European leaders to join Zelensky for Ukraine talks with Trump | FOX 28 Spokane
fox28spokane.com -- Sunday, August 17, 2025, 7:27:53 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Categories: U.S.–Russia Relations, Foreign Policy & International Relations, Social Media & Public Statements

European leaders will join Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky during his visit to Washington on Monday seeking an end to Moscow's invasion, after President Donald Trump dropped his push for a ceasefire following his Alaska summit with Russian leader Vladimir Putin.
Securing a ceasefire in Ukraine, more than three years after the Kremlin ordered the invasion, had been one of Trump's core demands before the summit, to which Ukraine and its European allies were not invited.
But after a meeting that yielded no clear breakthrough, Trump ruled out an immediate ceasefire in Ukraine -- a move that would appear to favour Putin, who has long argued for negotiations on a final peace deal.
Ukraine and its European allies have criticised it as a way to buy time and press Russia's battlefield advances, with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, French President Emmanuel Macron and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen among the leaders set to try and bend Trump's ear on the matter.
Ahead of the Washington visit on Monday, von der Leyen said on X she would welcome Zelensky for a meeting in Brussels on Sunday which other European leaders would join by video call, before accompanying the Ukrainian leader on his US trip at his "request" with "other European leaders".
The German government confirmed Merz was among those other European leaders, and would try to emphasise "interest in a swift peace agreement in Ukraine".
Finland said its president, Alexander Stubb, would also travel to Washington.
Trump briefed Zelensky and European leaders on his flight back from Alaska to Washington, saying afterwards that "it was determined by all that the best way to end the horrific war between Russia and Ukraine is to go directly to a peace agreement which would end the war."
Ceasefire agreements "often times do not hold up," Trump added on his Truth Social platform.
But Zelensky has appeared unconvinced by the change of tack, saying on Saturday that it "complicates the situation".
If Moscow lacks "the will to carry out a simple order to stop the strikes, it may take a lot of effort to get Russia to have the will to implement far greater -- peaceful coexistence with its neighbours for decades," he said on social media.
- 'Harsh reality' -
Trump expressed support during his call with Zelensky and European leaders for a proposal by Putin to take full control of two largely Russian-held Ukrainian regions in exchange for freezing the frontline in two others, an official briefed on the talks told AFP.
Putin "de facto demands that Ukraine leave Donbas," an area consisting of the Donetsk and Lugansk regions in eastern Ukraine, the source said.
In exchange, Russian forces would halt their offensive in the Black Sea port region of Kherson and Zaporizhzhia in southern Ukraine, where the main cities are still under Ukrainian control.
Several months into its full-scale invasion of Ukraine, Russia in September 2022 claimed to have annexed all four Ukrainian regions even though its troops still do not fully control any of them.
"The Ukrainian president refused to leave Donbas," the source said.
Trump notably also said the United States was prepared to provide Ukraine security guarantees, an assurance Merz hailed as "significant progress."
But there was a scathing assessment of the summit outcome from the European Union's top diplomat Kaja Kallas, who accused Putin of seeking to "drag out negotiations" with no commitment to end the bloodshed.
"The harsh reality is that Russia has no intention of ending this war any time soon," Kallas said.
- Zelensky back in White House -
The main diplomatic focus now switches to Zelensky's talks at the White House on Monday.
The Ukrainian president's last Oval Office visit in February ended in an extraordinary shouting match, with Trump and Vice President JD Vance publicly berating Zelensky for not showing enough gratitude for US aid.
In an interview with broadcaster Fox News after his sit-down with Putin, Trump had suggested that the onus was now on Zelensky to secure a peace deal as they work towards an eventual trilateral summit with Putin.
"It's really up to President Zelensky to get it done," Trump said.
- European pressure -
In an earlier statement, European leaders welcomed the plan for a Trump-Putin-Zelensky summit but added that they would maintain pressure on Russia in the absence of a ceasefire.
Meanwhile, the conflict in Ukraine raged on, with both Kyiv and Moscow launching attack drones at each other Sunday.
Back in Moscow, Putin said his summit talks with Trump had been "timely" and "very useful."
In his post-summit statement in Alaska, Putin had warned Ukraine and European countries not to engage in any "behind-the-scenes intrigues" that could disrupt what he called "this emerging progress."
sct-bur/js
FOX28 Spokane©
Sign Our PetitionThe recent developments surrounding the ongoing conflict in Ukraine, particularly the controversial discussions involving European leaders and former President Donald Trump, underscore long-standing tensions and the complexities of international diplomacy. As European leaders convene with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to seek a resolution to Russia's invasion, the implications of Trump’s stance and the historical context of this conflict become crucial to understanding the present situation. The dynamics of peace negotiations and the underlying motives of key actors must be scrutinized, particularly in light of the humanitarian impacts and historical grievances that continue to shape this tragic conflict.
Historically, the roots of the Ukraine-Russia conflict can be traced back to the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991, which left a power vacuum in Eastern Europe. Ukraine's subsequent push for sovereignty and closer ties with Western Europe has been met with resistance from Russia, culminating in the annexation of Crimea in 2014 and the ongoing war in the Donbas region. These actions are viewed not merely as land grabs but as part of a broader strategy by Putin to reassert Russian influence over former Soviet territories, revealing the imperial ambitions that resonate deeply in Russian foreign policy. The current standoff, therefore, is not just a territorial dispute but a struggle over national identity, geopolitical orientation, and the legacy of colonialism in Eastern Europe.
Trump's recent remarks regarding a potential peace agreement raise significant concerns about the implications of negotiating with a regime that has shown little regard for international norms. By suggesting that Ukraine should concede territory to Russia—specifically the Donbas regions—in exchange for a ceasefire, Trump’s approach appears to echo historical instances where aggressors were rewarded for their invasions. Such a strategy risks legitimizing Putin's actions while undermining the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Ukraine. The voices of dissent from Ukraine and its European allies, who view Trump's proposals as undermining their security efforts, highlight the critical need for solidarity among nations that prioritize the principles of self-determination and respect for national borders.
Moreover, the context of these negotiations is fraught with the realities of a protracted humanitarian crisis. Since the invasion began, millions of Ukrainians have been displaced, and countless lives have been lost. The dire need for humanitarian aid and support for those affected by the war should be at the forefront of any discussions surrounding peace. The insistence on immediate ceasefire and diplomatic dialogue must not come at the expense of the rights and lives of civilians caught in the crossfire. The legacy of World War II and the lessons learned from appeasement policies should inform our current responses; history teaches us that peace cannot be achieved through concessions that embolden aggressors.
Furthermore, the involvement of European leaders in these talks is crucial to reinforcing a collective stance against authoritarianism and aggression. The stakes are particularly high for European nations, many of which have historical ties to conflicts stemming from Russian expansionism. Their advocacy for a robust response underscores a commitment to collective security and the principles of international law. As the European Union grapples with its own internal dynamics and external pressures, it must remain resolute in supporting Ukraine as a sovereign nation, while also addressing the broader implications of Russian aggression for European stability.
In conclusion, the ongoing discussions between Trump, Zelensky, and European leaders represent a critical juncture in the Ukraine conflict. It is essential to advocate for a peace process that prioritizes justice, sovereignty, and the well-being of affected populations rather than merely seeking a quick diplomatic resolution. The historical context and the social justice implications of these negotiations cannot be overlooked; the lessons of history compel us to approach this situation with a firm commitment to uphold the values of democracy and human rights. As we engage in conversations about this topic, it is vital to challenge narratives that justify concessions to aggression and to promote a vision of peace that is grounded in respect for sovereignty and the right of nations to exist free from coercion.
The recent developments surrounding the ongoing conflict in Ukraine and the geopolitical maneuvering of global leaders highlight the complexities of international diplomacy in the face of aggression. The visit of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to Washington, accompanied by European leaders, is a significant moment in the quest for a resolution to the war that has been ravaging Ukraine since 2022. The backdrop of this meeting is the stark shift in rhetoric from former President Donald Trump regarding the pursuit of a ceasefire, a move that raises critical questions about the motivations and implications of such a stance. Trump's abrupt pivot appears to favor Russian President Vladimir Putin's agenda, reflecting a troubling trend in U.S. foreign policy that prioritizes appeasement over accountability.
Historically, the West's relationship with Russia has been fraught with tension and conflict, particularly since the end of the Cold War. The invasion of Ukraine by Russia is not merely a regional dispute but a manifestation of a broader struggle for democratic values versus authoritarian control. The urgency to support Ukraine stems from the realization that the outcome of this conflict could set a precedent for future aggressions against democratic nations. Trump's recent endorsement of a peace agreement that would grant Russia control over Ukrainian territories is reminiscent of past failed negotiations that have often led to further conflict rather than lasting peace. This underscores the necessity for a more robust strategy that considers long-term stability rather than short-term political gains.
As citizens, we must recognize the power of our voices and actions in shaping the narrative surrounding this conflict. Engaging in informed discussions about the implications of U.S. foreign policy decisions is crucial. Advocacy for a strong, unwavering support for Ukraine is essential, as half-measures or appeasement only embolden aggressors like Putin. We should push for a comprehensive understanding of what constitutes a "peace agreement"—one that does not compromise the territorial integrity and sovereignty of Ukraine. Additionally, we can support organizations that provide humanitarian aid to those affected by the conflict, amplifying the message that we stand in solidarity with the victims of war.
Educational outreach also plays a vital role in fostering a more informed public discourse. Initiating community discussions, workshops, and forums to dissect the intricacies of international relations can equip individuals with the knowledge to advocate effectively. Furthermore, encouraging critical media consumption can help debunk narratives that may inadvertently support aggressive foreign policies. Understanding the historical context of Russian aggression and the consequences of appeasement can empower citizens to challenge misleading rhetoric and advocate for a foreign policy rooted in principled diplomacy.
In engaging with those who may hold differing views on U.S. foreign policy, it is essential to approach conversations with empathy and a focus on shared values. By emphasizing the importance of democracy, human rights, and international law, we can create a common ground that transcends partisan divides. Inviting skeptics to consider the long-term ramifications of abandoning Ukraine to Russian control—and the potential for future aggressions against other nations—can lead to more fruitful dialogues. Ultimately, fostering a collective understanding of the importance of supporting Ukraine can galvanize public opinion and influence policymakers to pursue a course of action that aligns with democratic values and global stability.
In conclusion, the ongoing conflict in Ukraine serves as a critical touchstone for understanding the complexities of international diplomacy and the need for principled action in support of democratic nations. As we navigate this challenging landscape, we must remain engaged, informed, and active in advocating for policies that prioritize justice, accountability, and the fundamental rights of all individuals. The stakes are high, and the path forward requires a commitment to solidarity and a steadfast resolve to confront aggression in all its forms.
The ongoing conflict in Ukraine raises significant concerns about global peace, security, and the humanitarian crisis affecting millions. As individuals who care deeply about these issues, there are meaningful actions we can take to amplify our voices and advocate for a peaceful resolution. Here’s a detailed list of ideas and actions we can pursue:
### 1. **Advocate for Peaceful Resolutions** - **Write to Elected Officials:** Contact your local representatives and urge them to support diplomatic efforts for a ceasefire and peace negotiations in Ukraine. - **Who to contact:** - Your U.S. Senators and House Representatives. - Use [GovTrack.us](https://www.govtrack.us/) to find your representatives' contact information. - **Suggested Email/Letter Content:** ``` Subject: Urgent Action Needed for Peace in Ukraine
Dear [Representative's Name],
I am writing to express my concern regarding the ongoing conflict in Ukraine and the urgent need for a peaceful resolution. I urge you to advocate for negotiations and a ceasefire that prioritizes the safety and well-being of civilians affected by this war.
It is critical that the U.S. supports diplomatic efforts rather than military escalation. Please commit to working with fellow lawmakers to push for constructive dialogue that leads to lasting peace in the region.
Thank you for your attention to this urgent matter.
Sincerely, [Your Name] [Your Address] [Your Email] ```
### 2. **Sign and Share Petitions** - **Online Petitions:** Join or create petitions that call for an end to the conflict and for humanitarian aid to support affected populations. - **Example Petition:** Find petitions on platforms like [Change.org](https://www.change.org/) or [Care2.com](https://www.care2.com/). - **Suggested Petition Topics:** - Urging the U.S. government to increase humanitarian aid for Ukraine. - Calling for an international peace summit to negotiate a ceasefire.
### 3. **Support Humanitarian Organizations** - **Donate to Reputable Charities:** Providing financial support to organizations that are delivering aid to those affected by the war can make a tangible difference. - **Suggested Organizations:** - **Doctors Without Borders:** [donate.msf.org](https://donate.msf.org) - **International Red Cross:** [donate.icrc.org](https://www.icrc.org/en/donate) - **GlobalGiving:** [globalgiving.org](https://www.globalgiving.org)
### 4. **Raise Awareness and Educate Others** - **Host or Attend Community Events:** Organize or participate in discussions, town halls, or informational sessions about the conflict in Ukraine and its global implications. - **Social Media Campaigns:** Use your social media platforms to share articles, personal insights, and actions that others can take to contribute towards peace. - **Hashtags to Use:** #PeaceForUkraine, #EndTheWar, #SupportUkrainianPeople
### 5. **Engage with Local and National Advocacy Groups** - **Join Organizations:** Get involved with local or national groups that focus on peace, human rights, or international diplomacy. - **Suggested Groups:** - **Peace Action:** [peaceaction.org](https://peaceaction.org) - **American Friends Service Committee:** [afsc.org](https://www.afsc.org) - **Volunteer:** Offer your time to help with outreach, organizing events, or educational initiatives.
### 6. **Contact International Bodies** - **Write to European Leaders:** As European leaders are involved in discussions regarding Ukraine, you can reach out to them as well. - **Example Contact:** - **Ursula von der Leyen, President of the European Commission** - Email: contact@ec.europa.eu - Mailing Address: European Commission, Rue de la Loi 200, 1049 Brussels, Belgium - **Suggested Content:** ``` Subject: Support for Peace in Ukraine
Dear President von der Leyen,
I am reaching out to express my support for diplomatic initiatives aimed at resolving the conflict in Ukraine. I urge you and your fellow leaders to prioritize negotiations that protect civilian lives and promote lasting peace in the region.
Thank you for your commitment to this critical issue.
Sincerely, [Your Name] ```
### Conclusion By taking these actions, we can collectively contribute to efforts aimed at bringing about peace and stability in Ukraine. Each of us has the power to advocate for change, support those in need, and play a role in shaping the future of international relations.