What's at stake when Zelensky meets Trump at the White House with Starmer and EU allies in tow
yahoo.com -- Sunday, August 17, 2025, 2:56:58 PM Eastern Daylight Time
Categories: U.S.–NATO Relations, Foreign Policy & International Relations, U.S.–Russia Relations
European leaders, including Sir Keir Starmer, will join Volodymyr Zelensky for a high-stakes meeting with Donald Trump at the White House on Monday.
The prime minister will travel to Washington alongside several European leaders in a show of solidarity with the Ukrainian president, whose last visit to the Oval Office ended in a disastrous clash with Mr Trump.
The summit comes just days after the US president met Vladimir Putin in Alaska, in which it is understood that the Russian president demanded that Ukraine cede the Donetsk and Luhansk regions as a condition for ending the war.
Mr Trump is said to have privately endorsed the proposal, a move that Kyiv has strongly resisted.
Ukraine's leader has warned that Russia's refusal to halt hostilities before agreeing to a settlement would complicate any attempt at securing lasting peace. Speaking ahead of his trip, Mr Zelensky said: "Stopping the killing is a key element of stopping the war."
Downing Street said Sir Keir and other leaders "stand ready to support this next phase of talks" and will stress that their backing for Ukraine will continue "as long as it takes."
Who is going to Washington?
European leaders confirmed to be attending include:
The Ukrainian president will travel with a strong backing after participating in a coalition call on Sunday afternoon, hosted by the UK, France, and Germany.
The so-called "coalition of the willing" aims to provide security guarantees, including policing any future peace deal with troops on the ground in Ukraine.
What will be discussed on Monday?
The talks are expected to cover territorial questions, including Russia's demand for Ukraine to cede Donetsk and Luhansk.
They are also expected to address security guarantees for Ukraine, which could be backed by US air power.
The role of Nato and European allies in enforcing a settlement is likely to be discussed, alongside sanction pressures on Russia.
European leaders want to also ensure Ukraine is at the table for all negotiations.
Speaking alongside Mr Zelensky in Brussels, Ms von der Leyen said: "With regards to any territorial questions in Ukraine, our position is clear: international borders cannot be changed by force.
"These are decisions to be made by Ukraine and Ukraine alone, and these decisions cannot be taken without Ukraine at the table."
European powers also want to help set up a trilateral meeting between Mr Trump, Mr Putin and Mr Zelensky to make sure Ukraine has a seat at the table to shape its future.
What are Russia's demands?
At the Alaska summit, Mr Putin reportedly insisted Ukraine must surrender Donetsk and Luhansk in full, abandon its Nato aspirations and declare neutrality. He offered to freeze the front lines in Kherson and Zaporizhzhia, sources close to the meeting told The Independent.
Around 88 per cent of the Donbas is under Russian control. This includes almost all of the Luhansk region and 75 per cent of the Donetsk region.
Russia controls nearly 44,600 square miles or 19 per cent of Ukraine in total, including the Crimean peninsula, according to open-source maps of the battlefield.
Mr Zelensky has rejected the idea of handing over territory, insisting talks must be based on current front lines and begin with a ceasefire.
Mr Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff said Mr Putin agreed to allow the US and its European allies to offer Ukraine a security guarantee at his meeting with the US president on Friday.
"We were able to win the following concession: That the United States could offer Article 5-like protection, which is one of the real reasons why Ukraine wants to be in Nato," Mr Witkoff told CNN.
He added that it "was the first time we had ever heard the Russians agree to that" and called them "game-changing."
Article 5, at the heart of the 32-member military alliance, states that an armed attack against one or more of the members shall be considered an attack against all members.
Sir Keir commended Mr Trump's commitment to providing security guarantees to Ukraine, following a meeting of the coalition of the willing on Sunday afternoon.
What happened the last time Zelensky met Trump?
Their previous Oval Office meeting in February ended in a dramatic confrontation.
A planned mineral deal signing ceremony collapsed as Mr Trump and Vice President JD Vance accused Mr Zelensky of being "ungrateful" and "gambling with World War III".
Mr Zelensky pushed back, insisting there could be "no compromises with a killer" - a reference to Mr Putin.
The meeting was cut short, the joint press conference cancelled, and Mr Trump declared afterwards that Zelensky could "come back when he is ready for peace", and temporarily suspended aid to Ukraine.
Sign Our PetitionThe looming meeting between Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and former U.S. President Donald Trump, accompanied by European leaders such as Sir Keir Starmer, underscores a pivotal moment in the ongoing conflict between Ukraine and Russia. This encounter is not merely a diplomatic exercise; it is emblematic of the broader geopolitical struggles that have defined post-Cold War Europe. As the stakes rise regarding territorial integrity and sovereignty, it is crucial to contextualize this meeting within the historical backdrop of imperialism, nationalism, and the global balance of power.
Historically, the annexation of Crimea in 2014 marked a significant turning point in the relationship between Russia and the West, laying bare the vulnerabilities and resilience of small nations in the face of aggression from larger powers. The ongoing conflict in the Donbas region—comprising Donetsk and Luhansk—has seen Ukrainian sovereignty challenged by Russian military incursions and support for separatist movements. The demand by Vladimir Putin for Ukraine to cede these territories is not only a violation of international law but also a stark reminder of the imperial ambitions that have plagued global politics for centuries. This meeting at the White House offers an opportunity to reaffirm the principles of self-determination and territorial integrity, which are essential to a stable international order.
Zelensky's assertion that "stopping the killing is a key element of stopping the war" resonates deeply with the struggles faced by those advocating for peace and justice in conflict zones around the world. The humanitarian toll of this conflict has been staggering, with thousands of lives lost and millions displaced. The presence of European leaders at this summit serves a dual purpose: it not only demonstrates solidarity with Ukraine but also reinforces the notion that the response to aggression must be collective and unified. This is particularly significant in a world where multilateralism is increasingly under threat from nationalist and populist movements. It is essential for advocates of peace to remind their counterparts that the future of Ukraine must be determined by Ukrainians themselves, free from external coercion.
The proposed security guarantees, including potential NATO involvement, raise important questions about the role of military alliances in conflict resolution. While some may argue that an increased military presence could escalate tensions, it is vital to understand that a failure to adequately support Ukraine may embolden further aggression not just against Ukraine, but across Europe. The historical lessons from appeasement during the 1930s are pertinent here; allowing territorial concessions to authoritarian regimes often leads to wider conflicts. Thus, discussions surrounding NATO's role in ensuring peace and security must be framed not merely as military strategies but as commitments to uphold democratic values and human rights.
As the summit approaches, the emphasis on ensuring Ukraine's participation in discussions about its future is crucial. Any negotiation that excludes Ukraine is fundamentally flawed and risks legitimizing the imposition of solutions that do not reflect the will of the Ukrainian people. The rhetoric from European leaders, asserting that "international borders cannot be changed by force," must be bolstered by concrete actions that support Ukraine in resisting Russian encroachments. This moment serves as an opportunity to galvanize public opinion around the importance of sovereignty and self-determination, rallying support for Ukraine's right to exist and thrive as an independent nation.
In conclusion, the meeting between Zelensky and Trump, framed by the presence of European allies, represents more than just a diplomatic gathering; it is a critical juncture in the ongoing struggle for justice and peace in Eastern Europe. The historical context of imperialism, the humanitarian crises arising from conflict, the role of multinational alliances, and the fundamental rights of nations to self-determination must all inform the discussions held at this summit. For advocates of justice and peace, this is not just an opportunity to engage in high-stakes diplomacy; it is a moment to reaffirm a commitment to the principles that underpin a just global order—a commitment that must resonate far beyond the walls of the White House.
The upcoming meeting between Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and former U.S. President Donald Trump, accompanied by European leaders, marks a pivotal moment not only for Ukraine but also for the international community’s approach to security and geopolitical stability. The backdrop of this meeting is steeped in a complex historical narrative that underscores the importance of Ukraine as a sovereign nation grappling against Russian aggression. The tension surrounding the Donetsk and Luhansk regions, which have been embroiled in conflict since 2014, highlights the urgent need for a unified and principled stance against territorial expansionism and the manipulation of national borders through force.
Historically, Ukraine has endured a tumultuous relationship with Russia, stemming from centuries of political, cultural, and territorial entanglements. The annexation of Crimea in 2014 by Russia, and the subsequent support for separatist movements in Eastern Ukraine, exemplifies a broader pattern of authoritarian regimes attempting to exert control over neighboring countries. The current demands made by President Putin, which seek to strip Ukraine of its territorial integrity and NATO aspirations, reveal a blatant disregard for international law and the principles set forth in agreements like the Budapest Memorandum. This meeting presents an opportunity for American and European leaders to not only support Ukraine but also to reaffirm the sanctity of international borders and the importance of a rules-based global order.
In light of these pressing issues, it is crucial for Americans to engage thoughtfully in discussions about foreign policy and national security. By advocating for a strong and cohesive response to Russian aggression, individuals can help ensure that U.S. foreign policy aligns with the principles of democracy, sovereignty, and human rights. Grassroots movements, community organizations, and educational forums can serve as platforms for raising awareness about Ukraine’s struggle, as well as the broader implications of allowing authoritarianism to flourish unchecked. By fostering informed discussions, Americans can challenge the narratives that often downplay the significance of foreign conflicts, emphasizing instead the interconnectedness of global security and the moral imperative to stand against tyranny.
Moreover, the involvement of European allies, particularly through the "coalition of the willing," signals an emerging consensus around the need for collective security guarantees for Ukraine. This solidarity should be leveraged to push for more robust NATO involvement in the region, thereby reinforcing the alliance's commitment to its member states and partners. The idea of deploying troops to monitor peace agreements, as discussed among European leaders, is a potential step forward in providing Ukraine with the security it needs to navigate these treacherous waters. Americans can advocate for their government to support such initiatives, emphasizing that a strong European response is essential for deterring further Russian advances and promoting stability in Eastern Europe.
As the conversation pivots around the future of Ukraine, it is imperative to ensure that Ukrainian voices are central to any negotiations. The insistence by European leaders that Ukraine must be included in discussions about its future is a crucial acknowledgment of self-determination. Americans can take action by demanding that their representatives in Congress prioritize Ukrainian sovereignty in foreign policy discussions and reject any proposals that might undermine it. Engaging with local representatives, participating in advocacy campaigns, and supporting organizations that promote democracy and human rights in Ukraine can help amplify the message that the U.S. stands firmly with Ukraine in its fight against aggression.
In summary, the upcoming meeting between Zelensky and Trump, set against the backdrop of European solidarity, opens the door to critical discussions about the future of Ukraine and international security. The historical context of this struggle, combined with the current geopolitical climate, calls for Americans to be proactive in their engagement with foreign policy. By fostering informed dialogue, advocating for robust support for Ukraine, and ensuring that Ukrainian voices are heard, we can collectively work toward a future where sovereignty and democracy are upheld against the tide of authoritarianism.
In light of the recent developments surrounding the meeting between President Zelensky, Donald Trump, and European leaders, it is vital for individuals to take proactive steps in support of Ukraine and to advocate for the principles of sovereignty, peace, and international cooperation. Here are some actionable ideas and steps that can be taken:
### Personal Actions
1. **Educate Yourself and Others** - Stay informed about the ongoing conflict and the implications of international negotiations. Share articles, documentaries, and resources that provide insight into the situation in Ukraine. - Host or attend community discussions or forums to engage others in conversations about the importance of Ukraine's sovereignty and the impact of the war on civilians.
2. **Support Ukrainian Organizations** - Contribute to or volunteer with organizations that provide humanitarian aid to Ukraine, such as Razom for Ukraine or the Ukrainian Red Cross. - Example: Razom for Ukraine - donations can be made through their website at https://razomforukraine.org/.
3. **Engage with Local and National Representatives** - Write to your elected officials to express your support for Ukraine and advocate for robust U.S. support for Ukraine's sovereignty and territorial integrity. - **Example Contacts**: - **Your U.S. Senator**: Find contact information at https://www.senate.gov/senators/contact. - **Your House Representative**: Find contact information at https://www.house.gov/representatives/find-your-representative.
4. **Petition for Peace and Support for Ukraine** - Create or sign petitions advocating for specific actions, such as increased military and humanitarian support for Ukraine or sanctions against Russia for its aggression. - Websites like Change.org or MoveOn.org often host relevant petitions.
### Specific Actions
1. **Write Letters to Elected Officials** - **What to Say**: - Urge them to prioritize Ukraine's sovereignty in any negotiations and to ensure that Ukraine is included in discussions that affect its future. - Express the importance of strong international support for Ukraine and the need for measures to counter Russian aggression.
- **Example Template**: ``` Dear [Official's Name],
I am writing to express my concern regarding the ongoing conflict in Ukraine and the recent meetings involving President Zelensky, Donald Trump, and European leaders. It is crucial that any discussions surrounding Ukraine's future include the voices of its leaders and respect its sovereignty.
I urge you to support measures that provide military and humanitarian aid to Ukraine and to advocate for its inclusion in all diplomatic negotiations regarding its territorial integrity.
Thank you for your attention to this critical issue.
Sincerely, [Your Name] [Your Address] [Your Email] ```
2. **Participate in Local Activism** - Join local rallies or demonstrations supporting Ukraine. Organizations like the Ukrainian American National Association often host events. - Follow local activist groups on social media for updates on actions and events.
3. **Engage in Social Media Advocacy** - Use platforms like Twitter, Instagram, and Facebook to share information about the situation in Ukraine, using hashtags like #StandWithUkraine and #SupportUkraine. - Encourage others to join the conversation and amplify the message.
4. **Contact International Organizations** - Write to organizations such as the United Nations or European Union to express your support for Ukraine and advocate for international action against Russian aggression. - Example Contact for the United Nations: - Email: info@un.org - Mailing Address: United Nations Headquarters, 405 East 42nd Street, New York, NY 10017, USA.
5. **Promote Peaceful Resolutions** - Advocate for diplomatic efforts that prioritize peaceful resolutions, and support initiatives that call for an end to hostilities and the protection of civilian lives. - Engage with local peace organizations or initiatives that focus on diplomatic solutions to conflicts.
By taking these steps, individuals can contribute to a larger movement advocating for Ukraine's sovereignty, peace, and international cooperation. Each action, whether large or small, can help amplify the call for justice and support for the Ukrainian people during this challenging time.