Euro leaders race to be side-by-side with Zelensky as he faces Trump
dailymail.co.uk -- Sunday, August 17, 2025, 5:52:35 PM Eastern Daylight Time
Categories: U.S.–Russia Relations, U.S.–NATO Relations, Foreign Policy & International Relations
European leaders are rushing to Washington to stand side-by-side with President Zelensky as he faces Donald Trump in crunch talks at the White House on Monday.
The meeting comes after Trump's special envoy, Steve Witkoff, said the US had forced Vladimir Putin to agree a 'Nato-style' security agreement protecting Ukraine.
Mr Witkoff made the comments to CNN on Sunday amid reports the Russian leader had gained the upper hand at the summit in Anchorage, Alaska, on Friday.
In the bombshell interview, he said offering Ukraine 'Article 5-like protections' was the real prize and described the proposed security guarantees as 'game-changing'.
'We didn't think that we were anywhere close to agreeing to Article Five protection from the United States in legislative enshrinement within the Russian Federation, not to go after any other territory when the peace deal is codified,' Witkoff said.
He added: 'We got to an agreement that the United States and other European nations could effectively offer Article 5-like language to cover a security guarantee.'
Sir Keir Starmer is among the EU and Nato leaders travelling to the US in the hope of preventing a repeat of Zelensky's humiliation in the Oval Office in February.
There are fears Zelenksy may walk into a trap laid by Putin - with Trump appearing poised to urge him to agree to a Russian land grab of his country's territory.
Trump's special envoy, Steve Witkoff, said the US has forced Vladimir Putin to agree a 'Nato-style' security agreement protecting Ukraine
Russian president Vladimir Putin meets Donald Trump in Alaska on Friday
Zelensky, speaking in Brussels on Sunday, has said giving up land for peace in a future agreement with Russia could be 'impossible'
Putin is said to have demanded full control of Donetsk and Luhansk - two occupied Ukrainian regions - as a condition for ending the three-year war.
Zelensky, meanwhile, has said giving up land for peace in a future agreement with Russia could be 'impossible'.
Speaking in Brussels on Sunday, the Ukrainian president insisted that his country's constitution made it 'impossible to give up territory or trade land'.
But he went on to say: 'Since the territorial issue is so important, it should be discussed only by the leaders of Ukraine and Russia at a trilateral meeting.
'We need real negotiations, which means we can start where the front line is now,' Zelensky said, adding that European leaders supported this.
The Ukrainian leader reiterated his position that it was necessary to establish a ceasefire in order to then negotiate a final deal.
'It's important that Washington is with us,' the Ukrainian leader said.
Zelensky added that Ukraine did not yet know all the demands made by Putin at the meeting with Trump on Friday.
Volodymyr Zelensky faced a heated encounter when he met Donald Trump in February
Ursula von der Leyen, German chancellor Friedrich Merz and France's Emmanuel Macron will travel to Washington tomorrow for peace talks at the White House.
European leaders are seen following a so-called 'coalition of the willing' meeting in May
Read More Putin's 'last trick': As Trump urges Zelensky to fold, Russia launches suicidal 'fakery' missions
Meanwhile, the world is still reeling from Trump's meeting with Putin in Alaska, where he rolled out the red carpet for the war-mongering tyrant.
Most international commentators believe the negotiations were a win for Putin, with the media noticing he appeared energetic and satisfied by how the summit had gone.
Trump, on the other hand, appeared uncharacteristically deflated and seemed disheartened that the famed deal-maker was not able to get an agreement together.
But the US President has hit back at his critics.
He posted on his social media platform Truth Social on Sunday morning: 'It's incredible how the Fake News violently distorts the TRUTH when it comes to me.
'There is NOTHING I can say or do that would lead them to write or report honestly about me.
'I had a great meeting in Alaska on Biden's stupid War, a war that should have never happened!!!'
Only minutes later, he posted: 'If I got Russia to give up Moscow as part of the Deal, the Fake News, and their PARTNER, the Radical Left Democrats, would say I made a terrible mistake and a very bad deal.
Your browser does not support iframes.
US President Donald Trump shakes hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin as they meet for talks about Ukraine at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage, Alaska, on Friday
Vladimir Putin reportedly told the US president during the Alaska summit Friday that Ukrainian frontlines in Donetsk were on the verge of collapse
Read More Trump's bombshell but subtle gesture to Putin that everyone missed... it could be his most ingenious move yet: MARK HALPERIN
'That's why they are the FAKE NEWS! Also, they should talk about the 6 WARS, etc., I JUST STOPPED!!! MAGA.'
In his interview with CNN, Witkoff also discussed the issue of territory - and specifically of the five regions he described as always having been the 'crux of the deal'.
Russia illegally annexed Crimea in 2014 while the regions of Luhansk, Donetsk, Zaporizhzhia and Kherson were annexed after referendums internationally viewed as shams in 2022.
'The Russians made some concessions at the table with regard to all five of those regions,' Witkoff said today.
He added that the Donetsk region constitutes an 'important discussion' - and one which he said will happen tomorrow.
The Donbas is predominantly Russian-speaking, and after Russia snatched Crimea in 2014, its proxy forces have gained a foothold there in a long-running war.
Zelensky, who has rejected Putin's demands that Kyiv withdraw from the remaining 30 per cent of Donetsk that it still controls, played down the Russian advances, saying on X that his forces were 'countering' and 'increasing the pressure' on the 'occupier'.
'The Russian army continues to suffer significant losses in its attempts to secure more favourable political positions for the Russian leadership at the meeting in Alaska.
'We understand this plan and are informing our partners about the real situation,' he said.
Your browser does not support iframes.
A Russian tank fires during a practice session at an undisclosed location in Ukraine on Friday
President Volodymyr Zelensky is welcomed to Melsbroek Air Base near Brussels on Sunday
Sir Keir Starmer is set to be joined by Ursula von der Leyen, German chancellor Friedrich Merz and France's Emmanuel Macron at the talks in Washington on Monday.
Other European leaders who have confirmed they will go include Finnish president Alexander Stubb, Italian PM Giorgia Meloni and Nato secretary general Mark Rutte.
Zelensky's Oval Office rendezvous follows a 'coalition of the willing' video call held by Western allies at 2pm on Sunday, hosted by Sir Keir, Mr Macron and Mr Merz.
Downing Street has insisted Sir Keir and other allies stand ready to support the next phase of talks to end the war.
A statement from No 10 said: 'At the meeting that will take place at the White House tomorrow, the Prime Minister, with other European partners, stands ready to support this next phase of further talks and will reaffirm that his backing for Ukraine will continue as long as it takes.'
Sign Our PetitionThe recent diplomatic maneuvering surrounding President Volodymyr Zelensky's visit to Washington highlights the intricate web of international relations, historical grievances, and the persistent struggle for sovereignty that defines contemporary Ukraine. As European leaders rush to support Zelensky amid his meetings with former President Donald Trump, it is essential to situate this moment within the broader context of post-Cold War geopolitics and the enduring legacy of imperialism, particularly in Eastern Europe. The stakes are high, not only for Ukraine but for the principles of national sovereignty and self-determination that underpin global democratic ideals.
Ukraine's ongoing conflict with Russia cannot be divorced from its historical context. Since gaining independence in 1991, Ukraine has struggled to assert its sovereignty against a backdrop of Russian aggression, which has manifested in the annexation of Crimea in 2014 and ongoing military incursions in Donetsk and Luhansk. These actions are part of a broader pattern of imperialistic behavior by Russia, reminiscent of its Soviet past, where the subjugation of neighboring nations served to bolster its influence. Zelensky's insistence that discussions about territorial concessions be limited to Ukrainian and Russian leaders underscores a critical tenet of self-determination: that no external power should dictate the terms of a nation's sovereignty. This principle resonates with numerous historical struggles, from the decolonization movements of the mid-20th century to contemporary efforts to dismantle neocolonial structures in various parts of the world.
The meeting between Zelensky and Trump raises significant concerns regarding the role of the United States and NATO in shaping Ukraine's future. While Witkoff's assertion that the U.S. has compelled Putin to consider a NATO-style security agreement might appear advantageous, it also reveals the precarious nature of relying on external powers for national security. Historically, alliances have often been fraught with complications and betrayals. For example, the Warsaw Pact and its dissolution left many Eastern European nations vulnerable to Russian resurgence. The risk of Zelensky being maneuvered into conceding territory under the guise of peace cannot be overlooked, especially as Trump has a history of transactional diplomacy that prioritizes short-term gains over long-term stability.
Moreover, the urgency of Zelensky's situation should prompt us to reflect on the broader implications of international apathy toward the Ukrainian plight. The humanitarian crisis stemming from the conflict—displacement, economic instability, and loss of life—demands a robust and principled response from the global community. This moment offers a critical opportunity for solidarity, not only among European nations but also from global civil society, to advocate for a just resolution that honors Ukraine's sovereignty and addresses the humanitarian needs of its people. The historical precedent of ignoring the plight of nations under threat—such as the Balkan conflicts of the 1990s—should serve as a cautionary tale about the consequences of diplomatic neglect.
In conclusion, Zelensky's meetings in Washington symbolize more than just a diplomatic engagement; they are emblematic of the ongoing struggle for self-determination in the face of imperialist encroachments. The delicate balancing act of securing international support while safeguarding national sovereignty is fraught with challenges. As advocates for justice and equality, it is crucial to amplify calls for genuine negotiations that center Ukrainian agency and prioritize peace without the compromises that undermine territorial integrity. Engaging with right-wing perspectives that often downplay the importance of sovereignty and international solidarity can foster critical discussions about the roles of power, history, and justice in shaping the future of Ukraine and beyond.
The geopolitical landscape surrounding Ukraine is increasingly complex, particularly as European leaders convene in Washington to support President Volodymyr Zelensky amid fraught negotiations with Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin. The urgency of these meetings speaks volumes about the precariousness of Ukraine’s sovereignty and the potential ramifications of these talks on global stability. Historical contexts such as the Cold War, the disintegration of the Soviet Union, and the ongoing conflict in Ukraine underscore the importance of international support for Ukraine's territorial integrity. For the American public and particularly for those engaged in political discourse, recognizing the stakes of these negotiations is essential.
The historical background of Ukraine's struggle for sovereignty dates back to the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991. Ukraine's declaration of independence was a significant step in dismantling Russian influence in Eastern Europe. However, subsequent attempts at democratic consolidation have often been undermined by external pressures, notably from Russia. The 2014 annexation of Crimea and the ongoing conflict in the Donbas region exemplify the continued threat to Ukraine's territorial integrity. In this context, the current negotiations between Zelensky and Trump are not just about immediate security guarantees; they resonate with Ukraine’s historical fight against imperialism and the desire for self-determination.
As discussions unfold regarding the potential for "NATO-style" security guarantees for Ukraine, it is crucial to recognize the implications of such a framework. Article 5 of the NATO treaty, which stipulates collective defense, has historically served as a deterrent against aggression. However, the talk of "Article 5-like protections" raises questions about the sincerity and effectiveness of such guarantees when juxtaposed with Trump's unpredictable foreign policy approach. The fear that this may lead to a compromise on Ukraine’s territorial integrity is palpable and should evoke a strong response from American citizens who value democratic principles and international law.
In light of these developments, what can Americans do to influence the direction of U.S. foreign policy? First and foremost, fostering awareness and understanding of these issues is vital. Engaging in discussions within communities, attending town hall meetings, and advocating for policies that prioritize human rights and international cooperation can galvanize public opinion. Additionally, contacting representatives to express support for robust military and economic aid to Ukraine can help ensure that the U.S. remains committed to upholding its democratic values abroad.
Furthermore, there is an opportunity for citizens to champion diplomacy over militarism. While it is essential to provide support to Ukraine, advocating for a comprehensive diplomatic strategy that prioritizes negotiations and conflict resolution will be crucial in the long term. This approach echoes Zelensky's call for a ceasefire and direct negotiations with Russia, emphasizing the importance of dialogue in resolving conflicts. By promoting peace-oriented policies, Americans can contribute to a narrative that counters the instinct to engage in military escalation and, instead, seeks sustainable solutions for the region.
In conclusion, as the international community watches the outcome of these critical discussions, Americans must remain vigilant and proactive in advocating for policies that support Ukraine's sovereignty and promote peace. By understanding the historical context and complexities of the current situation, engaging in meaningful discourse, and pushing for diplomatic solutions, citizens can play an active role in shaping a future that respects the rights of nations to self-determine their destinies. The stakes are high, not only for Ukraine but for global democratic values, and it is our collective responsibility to ensure that these principles are upheld.
To engage with the pressing issues presented in the article regarding Ukraine's security and the dynamics with Russia, there are several actionable steps we can take as individuals to advocate for justice, peace, and support for Ukraine. Here’s a detailed list of ideas and actions:
### What Can We Personally Do About This?
1. **Educate Ourselves and Others**: Understanding the historical context and current realities of the Russia-Ukraine conflict is essential. Share articles, books, and documentaries that provide depth to the situation.
2. **Support Ukrainian Initiatives**: Contribute to organizations that are helping Ukraine or advocating for its sovereignty and territorial integrity.
3. **Engage Politically**: We can write to our elected representatives to express our stance on the U.S. involvement in Ukraine and the importance of supporting international law and human rights.
4. **Participate in Local Events**: Join or organize community gatherings, discussions, or rallies that support Ukraine and raise awareness about the conflict.
5. **Use Social Media**: Leverage platforms to spread awareness about the situation in Ukraine, support for its sovereignty, and the implications of international negotiations.
### Exact Actions We Can Take
1. **Sign Petitions**: Participate in petitions that advocate for the protection of Ukraine’s sovereignty. Websites like Change.org often host relevant petitions. Search for ones related to U.S. foreign policy in Ukraine or support for Ukrainian refugees.
2. **Write to Representatives**: - **Who to Write**: - Your local Congressional representatives (find them at [house.gov](https://www.house.gov) or [senate.gov](https://www.senate.gov)). - Specific influential senators and representatives such as: - **Senator Bob Menendez** - Email: senator@menendez.senate.gov - Mailing Address: 528 Hart Senate Office Building, Washington, DC 20510 - **Representative Adam Schiff** - Email: contact form on [schiff.house.gov](https://schiff.house.gov) - Mailing Address: 2111 Rayburn House Office Building, Washington, DC 20515
3. **What to Say**: When writing, express your support for Ukraine’s right to self-determination and urge them to advocate for strong support against any territorial concessions to Russia. Here’s a template: - "Dear [Representative's Name], I am writing to express my support for Ukraine’s sovereignty and call on you to ensure that the U.S. maintains a firm stance against any territorial concessions to Russia. It is essential that we stand with Ukraine in their right to self-determination and provide the necessary support for their security and peace efforts."
4. **Join Advocacy Groups**: Become involved with organizations such as: - **Ukrainian Congress Committee of America**: They have campaigns and advocacy initiatives. - **Human Rights Watch** or **Amnesty International**: Both often have campaigns related to the protection of human rights in conflict zones.
5. **Contact the U.S. State Department**: - **Secretary of State Antony Blinken** - Email: contact form on [state.gov](https://www.state.gov) - Mailing Address: U.S. Department of State, 2201 C Street NW, Washington, DC 20520 - **Message**: Urge the administration to prioritize Ukrainian sovereignty and ensure diplomatic efforts respect their territorial integrity.
6. **Support Local Ukrainian Communities**: Find local Ukrainian community centers or organizations and offer your time or resources. This could be attending cultural events, providing financial support, or volunteering.
### Conclusion
By taking these actions, we contribute to a collective movement advocating for justice and peace in Ukraine. Every letter, signature, and conversation can amplify the call for a just resolution to the conflict and uphold the principles of sovereignty and international law. Engage with your community, stay informed, and let your voice be heard in support of Ukraine's rights and its future.