Zelensky to meet with Trump in DC on Monday after 'no deal' reached in Putin summit
gazette.com -- Sunday, August 17, 2025, 12:24:39 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Categories: Foreign Policy & International Relations, U.S.–Russia Relations, Media Coverage & Press Relations
President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky announced plans to meet on Monday to hammer out "all of the details" about how to end the Russia-Ukraine war.
The meeting in Washington, D.C., marks the next stage of reaching a potential ceasefire or more sweeping and final peace deal, which the White House now hopes could be implemented. It is set to come three days after Trump held an Alaska summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin, seeking to help negotiate an end to the war that ended with "no deal," although the White House described the friendly encounter as "very productive."
Trump debriefed Zelensky and critical allies with a phone call following the Alaska meeting with Putin, with the Ukrainian president sounding broadly positive about the summit, leading him to accept an invitation from the White House for a similar meeting to further peace efforts next week.
"It was determined by all that the best way to end the horrific war between Russia and Ukraine is to go directly to a Peace Agreement, which would end the war, and not a mere Ceasefire Agreement, which often times do not hold up," Trump posted on Truth Social early Saturday morning. "President Zelenskyy will be coming to D.C., the Oval Office, on Monday afternoon. If all works out, we will then schedule a meeting with President Putin. Potentially, millions of people's lives will be saved."
'NO DEAL UNTIL THERE'S A DEAL': TRUMP SUMS UP PUTIN MEETING IN SURPRISINGLY BRIEF PRESS CONFERENCE
Zelensky confirmed the meeting in his own message to social media, saying he was "grateful" for the invitation and that the two men plan "to discuss all of the details regarding ending the killing and the war." He also backed Trump's proposal for a trilateral meeting between the U.S., Russia, and Ukraine, arguing that "Ukraine emphasizes that key issues can be discussed at the level of leaders, and a trilateral format is suitable for this."
"Ukraine reaffirms its readiness to work with maximum effort to achieve peace," Zelensky said. "President Trump informed about his meeting with the Russian leader and the main points of their discussion. It is important that America's strength has an impact on the development of the situation."
CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE GAZETTE
Sign Our PetitionThe recent announcement of a meeting between Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and former U.S. President Donald Trump in Washington, D.C., serves as a reflection of the complex, often fraught dynamics of international diplomacy, particularly in the context of the ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine. As the world watches, this meeting underscores the urgent need for a substantive dialogue and effective solutions to end the violence that has plagued Ukraine since 2014. However, it is essential to critically analyze the implications of this encounter, especially given the historical context of U.S.-Russia relations and the broader themes of imperialism and national sovereignty that have characterized the region’s geopolitical landscape.
Historically, Ukraine has been caught in the crossfire of great power ambitions, particularly between Russia and Western nations. The 2014 annexation of Crimea by Russia and the subsequent conflict in Eastern Ukraine are stark reminders of the enduring legacies of the Soviet Union and the West's failure to support Ukraine’s sovereignty effectively. Yet, as we observe this meeting, it is crucial to recognize the limitations of relying on figures like Trump, who has previously demonstrated a transactional approach to foreign policy. The emphasis on securing a “Peace Agreement” rather than a mere ceasefire is commendable; however, the effectiveness of such discussions often hinges on the willingness of all parties involved to prioritize genuine reconciliation over political expedience.
In the context of ongoing social struggles, the war in Ukraine is not merely a geopolitical crisis but a human tragedy that has displaced millions and decimated communities. As Zelensky and Trump prepare for their discussions, it is vital to remember that any peace deal must prioritize the voices and needs of the Ukrainian people, who have borne the brunt of the conflict. The emphasis on a trilateral meeting suggests a potential avenue for inclusivity; however, past experiences with international negotiations remind us that the presence of powerful leaders does not guarantee equitable outcomes. Grassroots movements in Ukraine and the broader region, advocating for peace and justice, must be centered in any discourse to ensure that the resulting agreements reflect the aspirations of those most affected by the war.
Moreover, Trump's recent characterization of his meeting with Putin as "productive" raises questions about the nature of the U.S. role in this conflict. The history of U.S. interventions abroad, often driven by imperial interests rather than genuine humanitarian concerns, casts a shadow over the current diplomatic efforts. While the desire to broker peace is commendable, it is crucial to question the motives behind such engagements and whether they align with the principles of self-determination and respect for national sovereignty. The American public must remain vigilant, demanding transparency and accountability from leaders who seek to navigate these complex international waters.
Finally, the broader implications of the Trump-Zelensky meeting extend beyond Ukraine and Russia, signaling a potential recalibration of U.S. foreign policy in a changing global landscape. As we engage in discussions about this meeting, we must consider how it fits into larger narratives of nationalism, imperialism, and the fight for social justice. The struggles faced by the Ukrainian people are emblematic of the broader fight against oppressive regimes and the need for solidarity across borders. In this moment of renewed diplomatic engagement, there lies an opportunity to advocate for a foreign policy that prioritizes human rights, equity, and the empowerment of marginalized voices, ensuring that any resolution to the conflict serves not only the interests of powerful nations but also the aspirations of the people of Ukraine.
The recent announcement regarding President Donald Trump's meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in Washington, D.C., signals a crucial moment in the ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine. With the specter of war casting a long shadow over the region, the stakes are incredibly high, not only for the immediate parties involved but for global peace and stability as well. This meeting comes on the heels of a seemingly unproductive summit between Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin, raising questions about the effectiveness of such diplomatic efforts and the motivations behind them.
Historically, the Russia-Ukraine conflict has deep roots, stemming from complex geopolitical dynamics and longstanding tensions between East and West. The annexation of Crimea by Russia in 2014 and the ensuing conflict in Eastern Ukraine set the stage for a protracted struggle that has claimed thousands of lives and displaced millions. This backdrop underscores the urgent need for a robust and sustainable peace agreement — one that transcends mere ceasefire discussions, which have often proven fragile and temporary. The rhetoric surrounding Trump’s push for a peace agreement, rather than a ceasefire, is an important distinction that should be emphasized. It reflects a recognition of the need for a comprehensive resolution that addresses core issues, including territorial integrity, governance, and security guarantees for Ukraine.
As Americans, it is essential to engage with the implications of these high-stakes diplomatic discussions. We must advocate for a peace process that is not merely a product of political maneuvering, but one that genuinely prioritizes the voices and needs of the Ukrainian people. This is particularly important given the historical context; previous negotiations have too often sidelined the concerns of the very populations affected by the violence. We can support humanitarian efforts aimed at providing aid to those displaced by the war and push for comprehensive engagement strategies that include civil society organizations in Ukraine. By elevating the voices of those most impacted, we can foster a more inclusive approach to peace that transcends the interests of political leaders.
Moreover, engaging in discussions about the role of the United States in this conflict is crucial. The U.S. has historically positioned itself as a key actor in global peacekeeping and conflict resolution. Therefore, we should call for a foreign policy that emphasizes diplomacy over military intervention and that seeks to build coalitions with international partners committed to the same goal. The trilateral format proposed by Zelensky, involving the U.S., Russia, and Ukraine, offers a promising avenue to facilitate dialogue and push for a peace agreement that is not only expedient but durable. We can advocate for increased diplomatic engagement with European allies, who share an interest in stabilizing the region, and work towards a multilateral framework that respects Ukraine's sovereignty while addressing Russia's security concerns.
Finally, we must remain vigilant about the narratives surrounding this conflict and the potential for misinformation. The portrayal of the war in media outlets often simplifies complex issues into black-and-white terms, which can lead to public apathy or misinformed opinions. By educating ourselves and others about the intricacies of the conflict, including the historical grievances and the human impact of the war, we can foster a more nuanced understanding that encourages empathy and solidarity with those affected. Engaging in informed discussions, sharing educational resources, and advocating for thoughtful policy changes can empower us as citizens to play a meaningful role in shaping the future of U.S. foreign policy and global peace initiatives.
In conclusion, the upcoming meeting between Trump and Zelensky presents a pivotal moment for not only the U.S. and Ukraine but for the broader international community. By recognizing the historical complexities of the Russia-Ukraine conflict and advocating for a peace process that prioritizes the voices of those affected, we can contribute to a more informed and humane approach to diplomacy. Engaging with these issues on a personal level, fostering broader discussions within our communities, and advocating for policies that promote lasting peace will empower us to be active participants in shaping a more just world.
In light of the recent developments regarding the ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine, particularly the meeting between Presidents Trump and Zelensky, individuals concerned about the humanitarian impact of the war and the importance of achieving a lasting peace can take several actions. Below is a detailed list of ideas and specific actions that can be taken to support peace efforts.
### Personal Actions for Peace
1. **Educate Yourself and Others** - Stay informed about the conflict by reading reputable news sources, following expert analyses, and understanding the historical context of the Russia-Ukraine war. - Organize community discussions or book clubs that focus on international relations, peace studies, or the specifics of the Ukraine conflict.
2. **Advocate for Peace Initiatives** - Write to local, state, and federal representatives to express support for peace initiatives. Emphasize the need for diplomatic solutions rather than military escalation.
3. **Sign and Share Petitions** - Look for petitions that advocate for humanitarian aid, ceasefire agreements, or diplomatic solutions. Websites like Change.org or MoveOn.org often feature relevant petitions. - **Example Petition**: "Support Peace Talks in Ukraine" (search for an active petition that aligns with this theme).
4. **Contact Elected Officials** - Reach out to your congressperson or senators to express your views. Here are some specific examples: - **Senator Chuck Schumer (NY)** - Email: schumer.senate.gov/contact/email-chuck - Address: 322 Hart Senate Office Building, Washington, D.C. 20510 - **Senator Mitch McConnell (KY)** - Email: mcconnell.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/contact - Address: 361A Russell Senate Office Building, Washington, D.C. 20510 - **Message Template**: - Subject: Urgent Call for Support for Peace in Ukraine - Body: "Dear [Senator/Representative's Name], I am writing to urge you to support diplomatic efforts aimed at ending the conflict in Ukraine. It is vital that our government prioritizes peace talks and humanitarian assistance to those affected by the war. Please advocate for a comprehensive peace agreement that addresses the needs of all parties involved."
5. **Participate in Local Events and Rallies** - Join or organize peace marches, vigils, or community forums that advocate for a peaceful resolution to the conflict. Check local event calendars or social media platforms for upcoming gatherings.
6. **Collaborate with NGOs and Advocacy Groups** - Volunteer or donate to organizations that provide humanitarian aid to Ukraine, such as: - **International Rescue Committee (IRC)**: [www.rescue.org](https://www.rescue.org) - **Doctors Without Borders**: [www.doctorswithoutborders.org](https://www.doctorswithoutborders.org) - Consider joining local chapters of peace organizations, such as the Peace Corps or Amnesty International, to participate in broader advocacy efforts.
7. **Engage on Social Media** - Use platforms like Twitter, Instagram, and Facebook to raise awareness about the conflict and share information about peace initiatives. Use relevant hashtags to broaden your reach, such as #PeaceInUkraine or #EndTheWar.
8. **Support Local Ukrainian Communities** - Attend events hosted by Ukrainian cultural organizations or support local Ukrainian businesses. Building community ties can foster empathy and understanding.
9. **Write Opinion Pieces or Letters to the Editor** - Share your perspective on peace efforts in local newspapers or online forums to inform and engage your community in the conversation about the importance of diplomacy.
By taking these actions, individuals can contribute to the ongoing dialogue around peace in Ukraine and support initiatives that prioritize humanitarian concerns and diplomatic resolutions. Engaging with others and advocating for change can amplify our collective impact in promoting a more peaceful world.