European leaders to join Zelensky and Trump for White House meeting
theglobeandmail.com -- Sunday, August 17, 2025, 7:57:48 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Categories: U.S.–Russia Relations, Foreign Policy & International Relations, U.S.–NATO Relations
European leaders including from Germany, France and Britain will accompany Volodymyr Zelensky to meet Donald Trump in Washington, they said on Sunday, seeking to bolster him as the U.S. president presses Ukraine to accept a quick peace.
Ahead of the Washington talks on Monday, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, French President Emmanuel Macron and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer were hosting a meeting of allies on Sunday to shore up Zelensky's position, hoping in particular to lock down robust security guarantees for Ukraine that would include a U.S. role.
Zelensky to meet Trump on Monday after U.S.-Russia summit failed to secure ceasefire
Despite Trump's impatience to broker a settlement in Russia-Ukraine War, Putin presents some obstacles to peace
President Trump is leaning on Ukraine to strike an agreement after meeting Vladimir Putin on Friday in Alaska. According to sources, the U.S. and Russian leaders discussed proposals for Russia to relinquish tiny pockets of occupied Ukraine in exchange for Ukraine ceding a swathe of fortified land in the east and freezing the front lines elsewhere.
At face value, some of Putin's demands would be hugely difficult for Ukraine to accept, setting the stage for potentially fraught talks about ending Europe's deadliest war in 80 years, which has killed or wounded more than 1 million people.
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen will also travel to Washington, as will Finland's President Alexander Stubb, whose access to Trump included rounds of golf in Florida earlier this year. Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, who is an admirer of many of Trump's policies, will also go to Washington, her office said.
European allies are keen to avoid a repeat of Zelensky's last Oval Office meeting, in February. That went disastrously, with Trump and Vice President JD Vance giving the Ukrainian leader a strong public dressing-down.
"The talks will address, among other things, security guarantees, territorial issues, and continued support for Ukraine in its defence against Russian aggression," the German government said in a statement about the Washington trip.
"This includes maintaining pressure on sanctions."
Macron, Merz and Starmer will host a virtual meeting of the "coalition of the willing" - a grouping of allies of Kyiv - from 1300 GMT on Sunday. Von der Leyen will host Zelensky in Brussels from where the two leaders will also dial in.
European powers want to help set up a trilateral meeting between Trump, Putin and Zelensky to make sure Ukraine has a seat at the table to shape its future.
They also want security guarantees for Ukraine with U.S. involvement, and the ability to crank up pressure on Moscow if needed.
"They will spell out what they consider essential in terms of security guarantees: what they can do themselves, what falls to the coalition of volunteers, and also what they expect from the United States," a European government official said. "Indeed, they expect a very robust commitment."
Trump said on Friday that Ukraine should make a deal to end the war with Russia because "Russia is a very big power, and they're not."
After the Alaska summit with Putin, Trump phoned Zelensky and told him that the Kremlin chief had offered to freeze most front lines if Kyiv ceded all of Donetsk, the industrial region that is one of Moscow's main targets, a source familiar with the matter said.
Zelensky rejected the demand, the source said. Russia already controls a fifth of Ukraine, including about three-quarters of Donetsk province, which it first entered in 2014.
Trump also said he agreed with Putin that a peace deal should be sought without the prior ceasefire that Ukraine and its European allies have called for. That was a reversal of his position before the summit, when he said he would not be happy unless a ceasefire was agreed on.
Zelensky said Russia's unwillingness to pause the fighting would complicate efforts to forge a lasting peace. "Stopping the killing is a key element of stopping the war," he said on X.
Russia launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 and has been gradually advancing for months.
In his statement after the Alaska summit, Putin signalled no movement in Russia's long-held demands, which also include a veto on Kyiv's desired membership in the NATO alliance.
He also warned Ukraine and its European allies not to "create any obstacles. That they will not attempt to disrupt the emerging progress through provocation or behind-the-scenes intrigue."
Sign Our PetitionThe recent meeting involving European leaders and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky at the White House illustrates a complex interplay of international diplomacy, power dynamics, and the quest for peace in a protracted conflict. This gathering not only showcases the urgency around the Russia-Ukraine war but also highlights the broader implications of geopolitical maneuvering in the face of historical grievances and ongoing struggles for sovereignty and independence. The involvement of figures such as Donald Trump, along with leaders from Germany, France, and Britain, raises questions about the efficacy of their approaches to diplomacy and the potential impact on the Ukrainian populace.
Historically, Ukraine's struggle for autonomy has deep roots, dating back to the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991. Since then, the country has grappled with its identity and orientation—whether to align more closely with European institutions or remain tethered to Russian influence. The current conflict, marked by Russia's annexation of Crimea in 2014 and its ongoing military aggression, is a manifestation of this tug-of-war. The historical context is essential; it reminds us that the consequences of geopolitical decisions extend far beyond boardroom diplomacy and into the lives of ordinary citizens. The estimated toll of over a million casualties underscores the urgent need for a resolution that respects Ukraine's territorial integrity while addressing the security concerns of its neighbors.
The involvement of Trump, a figure with a contentious history regarding foreign policy, complicates the situation further. His administration's previous approach to Ukraine was often characterized by transactional diplomacy—viewing international relations through a lens of personal gain rather than long-term stability. The meeting with Putin in Alaska, which reportedly sought to broker a hasty peace, appears to prioritize expediency over a comprehensive analysis of the intricacies involved in the conflict. Such a position raises alarms for those who recognize that quick fixes often neglect the underlying issues, such as the rights of displaced populations and the importance of reparative justice after decades of violence.
Moreover, the European leaders' push for robust security guarantees for Ukraine highlights the necessity for a coordinated response to Russian aggression, yet it also reflects a certain level of ambivalence. While they seek to support Ukraine, their simultaneous desire to avoid a repeat of previous diplomatic blunders—such as the publicly confrontational atmosphere during Zelensky's last Oval Office visit—indicates an underlying tension. The delicate balance between supporting Ukraine's defense and avoiding escalation underscores the need for a nuanced approach that prioritizes diplomacy over military posturing. It is essential to engage in dialogue that includes the voices of those most affected by the conflict, ensuring that Ukrainian sovereignty and the desires of its people are placed at the forefront of discussions.
The idea of a trilateral meeting involving Trump, Putin, and Zelensky also raises critical questions about representation and agency in peace talks. The insistence on having Ukraine at the negotiating table is a positive step, but it must be accompanied by a sincere commitment to listening to and addressing the concerns of Ukrainian leaders. The historical precedent for sidelining affected parties in negotiations—from the Treaty of Versailles to the Oslo Accords—demonstrates the dangers of exclusionary practices in diplomacy. It is imperative that the international community recognizes the importance of inclusive dialogue as a pathway to genuine resolution and healing.
Ultimately, the ongoing situation in Ukraine serves as a stark reminder of the complexities of international relations and the human cost of conflict. As European leaders and U.S. officials engage in discussions about security guarantees and territorial concessions, the focus must remain on fostering a peace that is equitable and just. The lessons of history teach us that mere political agreements do not suffice; instead, we must strive for solutions that honor the dignity and rights of all individuals impacted by war. As advocates for social justice and international solidarity, it is our responsibility to demand that diplomatic efforts prioritize the voices of those who have suffered the most, ensuring that their stories, needs, and aspirations shape the future of Ukraine.
The recent news surrounding the upcoming meeting between European leaders and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky at the White House signals an important moment in the ongoing conflict between Ukraine and Russia. As President Trump engages in negotiations to broker a peace agreement, the dynamics at play reflect not only the geostrategic interests of various nations but also the stark realities of power, diplomacy, and the lives impacted by war. Understanding the historical context and political implications of this meeting is crucial for Americans concerned about international relations and the moral implications of U.S. foreign policy.
Historically, the conflict in Ukraine is rooted in centuries of complicated relationships among Eastern European nations and Russia. The fall of the Soviet Union in 1991 left a power vacuum that has since been filled by various geopolitical maneuvers. The annexation of Crimea by Russia in 2014 and the ongoing conflict in Eastern Ukraine have underscored the fragile nature of security in the region. As European leaders gather to shore up support for Zelensky, it is essential to recognize the broader contexts of national sovereignty and self-determination that define Ukraine's struggle. This ongoing war is not just about territorial disputes; it is a fight for Ukraine's right to exist as an independent nation free from external coercion.
The fact that Trump is applying pressure on Ukraine to accept a quick peace settlement raises serious ethical and strategic concerns. The negotiations proposed by Trump, which include the possibility of Ukraine ceding territory in exchange for a ceasefire, could undermine Ukraine’s sovereignty and set a dangerous precedent for future conflicts. This approach reflects a transactional view of international relations that prioritizes expedience over a principled commitment to democratic values and human rights. As Americans, we must engage critically with the implications of such negotiations and advocate for policies that prioritize just outcomes over mere political expediency.
Moreover, the presence of European leaders at this meeting emphasizes the importance of international coalitions in addressing global conflicts. The idea of a “coalition of the willing” highlights the necessity of solidarity among nations to support Ukraine’s defense against Russian aggression. As citizens, we can advocate for our government to strengthen its commitments to international alliances, emphasizing the need for collaboration rather than unilateral actions in addressing the challenges posed by authoritarian regimes. This includes supporting increased military and humanitarian aid to Ukraine and opposing any negotiations that would compromise its territorial integrity or democratic aspirations.
Finally, we must recognize the human cost of this conflict. Over 1 million people have been killed or wounded, and millions more have been displaced. These statistics reflect not just numbers but the stories of individuals and families whose lives have been irrevocably changed by war. As we engage in discussions about U.S. foreign policy and our role in promoting global peace, we must center the human experience in our advocacy. Raising awareness about the realities faced by those affected by the conflict, supporting humanitarian efforts, and pushing for policies that prioritize human rights and dignity should be at the forefront of our collective action.
As we move forward, let us harness our voices and mobilize to demand a foreign policy that reflects our values of justice, equality, and respect for sovereignty. By engaging in informed discussions with others, particularly those who may hold opposing views, we can challenge reductive narratives and push for a more robust, principled approach to international relations that acknowledges the complexities of the Ukraine conflict and the importance of supporting a free and independent Ukraine.
In light of the recent developments surrounding the meeting between European leaders, Volodymyr Zelensky, and Donald Trump, there are numerous actions we can take to influence the conversation and advocate for a peaceful resolution to the ongoing conflict in Ukraine. Here’s a detailed list of actionable ideas:
### Personal Actions to Take
1. **Educate Yourself and Others**: - Stay informed about the situation in Ukraine and the geopolitical implications. Share articles, news, and analyses with friends, family, and social media followers to raise awareness.
2. **Contact Your Elected Representatives**: - Write to your congressional representatives to express your views on the U.S. role in the Ukraine conflict, advocating for a peaceful and diplomatic approach rather than military escalation. - **What to Say**: Emphasize the importance of supporting Ukraine’s sovereignty while pushing for negotiations that prioritize peace and humanitarian concerns. Encourage them to advocate for security guarantees that do not involve unnecessary territorial compromises.
**Example Contacts**: - Find your congressional representative here: [House of Representatives](https://www.house.gov/) - Send an email or letter detailing your concerns. A sample letter could be:
``` Dear [Representative's Name],
I am writing to urge you to support a diplomatic approach to the ongoing conflict in Ukraine. While it is crucial to ensure Ukraine's sovereignty and territorial integrity, I believe that a negotiated settlement must be prioritized to end the suffering of millions. Please advocate for robust security guarantees that empower Ukraine without compromising its territorial integrity.
Thank you for your attention to this urgent matter.
Sincerely, [Your Name] [Your Address] [Your Email] ```
3. **Sign Petitions**: - Look for petitions that call for responsible U.S. foreign policy in Ukraine, emphasizing diplomacy and humanitarian aid over military intervention. Websites like Change.org or MoveOn.org often have relevant petitions. - **Example Petition**: You could search for petitions advocating for increased humanitarian aid or diplomatic efforts in Ukraine and share them across your networks to gather more signatures.
4. **Engage with Local Activist Groups**: - Join or support local peace organizations or activist groups focused on international diplomacy and humanitarian aid. These groups often host events, discussions, and letter-writing campaigns to influence policy. - **Local Examples**: Groups like the Peace Action Network or the American Friends Service Committee may have local chapters involved in advocacy.
5. **Utilize Social Media**: - Use platforms like Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram to amplify messages regarding the importance of peace in Ukraine. Follow and share posts from credible organizations and voices advocating for a peaceful resolution.
6. **Contact European Leaders**: - While your primary focus may be on U.S. representatives, you can also reach out to European leaders involved in the discussions. Express your support for Ukraine and urge them to maintain a strong, unified front advocating for peace. **Example Contacts**: - **Emmanuel Macron**: - Email: contact@elysee.fr - Address: Palais de l'Élysée, 55 Rue du Faubourg Saint-Honoré, 75008 Paris, France
- **Friedrich Merz**: - Email: info@cdu.de (CDU party email) - Address: CDU Bundesgeschäftsstelle, Klingelhöferstraße 8, 10115 Berlin, Germany
- **Keir Starmer**: - Email: contact@labour.org.uk - Address: The Labour Party, 39 Victoria Street, London SW1H 0HA, UK
**What to Say**: You can adapt the previously mentioned letter format, emphasizing the importance of their roles in ensuring Ukraine’s voice is heard in any negotiations.
7. **Participate in Demonstrations or Vigils**: - Look for local events that advocate for peace in Ukraine or support for Ukrainian refugees. Participating in these events can help raise awareness and show solidarity with those affected by the conflict.
8. **Support Humanitarian Organizations**: - Donate to organizations providing aid to Ukraine, such as Doctors Without Borders, the International Red Cross, or local NGOs working on the ground. Your contributions can help support those who have been displaced or affected by the war.
9. **Promote Peaceful Dialogue**: - Organize or participate in community forums discussing the Ukraine conflict to promote dialogue and understanding. Engaging in respectful conversations can help bridge divides and foster a collective push for peace.
By taking these actions, we can contribute to a larger movement advocating for a peaceful resolution in Ukraine, ensuring that the voices of those most affected are prioritized in discussions about their future.