European leaders to join Zelenskiy in Washington as Trump presses Ukraine deal
marketscreener.com -- Sunday, August 17, 2025, 8:56:14 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Categories: U.S.–Russia Relations, Foreign Policy & International Relations, U.S.–NATO Relations
LONDON/BERLIN (Reuters) -European leaders including from Germany, France and Britain will accompany Volodymyr Zelenskiy to meet Donald Trump in Washington, they said on Sunday, seeking to bolster him as the U.S. president presses Ukraine to accept a quick peace agreement.
A day before the talks with Trump, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, French President Emmanuel Macron and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer were hosting a meeting of allies on Sunday to shore up Zelenskiy's position, hoping in particular to lock down robust security guarantees for Ukraine that would include a U.S. role.
President Trump is leaning on Zelenskiy to strike an agreement after he met Kremlin chief Vladimir Putin on Friday in Alaska. According to sources, the U.S. and Russian leaders discussed proposals for Russia to relinquish tiny pockets of occupied Ukraine in exchange for Ukraine ceding a swathe of fortified land in the east and freezing the front lines elsewhere.
At face value, some of Putin's demands would be hugely difficult for Ukraine to accept, setting the stage for potentially fraught talks about ending Europe's deadliest war in 80 years, which has dragged on for 3-1/2 years and killed or wounded more than 1 million people.
European allies are keen to help Zelenskiy avoid a repeat of his last Oval Office meeting, in February. That went disastrously, with Trump and Vice President JD Vance giving the Ukrainian leader a public dressing-down, accusing him of being ungrateful and disrespectful.
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen will also travel to Washington, as will Finland's President Alexander Stubb, whose access to Trump included rounds of golf in Florida earlier this year, and Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, who is an admirer of many of Trump's policies.
"The talks will address, among other things, security guarantees, territorial issues, and continued support for Ukraine in its defence against Russian aggression," the German government said in a statement about the Washington trip.
"This includes maintaining pressure on sanctions."
Macron, Merz and Starmer will host a virtual meeting of the "coalition of the willing" - a grouping of allies of Kyiv - from 1300 GMT on Sunday. Von der Leyen is hosting Zelenskiy in Brussels from where the two leaders will also dial in.
European powers want to help set up a trilateral meeting between Trump, Putin and Zelenskiy to make sure Ukraine has a seat at the table to shape its future.
They also want security guarantees for Ukraine with U.S. involvement, and the ability to crank up pressure on Moscow if needed.
"They will spell out what they consider essential in terms of security guarantees: what they can do themselves, what falls to the coalition of volunteers, and also what they expect from the United States," a European government official said. "Indeed, they expect a very robust commitment."
For his part, Putin briefed his close ally, Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko, about the Alaska talks, and also spoke with Kazakhstan's President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev. Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov held calls on Saturday with his Turkish and Hungarian counterparts.
Hungary has been a hold-out in the European Union against the bloc's efforts to isolate Putin since he sent troops into Ukraine in a full-scale invasion in February 2022. Turkey has tried to maintain open diplomatic channels with both Ukraine and Russia.
'VERY BIG POWER'
Trump said on Friday that Ukraine should make a deal to end the war because "Russia is a very big power, and they're not".
After the Alaska summit, Trump phoned Zelenskiy and told him that the Kremlin chief had offered to freeze most front lines if Ukraine ceded all of Donetsk, the industrial region that is one of Moscow's main targets, a source familiar with the matter said.
Zelenskiy rejected the demand, the source said. Russia already controls a fifth of Ukraine, including about three-quarters of Donetsk province, which it first entered in 2014.
Trump also said he agreed with Putin that a peace deal should be sought without the prior ceasefire that Ukraine and its European allies have called for. That was a reversal of his position before the summit, when he said he would not be happy unless a ceasefire was agreed on.
Zelenskiy said Russia's unwillingness to pause the fighting would complicate efforts to forge a lasting peace. "Stopping the killing is a key element of stopping the war," he said on X.
Russia has made steady advances for months, although in recent days Ukraine said it had cleared some territory where Russian troops had broken through.
In his statement after the Alaska summit, Putin signalled no movement in Russia's long-held demands, which also include a veto on Kyiv's desired membership in the NATO alliance.
He also warned Ukraine and its European allies not to "create any obstacles. That they will not attempt to disrupt the emerging progress through provocation or behind-the-scenes intrigue".
(Reporting by Andrew MacAskill, Tom Balmforth, Andreas Rinke, Layli Foroudi, Max Hunder, Julia Payne, Joshua McElwee, Dave Graham;Writing by Matthias WilliamsEditing by Frances Kerry)
By Andrew MacAskill, Tom Balmforth and Andreas Rinke
Sign Our PetitionThe recent diplomatic developments surrounding the meeting of European leaders with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy and former President Donald Trump underscore the complexities of international relations and the historical legacies that shape them. This convergence of global interests brings to light not only the ongoing Russian-Ukrainian conflict but also the broader implications for European security and the West’s role in shaping the geopolitical landscape. As individuals on the left, it is crucial to analyze these events through a lens that acknowledges historical injustices, the need for solidarity, and the importance of diplomatic engagement.
The backdrop of this meeting cannot be divorced from the historical context of Ukraine’s struggles for sovereignty and independence. Following the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991, Ukraine has navigated a tumultuous path marked by internal divisions, economic challenges, and external pressures, particularly from Russia. The annexation of Crimea in 2014 and the ongoing conflict in Eastern Ukraine highlight the vulnerability of nations grappling with their own identity amidst powerful neighbors. The current efforts by European leaders to support Ukraine in its defense against Russian aggression reflect a recognition of these historical injustices and a commitment to uphold the right to self-determination.
However, the apparent eagerness of Trump to push for a quick peace agreement raises significant concerns. The proposed negotiations, which appear to favor concessions from Ukraine, echo a troubling pattern in international diplomacy where the voices and rights of smaller nations are often sidelined. Historically, peace agreements that prioritize expediency over justice have led to long-term instability and resentment. The left's commitment to social justice must extend to international relations, advocating for a peace process that prioritizes the protection of human rights and the sovereignty of nations rather than merely appeasing powerful states.
The involvement of European allies in these discussions is noteworthy, as they seem to recognize the importance of securing robust security guarantees for Ukraine. It is essential to emphasize that these guarantees must go beyond mere rhetoric; they should translate into concrete actions that fortify Ukraine’s defense capabilities against future aggression. The historical context of NATO’s expansion and the West's previous failures to support Ukraine adequately must serve as lessons that inform current policy. A genuine commitment to Ukraine’s security should involve not only military assistance but also economic support aimed at rebuilding and strengthening civil society, ensuring that Ukrainians can determine their own future free from external coercion.
Moreover, the upcoming trilateral meeting involving Trump, Putin, and Zelenskiy presents an opportunity for advocates of peace and justice to call for a more equitable diplomatic approach. Historical precedents reveal that meaningful negotiations require the participation of all stakeholders, particularly those who will be most affected by the outcomes. The push for a more inclusive dialogue is essential, as it challenges the traditional power dynamics that often marginalize the voices of the most vulnerable. As left-leaning advocates engage in discussions around these issues, it is crucial to emphasize the importance of a participatory process that allows for genuine representation of Ukraine’s interests.
In conclusion, the meeting between Zelenskiy and European leaders with Trump provides a platform for critical reflection on the intersection of history, diplomacy, and justice. It is imperative that discussions surrounding Ukraine's future are framed within the broader context of international solidarity and the recognition of historical injustices. As advocates for social justice, we must urge our representatives to prioritize a peace that is just, inclusive, and respectful of Ukraine's sovereignty, ensuring that the lessons of history guide our approach to international affairs. The stakes are high, not only for Ukraine but for the principles of justice and democracy that resonate in struggles worldwide.
The ongoing conflict in Ukraine has ignited a profound debate about the role of international diplomacy, military support, and the significance of security guarantees in maintaining sovereignty. As European leaders gather to bolster Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy during his meeting with former President Donald Trump, it becomes clear that the stakes have never been higher. The proposed discussions around a potential peace deal, particularly one that involves territorial concessions from Ukraine, raises critical questions regarding the moral and political implications of such negotiations. History teaches us that peace agreements forged under duress often lead to long-term instability, and the current approach could mirror past failures, such as the Munich Agreement of 1938, which allowed Nazi Germany to annex parts of Czechoslovakia in exchange for a promise of peace.
The involvement of European leaders in these discussions highlights a collective anxiety about the future of Ukraine and the broader geopolitical landscape in Europe. It is imperative to acknowledge that the ongoing war is not merely a regional issue but a reflection of a global struggle between autocratic and democratic governance. The proposal for Ukraine to cede strategically important territories in exchange for a semblance of peace is not only dangerous but also undermines the very principles of self-determination and sovereignty that many nations fought to uphold in the aftermath of World War II. Such concessions risk emboldening aggressors like Putin and could set a precedent that rewards territorial expansion through military aggression. The historical lessons from global conflicts remind us that appeasement often leads to further aggression, rather than the desired peace.
In the face of such negotiations, it is essential for Americans to advocate for a more principled approach to foreign policy. Instead of promoting quick fixes and temporary agreements, we should rally for comprehensive support for Ukraine that emphasizes military aid, economic assistance, and the establishment of robust international alliances. This support must be coupled with a strong condemnation of any proposed concessions that undermine Ukraine's territorial integrity. Engaging in grassroots movements that advocate for sustained and meaningful assistance to Ukraine can influence policymakers and elevate the conversation around the importance of upholding democratic values in the face of authoritarianism.
Moreover, the upcoming discussions should serve as a catalyst for a broader dialogue about U.S. foreign policy and its implications for global security. Americans must engage in conversations that challenge the notion of transactional diplomacy, which often prioritizes short-term political gains over long-term stability. By fostering an understanding of the interconnectedness of international relations, we can advocate for policies that prioritize human rights, democracy, and the rule of law. This includes pushing back against the notion that any agreement with dictators is inherently better than continued conflict, particularly when the costs of such agreements are borne by those who have already suffered greatly.
In conclusion, the situation in Ukraine serves as a pivotal moment for both European and American foreign policy. By learning from historical precedents and advocating for a principled approach to diplomacy that prioritizes the rights of sovereign nations, we can work towards a more stable and just global order. This is not merely about the future of Ukraine, but about the values we uphold as a society. To that end, it is incumbent upon all of us to remain vigilant, informed, and engaged in the discourse surrounding international relations, ensuring that the voices of the oppressed are heard and that their rights are fiercely defended. Through collective action and persistent advocacy, we can help shape a future that respects sovereignty and fosters peace without compromising fundamental democratic principles.
In response to the ongoing conflict in Ukraine and the recent developments involving European leaders and U.S. President Trump, here are several actionable ideas and specific steps individuals can take to advocate for a more supportive and just resolution for Ukraine.
### Personal Actions We Can Take
1. **Educate Yourself and Others**: - Understand the nuances of the Ukraine conflict, including historical context and current developments. - Share this knowledge with friends, family, and community members to raise awareness.
2. **Engage with Local Representatives**: - Write or email your congressional representatives to voice support for Ukraine and advocate for robust security guarantees. - Make phone calls to their offices to express your views directly.
**Example Contact Information**: - **Senator Elizabeth Warren** (D-MA) - Email: senator_warren@warren.senate.gov - Mailing Address: 2400 JFK Federal Building, 15 Sudbury Street, Boston, MA 02203 - **Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez** (D-NY) - Email: ocasiocortez.house.gov/contact - Mailing Address: 144 E. 39th St., Suite 408, New York, NY 10016
3. **Sign Petitions**: - Join or create online petitions advocating for U.S. aid to Ukraine, condemning Russian aggression, and calling for a just peace settlement that respects Ukraine’s sovereignty.
**Example Petition**: - **Change.org Petition**: "Stand with Ukraine: Demand Strong U.S. Support" (Search for relevant petitions on platforms like Change.org or MoveOn.org).
4. **Support Humanitarian Efforts**: - Donate to organizations providing aid to those affected by the war, such as the International Rescue Committee or Doctors Without Borders.
5. **Use Social Media for Advocacy**: - Share information, articles, and updates on platforms like Twitter, Instagram, and Facebook to amplify the message of support for Ukraine. - Use hashtags such as #StandWithUkraine or #SupportUkraine to connect with broader movements.
6. **Attend Local Events**: - Participate in rallies, discussions, or forums focused on Ukraine and international relations. Look for events organized by local NGOs, universities, or community groups.
7. **Contact European Leaders**: - Reach out to European leaders and encourage them to maintain a strong stance against aggression and support Ukraine.
**Example Contact Information**: - **Chancellor Friedrich Merz** (Germany) - Email: info@bundeskanzler.de (generic contact) - Mailing Address: Willy-Brandt-Straße 1, 10557 Berlin, Germany - **President Emmanuel Macron** (France) - Email: contact@elysee.fr - Mailing Address: Palais de l'Élysée, 55 Rue du Faubourg Saint-Honoré, 75008 Paris, France
8. **Write Open Letters or Opinion Pieces**: - Draft an open letter or an op-ed for your local newspaper advocating for continued support for Ukraine and a strong stance against Russian aggression. - Highlight the need for a diplomatic resolution that includes Ukrainian voices.
### What to Say
When contacting representatives or engaging in discussions, consider conveying the following points:
- **Urgency of Support**: Emphasize the need for immediate and substantial support for Ukraine, both in terms of humanitarian aid and military assistance to defend against aggression. - **Importance of Sovereignty**: Stress that any negotiation must respect Ukraine's sovereignty and territorial integrity, ensuring that any peace agreement does not come at the expense of its rights and freedom.
- **Long-term Commitment**: Advocate for a long-term commitment to security guarantees in Ukraine, highlighting the strategic importance of a stable European security environment.
- **Humanitarian Focus**: Encourage your representatives to consider the humanitarian crisis caused by the war and the need for robust support to displaced populations.
By taking these actions, we can collectively influence the discourse surrounding the conflict in Ukraine and advocate for a just and sustainable resolution that prioritizes peace, justice, and respect for human rights.