how international alliances are being tested and reshaped in response to historical conflicts. The stakes are high not only for Ukraine but also for the broader European landscape, as past tensions between the U.S., Russia, and European nations continue to reverberate through contemporary politics.
Historically, the struggle for Ukraine's sovereignty has been emblematic of larger power dynamics between Russia and the West. The 2014 annexation of Crimea by Russia marked a critical turning point, leading to the ongoing conflict in Eastern Ukraine that has resulted in thousands of deaths and displaced millions. This backdrop is essential for understanding the urgency of the current discussions. The European leaders' decision to stand united with Zelenskyy represents a concerted effort to counter Russia's aggressive posturing, and it serves as a reminder that the principles of self-determination and territorial integrity are non-negotiable tenets of international law. The historical context of NATO's establishment and its expansion into Eastern Europe also plays a crucial role in this narrative, illustrating the complexities of European security in a post-Cold War era.
The implications of the meeting extend beyond mere military concerns; they also touch upon the social and humanitarian dimensions of the war. The conflict in Ukraine has resulted in a humanitarian crisis, with millions of Ukrainians facing dire conditions due to displacement, loss of livelihood, and violence. The European leaders' commitment to bolster Ukraine's armed forces signifies recognition of the necessity to protect civilians and maintain social stability. However, it is vital to question whether military support alone will suffice to address the underlying social injustices exacerbated by war. There is an opportunity for these leaders to advocate not just for military aid but also for comprehensive development programs that would support rebuilding efforts, promote social cohesion, and provide humanitarian assistance.
Furthermore, the dynamics of this high-stakes meeting are illustrative of the broader implications of Trump's foreign policy, which has often been characterized by unpredictability. The previous tense exchange between Trump and Zelenskyy in the Oval Office raises concerns about the potential for miscommunication and the fragility of diplomatic relations when leadership lacks consistency. This meeting could serve as a litmus test for how U.S. foreign policy will evolve under differing administrations, and it presents a moment for advocates of international solidarity to push for a more principled approach to foreign engagements—one that emphasizes diplomacy, human rights, and multilateral cooperation over transactional politics.
Finally, the role of the "coalition of the willing," which extends beyond European nations to include allies like Canada, Australia, and Japan, highlights the interconnectedness of global security. This collective response challenges the notion of isolationism and underscores the importance of international collaboration in addressing transnational threats. As these leaders navigate their discussions, the call for a "credible format for the Ukrainian army" should also resonate with advocates for peace and justice, urging them to consider how military readiness can coexist with diplomatic efforts aimed at sustainable solutions.
In conclusion, the meeting between Zelenskyy and European leaders with Trump presents a crucial moment in the ongoing struggle for Ukrainian sovereignty. It provides a platform for dialogue not only about military preparedness but also about fostering peace, social justice, and humanitarian aid. The outcomes of this meeting could shape the future trajectory of European security and international relations, and they present an opportunity for advocates to push for a more holistic approach to conflict resolution—one that centers human dignity and collective well-being as primary objectives. As this narrative unfolds, it is essential for citizens to engage critically with these developments, advocating for policies that prioritize peace over militarization and human rights over geopolitical maneuvering.
The meeting between European leaders and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy with former President Donald Trump marks a significant moment in the ongoing conflict between Ukraine and Russia. This event is not just a diplomatic endeavor; it is a reflection of the geopolitical landscape shaped by historical tensions, military strategies, and the shifting alliances in the post-Cold War era. The backdrop of this meeting is steeped in the long-standing struggle for Ukrainian sovereignty, which has been under threat since Russia’s annexation of Crimea in 2014 and the subsequent invasion of eastern Ukraine. For those concerned with global stability and the protection of democratic institutions, this meeting represents both an opportunity and a challenge.
Historically, the relationship between the United States and Ukraine has been complex, influenced by the broader dynamics of NATO and the European Union. The U.S. has often positioned itself as a protector of democracy, but Trump's approach has raised eyebrows due to his ambiguous stance towards Russia. The presence of European leaders rallying around Zelenskyy sends a clear message: unity among democratic nations is crucial in the face of authoritarian aggression. This coalition is a reminder of the importance of international alliances, not only for military support but also for shared values of democracy and human rights. The insistence of European leaders to stand by Zelenskyy underscores the need for a coherent strategy that transcends partisan politics in the U.S., emphasizing that this issue is fundamentally about global security and democratic integrity.
As Americans, there are several actionable steps we can take to support Ukraine and counteract the dangerous narratives surrounding the conflict. First, it is crucial to advocate for robust bipartisan support for Ukraine in Congress. Engaging with local representatives to express the importance of security assistance and humanitarian aid for Ukraine can amplify the voices of those seeking to uphold democratic values. Additionally, grassroots movements can help to raise awareness about the plight of Ukrainians and the broader implications of Russian aggression, fostering a sense of solidarity among citizens. This involvement might include organizing community events, educational forums, or social media campaigns that highlight the urgency of supporting Ukraine’s sovereignty.
Moreover, we must challenge the narratives that minimize the significance of this conflict. Discussions around security guarantees for Ukraine, as proposed by European leaders, should be framed not merely as a military issue but as a fundamental question of upholding international law and protecting democratic nations from authoritarian encroachment. Engaging in informed discussions with individuals who may hold differing views, particularly right-leaning audiences, is essential. Presenting facts about the conflict and the consequences of inaction can help bridge the divide and foster a more nuanced understanding of the stakes involved.
Finally, it is vital to educate ourselves and others about the historical context and the ongoing ramifications of this conflict. Understanding the nuances of Ukraine’s struggle, the role of NATO, and the implications of Russian aggression provides a solid foundation for meaningful discourse. By equipping ourselves with knowledge, we can effectively counter misinformation and articulate the importance of solidarity with Ukraine. This intellectual engagement not only empowers individuals but can also galvanize collective action that reinforces the commitment to democratic principles at home and abroad.
In conclusion, the upcoming meeting between Zelenskyy and Trump, supported by European leaders, serves as a pivotal moment in the fight for Ukraine's sovereignty. It is a reminder that the path forward requires a united front, both internationally and within the United States. By advocating for support, challenging harmful narratives, and educating ourselves and others, we can play a crucial role in shaping a future where democratic values are upheld in the face of authoritarianism. The fate of Ukraine does not belong solely to its people; it is an issue that resonates with the global community and calls for our collective action.
In response to the recent discussions surrounding Ukraine's security and the involvement of European leaders, there are several actions that individuals can take to advocate for peace, support Ukraine, and influence U.S. foreign policy. Here is a detailed list of ideas on how to get involved:
### What Can We Personally Do About This?
1. **Raise Awareness**: Use social media platforms to educate friends and followers about the situation in Ukraine, the implications of U.S. and European involvement, and the importance of global solidarity.
2. **Support NGOs and Humanitarian Efforts**: Donate to organizations that provide aid, support displaced individuals, and promote peace in Ukraine, such as the International Red Cross or local Ukrainian charities.
3. **Engage in Local Community Events**: Attend or organize community events focused on discussing the war in Ukraine, inviting speakers or panels that can provide information and ways to help.
4. **Participate in Peaceful Demonstrations**: Join or organize protests that advocate for peaceful resolutions to the conflict and support for Ukraine.
### Exact Actions We Can Take
1. **Sign Relevant Petitions**: - **Change.org Petition**: Search for petitions related to Ukraine support and U.S. foreign policy. For example, a petition titled “Support Ukraine's Right to Self-Defense” could be impactful. - **Example Petitions**: - Petition for increased humanitarian aid to Ukraine. - Petition urging Congress to support Ukraine's sovereignty.
2. **Contact Elected Officials**: - Write to your Senators and Representatives to express your views on U.S. involvement in Ukraine. Here are examples of who to contact: - **Senator Elizabeth Warren** (D-MA) - Email: https://www.warren.senate.gov/contact - Address: 2400 JFK Federal Building, 15 New Sudbury Street, Boston, MA 02203 - **Representative Adam Schiff** (D-CA) - Email: https://schiff.house.gov/contact - Address: 1508 Longworth House Office Building, Washington, DC 20515
**What to Say**: - Begin by introducing yourself and your concern regarding the U.S. role in supporting Ukraine amidst the ongoing conflict. - Request that they advocate for comprehensive support, including humanitarian aid, diplomatic solutions, and military assistance if deemed necessary. - Emphasize the importance of a united front with European allies to ensure a peaceful resolution to the conflict.
3. **Join Advocacy Groups**: - Become active with organizations like the **National Ukrainian-American Coordinating Council (NUCC)** or the **Ukrainian National Women's League of America (UNWLA)** that work on advocacy and support for Ukraine. - Participate in their campaigns or events to amplify your voice.
4. **Educate Yourself and Others**: - Read books and articles on the history of Ukraine and its relations with Russia to better understand the context of the conflict. - Host a discussion group or book club focusing on Ukraine, inviting local scholars or community leaders to share insights.
5. **Use Social Media Platforms**: - Share credible information about the situation in Ukraine. Use hashtags like #StandWithUkraine or #SupportUkraine to amplify your message. - Create infographics or simple messages that can be easily shared to raise awareness among your networks.
6. **Write Opinion Pieces**: - Draft letters to the editor for local newspapers expressing your views on U.S. foreign policy regarding Ukraine. - Share your thoughts on how community involvement can aid in the overall response to the crisis.
By actively engaging in these actions, individuals can contribute to a broader movement advocating for peace and support for Ukraine, while also influencing policymakers to consider the ramifications of their decisions.