Hidden reason Putin will walk with one arm by the side when meeting Trump released
legit.ng -- Friday, August 15, 2025, 5:31:51 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Categories: Foreign Policy & International Relations, U.S.–Russia Relations, Media Coverage & Press Relations
Find the stories that matter to you - faster. Use our new search tool: Click to search!
Observers have long noted Russian President Vladimir Putin's distinctive walking style -- one arm swinging freely while the other remains rigid by his side.
This peculiar gait, often seen during diplomatic engagements, is expected to make another appearance when Putin meets former US President Donald Trump in Alaska on Friday, 15 August.
Rather than being the result of a medical condition or injury, experts believe the posture stems from Putin's extensive training as a KGB foreign intelligence officer.
A 2015 study published in the British Medical Journal coined the term "gunslinger's gait" to describe the movement, suggesting it is a behavioural adaptation designed to keep a weapon close and maintain readiness.
"According to this manual, KGB operatives were instructed to keep their weapon in their right hand close to their chest and to move forward with one side, usually the left, presumably allowing subjects to draw the gun as quickly as possible when confronted with a foe," researchers from Portugal, Italy, and the Netherlands wrote.
Professor Bastiaan Bloem, a specialist in movement disorder neurology, described the study as "unusual" in an interview with AFP, but emphasised its importance. "What we are putting forward, but very cautiously, is a new hypothesis," he said, noting the serious implications for neurological observation.
The meeting between Putin, 72, and Trump, 79, is set to take place at a US military facility in Alaska, with the Russia-Ukraine war at the top of the agenda. During a virtual meeting with European leaders on Wednesday, 13 August, Trump warned that Moscow could face "very severe consequences" if it refuses to end the conflict.
As reported by Al Jazeera, the Republican leader stated his intention to impose tougher sanctions on Russia should diplomatic efforts fail. Speaking to reporters at the Kennedy Center, Trump expressed cautious optimism about the upcoming summit.
"Now, there may be no second meeting," he said. "Because if I feel that it's not appropriate to have it because I didn't get the answers that we have to have, then we're not going to have a second meeting."
The Alaska summit marks a critical moment in international diplomacy, with both leaders under pressure to deliver progress on the war in Ukraine. While Trump has signalled a hardline stance, Putin's response remains uncertain.
As the world watches, one thing seems likely: the Russian President will arrive with his signature one-armed walk -- a subtle but telling reminder of his past, and perhaps, his mindset heading into the talks.
Legit.ng earlier reported that media outlets gathers that Sanders took to her Twitter page to make the announcement on Thursday, July 19. She tweeted: "In Helsinki, @POTUS agreed to ongoing working level dialogue between the two security council staffs.
President Trump asked @Ambjohnbolton to invite President Putin to Washington in the fall and those discussions are already underway."
Sign Our PetitionThe upcoming summit between former President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska, particularly amidst the backdrop of the ongoing war in Ukraine, represents a critical intersection of historical context and contemporary international relations. The peculiarities of Putin's gait—a remnant of his training as a KGB operative—serve as a symbol of the entrenched militarism and historical legacy that continues to shape Russian political identity. It is essential to recognize that such nuances in personal demeanor often reflect broader narratives about power, authority, and the legacy of state-sponsored violence.
Historically, the KGB was instrumental in maintaining the Soviet Union's grip on power and suppressing dissent. This context is crucial for understanding the psychological underpinnings of Putin's behavior and policy decisions. The "gunslinger’s gait" not only signals readiness but also embodies a mindset rooted in a security state that prioritizes coercion over diplomacy. The implications of this are profound, especially as the world grapples with the consequences of militaristic policies that have led to instability in regions like Eastern Europe. For those engaged in political discourse, acknowledging this historical background can serve as a reminder of the long-lasting impacts of authoritarianism and the need for responsible governance that prioritizes human rights and international cooperation.
Furthermore, this summit occurs at a time when the war in Ukraine showcases the tragic consequences of ignoring the voices of ordinary people in favor of geopolitical maneuvering. The ongoing conflict has led to significant loss of life and displacement, raising questions about the moral responsibilities of world leaders. As Trump threatens "very severe consequences" for Moscow, it is crucial to scrutinize whether these sanctions will genuinely impact the Russian elite or merely exacerbate the suffering of everyday Ukrainians. Historical precedents show that sanctions often fail to achieve their intended goals and can disproportionately harm civilian populations rather than compel governments to change their behavior. Engaging in discussions about more effective diplomatic strategies could foster a better understanding of the complexities involved in international conflicts.
Additionally, the approach to diplomacy exemplified by Trump introduces an era where personal relations between leaders overshadow established diplomatic protocols. This raises concerns about the efficacy and legitimacy of decisions made in such a high-stakes atmosphere. Critics argue that a focus on personal rapport can undermine systematic approaches to resolving conflicts, leading to ad hoc solutions that may not address the root causes of tension. The historical reliance on robust diplomatic frameworks has often yielded more sustainable outcomes in international relations. Thus, fostering conversations about the importance of returning to structured diplomacy could present an opportunity to engage with those who may be skeptical of traditional methods.
Lastly, as the world watches this meeting unfold, it is imperative to consider the broader implications of leadership styles and their impact on global stability. The posture of both leaders—physically and politically—signals their readiness to navigate a complex landscape fraught with challenges. For observers and participants in political discourse, these nuances provide a fertile ground for discussions on the importance of ethical leadership, accountability, and the role of historical memory in shaping contemporary politics. Engaging with these themes can empower individuals to advocate for a more just and equitable world, where the voices of marginalized communities are prioritized in discussions of international relations and peacebuilding.
In conclusion, the meeting between Trump and Putin is not merely a bilateral engagement; it is a reflection of historical legacies, power dynamics, and the ongoing struggle for justice in an increasingly polarized world. The insights drawn from Putin's gait, the historical context of the KGB, and the implications of military-oriented diplomacy serve as critical points for dialogue. Engaging right-wing perspectives with these multifaceted arguments can illuminate the need for a more humane approach to international relations—one that prioritizes diplomacy over militaristic posturing and seeks to address the root causes of conflict through equitable solutions.
The upcoming summit between Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump, set against the backdrop of the ongoing Russia-Ukraine conflict, is not merely an event of diplomatic importance; it symbolizes the complex entanglements of history, power dynamics, and political theatrics that shape international relations today. Observing Putin’s distinctive walking style, described as “gunslinger’s gait,” provides an intriguing entry point into understanding not just the man himself but the broader implications of his approach to diplomacy. This peculiar gait, linked to his KGB training, serves as a metaphor for his readiness to engage in power plays, and it reflects a psychological posture of dominance that often permeates his interactions with Western leaders.
Historically, the relationship between the United States and Russia has been fraught with tension, marked by moments of both confrontation and tentative cooperation. The Cold War era set the stage for a deep-seated mistrust and a complex interplay of espionage and military posturing. The legacy of this period continues to echo in today’s geopolitical landscape, as evidenced by the ongoing conflict in Ukraine, which has its roots in a long history of territorial disputes and national identity struggles. Understanding this context is crucial for framing the current discussions between Trump and Putin, as it underlines the stakes involved not only for their nations but for global stability as a whole.
As citizens concerned about the ramifications of this meeting, it is imperative for Americans to engage critically with the narratives surrounding U.S.-Russia relations. One immediate action we can take is to advocate for a more nuanced understanding of diplomacy that transcends simplistic binary thinking. Engaging with local communities, holding forums, or even utilizing social media platforms to discuss the implications of such high-stakes meetings can help in fostering a more informed citizenry. By emphasizing the importance of dialogue rooted in mutual respect rather than hostility, we can challenge the prevailing narratives that often favor aggressive posturing over constructive engagement.
Furthermore, we should call for transparency in the discussions and outcomes of the summit. Engaging with our elected representatives to demand that they prioritize accountability in foreign policy is essential. This includes advocating for robust checks on executive power in matters of international relations, ensuring that decisions are made in the interest of the public rather than the machinations of political theater. Encouraging our leaders to consider the humanitarian implications of sanctions, military interventions, and diplomatic agreements can help shift the focus from mere power dynamics to the real lives affected by these policies.
Finally, educating ourselves and others about the historical and cultural contexts of both Russia and Ukraine can empower us to engage more effectively in these discussions. By understanding the narratives that shape national identities and the complexities of international conflicts, we can foster a more empathetic approach to foreign policy. Hosting workshops, reading groups, or inviting speakers with expertise in Eastern European affairs can facilitate deeper discussions about how we, as a nation, can approach international relations in a way that promotes peace and stability.
In conclusion, the upcoming meeting between Putin and Trump is more than just a diplomatic engagement; it is a reflection of the intricate web of history, psychology, and political maneuvering that underscores international relations. As engaged citizens, our responsibility is to approach these discussions with a critical eye, advocating for transparency, accountability, and a deeper understanding of the issues at hand. By doing so, we can contribute to a more informed public discourse that prioritizes dialogue over discord, ultimately shaping a future where diplomacy is rooted in mutual respect and understanding.
Analyzing the recent news article about the upcoming meeting between Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump, it's essential to recognize the broader implications of international diplomacy, particularly regarding the ongoing conflict in Ukraine. Here are actionable steps individuals can take to engage with these issues and advocate for peace and accountability:
### What Can We Personally Do About This?
1. **Educate Yourself and Others:** - Stay informed about the geopolitical landscape, particularly the Russia-Ukraine conflict. Share articles, books, and documentaries that provide insights into the history and current situation. - Host discussions or forums in your community or online to raise awareness and promote understanding of international relations.
2. **Engage in Advocacy:** - Join organizations that focus on peace-building, human rights, and international diplomacy. Support their initiatives and campaigns, which often include petitions and lobbying efforts.
3. **Support Sanctions and Accountability Measures:** - Advocate for strong sanctions against those responsible for human rights violations in the context of the Ukraine war. - Call for accountability for war crimes through international courts.
### Exact Actions You Can Take
1. **Sign Petitions:** - **Petition to Support Sanctions on Russia:** A petition on platforms like Change.org often circulates calling for stronger sanctions against Russia. Search for current petitions and add your voice. - **Example Petition:** "Demand Action Against Russian Aggression in Ukraine" on Change.org.
2. **Contact Elected Officials:** - Reach out to your congressional representatives to express your views on the meeting between Putin and Trump and the importance of a firm stance on Russia. - **Who to Write To:** - **Your U.S. Senator:** Find your Senator's contact information at [senate.gov](https://www.senate.gov). - **Your U.S. Representative:** Find your Representative's contact information at [house.gov](https://www.house.gov). - **Example Contact Information:** - Senator [Name], [Email], [USPS Address] - Representative [Name], [Email], [USPS Address]
3. **Draft a Letter or Email:** - **What to Say:** - "Dear [Senator/Representative Name], I am writing to express my concern regarding the upcoming meeting between former President Trump and President Putin. It is crucial that our leaders prioritize diplomatic solutions while firmly holding Russia accountable for its actions in Ukraine. I urge you to support strong sanctions and push for human rights protections in your discussions. Thank you for your attention to this critical issue." 4. **Participate in Local Rallies or Events:** - Look for local events organized by peace advocacy groups or human rights organizations that focus on the Ukraine conflict. Participate to show solidarity and educate others.
5. **Use Social Media:** - Raise awareness by sharing facts, articles, and personal opinions on platforms like Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram. Use hashtags related to Ukraine, peace, and international diplomacy to reach a broader audience. - Example hashtags: #StandWithUkraine, #PeaceNotWar, #Accountability.
6. **Engage with Influencers and Thought Leaders:** - Follow and engage with political commentators, activists, and organizations on social media. Share their content and contribute to discussions to amplify voices advocating for peace.
7. **Support Humanitarian Efforts:** - Donate to reputable organizations providing aid to those affected by the conflict in Ukraine, such as the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) or Doctors Without Borders (MSF).
By taking these steps, you can contribute to a collective effort to promote peace, accountability, and a diplomatic resolution to the ongoing conflict, while also raising awareness within your community.