Europe to mull over plan for peace in Ukraine after Trump-Putin summit | FOX 28 Spokane
fox28spokane.com -- Sunday, August 17, 2025, 12:28:01 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Categories: U.S.–Russia Relations, Foreign Policy & International Relations, Social Media & Public Statements
Leaders of France, Germany and Britain will host a video call on Sunday for their so-called "coalition of the willing" to discuss steps towards ending the war in Ukraine, after Donald Trump dropped his push for a ceasefire after his Alaska summit with Russian leader Vladimir Putin.
Securing a ceasefire in Ukraine, more than three years after Russia's invasion, had been one of the US president's core demands before the summit, to which Ukraine and its European allies were not invited.
But after a meeting that yielded no clear breakthrough, Trump ruled out an immediate ceasefire in Ukraine -- a move that would appear to favor Putin who has long argued for negotiations on a final peace deal.
Ukraine and its European allies have criticized it as a way to buy time and press Russia's battlefield advances.
Trump spoke with Zelensky and European leaders on his flight back from Alaska to Washington, saying afterward that "it was determined by all that the best way to end the horrific war between Russia and Ukraine is to go directly to a peace agreement which would end the war."
Ceasefire agreements "often times do not hold up," Trump added on his Truth Social platform.
But Zelensky, who is due to visit Washington on Monday, appeared unconvinced by the change of tack, saying on Saturday that it "complicates the situation".
If Moscow lacks "the will to carry out a simple order to stop the strikes, it may take a lot of effort to get Russia to have the will to implement far greater -- peaceful coexistence with its neighbors for decades," he said on social media.
- 'Harsh reality' -
Trump expressed support during his call with Zelensky and European leaders for a proposal by Putin to take full control of two largely Russian-held Ukrainian regions in exchange for freezing the frontline in two others, an official briefed on the talks told AFP.
Putin "de facto demands that Ukraine leave Donbas," an area consisting of the Donetsk and Lugansk regions in eastern Ukraine, the source said.
In exchange, Russian forces would halt their offensive in the Black Sea port region of Kherson and Zaporizhzhia in southern Ukraine, where the main cities are still under Ukrainian control.
Several months into its full-scale invasion of Ukraine, Russia in September 2022 claimed to have annexed all four Ukrainian regions even though its troops still do not fully control any of them.
"The Ukrainian president refused to leave Donbas," the source said.
Trump notably also said the United States was prepared to provide Ukraine security guarantees, an assurance German Chancellor Friedrich Merz hailed as "significant progress."
But there was a scathing assessment of the summit outcome from the European Union's top diplomat Kaja Kallas, who accused Putin of seeking to "drag out negotiations" with no commitment to end the bloodshed.
"The harsh reality is that Russia has no intention of ending this war any time soon," Kallas said.
- Zelensky back in White House -
The main diplomatic focus now switches to Zelensky's talks at the White House on Monday.
An EU source told AFP that a number of European leaders had also been invited to attend.
The Ukrainian president's last Oval Office visit in February ended in an extraordinary shouting match, with Trump and Vice President JD Vance publicly berating Zelensky for not showing enough gratitude for US aid.
Zelensky said Saturday after a "substantive" conversation with Trump about the Alaska summit that he looked forward to his Washington visit and discussing "all of the details regarding ending the killing and the war."
In an interview with broadcaster Fox News after his sit-down with Putin, Trump had suggested that the onus was now on Zelensky to secure a peace deal as they work towards an eventual trilateral summit with Putin.
"It's really up to President Zelensky to get it done," Trump said.
- European pressure -
In an earlier statement, European leaders welcomed the plan for a Trump-Putin-Zelensky summit but added that they would maintain pressure on Russia in the absence of a ceasefire.
Meanwhile, the conflict in Ukraine raged on, with Kyiv announcing Saturday that Russia had launched 85 attack drones and a ballistic missile during the night.
Back in Moscow, Putin said his summit talks with Trump had been "timely" and "very useful."
In his post-summit statement in Alaska, Putin had warned Ukraine and European countries not to engage in any "behind-the-scenes intrigues" that could disrupt what he called "this emerging progress."
sct-bur/dl/sla/tc/dhc
FOX28 Spokane©
Sign Our PetitionThe recent developments in Ukraine, particularly in light of the recent Trump-Putin summit, highlight the complex interplay of international relations, historical grievances, and the ongoing struggle for sovereignty faced by Ukraine. As leaders from France, Germany, and Britain convene to discuss a potential peace plan, it becomes evident that the path forward is fraught with challenges—both political and ethical. The ongoing conflict, now over three years since Russia’s invasion, is not merely a geopolitical issue; it is deeply rooted in the historical context of Eastern European conflicts and the global response to imperialistic aggression.
Historically, Ukraine has been a battleground for larger geopolitical struggles, often caught between the ambitions of its more powerful neighbors. The annexation of Crimea in 2014 marked a significant escalation in this historical pattern, as Russia sought to reclaim what it perceives as part of its national identity. This conflict is not only about land; it is also about the assertion of national sovereignty and the right of a people to self-determination. The current discussions about peace and ceasefire must not overlook the lessons of history where negotiations have often favored aggressors, leading to prolonged suffering for the invaded. The fact that Trump's approach seems to allow for Russian territorial claims raises serious concerns about the implications for Ukraine's sovereignty and territorial integrity.
The commentary from Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky underscores the skepticism surrounding the proposed peace agreements. His statement that Russia may lack the will to adhere to any ceasefire agreement speaks volumes about the historical experience of nations that have faced similar aggressions. The harsh reality is that peace negotiations often serve as a means for occupying forces to consolidate their power rather than a genuine step towards lasting peace. The legacy of past conflicts, such as the Balkans or the various peace processes in the Middle East, illustrates the danger of negotiating from a position of weakness. A mere freeze of the frontline without a commitment to restore Ukraine’s territorial integrity does not equate to peace; it risks legitimizing occupation and undermining the very fabric of international law.
Moreover, the role of the European Union and its leaders in this situation is crucial. As the EU’s top diplomat, Kaja Kallas, articulated, Russia's behavior suggests a strategy to prolong negotiations without genuine intentions to cease hostilities. The EU must remain steadfast in its support for Ukraine, not only as a matter of regional stability but also as a reflection of its commitment to democratic values and human rights. The historical precedent of European nations allowing aggression to go unchecked serves as a cautionary tale; it is imperative that the EU learns from its past failures to stand firm against authoritarianism.
Furthermore, Trump's pivot away from advocating for a ceasefire and towards supporting Putin’s territorial claims raises significant ethical questions about U.S. foreign policy. The implications of such a stance extend beyond Ukraine; they reflect a broader trend in international relations where power dynamics often overshadow the principles of justice and human rights. This moment presents an opportunity for advocates of social justice and international law to engage in a broader dialogue about how peace is defined and achieved. It is imperative for those concerned with global justice to challenge any narrative that facilitates imperialistic ambitions at the expense of marginalized nations.
In conclusion, the path to peace in Ukraine is not merely a political negotiation—it's a moral imperative that requires a reevaluation of historical injustices, an unyielding commitment to sovereignty, and a principled stance against aggression. As discussions continue among European leaders, it is crucial to advocate for solutions that prioritize the voices of those directly affected by the conflict. The lessons of history remind us that peace without justice is merely a precursor to further conflict. Thus, the global community must be vigilant and proactive in supporting Ukraine, not just against military aggression but also in affirming its right to self-determination in the face of overwhelming odds.
The unfolding situation in Ukraine, particularly following the recent summit between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin, raises critical questions about the geopolitical landscape in Europe and the role of the United States in international conflict resolution. The so-called “coalition of the willing,” consisting of European leaders from France, Germany, and Britain, is now tasked with navigating the complexities of a war that has persisted for over three years. With Trump’s apparent shift away from advocating for an immediate ceasefire, which has drawn criticism from both Ukraine and its European allies, it becomes evident that the stakes are higher than ever. As citizens and advocates for peace, it is crucial to examine the implications of this summit and explore actionable steps that can be taken to address the ongoing crisis.
Historically, the conflict in Ukraine is deeply rooted in a tangled web of post-Soviet tensions, territorial disputes, and competing nationalistic ambitions. The annexation of Crimea in 2014 and the subsequent war in the eastern Donbas region set the stage for a confrontation that has seen thousands of lives lost and millions displaced. The West’s response has been a mix of sanctions, military aid to Ukraine, and diplomatic efforts. However, the recent summit suggests a troubling retreat from these commitments, with Trump appearing to endorse Putin’s demands for territorial concessions. This shift not only undermines Ukraine's sovereignty but also sets a dangerous precedent in global diplomacy, where autocratic leaders might feel emboldened to pursue aggressive territorial ambitions without fear of consequence.
In light of these developments, it is essential for Americans to engage in meaningful dialogue about the implications of U.S. foreign policy. The rhetoric surrounding the summit indicates a willingness to compromise Ukraine’s territorial integrity, which could lead to further instability in Eastern Europe and beyond. To counter this trend, citizens can advocate for a more principled U.S. stance that supports Ukraine's right to self-determination. This includes pushing for sustained military and humanitarian aid, as well as advocating for international legal frameworks that prioritize human rights and sovereignty over geopolitical maneuvering.
Moreover, Americans can mobilize support for grassroots organizations that focus on peacebuilding and conflict resolution. By fostering connections with Ukrainian communities and supporting initiatives that promote dialogue and understanding, we can create platforms for peace that transcend national borders. These efforts should also extend to holding our elected officials accountable, urging them to prioritize diplomatic solutions that genuinely aim for a just and lasting peace rather than quick fixes that appease aggressors. Engaging in town hall meetings, writing to representatives, and participating in advocacy campaigns can amplify the call for a robust and principled approach to foreign policy.
Lastly, we must educate ourselves and our communities about the historical context of the Ukraine conflict and the broader implications of U.S. military and diplomatic engagements. By understanding the nuances of international relations, we can better articulate our positions and challenge narratives that seek to normalize aggression or undermine democratic processes. Utilizing social media platforms, writing articles, and holding community discussions can help raise awareness and foster a more informed electorate that prioritizes peace and justice in international affairs.
As we reflect on the recent summit and its potential ramifications, it is clear that the path forward requires collective action and unwavering commitment to the principles of sovereignty and peace. By standing in solidarity with Ukraine and advocating for policies that uphold these values, we can contribute to a more stable and just world order. The complexities of international relations demand our attention and our voices, and it is through concerted efforts that we can hope to influence the future trajectory of global peace.
The ongoing conflict in Ukraine is a pressing issue that demands our attention and action. As individuals concerned about peace, security, and the welfare of those affected by this war, there are several concrete steps we can take to advocate for a resolution and support those impacted by the conflict. Below is a detailed list of ideas and actions we can pursue:
### What Can We Personally Do About This?
1. **Educate Ourselves and Others**: Understanding the complexities of the Ukraine conflict is crucial. Share information from reputable sources to raise awareness within your community about the situation in Ukraine, the implications of international negotiations, and the voices of those affected by the war.
2. **Advocate for Peace Initiatives**: Engaging in peaceful advocacy can amplify calls for a ceasefire and negotiations that prioritize humanitarian concerns.
3. **Support Ukrainian Humanitarian Efforts**: Contribute to organizations that provide direct support to those affected by the conflict, including refugees and displaced persons.
4. **Engage with Political Representatives**: Reach out to elected officials to express your views on the need for strong diplomatic efforts and humanitarian support for Ukraine.
### Exact Actions We Can Take
1. **Sign Petitions**: - **Petition for Humanitarian Aid**: Join or create petitions urging your government to increase humanitarian aid to Ukraine. Websites like Change.org often have ongoing petitions. - **Example Petition**: Search for "Support Humanitarian Aid for Ukraine" on platforms like MoveOn.org or Avaaz.org.
2. **Contact Elected Officials**: - **Write to Your Representatives**: Express your concern about the conflict and urge them to prioritize peace negotiations and humanitarian support. - **Find Your Rep**: Use [GovTrack.us](https://www.govtrack.us/) to find your senators and representatives. - **Suggested Message**: ``` Dear [Representative's Name], I am writing to express my concern about the ongoing conflict in Ukraine. It is vital that the U.S. takes a strong stance in advocating for a peaceful resolution and provides necessary humanitarian assistance to those affected by the war. I urge you to support initiatives that prioritize diplomatic efforts and humanitarian aid. Thank you for your attention to this critical matter. Sincerely, [Your Name] [Your Address] [Your Email] ```
3. **Support Humanitarian Organizations**: - **Donate to Reputable Organizations**: Consider donating to organizations such as: - **International Rescue Committee (IRC)**: [www.rescue.org](https://www.rescue.org) - **Doctors Without Borders (MSF)**: [www.doctorswithoutborders.org](https://www.doctorswithoutborders.org) - **Ukrainian Red Cross**: [www.redcross.org.ua](https://www.redcross.org.ua)
4. **Participate in Local Advocacy Groups**: Join or support local organizations or groups focused on peace advocacy or humanitarian efforts for Ukraine. Look for local chapters of larger organizations or grassroots initiatives.
5. **Promote Awareness through Social Media**: Share information, articles, and calls to action using your social media platforms to raise awareness about the situation in Ukraine. Use hashtags related to peace and solidarity with Ukraine.
6. **Attend Community Events**: Participate in or organize community events, such as forums or vigils, to discuss the war in Ukraine and promote peace initiatives.
### Who to Write To
- **Your Local Congressional Representatives**: Use the following template to find their contact information: - **House of Representatives**: [www.house.gov](https://www.house.gov) - **Senate**: [www.senate.gov](https://www.senate.gov)
- **International Organizations**: - **United Nations**: Write to the UN Headquarters in New York (mailing address: 405 E 42nd St, New York, NY 10017). - **European Union**: Contact the EU Delegation to the United States (mailing address: 2175 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20037).
By engaging in these actions, we can contribute to a growing movement that advocates for peace and supports those affected by the conflict in Ukraine. It is essential that our voices are heard and that we stand in solidarity with those in need.