European leaders to quiz Trump on Ukraine security guarantees - kuwaitTimes
kuwaittimes.com -- Sunday, August 17, 2025, 3:25:44 PM Eastern Daylight Time
Categories: U.S.–Russia Relations, U.S.–NATO Relations, Foreign Policy & International Relations
LONDON/KYIV: European leaders will join Volodymyr Zelensky to meet Donald Trump in Washington, they said on Sunday, seeking to shore up Zelensky's position as the US president presses Ukraine to accept a quick peace deal to end Europe's deadliest war in 80 years.
Trump is leaning on Zelensky to strike an agreement after he met Kremlin chief Vladimir Putin in Alaska and emerged more aligned with Moscow on seeking a peace deal instead of a ceasefire first. Trump and Zelensky will meet on Monday. "If peace is not going to be possible here and this is just going to continue on as a war, people will continue to die by the thousands ... we may unfortunately wind up there, but we don't want to wind up there," Secretary of State Marco Rubio said in an interview with CBS' "Face the Nation."
French President Emmanuel Macron said Sunday that the European leaders would ask US President Donald Trump how far he would back security guarantees for Ukraine, adding he did not think Russia wanted peace. Macron was speaking from his summer residence after joining a call with other European leaders to coordinate their joint position.
Macron said the leaders' "will is to present a united front between Europeans and Ukrainians" and to ask the Americans "to what extent" they are ready to contribute to the security guarantees that would be offered to Ukraine in a peace agreement. On Moscow's position, he said: "There is only one state proposing a peace that would be a capitulation: Russia." And just as there could be no discussion of Ukrainian territory without Ukraine, so there could be "no discussions about the security of Europeans without them", he added.
Trump on Sunday promised "BIG PROGRESS ON RUSSIA" in a social media post without specifying what this might be. Sources briefed on Moscow's thinking told Reuters the US and Russian leaders have discussed proposals for Russia to relinquish tiny pockets of occupied Ukraine in exchange for Kyiv ceding a swathe of fortified land in the east and freezing the front lines elsewhere.
Top Trump officials hinted that the fate of Ukraine's eastern Donbas region - which incorporates Donetsk and Luhansk and which is already mostly under Russian control - was on the line, while some sort of defensive pact was also on the table. "We were able to win the following concession, that the United States could offer Article 5-like protection," Trump envoy Steve Witkoff told CNN's "State of the Union" on Sunday, suggesting this would be in lieu of Ukraine seeking NATO membership. "The United States could offer Article 5 protection, which was the first time we had ever heard the Russians agree to that."
Article 5 of NATO's founding treaty enshrines the principle of collective defense - the notion that an attack on a single member is considered an attack on them all. That pledge may not be enough to sway leaders in Kyiv to sign over Donbas. Ukraine's borders were already meant to have been guaranteed when Ukraine surrendered a Soviet-era nuclear arsenal in 1994, and it proved to be little deterrent when Russia absorbed Crimea in 2014 and then launched its full-scale invasion in 2022. The war has now dragged on for 3-1/2 years and killed or wounded more than 1 million people.
German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, French President Emmanuel Macron, and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer hosted a meeting of allies on Sunday to bolster Zelensky's hand, hoping in particular to lock down robust security guarantees for Ukraine that would include a US role.
The Europeans are keen to help Zelensky avoid a repeat of his last Oval Office meeting in February. That went disastrously, with Trump and Vice President JD Vance giving the Ukrainian leader a public dressing-down, accusing him of being ungrateful and disrespectful. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen will also travel to Washington, as will Finland's President Alexander Stubb, whose access to Trump included rounds of golf in Florida earlier this year, and Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, who is an admirer of many of Trump's policies. "It's important that Washington is with us," Zelensky said alongside von der Leyen on a visit to Brussels, saying that the current front lines in the war should be the basis for peace talks. "Putin does not want to stop the killing, but he must do it."
'Steel porcupine'
Setting out red lines, von der Leyen said Ukraine's allies wanted robust security guarantees for Ukraine, no limits to Ukraine's armed forces, and a seat at the table with Trump and Putin for Ukraine to discuss its territory. "As I've often said, Ukraine must become a steel porcupine, indigestible for potential invaders," she said. Rubio said both Russia and Ukraine would need to make concessions to reach a peace deal and that security guarantees for Ukraine would be discussed on Monday. He also said there would have to be additional consequences for Russia if no deal was reached.
"I'm not saying we're on the verge of a peace deal, but I am saying that we saw movement, enough movement to justify a follow-up meeting with Zelensky and the Europeans, enough movement for us to dedicate even more time to this," Rubio told broadcaster CBS. However, he said the US may not be able to create a scenario to end the war.
'Very big powder'
Putin briefed his close ally, Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko, about the Alaska talks, and also spoke with Kazakhstan's President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev. Trump said on Friday that Ukraine should make a deal to end the war because "Russia is a very big power, and they're not."
After the Alaska summit, Trump phoned Zelensky and told him that the Kremlin chief had offered to freeze most front lines if Ukraine ceded all of Donetsk, the industrial region that is one of Moscow's main targets, a source familiar with the matter said. Zelensky rejected the demand. Russia already controls a fifth of Ukraine, including about three-quarters of Donetsk province, which it first entered in 2014. Trump also said he agreed with Putin that a peace deal should be sought without the prior ceasefire that Ukraine and its European allies have called for. That was a reversal of his position before the summit, when he said he would not be happy unless a ceasefire was agreed on. -- Reuters
Sign Our PetitionThe recent announcement of a meeting between European leaders, Volodymyr Zelensky, and former U.S. President Donald Trump regarding security guarantees for Ukraine highlights the intricate web of international relations, historical context, and ongoing social struggles that define modern geopolitics. Central to this discussion is the devastating conflict in Ukraine, which has been characterized by significant loss of life and a humanitarian crisis that underscores the need for a robust and thoughtful diplomatic approach. As Trump presses for a quick peace deal, the implications of such negotiations raise important questions about sovereignty, autonomy, and the historical relationship between Eastern Europe and Western powers.
To understand the current discourse surrounding Ukraine, one must revisit the historical tensions that have shaped the region, particularly the legacy of Soviet influence and the post-Cold War expansion of NATO. Since the dissolution of the Soviet Union, many Eastern European nations have sought integration with Western institutions to secure their independence and territorial integrity. Ukraine’s aspirations for NATO membership and closer ties with Europe have frequently been met with resistance from Russia, which perceives these moves as a direct threat to its sphere of influence. Thus, the current negotiations surrounding security guarantees are not merely about ending hostilities but also about the broader struggle for national identity and self-determination in the face of historical oppression.
The commentary from French President Emmanuel Macron highlights the critical necessity of involving Ukraine in discussions about its future. Macron’s assertion that there can be “no discussions about Ukrainian territory without Ukraine” is a pertinent reminder of the importance of agency in international diplomacy. Historically, marginalized voices have often been sidelined in peace negotiations, resulting in agreements that fail to address the root causes of conflict or respect the sovereignty of affected nations. The notion of a peace deal that may require Ukraine to cede territory in exchange for temporary security assurances resembles past failures in diplomatic history, where the interests of powerful nations overshadowed the needs and rights of smaller countries.
Moreover, the current geopolitical landscape is also shaped by the complexities of U.S. foreign policy. The Trump administration's inclination towards a more conciliatory stance towards Russia, as indicated by his social media post promising “BIG PROGRESS ON RUSSIA,” raises concerns about the potential consequences for Ukraine. The possibility of a “capitulation” to Russian demands, particularly regarding the Donbas region, is especially troubling given the human cost of the ongoing conflict. If negotiations lead to an agreement that sacrifices Ukrainian territorial integrity for a fleeting promise of stability, it could set a dangerous precedent not only for Ukraine but for other nations in the region facing similar threats.
Furthermore, the dialogue surrounding security guarantees, including the mention of an Article 5-like protection, must be scrutinized in terms of its long-term implications. While the principle of collective defense is intended to provide a safety net for allied nations, it is essential to consider what such guarantees would mean for Ukraine's autonomy and decision-making power. Would Ukraine be reduced to a pawn in a larger geopolitical game, with its fate determined by the interests of Western powers rather than its own people? This question resonates with the broader historical context of how international alliances have often prioritized strategic interests over the voices and rights of local populations.
In conclusion, the upcoming discussions between Trump, Zelensky, and European leaders are pivotal not only for the immediate future of the Ukraine conflict but also for the broader principles of sovereignty, self-determination, and international justice. As different factions within the international community vie for influence, it is crucial to advocate for a peace process that respects the agency of the Ukrainian people and addresses the historical injustices that have contributed to the current crisis. Engaging in informed dialogue about these complexities will empower individuals to challenge narratives that prioritize power over principles, and to advocate for a foreign policy that genuinely reflects the values of democracy, human rights, and solidarity with those who suffer the consequences of war.
The recent discussions surrounding Ukraine's future, particularly in the context of negotiations with former President Donald Trump and his administration, highlight the precarious balance of power and diplomacy in international relations. As European leaders, including French President Emmanuel Macron, prepare to question Trump about the U.S.'s commitment to security guarantees for Ukraine, it raises crucial points about the historical context of Ukraine's geopolitical struggles and the implications of U.S. foreign policy. The ongoing war in Ukraine has emerged as one of the most significant conflicts in Europe since World War II, and the stakes are incredibly high.
Historically, Ukraine has been a focal point in the contest between Western powers and Russia. After gaining independence in 1991, Ukraine has faced significant challenges, ranging from political instability to economic hardship. The 2014 annexation of Crimea by Russia and the ongoing conflict in the Donbas region have underscored the precariousness of Ukrainian sovereignty. For many, the U.S. and NATO's support has been vital in countering Russian aggression, yet the current dialogue suggests a willingness to negotiate terms that could undermine Ukraine's territorial integrity. The implications of such negotiations could echo historical instances where appeasement led to greater conflicts, reminding us of the need for a firm stance against authoritarianism.
The mixed signals from the U.S. administration, especially under Trump's leadership, have raised concerns about the reliability of American support for Ukraine. While the administration claims to seek "BIG PROGRESS ON RUSSIA," there remain significant ambiguities about what this entails. The proposal to offer Ukraine a form of Article 5 protection—typically reserved for NATO members—while suggesting territorial concessions, could be perceived as a betrayal of Ukraine’s aspirations for self-determination and sovereignty. It is essential for Americans to recognize that support for Ukraine is not merely a matter of foreign policy; it is intrinsically linked to the values of democracy and human rights that many citizens cherish.
In light of these developments, what can ordinary Americans do to influence the direction of U.S. foreign policy? First and foremost, education and advocacy are key. Engaging with community organizations that focus on international relations, human rights, and democratic support can amplify voices that demand a robust and principled stance in favor of Ukraine. Additionally, communicating with elected officials—whether through letters, calls, or town hall meetings—about the importance of supporting Ukraine as a sovereign nation can put pressure on policymakers to consider the long-term implications of their decisions. It is imperative to create a narrative that emphasizes the moral obligation of the U.S. to uphold democratic values and support allies facing aggression.
Moreover, it’s crucial to foster a dialogue around the broader implications of U.S. foreign policy. The notion that peace can be brokered at the expense of a nation’s territorial integrity is a dangerous precedent. Engaging with right-wing perspectives on this issue can provide an opportunity to challenge the framing of peace as a mere transactional agreement that disregards the rights and desires of the Ukrainian people. By emphasizing the importance of a comprehensive approach that includes diplomatic pressure on Russia and continued support for Ukraine, Americans can advocate for a more principled stance that prioritizes justice over convenience.
In conclusion, as we approach these critical discussions about Ukraine, it is essential to remain vigilant and engaged. The potential for a peaceful resolution to the conflict should not come at the cost of Ukrainian sovereignty. By promoting awareness and advocating for strong support of Ukraine, we can contribute to a more just and equitable international order—one that respects the right of nations to exist and thrive independently. This is not just a foreign policy issue; it is a reflection of our values as a nation and our commitment to upholding democratic ideals on the global stage.
The ongoing situation in Ukraine and the potential peace negotiations, as highlighted in the article, presents an opportunity for individuals to take meaningful action. Here’s a detailed list of ideas and actions that can be pursued to influence the trajectory of this conflict and support Ukraine:
### What Can We Personally Do About This?
1. **Stay Informed and Educate Others:** - Read reputable sources on the Ukraine conflict and share this information with friends and family. This fosters informed discussions and awareness.
2. **Advocate for Humanitarian Aid:** - Support organizations providing humanitarian assistance to those affected by the conflict. This includes donating to charities that supply food, medical aid, and shelter to displaced individuals.
3. **Engage with Elected Officials:** - Contact your representatives to express your views on U.S. involvement in Ukraine and advocate for support for Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity.
4. **Participate in or Organize Community Events:** - Attend or organize rallies, discussions, or informational sessions that focus on raising awareness about the Ukraine conflict and advocating for peace.
5. **Petition for Strong Support:** - Sign and circulate petitions that call for robust U.S. support for Ukraine, including humanitarian, military, and economic assistance.
### Exact Actions We Can Personally Take
1. **Petition Example:** - **Petition Name:** Support Ukraine’s Sovereignty and Territorial Integrity - **Platform:** Change.org - **Example Link:** [Support Ukraine's Sovereignty](https://www.change.org) - **Action:** Sign the petition and share it on social media platforms to gather more signatures.
2. **Contacting Elected Officials:** - **Senator Chuck Schumer (Democratic Leader)** - Email: schumer.senate.gov/contact - Address: 322 Hart Senate Office Building, Washington, DC 20510
- **Senator Kirsten Gillibrand** - Email: gillibrand.senate.gov/contact - Address: 478 Russell Senate Office Building, Washington, DC 20510
- **Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez** - Email: ocasiocortez.house.gov/contact - Address: 229 East 104th Street, 3rd Floor, New York, NY 10029
**What to Say:** - Express your support for Ukraine and the need for the U.S. to provide comprehensive support, including humanitarian aid and military assistance. - Advocate against any proposals that may compromise Ukrainian territorial integrity, such as ceding regions to Russia.
3. **Join Advocacy Groups:** - Organizations like the Ukrainian Congress Committee of America (UCCA) actively advocate for Ukrainian rights and interests. - Get involved by attending meetings, participating in campaigns, and amplifying their messages.
4. **Social Media Engagement:** - Share informative articles, personal opinions, and calls to action on platforms like Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram. - Use hashtags such as #StandWithUkraine and #SupportUkraine to join the larger conversation.
5. **Participate in Local Events:** - Look for local organizations or community centers that are hosting events in support of Ukraine. This could include fundraisers, informational seminars, or cultural events showcasing Ukrainian heritage.
6. **Write Opinion Pieces or Letters to the Editor:** - Write and submit letters to local newspapers advocating for a strong stance on Ukraine and the importance of international solidarity in times of conflict.
By taking these actions, individuals can amplify their voices and contribute to a broader movement advocating for peace and support for Ukraine amidst ongoing negotiations and tensions. Each action counts, whether it’s contacting representatives, participating in community events, or supporting humanitarian efforts.