'End the war': Leaders rally around Ukraine
news.com.au -- Sunday, August 17, 2025, 10:59:34 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Categories: U.S.–Russia Relations, Foreign Policy & International Relations, Social Media & Public Statements
European leaders will join Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky during his visit to Washington on Monday seeking an end to Moscow's invasion, after President Donald Trump dropped his push for a ceasefire following his Alaska summit with Russian leader Vladimir Putin.
Securing a ceasefire in Ukraine, more than three years after the Kremlin ordered the invasion, had been one of Trump's core demands before the summit, to which Ukraine and its European allies were not invited.
But after a meeting that yielded no clear breakthrough, Trump ruled out an immediate ceasefire in Ukraine - a move that would appear to favour Putin, who has long argued for negotiations on a final peace deal.
Ukraine and its European allies have criticised it as a way to buy time and press Russia's battlefield advances, with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, French President Emmanuel Macron and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen among the leaders set to try and bend Trump's ear on the matter.
Ahead of the Washington visit on Monday, von der Leyen said on X she would welcome Zelensky for a meeting in Brussels on Sunday which other European leaders would join by video call, before accompanying the Ukrainian leader on his US trip at his "request" with "other European leaders".
The German government confirmed Merz was among those other European leaders, and would try to emphasise "interest in a swift peace agreement in Ukraine".
Finland said its president, Alexander Stubb, would also travel to Washington. Trump briefed Zelensky and European leaders on his flight back from Alaska to Washington, saying afterwards that "it was determined by all that the best way to end the horrific war between Russia and Ukraine is to go directly to a peace agreement which would end the war." Ceasefire agreements "often times do not hold up," Trump added on his Truth Social platform.
But Zelensky has appeared unconvinced by the change of tack, saying on Saturday that it "complicates the situation".
If Moscow lacks "the will to carry out a simple order to stop the strikes, it may take a lot of effort to get Russia to have the will to implement far greater - peaceful coexistence with its neighbours for decades," he said on social media.
'Harsh reality'
Trump expressed support during his call with Zelensky and European leaders for a proposal by Putin to take full control of two largely Russian-held Ukrainian regions in exchange for freezing the frontline in two others, an official briefed on the talks told AFP.
Putin "de facto demands that Ukraine leave Donbas," an area consisting of the Donetsk and Lugansk regions in eastern Ukraine, the source said.
In exchange, Russian forces would halt their offensive in the Black Sea port region of Kherson and Zaporizhzhia in southern Ukraine, where the main cities are still under Ukrainian control.
Several months into its full-scale invasion of Ukraine, Russia in September 2022 claimed to have annexed all four Ukrainian regions even though its troops still do not fully control any of them.
"The Ukrainian president refused to leave Donbas," the source said. Trump notably also said the United States was prepared to provide Ukraine security guarantees, an assurance Merz hailed as "significant progress." But there was a scathing assessment of the summit outcome from the European Union's top diplomat Kaja Kallas, who accused Putin of seeking to "drag out negotiations" with no commitment to end the bloodshed.
"The harsh reality is that Russia has no intention of ending this war any time soon," Kallas said.
Zelensky back in White House
The main diplomatic focus now switches to Zelensky's talks at the White House on Monday.
The Ukrainian president's last Oval Office visit in February ended in an extraordinary shouting match, with Trump and Vice President JD Vance publicly berating Zelensky for not showing enough gratitude for US aid.
In an interview with broadcaster Fox News after his sit-down with Putin, Trump had suggested that the onus was now on Zelensky to secure a peace deal as they work towards an eventual trilateral summit with Putin.
"It's really up to President Zelensky to get it done," Trump said.
European pressure
In an earlier statement, European leaders welcomed the plan for a Trump-Putin-Zelensky summit but added that they would maintain pressure on Russia in the absence of a ceasefire.
Meanwhile, the conflict in Ukraine raged on, with both Kyiv and Moscow launching attack drones at each other Sunday.
Back in Moscow, Putin said his summit talks with Trump had been "timely" and "very useful." In his post-summit statement in Alaska, Putin had warned Ukraine and European countries not to engage in any "behind-the-scenes intrigues" that could disrupt what he called "this emerging progress."
Sign Our PetitionThe ongoing conflict in Ukraine, now well into its third year following Russia's full-scale invasion, has become a focal point for discussions on international diplomacy, national sovereignty, and the broader implications of war in the 21st century. The recent diplomatic engagements, particularly the one involving Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and various European leaders in Washington, offer a stark glimpse into the complexities of this war and the varying international responses. This situation is not just a geopolitical chess match; it is deeply intertwined with historical grievances, the impacts of European colonialism, and the legacy of nationalism that continues to shape global politics.
At the heart of the discourse is the notion of sovereignty and self-determination, which Ukraine is fighting to uphold against Russian aggression. The annexation of Crimea in 2014 and the subsequent support for separatist movements in the Donbas region by Moscow have highlighted Russia's willingness to undermine international norms regarding state borders and national integrity. This behavior dovetails with historical instances where imperial powers have attempted to assert dominance over neighboring states, often at the cost of local populations’ rights and freedoms. The plight of Ukrainians today reflects a broader narrative of resistance against imperialism, drawing parallels to other struggles worldwide, from the decolonization movements in Africa to contemporary fights for autonomy in regions like Taiwan and Tibet.
Donald Trump's recent shift in stance towards seeking a peace agreement raises concerns about the implications of his approach, which may inadvertently embolden authoritarian regimes. Trump's dismissal of a ceasefire in favor of negotiations without clear commitments from Russia serves to legitimize a narrative that prioritizes political expediency over moral clarity. The historical context of appeasement, particularly in the lead-up to World War II, serves as a cautionary tale. When aggressors are given room to maneuver without accountability, it often leads to further territorial expansion and suffering for the victims of such aggression. Zelensky's apprehension about Trump's rhetoric underscores the necessity of a comprehensive and enforceable peace framework that prioritizes Ukraine's sovereignty rather than merely managing the status quo.
Moreover, the European leaders' support for Ukraine is indicative of the shifting dynamics within Europe regarding security and collective defense. The war has catalyzed a reevaluation of NATO's role and the urgency of a unified European response to external threats. Historically, the legacy of World War II and the Cold War has shaped a European consciousness that values unity in the face of aggression. However, this unity must also extend towards addressing the underlying social issues exacerbated by war, including refugee displacement, economic instability, and the erosion of democratic norms. As the conflict continues, it is imperative that European leaders not only advocate for military support but also commit to a robust humanitarian response that addresses these pressing social challenges.
The geopolitical ramifications of this conflict extend beyond the immediate region, affecting global energy markets, trade relations, and international alliances. The ongoing war has highlighted the vulnerabilities of European energy dependence on Russia, prompting discussions on transitioning to renewable energy sources and enhancing energy security. This situation presents an opportunity for progressive movements to advocate for sustainable energy solutions that could reduce reliance on fossil fuels while addressing climate change. By framing the conversation around energy independence in the context of social justice and environmental stewardship, advocates can connect the dots between the war in Ukraine and broader global crises, creating a narrative that resonates with a diverse audience.
In conclusion, the situation in Ukraine is emblematic of the struggles faced by nations seeking to assert their autonomy against powerful aggressors. It underscores the necessity for a principled approach to international relations that prioritizes human rights and self-determination over mere political expediency. The ongoing conflict serves as a reminder of the historical lessons we must grapple with to avoid repeating past mistakes. As advocates engage in conversations with those holding different political views, it is crucial to emphasize the interconnectedness of these issues, drawing links between the war in Ukraine, historical imperialism, energy security, and the urgent need for a comprehensive approach to global peace and justice.
The ongoing conflict in Ukraine serves as a poignant reminder of the complexities of international relations and the dire consequences of political maneuvers on the global stage. The recent developments surrounding former President Donald Trump's stance on the war illuminate a pivotal juncture in the quest for peace, with profound implications for the people of Ukraine, Europe, and the world. Trump's abrupt shift away from advocating a ceasefire raises legitimate concerns regarding the motivations behind such a pivot and the potential ramifications for the future of Ukraine. For many observers, this situation reflects a troubling tendency to prioritize geopolitical strategies over humanitarian concerns, leading to a deepening of the crisis rather than a resolution.
Historically, the roots of the conflict can be traced back to Ukraine’s struggle for sovereignty and its complex relationship with Russia. The annexation of Crimea in 2014 and the subsequent support of separatist movements in Eastern Ukraine set the stage for an ongoing war that has claimed countless lives and displaced millions. Trump's approach, particularly his recent suggestions of ceding control over Ukrainian territory to Russia, echoes a narrative that has surfaced throughout history: the willingness of powerful nations to broker peace at the expense of smaller, sovereign states. This approach not only undermines the principle of self-determination but also sets a dangerous precedent for international diplomacy, wherein the voices of aggressors might overshadow the legitimate claims of those seeking peace and security.
As American citizens and global citizens, it is critical to engage with this issue on multiple levels. First and foremost, we must elevate the voices of Ukrainian leaders, such as President Zelensky, who articulate the complexities and harsh realities of the situation. Supporting their calls for a just and lasting peace that respects Ukraine's territorial integrity is essential. Furthermore, we can encourage our elected representatives to prioritize diplomatic solutions that involve all stakeholders rather than sidelining the legitimate concerns of the affected populations. Advocacy for Ukraine should be coupled with a broader push for accountability in international relations, demanding that no peace settlement be reached that compromises the fundamental rights and sovereignty of nations.
Educational initiatives also play a vital role in shaping public understanding of the war. Efforts to inform the American populace about the historical context of the conflict and the geopolitical dynamics at play can foster a more nuanced conversation around U.S. foreign policy. Public forums, discussions, and outreach to local communities can help dispel myths and build solidarity with the Ukrainian struggle. It is crucial to recognize that the crisis in Ukraine is not merely a regional conflict; it is emblematic of larger global issues, including the rise of authoritarianism, the challenges of international law, and the moral imperatives of humanitarian intervention.
Finally, we must consider the importance of grassroots movements in advocating for a peaceful resolution to the conflict. This can take the form of peaceful protests, petitions, and coalition-building among progressive organizations that prioritize human rights and international law. Engaging with local representatives and urging them to support legislation that protects Ukraine's sovereignty and promotes peace can amplify the message of solidarity and humanity. The collective action of concerned citizens can create a ripple effect, influencing policymakers and drawing attention to the urgent need for a diplomatic resolution that respects the rights of all parties involved. In an era where misinformation and political polarization often cloud our understanding of complex issues, it is incumbent upon us to advocate for transparency, accountability, and justice in our foreign policy.
In conclusion, as the international community grapples with the ongoing war in Ukraine, it is essential that we remain vigilant and proactive in our efforts to support a peaceful resolution. By educating ourselves and others, advocating for the voices of the oppressed, and engaging in grassroots activism, we can contribute to a future where diplomacy prevails over aggression. The legacy of this conflict will be shaped by the actions we take today, and it is imperative that we respond with empathy, purpose, and a commitment to justice for all.
To address the complexities surrounding the ongoing war in Ukraine and to advocate for peace and support for those affected by the conflict, we can personally take a variety of actions. Here’s a detailed list of ideas and specific actions you can take:
### Personal Actions to Support Peace and Solidarity
1. **Educate Yourself and Others:** - Stay informed about the situation in Ukraine and the geopolitical dynamics at play. Share articles, books, and documentaries that provide insights into the conflict and its historical context.
2. **Contact Your Elected Officials:** - **Action**: Write to your senators and representatives urging them to advocate for a diplomatic resolution to the conflict and to support humanitarian aid for those affected by the war. - **What to Say**: Express your concern about the ongoing violence and emphasize the importance of negotiations for a ceasefire. Urge them to prioritize humanitarian efforts and support peace initiatives. - **Who to Write**: Use the following contact information for your local representatives. You can find your specific representatives through [www.congress.gov](https://www.congress.gov/).
Example Names (for illustrative purposes): - Senator John Doe - Email: senator.doe@example.com - USPS Address: 123 Senate Office Building, Washington, D.C. 20510 - Representative Jane Smith - Email: representative.smith@example.com - USPS Address: 456 House Office Building, Washington, D.C. 20515
3. **Support Humanitarian Organizations:** - Donate to organizations providing humanitarian aid to Ukraine, such as the International Rescue Committee (IRC), Doctors Without Borders, or UNICEF. - **Action**: Organize a fundraising event in your community to raise awareness and funds for these organizations.
4. **Sign and Share Petitions:** - **Action**: Find and sign petitions advocating for peace and increased humanitarian aid. Websites like Change.org and MoveOn.org often host relevant petitions. - Example Petitions: - "Call for Immediate Ceasefire in Ukraine" on Change.org. - "Support Humanitarian Aid for Ukraine" on MoveOn.org.
5. **Join or Support Local Activist Groups:** - **Action**: Connect with local peace organizations or advocacy groups that focus on international conflict resolution. Participate in events, meetings, or rallies that promote peace. - Example Organizations: Peace Action, World Beyond War.
6. **Engage on Social Media:** - Use your social media platforms to raise awareness about the conflict, share reliable information, and promote campaigns for peace. Create a supportive online dialogue about the importance of diplomacy over escalation.
7. **Attend Community Events or Forums:** - Look for local events discussing the Ukraine conflict and its implications. Participate in discussions, ask questions, and share your perspective on how to achieve a peaceful resolution.
8. **Write to Editorial Sections of Newspapers:** - **Action**: Submit op-eds or letters to the editor of local newspapers expressing your views on the need for a peaceful resolution and the importance of humanitarian support. - **What to Say**: Clearly articulate your position on the conflict and suggest actionable steps that can be taken by the government and community to foster peace.
### Conclusion
Taking individual actions can contribute significantly to the broader movement for peace and support for those affected by war. By educating ourselves, advocating for humanitarian assistance, and engaging with our communities and elected officials, we can play a vital role in promoting a peaceful resolution to the conflict in Ukraine. Each small effort collectively contributes to a larger impact.