Wrap-up: Trump tells Zelenskyy that Putin wants more of Ukraine, urges Kyiv make a deal
rappler.com -- Sunday, August 17, 2025, 12:27:33 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Categories: U.S.–Russia Relations, Foreign Policy & International Relations, Social Media & Public Statements
WASHINGTON/MOSCOW/KYIV - US President Donald Trump said on Saturday that Ukraine should make a deal to end the war with Russia because "Russia is a very big power, and they're not," after a summit where Vladimir Putin was reported to have demanded more Ukrainian land.
After the two leaders met in Alaska on Friday, August 15, Trump told Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy that Putin had offered to freeze most front lines if Kyiv ceded all of Donetsk, the industrial region that is one of Moscow's main targets, a source familiar with the matter said.
Zelenskyy rejected the demand, the source said. Russia already controls a fifth of Ukraine, including about three-quarters of Donetsk province, which it first entered in 2014.
Trump also said he agreed with Putin that a peace deal should be sought without the prior ceasefire that Ukraine and its European allies had demanded. That was a change from his position before the summit, when he said he would not be happy unless a ceasefire was agreed on.
"It was determined by all that the best way to end the horrific war between Russia and Ukraine is to go directly to a Peace Agreement, which would end the war, and not a mere Ceasefire Agreement, which often times do not hold up," Trump posted on Truth Social.
Zelenskyy said Russia's unwillingness to pause the fighting would complicate efforts to forge a lasting peace. "Stopping the killing is a key element of stopping the war," he said on X.
Nevertheless, Zelenskyy said he would meet Trump in Washington on Monday, August 18.
That will evoke memories of a meeting in the White House Oval Office in February, where Trump and Vice President JD Vance gave Zelenskyy a brutal public dressing-down. Trump said a three-way meeting with Putin and Zelenskyy could follow.
Kyiv's European allies welcomed Trump's efforts but vowed to back Ukraine and tighten sanctions on Russia. European leaders might join Monday's White House meeting as well, German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul said.
Russia launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 and has been gradually advancing for months. The war -- the deadliest in Europe for 80 years -- has killed or wounded well over a million people from both sides, including thousands of mostly Ukrainian civilians, according to analysts.
Trump's various comments on the three-hour meeting with Putin mostly aligned with the public positions of Moscow, which says a full settlement will be complex because positions are "diametrically opposed."
Putin signaled no movement in Russia's long-held demands, which also include a veto on Kyiv's desired membership in the NATO alliance. He made no mention in public of meeting Zelenskyy. Kremlin aide Yuri Ushakov said a three-way summit had not been discussed.
In an interview with Fox News' Sean Hannity, Trump signaled that he and Putin had discussed land transfers and security guarantees for Ukraine, and had "largely agreed".
"I think we're pretty close to a deal," he said, adding: "Ukraine has to agree to it. Maybe they'll say 'no'."
Asked what he would advise Zelenskyy to do, Trump said: "Gotta make a deal."
"Look, Russia is a very big power, and they're not," he added.
Zelenskyy has consistently said he cannot concede territory without changes to Ukraine's constitution, and Kyiv sees Donetsk's "fortress cities" such as Sloviansk and Kramatorsk as a bulwark against further Russian advances.
Zelenskyy has also insisted on security guarantees to deter Russia from invading again. He said he and Trump had discussed "positive signals" on the US taking part, and that Ukraine needed a lasting peace, not "just another pause" between Russian invasions.
Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney welcomed what he described as Trump's openness to providing security guarantees to Ukraine under a peace deal. He said security guarantees were "essential to any just and lasting peace."
Putin, who has opposed involving foreign ground forces, said he agreed with Trump that Ukraine's security must be "ensured."
For Putin, just sitting down with Trump represented a victory. He had been ostracized by Western leaders since the start of the war, and just a week earlier had faced a threat of new sanctions from Trump.
Trump spoke to European leaders after returning to Washington. Several stressed the need to keep pressure on Russia.
British Prime Minister Keir Starmer said an end to the war was closer than ever, thanks to Trump, but said he would impose more sanctions on Russia if the war continues.
European leaders said in a statement that Ukraine must have "ironclad" security guarantees and no limits should be placed on its armed forces or right to seek NATO membership, as Russia has sought.
Some European commentators were scathing about the summit.
"Putin got his red carpet treatment with Trump, while Trump got nothing," Wolfgang Ischinger, former German ambassador to Washington, posted on X.
Both Russia and Ukraine carried out overnight air attacks, a daily occurrence, while fighting raged on the front.
Trump told Fox he would postpone imposing tariffs on China for buying Russian oil, but he might have to "think about it" in two or three weeks.
He ended his remarks after the summit by telling Putin: "We'll speak to you very soon and probably see you again very soon."
Sign Our PetitionThe recent developments surrounding the ongoing conflict in Ukraine, particularly President Donald Trump's remarks during his meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and Russian President Vladimir Putin, highlight an alarming shift in the dialogue surrounding this humanitarian crisis. Trump's assertion that Ukraine should make concessions to Russia, including ceding territory, echoes a troubling historical precedent where powerful nations dictate terms to weaker states. This perspective not only undermines Ukraine's sovereignty but also reflects a broader geopolitical trend where might is equated with right, often at the expense of international law and human rights.
Historically, the principle of national sovereignty has been a cornerstone of international relations. The post-World War II order was largely built on the idea that borders should be respected and that nations have the right to self-determination. However, the Russian invasion of Ukraine in 2014 marked a significant breach of this principle, as Moscow annexed Crimea and supported separatist movements in the Donetsk and Luhansk regions. Trump’s recent comments, suggesting that Ukraine should negotiate under duress, risk normalizing this aggressive behavior and sending a dangerous message that territorial integrity can be negotiated away. This sentiment is reminiscent of the infamous Munich Agreement of 1938, where Western powers allowed Hitler to annex parts of Czechoslovakia in a bid to avoid conflict, only to embolden his expansionist ambitions.
Moreover, the humanitarian implications of Trump’s remarks cannot be overlooked. The ongoing war in Ukraine has resulted in catastrophic loss of life, with estimates of over a million people killed or wounded, predominantly civilians. The suggestion that Ukraine should consider ceding territory to achieve a peace deal overlooks the suffering of those who have been displaced and affected by the war. It trivializes the sacrifices made by Ukrainians who resist foreign aggression and undermines their right to live in a country free from occupation. For any peace to be lasting, it must be built on respect for Ukraine's territorial integrity and a recognition of the rights of its people.
Zelenskyy's rejection of Trump's advice to negotiate with Putin without a ceasefire demonstrates a commitment to uphold Ukraine's sovereignty and the need for genuine peace, not a mere cessation of hostilities that could lead to further exploitation. The Ukrainian leader's insistence on a ceasefire as a precursor to negotiations highlights the importance of establishing a framework that prioritizes the protection of civilians and addresses the conditions that led to the conflict. This approach aligns with international humanitarian law, which seeks to protect those who are not participating in hostilities, and emphasizes the need for accountability for war crimes.
The response from European allies, who have reaffirmed their support for Ukraine while contemplating additional sanctions against Russia, underscores the importance of international solidarity in addressing aggression. The transformation of the European Union's approach to defense and foreign policy since the onset of the conflict reflects a significant shift toward collective security and a recognition that aggression must be met with a united front. By reinforcing support for Ukraine, these nations send a clear message that violations of international law will not be tolerated and that the principle of self-determination remains paramount.
In conclusion, the dialogue surrounding the Ukraine conflict must transcend mere negotiations over territory. It is crucial to recognize the historical context of such discussions and the potential repercussions on global norms regarding sovereignty and human rights. By advocating for a peace that respects Ukraine's territorial integrity and prioritizes humanitarian considerations, we can work toward a more just resolution to this crisis. Engaging with the underlying principles of justice and accountability is essential, especially when confronted with the rhetoric of powerful leaders who may prioritize their geopolitical interests over the rights and lives of those directly affected by conflict.
The geopolitical landscape surrounding the ongoing conflict in Ukraine has become increasingly complex with the recent statements made by former President Donald Trump. This commentary seeks to unpack the implications of Trump's remarks and the broader context of U.S. foreign policy, particularly regarding its approach to Russia and Ukraine, while also suggesting actionable steps that concerned Americans can take to engage in constructive dialogue and advocacy.
Historically, the conflict in Ukraine can be traced back to the larger narrative of post-Soviet relations and the struggle for sovereignty that many Eastern European nations have faced since the dissolution of the Soviet Union. The Kremlin's aggressive expansionism, particularly since the annexation of Crimea in 2014, exemplifies the precarious balance of power in the region. Trump's recent assertion that Ukraine should consider ceding territory to a militarily superior Russia echoes a troubling pattern of undermining the sovereignty of nations in favor of appeasing authoritarian regimes. Such a stance not only threatens Ukraine's territorial integrity but also sends a dangerous message to other nations facing similar pressures.
The consequences of Trump's comments extend beyond the immediate geopolitics; they also resonate with the historical lessons of appeasement. The failure to stand firm against oppressive regimes has often led to greater conflicts down the line. By advocating for a "peace agreement" without first establishing a ceasefire, Trump risks legitimizing Russia's territorial ambitions and weakening international norms that uphold sovereign rights. It becomes imperative to remember that peace achieved through coercion is not sustainable; true peace must be built on justice and mutual respect, not on the capitulation of the weaker party.
In light of these developments, Americans who are concerned about the implications of U.S. foreign policy should take proactive steps to engage with their representatives. Advocacy can take various forms, from participating in town hall meetings to writing letters and emails to elected officials. Citizens should express their support for policies that prioritize diplomatic solutions anchored in international law, rather than those that appease aggressors. Moreover, grassroots organizations that focus on peacebuilding can amplify voices calling for a robust U.S. commitment to supporting Ukraine's sovereignty and territorial integrity. This is not merely a matter of foreign policy but a fundamental issue of human rights and democratic values.
Furthermore, it is vital for Americans to remain informed about the consequences of the U.S.'s foreign policy decisions on global stability. Educational initiatives, including discussions, workshops, and community events, can foster a deeper understanding of international relations and the importance of solidarity with nations facing aggression. Engaging with diverse perspectives will equip individuals with the knowledge and confidence to challenge narratives that promote appeasement, including those propagated by influential figures like Trump.
In conclusion, the recent developments in the conversation surrounding Ukraine and Russia underscore the need for a vigilant and informed citizenry. As individuals committed to justice and peace, Americans have the power to influence their representatives and advocate for a foreign policy that prioritizes human rights, sovereignty, and the principles of international law. By fostering dialogue and education, we can collectively push back against dangerous rhetoric that undermines the very foundations of democratic society and global stability. The fight for a just peace in Ukraine is not just a geopolitical issue; it is a testament to our values and a reflection of who we aspire to be as a nation.
In light of the troubling developments surrounding the ongoing conflict in Ukraine as highlighted in the article, it is crucial that we mobilize as individuals to advocate for a fair and lasting resolution. Here’s a detailed list of actions we can take to contribute to the cause:
### Personal Actions
1. **Educate Yourself and Others**: Understanding the complexities of the Ukraine-Russia conflict is essential. Share articles, books, and documentaries that provide historical context and current developments. Engage in discussions within your community to raise awareness.
2. **Advocate for Humanitarian Support**: Support organizations that provide aid to those affected by the conflict. Consider organizing or participating in fundraising events for such organizations.
3. **Contact Elected Officials**: Reach out to your representatives to express your views on the need for a strong, principled stance against any attempts to undermine Ukraine's sovereignty.
### Concrete Actions
1. **Sign Petitions**: - **Petition for Continued Support for Ukraine**: - **Petition Site**: Change.org - **Example Petition**: "Support Ukraine: Uphold Sovereignty and Human Rights" (search for current petitions). - **How to Sign**: Visit the Change.org website, search for the petition, and add your name.
2. **Write to Elected Representatives**: - **What to Say**: Express your support for Ukraine's sovereignty and your opposition to any peace agreements that would compromise its territorial integrity. Urge them to maintain or increase military and humanitarian support for Ukraine. - **Who to Write**: - **Your Senators**: - **Senator Chuck Schumer (D-NY)** - Email: schumer.senate.gov/contact/email - Address: 322 Hart Senate Office Building, Washington, DC 20510 - **Senator Mitch McConnell (R-KY)** - Email: mcconnell.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/contactform - Address: 317 Russell Senate Office Building, Washington, DC 20510 - **Your House Representative**: Find your representative at [House.gov](https://www.house.gov) and use the contact information provided.
3. **Participate in Local Activism**: - Join local peace and justice organizations that focus on international conflict resolution. Participate in rallies or informational meetings. - **Example Organizations**: - United for Peace and Justice (UFPJ) - Amnesty International - Local Chapter
4. **Engage on Social Media**: - Use platforms to raise awareness about the conflict. Share informative posts, articles, and facts about the impacts of the war on civilians. - Use hashtags like #StandWithUkraine to join larger conversations.
5. **Support Refugees**: - Volunteer with local organizations that support Ukrainian refugees. This could include helping with language classes, providing legal assistance, or simply offering community support. - **Example Organizations**: - Refugee Council USA: [refugeecouncilusa.org](https://refugeecouncilusa.org)
6. **Write Opinion Pieces**: - Submit letters to the editor or opinion pieces to local publications expressing your views on the conflict and advocating for a strong response to aggression.
### Conclusion
By taking these actions, we can collectively amplify our voices in support of Ukraine and its people. The conflict is not just a geopolitical issue; it directly impacts human lives. Your engagement can help shape the narrative and influence decision-makers to support a just resolution to the crisis.