Russian troops make gains in Ukraine ahead of the Putin-Trump summit
cbsnews.com -- Friday, August 15, 2025, 7:58:19 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Categories: U.S.–Russia Relations, Foreign Policy & International Relations, Social Media & Public Statements
Days before the summit between the leaders of Russia and the U.S. in Alaska, Moscow's forces breached Ukrainian lines in a series of infiltrations in the country's industrial heartland of Donetsk. Though the advances amount to only a limited success for Russia since it still needs to consolidate its gains before achieving a true breakthrough, analysts say, it's a potentially dangerous moment for Ukraine.
President Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin will hold their high-stakes discussion about the war in Ukraine in Alaska on Friday. At the same time, Ukraine will be watching from the outside along with with European allies, hoping Mr. Trump is protecting their interests.
Putin will likely try to persuade Mr. Trump to pressure Ukraine by arguing the war is going badly for Kyiv, said Mykola Bieleskov, a senior analyst at CBA Initiatives Center.
"The key risk for Ukraine is that the Kremlin will try to turn certain local gains on the battlefield into strategic victories at the negotiating table," he said.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said Tuesday that Putin wants Ukraine to withdraw from the remaining 30% of the Donetsk region that Kyiv still controls as part of a ceasefire deal, a proposal the Ukrainian leader categorically rejected.
After years of fighting, Russia still does not fully control all of the Donetsk region, which it illegally annexed in 2022, along with the Luhansk, Kherson and Zaporizhzhia regions.
Attention has been focused on Pokrovsk - a key highway and rail junction that once was home to about 60,000 and now is partially encircled - but Russian forces have been probing for weaknesses north of the city, according to battlefield analysis site DeepState. The forces found a gap east of the coal-mining town of Dobropillia and advanced about 6 miles.
Zelenskyy noted its clear significance to the summit: "To create a certain information backdrop ahead of Putin's meeting with Trump, especially in the American information space, suggesting that Russia is moving forward and Ukraine is losing ground."
Small groups of Russian troops are slipping past the first defensive line, hiding and trying to build up their forces, said Dmytro Trehubov, spokesman for Ukraine's "Dnipro" operational-strategic group.
Ukraine's military has been repelling these attempts, he said, although DeepState said the situation has not been stabilized.
Analysts described the breach near Dobropillia as a localized crisis that could escalate if the Russians are not neutralized and their main forces can widen the gap.
The breach of the defensive line has seemed inevitable for months, according to a drone pilot in the area, speaking on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to talk publicly. Moscow's forces have been exploiting the lack of Ukrainian infantry, a problem tied not only to the country's stalled mobilization but also to poor management, the pilot said.
"We pay with territory and lives to fix mistakes - and we can keep fixing mistakes only as long as we have even a scrap of land left," the pilot said.
Ukrainian forces have tried to plug the gaps by extensive use of first-person-view drones - remotely piloted devices loaded with explosives that enable operators to see targets before striking.
These FPVs have turned areas up to about 12 miles from the front into deadly zones on both sides of the line. But because the Russians attack with small groups, it's hard to counter with drones alone.
"We can't launch 100 FPVs at once," the pilot said, noting the drone operators would interfere with each other.
With tactics and technology roughly equal on both sides, the Russians' superior manpower works to their advantage, said Bielieskov, the Kyiv-based analyst.
"They have no regard for human life. Very often, most of those they send are on a one-way mission," he said.
Stopping the infiltrations and assaults by armored vehicles requires different defenses and leadership structures - changes that have yet to appear on Ukraine's side, he said.
Ukraine's military said Thursday additional troops have been moved to affected areas, with battle-hardened forces like the Azov brigade being deployed to the sector. However, the Deepstate map doesn't show any changes in favor of the Ukrainian army.
Michael Kofman, a military analyst for the Carnegie Endowment, said in a post on X that it was too early to assess if the front line was collapsing,
Russia is focused on expanding the breach of the front line into a corridor to support its ground forces, Bieleskov said. The strategy avoids direct assaults on heavily fortified urban centers, instead pushing through open terrain where Ukraine's troop shortages and large settlements make defense harder.
If successful, such a move could bypass Russia's need to storm Kostiantynivka - once a city of over 67,000 people and now significantly ruined and on the verge of falling. That would complicate defending the region's last big cities of Sloviansk, Kramatorsk and Druzhkivka, posing a serious challenge for Ukraine's military.
Cmdr. Serhii Filimonov of the "Da Vinci Wolves" battalion of the 59th brigade warned that Kostiantynivka could fall without a fight if Russia severs supply routes.
With few major roads, maintaining logistics for the large number of Ukrainian forces in the area would become "extremely difficult," Filimonov said.
Turning to the summit, Filimonov decried what he described as ongoing Russian killings and atrocities. "And then the civilized world comes to them and says, 'Fine, let's make a deal.' That's not how it should be done," he said.
Sign Our PetitionThe ongoing conflict in Ukraine, particularly with the recent developments in the Donetsk region, serves as a stark reminder of the geopolitical tensions that often unfold in the shadows of international summits. As Russian forces make tentative yet concerning advances, the implications extend far beyond military strategy; they touch upon the historical narratives of imperialism, the legacies of past conflicts, and the enduring struggle for sovereignty and self-determination. The upcoming summit between Presidents Putin and Trump in Alaska raises not only questions about diplomatic engagement but also the moral complexities of negotiating peace amid ongoing aggression.
Historically, Ukraine has occupied a pivotal position in the struggle between Western and Eastern influences. Its geographical positioning has made it a battleground for various empires over centuries, from the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth to the Soviet Union. The current conflict, which escalated dramatically in 2014 with Russia's annexation of Crimea, is part of a longer trajectory of Ukrainian resistance against domination, whether from Russia or external powers. It is crucial to recognize that this struggle is not merely a contemporary issue; it is deeply rooted in the national identity and historical experiences of the Ukrainian people. Thus, any discussions surrounding Ukraine's future must consider not just the immediate military and political dynamics but also the historical context that shapes these interactions.
Moreover, the summit in Alaska poses a critical juncture for international alliances. The concerns voiced by Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy highlight the precarious nature of Ukraine's position. His rejection of Putin's demands reflects a broader commitment to sovereignty and democratic governance, principles that are often cited in international law and human rights discourse. The potential for Trump to act as a mediator—or, conversely, an enabler of Russian aggression—will have profound implications for Ukraine's territorial integrity and the broader stability of the region. The role of the United States in this conflict should not be underestimated, as its historical interventions have often led to significant outcomes, sometimes exacerbating conflicts rather than resolving them.
The situation in Donetsk also reveals the complexities of military strategy and resource allocation. Reports suggest that Russian forces are exploiting gaps in Ukrainian defenses, highlighting systemic issues within the Ukrainian military, including manpower shortages and logistical difficulties. This reflects not only a need for military reform but also underscores the importance of international support for Ukraine. Allies in Europe and beyond must recognize that solidarity with Ukraine is not merely a question of geopolitical strategy; it is also a moral imperative to uphold the principles of self-determination and resistance against oppression. The lessons of history remind us that failing to support nations in their struggle against imperialism can lead to dire consequences, both for those directly affected and for global peace.
As the conflict continues to unfold, it is essential for advocates of social justice and peace to engage with the narratives surrounding Ukraine. The framing of this conflict must center on the experiences of those most affected—the civilians caught in the crossfire, the families displaced by war, and the soldiers defending their homeland. By amplifying these voices, we can challenge the often abstract discussions about geopolitical maneuvering and remind ourselves that at the heart of this issue is a struggle for human rights and dignity. The plight of Ukrainians reflects broader themes of resistance against authoritarianism and the fight for a future free from the shadows of imperialism.
In conclusion, the developments in Ukraine are not merely a localized crisis but rather a focal point of broader historical and political struggles. As the world watches the summit between Putin and Trump, it is imperative to advocate for a diplomatic approach that respects Ukraine's sovereignty and recognizes the historical context of the conflict. Engaging in thoughtful dialogue and supporting international solidarity efforts can contribute to a more just and peaceful resolution. The lessons of history compel us to act, ensuring that the voices of those who seek freedom and self-determination are not drowned out by the machinations of power.
The ongoing conflict in Ukraine has reached yet another critical juncture, with Russian troops making advancements in the eastern regions of Donetsk and Luhansk. This escalation occurs just ahead of a high-stakes summit between U.S. President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin, which raises significant concerns about the potential implications for Ukraine and its sovereignty. Historical context is essential to understanding the complexities of this situation: the conflict began in 2014 when Russia annexed Crimea, and has since evolved into a prolonged war characterized by shifting territorial control and heavy civilian costs. The specter of foreign negotiations, especially those that may prioritize geopolitical maneuvering over the rights and wishes of the Ukrainian people, looms large as the summit approaches.
As observers note, the military developments on the ground are not merely tactical maneuvers; they are also symbolic gestures intended to influence the narrative leading up to the Trump-Putin meeting. The Kremlin's strategy appears to involve crafting an image of Russian resurgence, potentially to force concessions from Ukraine and to alter the dynamics of international support for Kyiv. Analysts emphasize that the danger lies in allowing these localized military gains to convert into strategic victories at the negotiating table, undermining Ukraine's position. It is vital for the international community—particularly allies in Europe and the United States—to recognize that any settlement that does not prioritize Ukraine's territorial integrity and sovereignty may set a grave precedent for future aggressions, not only in Eastern Europe but globally.
In light of this precarious situation, American citizens and policymakers alike must advocate for a robust response that prioritizes support for Ukraine's sovereignty. Engaging in grassroots advocacy, supporting relevant non-profits, and demanding that elected representatives take a firm stand against Russian aggression are all imperative actions. There is an urgent need to amplify voices that call for a comprehensive approach to Ukraine's defense, which includes military aid, humanitarian support, and a commitment to holding Russia accountable for its actions on the world stage. As Americans, we can also work to ensure that diplomatic negotiations do not overlook the perspectives and needs of those directly affected by the conflict, namely the Ukrainian people.
Moreover, public awareness and understanding of the historical context of the conflict can empower citizens to engage meaningfully in these discussions. The narrative surrounding Ukraine often lacks nuance, focusing predominantly on military engagement without addressing the broader implications for democracy and human rights. By educating ourselves and others about the historical grievances, the role of nationalism, and the aspirations of the Ukrainian people for self-determination, we can foster a more informed discourse that challenges the simplistic portrayals often seen in mainstream media. This informed approach can help frame discussions with skeptics or those inclined to downplay the significance of Ukraine’s struggle against Russian aggression.
Ultimately, the stakes are higher than they may seem at first glance. The outcome of the upcoming summit and the ensuing negotiations will not only shape the future of Ukraine but also reflect the broader values that the United States and its allies stand for in the international arena. By actively participating in advocacy and education around this issue, Americans can exert pressure on their leaders to adopt a stance that upholds democratic values and international law. The fight for Ukraine is not merely a regional conflict; it is a defining moment for global governance and the principles of sovereignty, freedom, and justice. As citizens, we must take this responsibility seriously and work collectively to ensure that the voices of those affected by this crisis are heard, respected, and prioritized in any discussions that seek to resolve it.
In light of the recent developments concerning the situation in Ukraine, particularly the military advances by Russian troops and the upcoming summit between Presidents Trump and Putin, there are several steps we can take to advocate for the Ukrainian cause and influence the dialogue surrounding this critical issue. Here are actionable ideas and information on how to engage with this matter:
### What Can We Personally Do About This? 1. **Raise Awareness:** Use social media platforms to share information about the situation in Ukraine. Highlight the implications of the Russian advances and the importance of international support for Ukraine. 2. **Educate Yourself and Others:** Stay informed about the ongoing conflict, its history, and its geopolitical implications. Organize local discussions or book clubs to engage with related literature. 3. **Advocate for Policy Change:** Write to your representatives to express your concerns about U.S. foreign policy regarding Ukraine and advocate for supporting Ukraine in its fight against aggression. 4. **Support Ukrainian Organizations:** Contribute to humanitarian organizations providing aid and support to those affected by the conflict.
### Exact Actions You Can Personally Take 1. **Petitions:** - **Petition for Support of Ukraine:** Sign and share petitions that call for increased U.S. support for Ukraine. Websites like MoveOn or Change.org often have active petitions. - Example: Search for petitions titled "Support Ukraine Against Russian Aggression" on these platforms.
2. **Contact Elected Officials:** - **Write to Your Senators and Representatives:** - Locate your representatives using [govtrack.us](https://www.govtrack.us/) or [congress.gov](https://www.congress.gov/). - Example contacts: - **Senator Chuck Schumer (D-NY)** Email: schumer.senate.gov/contact Address: 322 Hart Senate Office Building, Washington, DC 20510 - **Senator Mitch McConnell (R-KY)** Email: mcconnell.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/contactform Address: 317 Russell Senate Office Building, Washington, DC 20510 - **Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY)** Email: ocasiocortez.house.gov/contact Address: 2182 Rayburn House Office Building, Washington, DC 20515
3. **Send Letters:** - Write letters to the editor of your local newspaper expressing your views on the importance of supporting Ukraine and urging elected officials to take action. - Consider mailing your letters to your representatives to ensure they receive your message directly.
### What to Say 1. **In Your Correspondence:** - Express your concerns about the current military situation in Ukraine and the implications of the upcoming Trump-Putin summit. - Urge your representatives to advocate for strong support for Ukraine, including military aid, humanitarian assistance, and diplomatic efforts to ensure Ukraine's territorial integrity. - Highlight the importance of Ukraine as a democratic ally and the need to stand firm against authoritarian aggression.
2. **In Petitions:** - Clearly state the goal of the petition, emphasizing the need for U.S. support for Ukraine in light of recent military advances by Russia. - Encourage signers to share their personal stories or connections to Ukraine, which can strengthen the petition's impact.
3. **Public Statements:** - When discussing the issue publicly or on social media, frame the narrative around democracy, freedom, and international solidarity. - Share data and stories that illustrate the human impact of the conflict, emphasizing the resilience of the Ukrainian people and the importance of global support.
By actively engaging in these actions, we can contribute to a broader movement advocating for Ukraine and emphasizing the importance of international cooperation in times of crisis.