Ukraine to be forced to give up territory & forget about Nato under peace terms
the-sun.com -- Saturday, August 16, 2025, 5:55:28 PM Eastern Daylight Time
Categories: Foreign Policy & International Relations, U.S.–Russia Relations, U.S.–NATO Relations
STRICKEN Ukraine will be forced to surrender large swathes of its eastern territory and forget about ever joining Nato under peace terms haggled by Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin.
The war-torn country's desire to join the European Union is also in doubt after the two superpower presidents held controversial talks in Alaska on Friday.
Ukraine would be outlawed from joining the Western defence alliance, but have its redrawn borders underwritten by its US and European allies, in the terms suggested by the White House.
Allies have offered "ironclad" security assurances to protect Ukraine from future Russian aggression if a peace deal can be forged.
But it would stop short of Nato Article 5 status, which sees members of the alliance leap to the aid of any member that is attacked.
Ukraine's desire to join Nato has been blamed as a root cause of President Putin's invasion.
He has insisted "Nyet" -- Russian for "No" -- over the proposal.
But the future security of Ukraine is the number one condition of its president, Volodymyr Zelensky.
British and other European troops could be committed to police the peace, with President Trump finally conceding the Americans would play a vital role in the future defence of Ukraine.
Last night, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz publicly stated: "The good news is that America is ready to participate in such security guarantees and is not leaving it to the Europeans alone."
And PM Sir Keir Starmer said Trump's "leadership in pursuit of an end to the killing" should be commended.
Calls for an immediate ceasefire were dropped by world leaders yesterday, after Trump announced he was instead pursuing a more lasting "peace deal".
Plans haggled at Friday's face-to-face summit are being circulated by the Americans after the US President and the Kremlin tyrant met for talks in Anchorage, Alaska, lasting more than three hours.
The Sun has been told a surrender deal would see Ukraine forced to reject Nato membership and other "multinational deals".
Negotiations would also begin about ceding control of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions of eastern Ukraine which are, in part, occupied by Russian troops.
There was confusion last night over whether the talks would focus on territory currently held by the Kremlin invaders, or whether the wider regions were on the table.
Yesterday, EU leaders insisted: "Russia cannot have a veto against Ukraine's pathway to EU and Nato."
However, that does not rule out Zelensky deciding to withdraw Ukraine's stated aim to join both alliances as part of the wider deal.
He will fly to Washington DC on Monday to meet with President Trump at the White House -- six months after their disastrous Oval Office bust up, which saw the leader of the free world savage Zelensky live on TV.
Russia has long claimed Donetsk and Luhansk are more loyal to Moscow than Kyiv, while Zelensky has publicly ruled out giving up the land.
However, he is under massive pressure to concede and end the bloody three-and-a-half year conflict, which has seen more than a million deaths.
European leaders were locked in talks with the White House this weekend, as the world scrambled to catch up with what Trump had offered Putin to end the war.
Last night, UK government sources said the PM was playing a key role in selling the terms of the deal to wider Western allies in a series of calls following the talks between the Americans and Russians.
Trump yesterday insisted it is time for Zelensky to choose whether to agree with the terms of the deal -- as the pair prepared to meet tomorrow.
The White House has also offered to play host to a trilateral summit between the Russians and Ukrainians if the deal is within reach.
Speaking following Friday's talks, where he met with his Russian counterpart for the first time in six years, President Trump insisted it was "a great and very successful day in Alaska!"
He wrote on his Truth Social website: "The meeting with President Vladimir Putin went very well, as did a late night phone call with President Zelensky and various European Leaders, including the highly respected Secretary General of Nato.
"It was determined by all that the best way to end the horrific war between Russia and Ukraine is to go directly to a Peace Agreement, which would end the war, and not a mere Ceasefire Agreement, which often times do not hold up.
"President Zelensky will be coming to D.C., the Oval Office, on Monday afternoon. If all works out, we will then schedule a meeting with President Putin.
"Potentially, millions of people's lives will be saved. Thank you for your attention to this matter!"
Last night, Putin also welcomed progress made at the talks, after leaving the summit without taking questions from hundreds of assembled journalists.
In a televised address released by the Kremlin, he said: "The conversation was very frank, substantive, and, in my opinion, brings us closer to the necessary decisions."
He added: "We have not had direct negotiations of this kind at this level for a long time. We had the opportunity to calmly and in detail reiterate our position."
In a long statement, Zelensky welcomed the offer of security guarantees outlined by Trump, in a tentative sign he may be willing to sign up to the terms.
He wrote: "A real peace must be achieved, one that will be lasting, not just another pause between Russian invasions. Killings must stop as soon as possible, the fire must cease both on the battlefield and in the sky, as well as against our port infrastructure.
"All Ukrainian prisoners of war and civilians must be released, and the children abducted by Russia must be returned.
"Thousands of our people remain in captivity -- they all must be brought home. Pressure on Russia must be maintained while the aggression and occupation continue."
He went on: "In my conversation with President Trump, I said that sanctions should be strengthened if there is no trilateral meeting or if Russia tries to evade an honest end to the war. Sanctions are an effective tool.
"Security must be guaranteed reliably and in the long term, with involvement of Europe and the US.
"All issues important to Ukraine must be discussed with Ukraine's participation, and no issue, particularly territorial ones, can be decided without Ukraine. I thank our partners who are helping."
Yesterday, the PM was taking part in a round of behind the scenes diplomacy, speaking to the White House and European capitals.
He heaped praise on Trump, saying his "efforts have brought us closer than ever before to ending Russia's illegal war in Ukraine".
He went on: "His leadership in pursuit of an end to the killing should be commended."
But the PM warned: "While progress has been made, the next step must be further talks involving President Zelensky.
"The path to peace in Ukraine cannot be decided without him. I spoke to President Zelensky, President Trump and other European partners, and we all stand ready to support this next phase. I welcome the openness of the United States, alongside Europe, to provide robust security guarantees to Ukraine as part of any deal.
"In the meantime, until he stops his barbaric assault, we will keep tightening the screws on his war machine with even more sanctions, which have already had a punishing impact on the Russian economy and its people.
"Our unwavering support for Ukraine will continue for as long as it takes."
In a joint statement, Sir Keir and European leaders, including France's Emmanuel Macron and Italy's Giorgia Meloni, said: "We are clear Ukraine must have ironclad security guarantees to effectively defend its sovereignty and territorial integrity.
"No limitations should be placed on Ukraine's armed forces or on its cooperation with third countries. Russia cannot have a veto against Ukraine's pathway to EU and Nato."
Sign Our PetitionThe ongoing war in Ukraine has become a focal point of international politics, illustrating the complex interplay between national sovereignty, geopolitical ambition, and historical grievances. Recent reports suggest that the peace terms being negotiated between the United States and Russia may compel Ukraine to relinquish significant portions of its territory and abandon its aspirations for NATO membership, a development that raises profound questions about sovereignty, self-determination, and the role of global powers in regional conflicts. This situation demands a closer examination of the implications for Ukraine, as well as the broader lessons it offers regarding the responsibilities of international actors in upholding the principles of justice and self-determination.
Historically, Ukraine has been a battleground for imperial ambitions, caught between Russia and the West. The dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991 was a watershed moment for Ukraine, granting it independence and setting the stage for a tumultuous relationship with Russia, which has frequently attempted to reassert its influence over former Soviet territories. The 2014 annexation of Crimea by Russia underscored this ongoing conflict, with NATO's eastward expansion being cited by Russia as a provocation, although it is essential to recognize that Ukraine's desire for integration with Western institutions is rooted in a long-standing aspiration for self-determination and democratic governance. Thus, the proposed peace terms, which suggest Ukraine will be forced to abandon its NATO ambitions, not only undermine its sovereignty but also send a troubling message about the willingness of powerful nations to sacrifice the aspirations of smaller nations for geopolitical expediency.
The implications of such a peace deal extend beyond the immediate concerns of territorial integrity and military alignment. The notion that Ukraine might be coerced into ceding territory—specifically the Donetsk and Luhansk regions—raises critical questions about the principles of self-determination and the right of nations to exist free from external coercion. The residents of these regions, many of whom identify as Ukrainian, should have a voice in their future. The prospect of relinquishing control to Russia not only jeopardizes the territorial integrity of Ukraine but also poses a threat to the democratic processes that have been gradually established since independence. This scenario serves as a reminder of the historical struggles for autonomy faced by nations worldwide, where the machinations of powerful states often overshadow the voices of local populations.
Moreover, the negotiations led by prominent figures such as Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin, seemingly devoid of input from Ukrainian leaders or civil society, reflect a troubling trend in modern diplomacy. The idea that powerful nations can dictate terms to weaker states without genuine consultation or respect for their agency is reminiscent of colonial practices that marginalized local populations in favor of imperial interests. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky's struggle to maintain Ukraine’s aspirations amidst these negotiations underscores the broader fight for justice in international relations. It is crucial for the global community to advocate for a diplomatic approach that prioritizes inclusive dialogue, ensuring that the voices of those most affected by decisions are heard and considered.
The current situation also highlights the need for a robust critique of the narrative surrounding NATO's role in Eastern Europe. While it is true that NATO’s expansion has been a source of tension, framing Ukraine's aspirations for NATO membership solely as a cause of conflict oversimplifies the complexities of the situation. Ukraine's pursuit of NATO membership can be viewed as a legitimate quest for security in the face of Russian aggression, reflecting a desire for solidarity with democratic nations. It is imperative to acknowledge that the right to self-determination includes the choice of alliances that nations deem necessary for their security. Thus, any peace terms that ignore this fundamental right not only undermine Ukraine’s sovereignty but also destabilize the fragile balance in Eastern Europe.
In conclusion, the potential peace terms being discussed between the US and Russia regarding Ukraine are emblematic of broader geopolitical dynamics that often marginalize the voices of smaller nations. The historical context of Ukraine's struggle for autonomy, the implications of territorial concessions, and the narratives surrounding NATO membership all serve as critical points of reflection for those engaged in discussions about international politics and justice. As advocates for progressive change, it is vital to emphasize the importance of respecting the rights of nations to determine their own futures free from coercion, while also recognizing the interconnectedness of global struggles for sovereignty and self-determination. Engaging in these discussions not only elevates the discourse around Ukraine but also reinforces the need for a more equitable and just international order.
The ongoing conflict in Ukraine, marked by its geopolitical significance and the intersection of numerous global interests, has reached a critical juncture with the recent talks between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin. The proposed peace terms, which suggest that Ukraine may be forced to relinquish territory and abandon its aspirations for NATO membership, raise profound questions about sovereignty, stability, and the future of international alliances. Historically, Ukraine has been caught in the crossfire of East-West tensions, and its quest for Western integration has long been viewed as a threat by Russia. This context is essential for understanding the implications of the current negotiations and the potential consequences for both Ukraine and the broader international community.
The notion that Ukraine might be coerced into surrendering territory and forsaking NATO membership is deeply troubling. It echoes past instances where powerful nations dictated terms to smaller states, often with devastating consequences. The Munich Agreement of 1938, which allowed Nazi Germany to annex parts of Czechoslovakia, serves as a cautionary tale about the dangers of appeasement and the consequences of sacrificing a nation's territorial integrity for the sake of expediency. As we witness the potential for a similar scenario to unfold in Ukraine, it is crucial to recognize the historical patterns that shape these geopolitical dynamics and the need for unwavering support of Ukraine's right to self-determination.
As Americans, there are numerous avenues through which we can advocate for a more equitable resolution to the Ukrainian crisis. First and foremost, it is essential to engage in grassroots activism that pressures our government to uphold its commitment to Ukraine's sovereignty. This could take the form of petitions, contacting representatives, or participating in wider campaigns that emphasize the importance of international law and the principles of self-determination. Furthermore, public discourse should center on the moral implications of coercing a nation to relinquish territory, drawing on historical examples to highlight the dangers of such actions. By fostering a dialogue that underscores the values of justice and integrity in foreign policy, we can challenge narratives that excuse capitulation in the face of aggression.
Moreover, educating ourselves and others about the complexities of the Ukrainian conflict is vital. Understanding the historical context, including the Soviet legacy and the significance of NATO in Eastern Europe, allows for a more nuanced discussion about the current negotiations. Engaging with materials from academic sources, think tanks, and credible media outlets can equip us with the knowledge needed to articulate our concerns effectively. By bringing attention to the voices of Ukrainians themselves, including their aspirations for democratic governance and integration with Europe, we can humanize the conflict and counteract the narratives that perpetuate the view of Ukraine as a pawn in a larger geopolitical game.
Lastly, it is imperative to bolster support for policies that provide tangible assistance to Ukraine. This can manifest in various forms, from advocating for increased humanitarian aid to supporting military assistance that enables Ukraine to defend itself against aggression. Additionally, promoting diplomatic efforts that prioritize Ukrainian agency in negotiations can ensure that any peace deal respects the sovereignty and territorial integrity of the nation. By standing in solidarity with Ukraine, we reaffirm our commitment to a world where nations are empowered to make their own choices without the looming threat of coercion by more powerful states.
In conclusion, the current negotiations surrounding Ukraine's future raise critical questions about the principles of sovereignty, self-determination, and international solidarity. As Americans, we have a responsibility to advocate for a just resolution that upholds these values and emphasizes the importance of supporting nations in their quest for autonomy. By engaging in informed activism, educating ourselves and others, and promoting policies that respect Ukraine's rights, we can contribute to a more equitable and stable international order. The stakes are high, and now is the time to act with conviction and purpose.
The situation in Ukraine is complex and deeply impactful, affecting millions of lives both in the region and globally. As concerned citizens looking to make a positive impact, there are several actionable steps we can take to advocate for a fair resolution that respects Ukraine’s sovereignty and supports the interests of its people. Here are detailed ideas and actions:
### Personal Actions We Can Take
1. **Educate Ourselves and Others**: - Stay informed about the situation in Ukraine through reputable news sources, academic articles, and documentaries. Share this information within your community to raise awareness.
2. **Engage in Local Advocacy**: - Attend public meetings or forums discussing foreign policy and Ukraine. Engage with local representatives to express your views on how the U.S. and other nations should approach their policy towards Ukraine.
3. **Support Ukrainian Organizations**: - Contribute to or volunteer with organizations that support Ukraine, such as the Ukrainian Red Cross or various humanitarian organizations providing relief to those affected by the conflict.
### Specific Actions
1. **Sign Petitions**: - Look for online petitions advocating for Ukraine's sovereignty and the right to self-determination. Websites like Change.org often have ongoing campaigns. For example, a petition titled "Support Ukraine’s Right to Choose Its Alliances" could be created to gather signatures.
2. **Contact Your Elected Officials**: - Write to your Senators and Congressional Representatives to express your stance on Ukraine's territorial integrity and the importance of supporting its NATO aspirations. - **Sample Contacts**: - **Senator Dick Durbin (IL)** - Email: https://durbin.senate.gov/contact - Address: 525 S. 8th St., Springfield, IL 62703 - **Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (NY)** - Email: https://ocasio-cortez.house.gov/contact - Address: 1441 D. Smith St., Bronx, NY 10460
3. **Draft a Letter or Email**: - Express your concerns in a clear and concise manner. Here’s a sample structure: - **Subject**: Support for Ukraine's Sovereignty and NATO Aspirations - **Body**: - Introduce yourself and your interest in international relations. - State your concern regarding the potential loss of Ukrainian territory and NATO membership. - Urge them to support measures that affirm Ukraine’s right to self-determination and protect its sovereignty. - Mention the importance of the U.S. commitment to international law and human rights.
4. **Organize or Participate in Peaceful Demonstrations**: - Join or organize rallies advocating for a peaceful resolution to the conflict that respects Ukraine's territorial integrity. Websites like Eventbrite or local community boards can provide information on upcoming events.
5. **Engage on Social Media**: - Use platforms like Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram to raise awareness about Ukraine's plight. Share articles, petitions, and your thoughts on the situation using hashtags like #StandWithUkraine or #UkrainianSovereignty.
6. **Support Local Ukrainian Communities**: - Attend cultural events or fundraisers organized by Ukrainian communities in your area. This not only raises funds for aid but also fosters community solidarity.
7. **Contact International Organizations**: - Write to organizations like the United Nations, urging them to take a strong stance on Ukraine’s sovereignty and support peace initiatives. - **Example Contact**: - **UN Secretary-General António Guterres** - Email: sg@un.org - Address: United Nations, 405 East 42nd Street, New York, NY 10017
By taking these actions, we can collectively advocate for a resolution that honors Ukraine’s right to choose its alliances and protects its territorial integrity. It’s important to remember that our voices matter, and by speaking out, we contribute to the global dialogue on peace and justice.