Putin agreed to let US, Europe offer NATO-style security protections for Ukraine, Trump envoy says
princegeorgecitizen.com -- Sunday, August 17, 2025, 7:51:28 PM Eastern Daylight Time
Categories: U.S.–NATO Relations, Foreign Policy & International Relations, U.S.–Russia Relations
NEW YORK (AP) -- Special U.S. envoy Steve Witkoff said Sunday that Russian leader Vladimir Putin agreed at his summit with President Donald Trump to allow the U.S. and European allies to offer Ukraine a security guarantee resembling NATO's collective defense mandate as part of an eventual deal to end the 3 1/2-year war.
"We were able to win the following concession: That the United States could offer Article 5-like protection, which is one of the real reasons why Ukraine wants to be in NATO," he said on CNN's "State of the Union." He added that it "was the first time we had ever heard the Russians agree to that."
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, speaking at a news conference in Brussels with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, said that "we welcome President Trump's willingness to contribute to Article 5-like security guarantees for Ukraine. and the 'Coalition of the willing' -- including the European Union -- is ready to do its share."
Witkoff, offering some of the first details of what was discussed at Friday's summit in Alaska, said the two sides agreeing to "robust security guarantees that I would describe as game-changing." He added that Russia said that it would make a legislative commitment not to go after any additional territory in Ukraine.
Zelenskyy thanked the United States for recent signals that Washington is willing to support security guarantees for Ukraine, but said the details remained unclear.
"It is important that America agrees to work with Europe to provide security guarantees for Ukraine," he said, "But there are no details how it will work, and what America's role will be, Europe's role will be and what the EU can do, and this is our main task, we need security to work in practice like Article 5 of NATO, and we consider EU accession to be part of the security guarantees."
Witkoff defended Trump's decision to abandon his push for Russian to agree to an immediate ceasefire, saying the president had pivoted toward a peace deal because so much progress was made.
"We covered almost all the other issues necessary for a peace deal," Witkoff said, without elaborating.
"We began to see some moderation in the way they're thinking about getting to a final peace deal," he said.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio insisted there would be "additional consequences" as Trump warned before meeting with Putin, if they failed to reach a ceasefire. But Rubio noted that there wasn't going to be any sort of deal on a truce reached when Ukraine wasn't at the talks.
"Now, ultimately, if there isn't a peace agreement, if there isn't an end of this war, the president's been clear, there are going to be consequences," Rubio said on ABC's "This Week." "But we're trying to avoid that. And the way we're trying to avoid those consequences is with an even better consequence, which is peace, the end of hostilities."
Rubio, who is also Trump's national security adviser, said he did not believe issuing new sanctions on Russia would force Putin to accept a ceasefire, noting that the latter isn't off the table but that "the best way to end this conflict is through a full peace deal."
"The minute you issue new sanctions, your ability to get them to the table, our ability to get them to table will be severely diminished," Rubio said on NBC's "Meet the Press."
He also said "we're not at the precipice of a peace agreement" and that getting there would not be easy and would take a lot of work.
"We made progress in the sense that we identified potential areas of agreement, but there remains some big areas of disagreement. So we're still a long ways off," Rubio said.
Zelenskyy and Europeans leaders are scheduled to meet Monday with Trump at the White House. They heard from the president after his meeting with Putin.
"I think everybody agreed that we had made progress. Maybe not enough for a peace deal, but we are on the path for the first time," Witkoff said.
He added: "The fundamental issue, which is some sort of land swap, which is obviously ultimately in the control of the Ukrainians -- that could not have been discussed at this meeting" with Putin. "We intend to discuss it on Monday. Hopefully we have some clarity on it and hopefully that ends up in a peace deal very, very soon."
Jill Colvin, The Associated Press
Sign Our PetitionThe recent announcement regarding negotiations between the United States, Russia, and Ukraine has once again illuminated the complex dynamics of international relations, particularly in the context of Eastern European geopolitics. The decision to explore NATO-style security guarantees for Ukraine represents a significant moment in a protracted conflict that has roots in historical struggles for sovereignty, national identity, and territorial integrity. This analysis aims to unpack the implications of this potential agreement, connecting it to broader themes of social justice and historical context.
First and foremost, the backdrop of the conflict in Ukraine is essential to understanding the stakes involved. Since the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991, Ukraine has been navigating its post-Soviet identity, striving to balance its historical ties with Russia and its aspirations for closer integration with Western Europe. The 2014 annexation of Crimea by Russia marked a turning point, as it underscored the precariousness of Ukraine's territorial integrity and sovereignty. The current proposal for NATO-style security guarantees echoes historical promises made to nations seeking refuge under the umbrella of collective defense, reminiscent of the post-World War II era when many nations turned to alliances for protection against aggressive state actors.
Furthermore, the notion of a "Coalition of the Willing," as articulated by European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, raises important questions about the nature of international solidarity. While such coalitions can provide essential support, they can also lead to fragmented approaches to security that prioritize geopolitical interests over the needs of the local populace. In Ukraine’s case, the promise of security guarantees must translate into tangible benefits for ordinary citizens, who have borne the brunt of this conflict. This perspective is especially vital when considering the broader social justice implications; the people of Ukraine have faced immense suffering due to war, displacement, and economic instability, and their voices must remain central in any discussions about peace and security.
The role of diplomacy and negotiation in achieving peace cannot be overstated. Special envoy Steve Witkoff's comments suggest a cautious optimism about potential concessions from Russia, which, if realized, could pave the way for a more stable Ukraine. However, the emphasis on a peace deal that excludes direct Ukrainian participation raises significant concerns. The history of peace negotiations has shown that the absence of affected parties often leads to outcomes that do not reflect the will or needs of the people directly impacted by conflict. It is crucial for advocates of justice and democracy to insist on the inclusion of Ukrainian voices in any discussions, ensuring that their agency is not sidelined in favor of geopolitical maneuvering.
Moreover, the potential abandonment of an immediate ceasefire by the Trump administration signifies a troubling trend towards prioritizing broader diplomatic gains over immediate humanitarian needs. The complexities of international diplomacy often lead to compromises that can overlook the urgent need for cessation of hostilities, particularly in war-torn areas where civilians face daily threats to their lives. The call for peace must not only be about negotiating political agreements but also about addressing the humanitarian crises that result from prolonged conflict. The international community has a moral obligation to prioritize the protection of civilians and to ensure that peace processes are inclusive and comprehensive.
In conclusion, the discussions surrounding security guarantees for Ukraine are emblematic of broader struggles for justice and sovereignty in the face of imperial ambitions. As this situation unfolds, it is imperative for advocates of peace and social justice to engage deeply with the historical context and the implications of international agreements. By pushing for inclusive dialogues that center on the voices of those most affected, we can work towards a resolution that not only ends hostilities but also fosters a just and stable future for Ukraine and its people. The lessons of history remind us that a lasting peace must be built on the foundations of human rights, dignity, and mutual respect among nations.
The recent developments surrounding Ukraine, as reported in the news article, shed light on a complex geopolitical landscape that demands a thorough examination. The agreement purportedly reached between Russian President Vladimir Putin and former President Donald Trump regarding NATO-style security protections for Ukraine is both a significant concession and a potential turning point in the ongoing conflict. As citizens of a democratic society, it is essential to engage critically with these developments, understanding their historical context and the implications they hold for international relations and domestic policy.
Historically, Ukraine has been a focal point of contention between Russia and the West, especially after the 2014 annexation of Crimea by Russia, which triggered a protracted conflict in Eastern Ukraine. This crisis not only reshaped Ukraine's national identity but also sparked debates around NATO's role and its collective security principles. The idea of extending NATO-like protections to Ukraine reflects a growing recognition of the country's strategic importance to European security and the necessity of ensuring its sovereignty against external aggression. The United States, along with its European allies, has a vested interest in supporting Ukraine not only to maintain regional stability but also to uphold the principles of international law that prohibit territorial conquest.
However, while the reported concessions appear promising, they must not be viewed through a lens of uncritical optimism. The ambiguity surrounding the specifics of these security guarantees raises concerns. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy's call for clarity on America's role and the EU’s involvement underscores the need for a well-defined strategy that goes beyond mere assurances. As citizens, we must advocate for a comprehensive approach to foreign policy that prioritizes diplomacy, supports the rights of nations to self-determination, and actively engages with international partners to address security challenges. This is a crucial moment for Americans to demand transparency and accountability from their government regarding its commitments to Ukraine and the broader implications of such agreements.
Moreover, the emphasis on a potential peace deal must be scrutinized. The ongoing conflict in Ukraine has resulted in significant human suffering, and any resolution must prioritize the needs and voices of those directly impacted by the war. Engaging with grassroots movements, supporting humanitarian efforts, and amplifying the perspectives of Ukrainian citizens are vital steps we can take to ensure that peace negotiations are inclusive and equitable. As we engage with right-wing perspectives that may downplay the importance of such considerations, we can emphasize that a sustainable peace must involve the participation of all stakeholders, not just the major powers negotiating behind closed doors.
In this context, it is crucial for Americans to recognize the broader implications of U.S. foreign policy. The decision to engage with authoritarian regimes like Russia, even in the pursuit of peace, raises ethical questions about the values we uphold as a nation. The historical precedence of appeasement in global politics teaches us that short-term concessions can lead to long-term challenges. We must advocate for a foreign policy that is firmly rooted in democratic principles, human rights, and a commitment to international norms. This means holding our leaders accountable for their actions and ensuring that any agreements reached do not compromise the integrity of our democratic values.
Ultimately, the situation in Ukraine presents an opportunity for robust public discourse about our role in the world and the kind of nation we aspire to be. By fostering an informed citizenry that actively engages in discussions about foreign policy, we can influence the direction of our government and promote a vision of security that aligns with our democratic ideals. As we move forward, it is imperative to remain vigilant, advocate for transparency, and ensure that the voices of affected communities are heard loud and clear. By doing so, we can contribute to a more just and peaceful world, one where the rights of all nations, including Ukraine, are respected and upheld.
In light of the complexities around the situation in Ukraine and the recent discussions involving U.S. and European security guarantees, there are several actionable steps individuals can take to engage with this issue meaningfully. Here’s a detailed list of ideas and actions that can be pursued:
### 1. **Educate Yourself and Others** - **Action**: Hold or attend community discussions or forums about the Ukraine crisis, its implications, and the role of international relations. - **Example**: Organize a local meetup through platforms like Meetup.com or Facebook Events to discuss Ukraine's security situation and the importance of international cooperation.
### 2. **Advocate for Peace and Support for Ukraine** - **Action**: Write to your congressional representatives to express support for strong diplomatic measures aimed at peace in Ukraine. - **Who to Write**: - **Your Representative**: Find their contact information at [House.gov](https://www.house.gov) or [Senate.gov](https://www.senate.gov). - **Sample Message Content**: - “Dear [Representative's Name], I urge you to advocate for comprehensive security guarantees for Ukraine that prioritize peace and stability in the region. Please support diplomatic efforts that seek to end hostilities and promote international cooperation.”
### 3. **Sign and Share Petitions** - **Action**: Find and sign petitions advocating for the U.S. to support Ukraine through peace initiatives rather than military escalation. - **Example**: Use platforms like Change.org or MoveOn.org to discover active petitions. - **Sample Petition**: “Support Comprehensive Peace Initiatives in Ukraine” or a similar title. - After signing, share the petition within your networks to gather more support.
### 4. **Engage with Local Organizations** - **Action**: Join or support local organizations that focus on international relations or humanitarian assistance in conflict zones. - **Example**: Organizations like “Doctors Without Borders” or “Amnesty International” often have local chapters that welcome volunteers and supporters. - **How to Get Involved**: Visit their websites to find volunteer opportunities or donation drives.
### 5. **Contact Your Local Media** - **Action**: Write opinion pieces or letters to the editor in local newspapers advocating for Ukraine and explaining the importance of international solidarity. - **Who to Write**: Identify the editorial contacts in your local newspapers. - **Sample Message Content**: - “The situation in Ukraine requires our attention and action. I urge our leaders to prioritize peace and support for the Ukrainian people in their fight for sovereignty.”
### 6. **Use Social Media for Awareness** - **Action**: Utilize platforms like Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram to raise awareness about the situation in Ukraine. - **Example**: Share articles, infographics, or personal statements that highlight the need for peace and the importance of international support. - **Hashtags to Use**: #StandWithUkraine, #PeaceForUkraine, #InternationalSolidarity.
### 7. **Participate in Rallies and Events** - **Action**: Join rallies or events that focus on supporting Ukraine and promoting peace. - **Example**: Look for events organized by local NGOs or community groups, often advertised on social media or community bulletin boards. - **What to Bring**: Signage that communicates your support for Ukraine, and materials to share information about the issue.
### 8. **Engage with Elected Officials** - **Action**: Schedule meetings with local representatives to discuss your concerns and advocate for specific actions regarding Ukraine. - **How to Request a Meeting**: Call their office or use their website to request a meeting, expressing your desire to discuss U.S. policy on Ukraine. - **What to Discuss**: Mention the importance of peace negotiations, humanitarian aid, and international cooperation.
### 9. **Support Ukrainian Culture** - **Action**: Attend cultural events celebrating Ukrainian heritage, which can foster understanding and solidarity. - **Example**: Look for Ukrainian festivals, art exhibitions, or film screenings in your area.
By taking these actions, individuals can contribute to a broader effort to promote peace and support for Ukraine, engaging in meaningful advocacy and fostering a community committed to international solidarity and cooperation.