Trump says he will meet with Zelenskyy after "very successful day" with Putin
cbsnews.com -- Saturday, August 16, 2025, 1:57:18 PM Eastern Daylight Time
Categories: U.S.–Russia Relations, Foreign Policy & International Relations, Social Media & Public Statements
Kerry Breen is a news editor at CBSNews.com. A graduate of New York University's Arthur L. Carter School of Journalism, she previously worked at NBC News' TODAY Digital. She covers current events, breaking news and issues including substance use.
President Donald Trump said he will meet with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy at the White House on Monday afternoon to discuss an agreement "which would end the war" between Russia and Ukraine.
The Truth Social post came about half a day after Mr. Trump met with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska. Mr. Trump said the meeting with Putin "went very well." He also said the meeting was followed by a "late night phone call" with Zelenskyy and other European leaders, including Mark Rutte, the secretary general of NATO. The call took place around 2:40 a.m. ET.
"It was determined by all that the best way to end the horrific war between Russia and Ukraine is to go directly to a Peace Agreement, which would end the war, and not a mere Ceasefire Agreement, which often times do not hold up," Mr. Trump said.
Mr. Trump did not share any details of the agreement. Diplomatic sources told CBS News that Mr. Trump said that Putin would make some concessions, but failed to specify what that might mean.
European leaders, including French President Emmanuel Macron and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, said in a statement that they had been debriefed on the meeting with Putin, and said Mr. Trump had supported security guarantees for Ukraine. The guarantees would allow Ukraine to "effectively defend its sovereignty and territorial integrity," the statement said.
Diplomatic sources told CBS that European leaders were relieved to hear President Trump offer a U.S. security guarantee, but described the idea as vague, and it's unclear how it would work.
Mr. Trump said Zelenskyy would join him in the Oval Office on Monday afternoon to discuss the proposal.
Zelenskyy has previously supported a ceasefire agreement to meet and discuss a peace agreement, but Moscow has rejected the idea. He has also criticized any talks that take place without Ukraine.
"If it all works out, we will then schedule a meeting with President Putin," Mr. Trump said. "Potentially, millions of people's lives will be saved."
Zelenskyy previously joined Mr. Trump and Vice President JD Vance in the Oval Office in March, but the gathering quickly descended into insults and chaos.
Mr. Trump's meeting with Putin in Anchorage on Friday ended without a ceasefire or peace deal. In brief remarks after the leaders' nearly three-hour meeting, Putin alluded to "unspecified agreements," but no further details were given. Mr. Trump said the meeting had been "extremely productive." Neither leader mentioned an end to the fighting in Ukraine.
The summit, which included a red carpet and military flyover, ended early without a planned luncheon between a broader group of officials. Mr. Trump returned to Washington, D.C. overnight.
In a taped conversation with Fox News' Sean Hannity before his departure from Alaska, Mr. Trump said he believes Putin wants the war to end and that the nations are close to a deal, and added that it's "really up to President Zelenskyy to get it done." He did not specify what an agreement might look like.
Zelenskyy has said in the past that he will never agree to any formal Russian annexation of Ukrainian territory or abandon the country's bid for NATO membership. Meanwhile, Putin has been unwavering in his demand to keep all Ukrainian territory that his forces occupy and prevent Ukraine from joining NATO, with the long-term goal of returning it to Moscow's sphere of influence.
Diplomatic sources expressed concern to CBS that Mr. Trump had dropped his ceasefire demand and feared that the U.S. president and Putin may have come to an agreement on deal terms that they may try to force on Ukraine. The sources said that European leaders are trying to show unity with Zelenskyy to push back.
Mr. Trump has called ending the war in Ukraine and Russia a top priority for his administration. He previously said he would end the conflict within 24 hours of taking office in January. He has criticized both Putin and Zelenskyy for failing to end the conflict. In recent months, he has appeared to become frustrated with Putin, giving several ultimatums and criticizing the Russian leader for the violence against civilians in Ukraine amid ongoing conversations with the U.S.
"I always hang up, [and] say, 'Well, that was a nice phone call,'" Mr. Trump said in July. "And then missiles are launched into Kyiv or some other city, and I say, 'That's strange.' And after that happens three or four times, you say, the talk doesn't mean anything."
Mr. Trump said Friday that he would not enact economic sanctions he had threatened against Russia if an agreement wasn't reached by early August. He said he "may have to think about" enacting the sanctions "in two weeks or three weeks or something."
There were strikes between the two countries overnight. Russia's Defense Ministry said its air defenses shot down 29 Ukrainian drones over Russia and the Sea of Azov, the Associated Press reported. Ukraine's air force said one ballistic missile and 85 Shahed drones were fired at parts of Sumy, Donetsk, Dnipropetrovsk and Chernihiv, according to the AP, and 61 of the drones were shot down.
A Ukrainian soldier in Sumy told CBS News that "things get even more terrifying on the front line" when there are peace talks.
"They try and seize more territory," the soldier said.
Sign Our PetitionThe recent announcement that former President Donald Trump plans to meet with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy following his discussions with Russian President Vladimir Putin raises significant questions about the nature and implications of U.S. foreign policy in the context of the ongoing conflict in Ukraine. Trump’s assertion that he aims to negotiate a peace agreement, rather than a mere ceasefire, reflects a simplistic understanding of a deeply complex geopolitical situation. While the desire to end hostilities is commendable, Trump's history of erratic foreign policy raises concerns about the effectiveness and intentions behind his proposed negotiations.
Historically, the U.S. has played a pivotal role in shaping the geopolitical landscape of Eastern Europe, particularly since the collapse of the Soviet Union. The promise of NATO expansion and U.S. support for democratic movements in Ukraine can be seen as part of a broader strategy to counter Russian influence. However, this has often been complicated by the United States' own interests, which have not always aligned with the principles of sovereignty and self-determination for the people of Ukraine. Trump’s recent overtures to Putin, including vague promises of security guarantees, echo a past where U.S. leaders have prioritized strategic partnerships over genuine support for affected populations. It is crucial to remember that any peace agreement must center the voices of Ukrainians and honor their right to self-determination, rather than being dictated by external powers.
The talk of a peace agreement, particularly in the absence of concrete details, raises eyebrows given the historical context of the Minsk agreements, which sought to de-escalate the conflict but ultimately failed to bring about lasting peace. The complexity of the Ukrainian-Russian conflict cannot be overstated; it is rooted in historical grievances, territorial disputes, and the wider struggle for influence between East and West. The notion that a quick resolution can be achieved through high-profile meetings, particularly without a clear strategy or understanding of the ground realities, is naive at best and potentially harmful at worst. The emphasis on security guarantees, while important, must also address the underlying issues that fuel the conflict, including economic instability and political corruption.
Moreover, Trump's penchant for creating dramatic diplomatic encounters, such as the red carpet treatment for Putin, often serves more to bolster his own image than to genuinely seek solutions. This pattern highlights a troubling trend where diplomacy becomes a spectacle rather than a substantive process aimed at resolving conflicts. The failure to achieve a concrete ceasefire or agreement after his meeting with Putin should serve as a cautionary tale against viewing diplomacy as merely a tool for political gain. This is especially pertinent given that the lives of millions are at stake in the ongoing conflict, which has already resulted in significant humanitarian crises.
For those discussing these issues within their communities or in political debates, it's essential to emphasize the need for a genuine, inclusive peace process that prioritizes the voices of Ukrainians and addresses the root causes of the conflict. While Trump may present himself as a potential peacemaker, it is crucial to critically assess the implications of his approach and to advocate for policies that genuinely support the sovereignty of nations and the welfare of their people. Understanding the historical context of U.S.-Russia relations, the complexities of the Ukrainian struggle, and the importance of a people-centered approach to peace can empower individuals to engage more effectively in discussions about international relations and the importance of social justice in foreign policy.
The recent announcement by former President Donald Trump regarding a meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, following his engagement with Russian President Vladimir Putin, raises significant concerns about the dynamics of U.S. foreign policy and the implications for global peace. By emphasizing a direct peace agreement rather than a ceasefire, Trump appears to suggest a departure from established diplomatic norms, which could further complicate an already fraught situation. Historically, the U.S. has played a pivotal role in mediating international conflicts, but this approach risks undermining the sovereignty of nations and the legitimacy of their governments, especially when discussions are initiated without all relevant parties at the table.
The context surrounding this announcement is critical. The war in Ukraine has been a flashpoint in U.S.-Russia relations, with dire humanitarian consequences for millions of Ukrainians. Trump's framing of a "peace agreement" without detailing what concessions might be expected from Putin raises red flags. It is imperative to recall that previous peace discussions have often been tainted by a lack of transparency and accountability. The notion that peace can be brokered without addressing the underlying issues, such as territorial integrity and the rights of the Ukrainian people, is not only naive but potentially dangerous. It could pave the way for further aggression under the guise of diplomacy, allowing authoritarian regimes to dictate terms while sidelining the very nations that are most affected by their actions.
As engaged citizens, Americans can take action by demanding greater accountability and clarity from their leaders regarding foreign policy. This means advocating for a foreign policy that prioritizes human rights, democratic values, and the voices of those directly impacted by conflicts. Grassroots movements can push for a more inclusive diplomatic process that ensures all stakeholders, especially those in the line of fire, are part of the conversation. Letters to representatives, participation in town hall meetings, and leveraging social media can amplify calls for a U.S. foreign policy that respects the sovereignty and self-determination of nations rather than one that is based on vague promises and potential concessions that may not materialize.
Furthermore, it is essential to foster a deeper understanding among the American public about the complexities of international relations and the need for nuanced engagement. Educational initiatives can be pivotal in this regard. By promoting discussions about the history of U.S. involvement in foreign affairs, the consequences of military intervention, and the importance of multilateral agreements, we can cultivate a more informed citizenry. Such an understanding will help counteract simplistic narratives that often dominate mainstream discourse, allowing for a more sophisticated debate about the role of the U.S. in global conflicts.
Finally, we must also engage with international allies and organizations that advocate for peace and stability. Supporting entities that promote dialogue and conflict resolution can help reinforce a global framework that seeks to prevent wars rather than escalate them. Collaboration with non-governmental organizations, think tanks, and academic institutions focused on peace studies can provide the necessary resources and platforms to push for policies that favor diplomacy over military action. In doing so, Americans can contribute to a collective effort that not only seeks to end the war in Ukraine but also to set a precedent for future conflicts, ensuring that peace is pursued through inclusive dialogue rather than unilateral decisions made in backrooms.
In conclusion, the unfolding situation surrounding Trump's meeting with Zelenskyy and his recent engagement with Putin necessitates a thoughtful and active response from the American public. By advocating for a foreign policy grounded in democratic principles, educating ourselves and others about the complexities of international relations, and supporting collaborative solutions, we can work towards a more just and peaceful world. It is through these actions that we can hold our leaders accountable and ensure that the voices of those most affected by conflict are not merely an afterthought in the pursuit of peace.
To address the complexities surrounding the ongoing situation between Russia, Ukraine, and the United States as highlighted in the article, individuals can take several meaningful actions to advocate for peace, accountability, and support for Ukraine. Here’s a detailed list of actions that can be taken:
### Personal Actions
1. **Educate Yourself and Others**: - Stay informed about the developments in Ukraine and Russia by following credible news sources, reading reports from NGOs, and understanding the historical context of the conflict. - Host discussions or educational sessions in your community or online to raise awareness about the importance of supporting Ukraine’s sovereignty.
2. **Support Humanitarian Efforts**: - Donate to organizations providing humanitarian aid to Ukraine. Some reputable organizations include: - Direct Relief: [directrelief.org](https://www.directrelief.org) - Doctors Without Borders: [doctorswithoutborders.org](https://www.doctorswithoutborders.org) - United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR): [unhcr.org](https://www.unhcr.org)
3. **Petition for Support and Accountability**: - Start or sign petitions advocating for robust support for Ukraine. Websites like Change.org or MoveOn.org are good platforms to find existing petitions or create new ones. - Example: A petition to increase military and humanitarian support for Ukraine can be found on platforms like [Change.org](https://www.change.org).
### Contacting Officials
4. **Write to Elected Representatives**: - Reach out to your local and federal representatives to express your concerns and urge them to support Ukraine through legislation. - Use the following templates for letters or emails: - **Subject Line**: Urging Support for Ukraine - **Content**: ``` Dear [Representative's Name], I am writing to express my concern regarding the ongoing conflict in Ukraine. It is imperative that the United States takes a firm stance in supporting Ukraine’s sovereignty. I urge you to advocate for increased military aid and humanitarian assistance to help the Ukrainian people during this critical time. Please prioritize this issue in your discussions with your colleagues. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, [Your Name] [Your Address] [Your Email] ``` - **Example Contacts**: - **Senator Chuck Schumer** (D-NY) - Email: schumer.senate.gov/contact - Mailing Address: 322 Hart Senate Office Building, Washington, D.C. 20510 - **Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez** (D-NY-14) - Email: ocasio-cortez.house.gov/contact - Mailing Address: 1236 Longworth House Office Building, Washington, D.C. 20515
5. **Engage with Local Advocacy Groups**: - Join or support local peace and human rights organizations that focus on Ukraine. Groups often host events, rallies, or letter-writing campaigns. Examples include: - **Peace Action**: [peaceaction.org](https://www.peaceaction.org) - **Amnesty International**: [amnesty.org](https://www.amnesty.org)
6. **Utilize Social Media**: - Use platforms like Twitter and Facebook to raise awareness and urge action. Tag your representatives and share information about petitions, events, and fundraising drives. - Example Tweet: “We must stand with Ukraine! Join me in urging our representatives to support humanitarian aid and military support. [link to petition]”
### Grassroots Organizing
7. **Host or Participate in Peace Rallies and Events**: - Participate in or organize events advocating for peace and support for Ukraine. This can be a local demonstration, a fundraiser, or an awareness event.
8. **Engage in Dialogue**: - Foster discussions about the conflict in community forums, schools, or local organizations to encourage a deeper understanding and collective action.
9. **Contact the Media**: - Write letters to the editor of local newspapers or submit op-eds discussing the importance of U.S. involvement in supporting Ukraine and the need for clear, actionable policies.
By taking these actions, individuals can contribute to a larger movement aimed at ensuring support for Ukraine and advocating for peace in the region. Each step, no matter how small, can help amplify the call for justice and stability in a time of conflict.