Europe to discuss Ukraine peace plan after Trump-Putin summit
thesun.my -- Sunday, August 17, 2025, 2:28:50 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Categories: Foreign Policy & International Relations, U.S.–Russia Relations, Media Coverage & Press Relations

WASHINGTON: Leaders of France, Germany, and Britain will hold a video call on Sunday to discuss steps towards ending the war in Ukraine.
This follows Donald Trump's decision to drop his push for a ceasefire after his summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska.
Securing a ceasefire had been one of Trump's key demands before the meeting, which excluded Ukraine and its European allies.
However, after the summit yielded no clear breakthrough, Trump ruled out an immediate ceasefire, a move seen as favouring Putin's push for long-term peace talks.
Ukraine and European allies have criticised this approach, calling it a tactic to buy time for Russian military gains.
Trump later spoke with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and European leaders on his flight back to Washington.
He stated that all parties agreed the best way to end the war was through a direct peace agreement rather than a temporary ceasefire.
Trump added on his Truth Social platform that ceasefire deals often fail to hold.
Zelensky, set to visit Washington on Monday, expressed doubts about the shift in strategy, saying it "complicates the situation."
He warned that Russia's unwillingness to halt attacks raises concerns about its commitment to lasting peace.
An official briefed on Trump's discussions revealed his support for Putin's proposal to take full control of two Russian-held Ukrainian regions.
In exchange, Russia would freeze military advances in Kherson and Zaporizhzhia, where Ukrainian forces still hold key cities.
Russia had previously claimed annexation of four Ukrainian regions despite not fully controlling any of them.
The official noted that Zelensky refused to cede Donbas, a region comprising Donetsk and Lugansk.
Trump also offered Ukraine security guarantees, a move praised by German Chancellor Friedrich Merz as "significant progress."
EU diplomat Kaja Kallas, however, accused Putin of prolonging negotiations without genuine intent to end the war.
She stated that Russia has no plans to stop the conflict soon.
Zelensky's upcoming White House visit will be a key diplomatic focus.
An EU source confirmed several European leaders were invited to join the talks.
Zelensky's last Oval Office meeting in February ended in a heated exchange over US aid.
He described his recent conversation with Trump as "substantive" and looked forward to discussing peace details in Washington.
Trump suggested in a Fox News interview that Zelensky must now take the lead in securing a peace deal.
European leaders welcomed plans for a trilateral summit but vowed to maintain pressure on Russia without a ceasefire.
Meanwhile, Ukraine reported overnight Russian attacks involving 85 drones and a ballistic missile.
Putin called his summit with Trump "timely" and "very useful."
He warned against "behind-the-scenes intrigues" that could disrupt progress towards peace. - AFP
Sign Our PetitionThe recent developments surrounding the Ukraine conflict and the proposed peace efforts following the Trump-Putin summit highlight the complex interplay of international diplomacy, national sovereignty, and historical grievances. As European leaders convene to discuss a way forward, it is crucial to situate these events within the broader context of post-Cold War geopolitics and the ongoing struggles for self-determination and justice facing Ukraine. The discussions of a peace plan, particularly in light of Trump's controversial positions and actions, raise critical questions about the efficacy of negotiations and the implications for Ukraine's future.
Historically, Ukraine has been at the crossroads of East and West, a nation that has struggled for independence and territorial integrity in the face of external aggression. The 2014 annexation of Crimea by Russia marked a pivotal moment in this ongoing struggle, as it underscored the aggressive tactics employed by the Kremlin in pursuing its regional ambitions. The subsequent war in the Donbas region has further complicated the situation, resulting in thousands of lives lost and millions displaced. With the backdrop of this history, Trump's recent dismissal of a ceasefire in favor of a direct peace agreement appears to dismiss the realities on the ground, particularly as Ukraine continues to face ruthless military offensives.
Moreover, Trump’s alignment with Putin raises alarms regarding the United States' role in global diplomacy, especially concerning its allies. By sidelining Ukraine and its European partners during the summit, Trump not only undermined Ukraine’s sovereignty but also showcased a troubling willingness to prioritize personal diplomacy over established alliances. Such a maneuver echoes historical precedents where powerful nations have negotiated at the expense of smaller nations, often disregarding their interests and aspirations. This pattern is reminiscent of the Munich Agreement of 1938, where the fate of Czechoslovakia was decided without its input, leading to dire consequences. The lessons of history remind us that true peace cannot be brokered through appeasement or unilateral concessions but must consider the voices of all parties involved.
President Zelensky’s skepticism about Trump’s approach is not unfounded. As a leader whose nation is embroiled in an existential struggle against Russian military aggression, Zelensky understands that temporary ceasefires historically provide little more than a reprieve for aggressors to regroup and strategize. The ongoing violence, including the recent reports of drone and missile attacks on Ukrainian cities, serves as a stark reminder that Russia’s commitment to peace is questionable at best. This reality underscores the need for a robust international response that prioritizes Ukraine's autonomy and territorial integrity rather than a simplistic agreement that could favor Russian interests.
The European response to these developments is equally critical. As leaders from France, Germany, and Britain engage in discussions, their commitment to maintaining pressure on Russia without a ceasefire reflects a broader understanding of the fragility of peace in this context. The historical lessons from the interwar period emphasize the importance of standing firm against aggression to prevent further conflict. In this vein, the European Union's role as a mediator and a supporter of Ukraine is essential, not only for regional stability but also for reinforcing the principles of international law and human rights that underpin the European project.
In conclusion, the emerging discussions around a potential peace plan for Ukraine necessitate a nuanced understanding of history, diplomacy, and the ongoing fight for justice. As the world watches these developments unfold, it is essential to remain vigilant regarding the implications of any agreements proposed without Ukraine’s full participation. The fragile nature of peace in regions affected by military conflict demands a commitment to genuine dialogue that prioritizes the rights and agency of those directly impacted. Only through a comprehensive approach that acknowledges historical grievances and contemporary realities can we hope to foster lasting peace and stability in Ukraine and the broader European landscape.
The recent discussions around the Ukraine peace plan following the Trump-Putin summit have illuminated a deeply complex and troubling landscape in international politics. While the situation ostensibly centers on ending the conflict in Ukraine, it also reveals the growing tensions between the West and Russia, the fraught politics of U.S. foreign policy, and the perilous state of democracy and human rights. The implications of these developments extend well beyond Ukraine's borders, affecting global stability, the integrity of international alliances, and the fundamental principles of self-determination and sovereignty that nations everywhere espouse.
Historically, Ukraine has been at the crossroads of East and West, and its geopolitical significance cannot be overstated. The nation has endured centuries of foreign domination, from the Tsarist Empire to the Soviet Union, and its recent aspirations towards European integration are a direct challenge to Russia’s sphere of influence. The conflict that erupted in 2014, following Russia's annexation of Crimea, is emblematic of this struggle. As the war continues, it serves as a reminder of the fragility of democratic governance in the face of authoritarian aggression—a theme that resonates in the current global climate, where many countries are grappling with the rise of populism and far-right movements.
The recent decision by Trump to abandon calls for a ceasefire has raised alarms among those who view it as a capitulation to Putin's demands. This move not only undermines Ukraine's position but also sets a dangerous precedent in international relations. The push for a peace agreement, rather than a ceasefire, could easily be interpreted as an invitation for further territorial concessions to Russia—concessions that could embolden future aggressions. It is critical to question the motivations behind such political maneuvers. Are they genuinely aimed at achieving lasting peace, or are they simply tactical shifts designed to placate powerful allies and consolidate political support at home?
In light of these developments, it is crucial for American citizens to engage with these issues thoughtfully and proactively. Advocacy for a strong and unwavering commitment to Ukraine's sovereignty is paramount. This can take many forms, from contacting elected officials to voice support for continued military and humanitarian aid for Ukraine, to participating in grassroots organizations that promote human rights and democracy. Furthermore, public discourse should emphasize the importance of diplomatic solutions that prioritize the self-determination of nations over strategic geopolitical calculations. Engaging with local communities to raise awareness about the intricacies of the Ukraine conflict can also foster a more informed populace that advocates for just and ethical foreign policy.
Educational efforts can play a vital role in shaping public understanding of these issues. By promoting discussions around the historical context of the Ukraine conflict, the implications of Russian expansionism, and the importance of international solidarity, we can equip individuals with the knowledge they need to articulate their views effectively. Encouraging critical engagement with media narratives surrounding the conflict is also essential. Misinformation and reductive portrayals can dehumanize the complexities of warfare and oversimplify the motivations of key players. A well-informed citizenry can challenge simplistic narratives and push for policies that align with ideals of justice and equity on the global stage.
In conclusion, the ongoing situation in Ukraine is not merely a distant conflict; it reflects broader struggles for democracy, sovereignty, and human rights that resonate globally. As Americans, we must advocate for policies that prioritize peace through justice, reject any inclination towards appeasement of authoritarian regimes, and support the resilience of democratic movements. Engaging in thoughtful discourse, promoting educational initiatives, and maintaining pressure on our leaders to uphold the principles of self-determination and international law are all crucial steps in navigating this multifaceted crisis. The future of Ukraine, and indeed the health of global democracy itself, depends on our collective action and commitment to these ideals.
### Analyzing the Situation: Actions We Can Take
The situation surrounding the conflict in Ukraine is complex and requires a multifaceted approach from individuals who are concerned about the ongoing war and its implications. Here’s a detailed list of actions we can take, including advocacy, direct communication, and community engagement.
#### 1. **Advocacy and Petitions** - **Sign and Share Petitions**: - **"Call for a Peaceful Resolution in Ukraine" Petition**: Available on platforms like Change.org, encourage your friends and family to sign and share this petition urging leaders to prioritize a diplomatic resolution instead of military escalation. - **Example Petition**: [Peace in Ukraine - Change.org](https://www.change.org) (Search for Ukraine peace petitions). - **Create Your Own Petition**: Use platforms like Change.org or MoveOn.org to gather support for a specific peace initiative or to call on leaders to take action towards a ceasefire.
#### 2. **Writing to Political Leaders** - **Communicate Your Concerns**: Write to your elected representatives expressing your views on the importance of pursuing peace in Ukraine. Here are examples of whom to contact: - **Joe Biden, President of the United States** - Email: contact@whitehouse.gov - Mailing Address: The White House, 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20500 - **Nancy Pelosi, Former Speaker of the House** - Email: pelosi.house.gov/contact - Mailing Address: 1236 Longworth House Office Building, Washington, DC 20515 - **Chuck Schumer, Senate Majority Leader** - Email: schumer.senate.gov/contact - Mailing Address: 322 Hart Senate Office Building, Washington, DC 20510 - **What to Say**: - Express your concerns about the ongoing conflict and urge them to advocate for a ceasefire and meaningful peace talks. - Highlight the humanitarian costs of the war and the importance of international cooperation for a sustainable peace process.
#### 3. **Community Engagement and Awareness** - **Organize or Attend Local Events**: Participate in or organize community discussions, vigils, or rallies focused on peace in Ukraine. Use social media platforms to promote these events, fostering community solidarity. - **Host Informational Sessions**: Partner with local organizations to host talks or webinars discussing the implications of the Ukraine conflict and ways to advocate for peaceful resolutions. - **Engage with Local Media**: Write op-eds or letters to the editor in local newspapers expressing your perspective on the need for a peaceful resolution in Ukraine.
#### 4. **Support Humanitarian Efforts** - **Donate to Reputable Organizations**: Contribute to organizations providing humanitarian aid to those affected by the conflict, such as: - **Doctors Without Borders**: [donate.doctorswithoutborders.org](https://donate.doctorswithoutborders.org) - **International Rescue Committee**: [rescue.org](https://www.rescue.org) - **Volunteer Your Time**: Many local organizations assist refugees or those displaced by the conflict. Reach out to see how you can help.
#### 5. **Utilize Social Media** - **Raise Awareness**: Use your social media accounts to share articles, petitions, and information about the conflict. Encourage your followers to take action. - **Engage with Influencers**: Reach out to social media influencers who advocate for peace and ask them to amplify messages calling for ceasefires and peace negotiations.
#### 6. **Educate Yourself and Others** - **Stay Informed**: Regularly read updates from credible news sources about the situation in Ukraine. Understanding the complexities will allow you to engage more effectively in conversations and advocacy efforts. - **Share Knowledge**: Organize book clubs or discussion groups focusing on the history of Ukraine and the geopolitical dynamics at play to foster deeper understanding within your community.
### Conclusion Each of these actions contributes to a broader movement advocating for peace in Ukraine. By raising awareness, communicating with leaders, and supporting humanitarian efforts, individuals can play a significant role in shaping the discourse around this critical issue. Your voice matters, and collective action can lead to meaningful change.