European leaders to join Zelensky for Washington talks - RTHK
news.rthk.hk -- Sunday, August 17, 2025, 7:53:22 PM Eastern Daylight Time
Categories: Foreign Policy & International Relations, U.S.–Russia Relations, U.S.–NATO Relations
European leaders have said they will join Volodymyr Zelensky to meet Donald Trump in Washington, in a bid to shore up the Ukrainian leader's position as the US president presses Kyiv to accept a quick peace deal to end Europe's deadliest war in 80 years.
Trump is leaning on Zelensky to strike an agreement after he met Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska and emerged more aligned with Moscow on seeking a peace deal instead of a ceasefire first.
Trump and Zelensky will meet on Monday.
"If peace is not going to be possible here and this is just going to continue on as a war, people will continue to die by the thousands... we may unfortunately wind up there, but we don't want to wind up there," Secretary of State Marco Rubio said in an interview with CBS' "Face the Nation."
Trump on Sunday promised "BIG PROGRESS ON RUSSIA" in a social media post without specifying what this might be.
Mikhail Ulyanov, Russia's envoy to international organisations in Vienna, said Russia agreed that any peace agreement on Ukraine must provide security guarantees to Kyiv.
"Many leaders of #EU states emphasize that a future peace agreement should provide reliable security assurances or guarantees for Ukraine," Ulyanov said on social media platform X.
"Russia agrees with that. But it has equal right to expect that Moscow will also get efficient security guarantees."
Top Trump officials hinted that the fate of Ukraine's eastern Donbas region - which is already mostly under Russian control - was on the line, while some sort of defensive pact was also on the table.
"We were able to win the following concession, that the United States could offer Article 5-like protection," Trump envoy Steve Witkoff told CNN's "State of the Union" on Sunday, suggesting this would be in lieu of Ukraine seeking Nato membership.
He said it was "the first time we had ever heard the Russians agree to that."
Article 5 of Nato's founding treaty enshrines the principle of collective defense, in which an attack on any member is considered an attack on all.
Meanwhile, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, French President Emmanuel Macron, and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer hosted a meeting of allies on Sunday to bolster Zelensky's hand, hoping in particular to lock down robust security guarantees for Ukraine that would include a US role.
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen will also travel to Washington, as will Finnish President Alexander Stubb, who has played rounds of golf with Trump this year, and Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, an admirer of many Trump policies.
European leaders at the Sunday meeting projected unity, welcoming US talk of a security guarantee but stressing no discussions over territory could take place without Kyiv's involvement and clear arrangements to safeguard the rest of Ukraine's land.
Some called for an immediate ceasefire, which Trump originally said he was trying to secure during his summit with Putin.
Trump later changed course and agreed with the Russians that peace negotiations could come without a ceasefire, an idea dismissed by some of Ukraine's European allies.
"You cannot negotiate peace under falling bombs," Poland's foreign ministry said in a statement.
A joint communique released by Britain, France and Germany after the meeting said their leaders were ready "to deploy a reassurance force once hostilities have ceased, and to help secure Ukraine's skies and seas and regenerate Ukraine's armed forces." (Reuters)
Sign Our PetitionThe recent news surrounding European leaders, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, and former US President Donald Trump serves as a pivotal moment in the ongoing discourse about the war in Ukraine. As European leaders converge in Washington to bolster Zelensky's position amidst Trump's overtures towards Russia, it is crucial to examine the historical and political nuances of these developments. The interplay between the desire for peace and the complex geopolitical landscape requires a deeper understanding of the implications surrounding any prospective agreements, particularly considering the long history of imperialism, colonialism, and the struggle for self-determination that has shaped Ukraine's current crisis.
Historically, Ukraine has been caught in the crosshairs of larger geopolitical conflicts, often serving as a battleground for the competing interests of Russia and Western powers. The disintegration of the Soviet Union in the early 1990s left Ukraine as an independent nation but also exposed it to the vulnerabilities of external influences and internal divisions. This historical context is paramount in understanding the current conflict, as the ongoing war has roots in Ukraine's desire to assert its sovereignty against Russian aggression. Trump's recent shift towards advocating for a peace deal, while seemingly a step towards resolution, raises concerns about the implications of compromising Ukraine's territorial integrity—particularly in the Donbas region, where Russian influence is prominent.
Moreover, the notion of negotiating peace without the full involvement and consent of the Ukrainian leadership is reminiscent of historical patterns where the voices of smaller nations are overlooked in favor of larger power dynamics. The insistence of European leaders that no discussions regarding territory take place without Kyiv's involvement is a vital principle rooted in the respect for national sovereignty and self-determination. This insistence is critical, especially in light of historical injustices faced by nations that have been coerced into unfavorable agreements due to the pressures exerted by more powerful states. The international community must remain vigilant against any attempts to marginalize Ukraine's agency in decisions affecting its future.
The calls for an immediate ceasefire must also be framed within the broader context of social justice and the human cost of war. As Secretary of State Marco Rubio highlighted, the continuation of conflict results in thousands of deaths, and the urgent need for dialogue should not be a façade for capitulation. Advocating for a ceasefire is not just a political maneuver; it is a moral imperative that recognizes the lived realities of those affected by the war. The humanitarian crisis unfolding as a result of the conflict should compel all parties involved to prioritize the lives of civilians and the stability of the region over geopolitical calculations. In this light, the push for robust security guarantees for Ukraine is not merely a strategic necessity; it is an acknowledgment of the right of nations to defend themselves against aggression and to seek peace without compromising their sovereignty.
Finally, the complexities of this situation underscore the importance of solidarity movements that can mobilize public opinion and press for just resolutions. Activists and citizens alike must engage in conversations that elevate the voices of those directly impacted by the war, advocating for policies that prioritize diplomacy over military confrontation. As history has shown, peace is often achieved not through the imposition of power but through the genuine collaboration and respect of all parties involved. The present moment demands a commitment to equity and justice, ensuring that the lessons of history inform the pathways toward a peaceful resolution in Ukraine. The stakes are high, and the path forward requires a deep commitment to human rights, international law, and the principle that all nations deserve to chart their own futures free from coercion.
The recent developments surrounding the meeting between European leaders and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in Washington illuminate a complex geopolitical landscape marked by high stakes and potential for miscalculation. As the 80-year conflict in Europe unfolds, with the United States at a pivotal intersection of diplomacy, it is crucial to analyze the historical context and the implications of pursuing peace at the cost of territorial integrity and self-determination. The meeting, catalyzed by negotiations with Donald Trump—who appears to be leaning towards a rapid peace deal—raises significant questions about the direction of U.S. foreign policy and its commitment to Ukraine's sovereignty amidst pressure to accommodate Russian interests.
Historically, the post-World War II order has been characterized by a struggle between Western democratic nations and authoritarian regimes. The emergence of NATO and the European Union were responses to the Soviet threat, aiming to create a united front against aggression. The situation in Ukraine, particularly the ongoing war in the Donbas region, serves as a stark reminder of the fragility of these alliances. As Trump advocates for a peace deal that seemingly prioritizes expediency over justice, it risks undermining decades of collective security efforts. The potential for Article 5-like protections for Ukraine, as hinted by Trump's envoy, raises further concerns about the implications of such guarantees without robust discussions about the territorial integrity of Ukraine and the rights of its people.
In light of these developments, it is imperative for Americans to engage actively in the discourse surrounding U.S. foreign policy. Supporting a peaceful resolution that respects Ukraine's sovereignty should be at the forefront of our advocacy. Grassroots movements can mobilize public sentiment by highlighting the importance of international law in upholding the rights of nations to self-determination. Engaging with representatives, writing letters, and participating in town halls can amplify voices that demand a responsible approach to peace negotiations—one that does not come at the expense of Ukraine's territorial integrity or democratic aspirations.
Moreover, educating ourselves and our communities about the nuances of international relations can dismantle the simplistic narratives often propagated by political leaders seeking quick solutions. This includes understanding the historical implications of appeasement, the consequences of territorial concessions, and the importance of involving affected nations in peace discussions. By fostering informed conversations, we can challenge the rhetoric that seeks to prioritize expediency over ethical commitments and human rights. Engaging in debates about the implications of security guarantees for Ukraine and what they entail in practice will also empower citizens to hold their leaders accountable for the decisions they make on the world stage.
As European leaders emphasize the necessity of a united front in supporting Ukraine, it is vital for American citizens to recognize that solidarity extends beyond mere political posturing. The humanitarian implications of war are profound, and any prolonged conflict results in untold suffering for civilians. Advocating for a ceasefire and a diplomatic resolution should be framed not only as a strategic necessity but also as a moral imperative. It is our responsibility to ensure that the voices of those affected by the war—Ukrainians seeking a just resolution—are prioritized in discussions about their future. By pushing for a peace process that centers on Ukrainian needs and aspirations, we reaffirm our commitment to a world order that values human dignity and collective security over realpolitik.
In conclusion, the unfolding events in Washington and their ramifications for Ukraine highlight a critical juncture in U.S. foreign policy. It is essential for Americans to engage thoughtfully and actively in this discourse, advocating for solutions that uphold the principles of sovereignty and self-determination. This is a moment to galvanize public opinion, educate our communities, and demand that our leaders prioritize a just and equitable resolution to the conflict. Only through informed and passionate advocacy can we hope to influence the trajectory of international relations in favor of peace and justice for all nations.
Analyzing the geopolitical dynamics surrounding the ongoing conflict in Ukraine, as highlighted in the article, opens avenues for personal engagement and advocacy. Here are some actionable steps individuals can take to influence the situation positively and encourage diplomatic resolution:
### What Can We Personally Do About This?
1. **Educate Yourself and Others**: Understanding the complexities of the Ukraine conflict, including historical context and current developments, is vital. Share this knowledge through discussions, blogs, and social media.
2. **Support Humanitarian Efforts**: Contribute to organizations providing relief to those affected by the war. This can help alleviate immediate suffering and build global solidarity.
3. **Advocate for Peaceful Resolutions**: Engage in activism that promotes dialogue and peaceful negotiations over military solutions.
4. **Contact Elected Officials**: Advocate for policies that support Ukraine’s sovereignty while pushing for diplomatic solutions rather than military escalations.
5. **Join or Form Local Advocacy Groups**: Collaborate with like-minded individuals to amplify your voice and actions.
### Exact Actions You Can Personally Take
1. **Sign Petitions**: - **“Peace for Ukraine” Petition**: - A petition advocating for a ceasefire and diplomatic negotiations can be found on platforms like Change.org. Search for current petitions related to Ukraine and add your name. 2. **Write to Elected Officials**: - **Contacting U.S. Senators and Representatives**: - Find your elected officials via [Congress.gov](https://www.congress.gov/). Write letters urging them to support Ukraine through diplomatic means. - Example: - **Senator Chuck Schumer** (D-NY) Email: schumer.senate.gov/contact/contact.html USPS Address: 322 Hart Senate Office Building, Washington, DC 20510
- **Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez** (D-NY) Email: ocasio-cortez.house.gov/contact USPS Address: 1236 Longworth House Office Building, Washington, DC 20515
3. **Engage with Local Representatives**: - Attend town hall meetings or community forums where foreign policy is discussed. Ask questions and express your views on the need for a peaceful resolution in Ukraine.
4. **Support Humanitarian Organizations**: - Donate to reputable organizations like the **International Rescue Committee** or **Doctors Without Borders**, which are actively providing aid to those affected in Ukraine. - Example donation page: [International Rescue Committee](https://www.rescue.org)
5. **Educate and Mobilize Your Community**: - Host a discussion or webinar on the Ukraine conflict to raise awareness about the humanitarian impact and the importance of peace efforts. Use platforms like Zoom or local community centers.
6. **Social Media Advocacy**: - Use platforms like Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram to share information, articles, and personal insights on the importance of diplomatic solutions in Ukraine. Tag your elected officials to increase visibility.
7. **Participate in Peaceful Protests**: - Join or organize rallies advocating for peace in Ukraine. Ensure that these events are peaceful and promote dialogue.
### What to Say
When communicating with officials or in public forums, consider using the following points:
- **Emphasize the Human Cost**: Highlight the thousands of lives at stake due to the ongoing conflict and the urgent need for a diplomatic resolution. - **Advocate for Specific Policies**: Suggest clear policies that support Ukraine’s sovereignty while promoting negotiations, such as “I urge you to prioritize a ceasefire and engage in peace talks that include all stakeholders.”
- **Call for Transparency**: Encourage officials to publicly share their strategies regarding Ukraine to ensure accountability and alignment with humanitarian principles.
- **Encourage International Cooperation**: Stress the importance of a united front among global leaders to find a sustainable, peaceful solution that respects Ukraine’s territorial integrity.
By taking these actions, individuals can contribute to a broader push for peace and support the rights and lives of those affected by the conflict in Ukraine, fostering a climate of understanding and resolution in international relations.