Trump pushes on despite 'nothing burger' Putin summit: White House Report Card
denvergazette.com -- Saturday, August 16, 2025, 12:28:18 PM Eastern Daylight Time
Categories: Public Opinion & Polling, Foreign Policy & International Relations, U.S.–Russia Relations
President Donald Trump on Saturday brushed off his inability to win a quick Ukraine peace deal with Russian President Vladimir Putin at their high-stakes three-hour summit in Alaska on Friday, while showing anew that he is not giving up his goal to end their war.
The president said that he would push on in his peace efforts by greeting Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in Washington, D.C., on Monday. In a Truth Social post, he said he would urge Zelensky to embrace talks to a full peace settlement and a potential trilateral meeting to cement that deal.
While the media parsed the Alaska summit, White House officials said the president successfully revived the U.S.-Russia relationship after it hit rock bottom under former President Joe Biden, opening several doors to a peace deal and better trade relations.
A great and very successful day in Alaska! The meeting with President Vladimir Putin of Russia went very well, as did a late night phone call with President Zelenskyy of Ukraine, and various European Leaders, including the highly respected Secretary General of NATO. It was...
-- Trump Truth Social Posts On X (@TrumpTruthOnX)
August 16, 2025
The summit capped another historic week for the new president, who seems to make history every week and keep our graders of the Washington Secrets weekly White House Report Card busy.
In addition to the summit, Trump's move to take charge of Washington, D.C., which has been plagued with high-profile violent crime, took center stage as did new questions about how his tariffs are impacting inflation.
Democratic pollster John Zogby graded the week an "F," and revealed to Secrets his new survey showing that more Americans than not are "ashamed" of Trump. "We have been polling that question since 1998, and that is by far the lowest set of numbers we have seen," he said.
Conservative grader Jed Babbin graded the week a "C-plus," but saw many highlights to note.
John Zogby
Grade: F
The good news this week for President Donald Trump is that last month's annualized inflation rate was down to 2.7%. The bad news is that the figure comes from the Bureau of Labor Statistics which the president has taught us to not trust. It doesn't get any better for him.
Crime in the nation's capital is a problem, even if crime rates are down. But federalizing the National Guard and appointing a new 'police commissioner' is not resting well. The whole idea of troops patrolling Washington, D.C., is not the image a fellow who wants to reduce the government's footprint in our lives ought to be displaying.
Only 31% believe that the president can be counted on to tell the truth and even fellow narcissist Curtis Sliwa has asked Trump to stay away from his New York City Republican mayoral campaign.
Our latest John Zogby Strategies poll finds that only 36% of likely voters are proud that Trump is president, while 51% are ashamed. That includes only 23% of independent voters who are proud, while 57% are ashamed. We have been polling that question since 1998, and that is by far the lowest set of numbers we have seen.
Then we get to the Big Nothing Burger in Alaska, which at this point anyway appears to have been disrespectful to everyone on this planet except the Russian President Vladimir Putin.
Jed Babbin
Grade: C+
We have a little catching up to do, having not done a grade last week. In the past two weeks, President Donald Trump has managed to: declare a covert war against the drug cartels, order a count of citizens to exclude illegal immigrants, and counter a nuclear threat from Russia by repositioning two of our ballistic missile subs. And Trump nationalized the Washington, D.C., police force and ordered 800 D.C. National Guard troops -- as well as a slew of FBI and DEA agents -- to the District to round up many of the criminals who are making D.C. a deadly destination.
The covert war on the drug cartels has already met with a little success. Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum already surrendered to Trump 26 supposedly high-ranking people in the cartels. Good luck with that. There will be many more caught or killed in this war.
The repositioning of our subs was perfect, both strategically and tactically. The Russians heard about it quietly and backed down.
The illegal-free census may cause a constitutional problem. Section 2 of the 14th Amendment requires all people be counted except "...Indians not taxed." Trump isn't going to get that Census without a huge constitutional fight.
The nationalization of D.C. cops and National Guard can only last 30 days. In that period, Trump and new D.C. U.S. Attorney Jeanne Pirro want to make the District safe. That's a tall order given the fact that most people risk being carjacked at gunpoint if they go into the District by 12-year-olds. As Pirro said, punks have been getting away with too much for too long. There have been over 100 arrests already. Trump said he wants to get an extension of his authority, but the Democrats in Congress will block him.
Another bit of good news is that Trump's tariffs are pouring billions into the federal treasury. But, of course, Trump's tariff authority is being challenged in court.
Deportations of illegal immigrants are at about 1,300 per day and already exceed 1 million.
And then there's the Alaska "summit" with Russian President Vladimir Putin. Trump said there was a lot of progress, but no peace deal for Ukraine. Putin seems to be able to talk Trump into or out of anything Putin desires, such as Trump's pre-summit threat of massive sanctions. Trump's failure is entirely obvious to the world.
John Zogby is the founder of the Zogby Survey and senior partner at John Zogby Strategies. His latest book is Beyond the Horse Race: How to Read Polls and Why We Should. His podcast with son and managing partner and pollster Jeremy Zogby can be heard here. Follow him on X @ZogbyStrategies.
Jed Babbin is a Washington Examiner contributor and former deputy undersecretary of defense in the administration of former President George H.W. Bush. Follow him on X @jedbabbin.
Sign Our PetitionThe recent article on President Trump’s summit with Vladimir Putin in Alaska raises important questions regarding the efficacy and ethical implications of his foreign policy, particularly concerning the ongoing war in Ukraine. While Trump presents his efforts as a revival of U.S.-Russia relations aimed at peace, one cannot overlook the historical context of U.S.-Russian relations and the broader implications of Trump's approach to international diplomacy. This framing is crucial for understanding the complexities of global politics today and the potential risks associated with a simplistic narrative of peace through negotiation without addressing underlying power dynamics.
Historically, U.S.-Russian relations have been rife with tension, largely stemming from Cold War ideologies and contrasting political systems. The notion of peace between the two nations has often been marred by military interventions, economic sanctions, and a mutual distrust that has persisted through administrations. Trump's recent claims of reviving these ties are particularly stark given the backdrop of Biden’s foreign policy, which has been characterized by a firm stance against Russian aggression, especially in light of the invasion of Ukraine. The juxtaposition of these two approaches highlights a fundamental debate over how best to engage with authoritarian regimes: should we confront them or seek diplomacy? The left often advocates for a nuanced approach that incorporates human rights considerations and international law into diplomatic efforts, acknowledging that deals made with authoritarian leaders can inadvertently legitimize oppressive regimes.
The article also touches upon the domestic ramifications of Trump’s presidency, indicating a notable decline in public support and trust. Polling data revealing that a significant majority of Americans feel “ashamed” of Trump’s presidency underscores the disconnect between his administration's actions and the values many citizens hold dear, such as integrity, accountability, and a commitment to democracy. This sentiment echoes the historical role of public opinion in shaping foreign policy, suggesting that any potential peace deal with Russia must not only be beneficial on the international stage but also resonate positively at home. Engaging citizens in discussions about foreign policy and its ethical dimensions is critical, as it empowers them to hold leadership accountable and fosters a more informed electorate.
Furthermore, the article highlights the problematic nature of Trump's domestic policies, particularly concerning crime and militarization. The federalization of the National Guard in response to crime raises significant concerns about civil liberties and the role of military force in policing, a topic that resonates deeply with ongoing social justice movements across the country. The increase in police presence in urban areas, often justified by rising crime rates, can lead to further marginalization of communities of color and exacerbate tensions between citizens and law enforcement. This issue calls for a leftist critique of the militarization of police and a push for community-based approaches to public safety, emphasizing restorative justice and social support systems rather than punitive measures.
Lastly, Trump's insistence on a peace summit without addressing the root causes of conflict—such as historical grievances, territorial disputes, and human rights violations—can be seen as an oversimplification of complex geopolitical issues. The left has long advocated for a comprehensive approach to peace that prioritizes dialogue, reconciliation, and reparations where necessary. This perspective urges a shift away from transactional politics to one that emphasizes justice, equity, and the voices of those who are most affected by these conflicts. By fostering an understanding of the interconnectedness of global issues and local struggles, we can better equip individuals to engage meaningfully in the political discourse surrounding foreign policy, urging a transition from mere rhetoric to substantive action.
In conclusion, the summit between Trump and Putin serves as a microcosm of larger ideological battles in international relations, domestic policy, and social justice. Engaging critically with these themes encourages a more robust dialogue about the implications of leadership choices on both national and global scales. It is essential for citizens to remain vigilant and informed, advocating for policies that reflect democratic values and prioritize human rights, thereby fostering a more just and equitable world.
The recent summit between President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin has ignited fresh discourse on the complexities of foreign relations and the perception of leadership in the United States. While Trump appears to dismiss criticism surrounding the summit, labeling it as a “nothing burger,” the implications of his policies and their reception deserve critical examination. Historically, U.S.-Russia relations have oscillated between cooperation and confrontation, heavily influenced by the Cold War’s legacy and ongoing geopolitical tensions. Trump's approach, which he claims is aimed at peace in Ukraine, seems to gloss over the nuanced reality of international diplomacy, where simplistic narratives often mask deeper issues.
The historical context of U.S.-Russia relations cannot be overlooked. Since the end of the Cold War, the dynamics have been fraught with suspicion and rivalry, punctuated by conflicts ranging from the wars in Chechnya to the annexation of Crimea. The Obama administration’s response to Russia's aggressive maneuvers was marked by sanctions and a pivot towards NATO solidarity, a stance that drew criticism from various political factions. In stark contrast, Trump's overtures to Putin suggest a willingness to abandon long-established principles in favor of personal diplomacy, which raises questions about the effectiveness and ethics of such a strategy. The potential normalization of relations with a regime known for human rights abuses and aggressive military posturing could set a dangerous precedent for American foreign policy.
As citizens, we have a responsibility to engage critically with our leaders and their policies. One actionable step is to foster informed discussions about the implications of Trump's foreign policy. Engaging in community forums, writing letters to the editor, or utilizing social media platforms can amplify voices advocating for a more principled approach to international relations. Furthermore, grassroots organizations focused on peace and diplomacy can provide platforms for discourse that challenge the prevailing narratives propagated by those in power. By equipping ourselves with historical knowledge and fostering dialogue, we can better articulate the necessity of a coherent and ethical foreign policy.
Moreover, the economic ramifications of Trump's policies must be scrutinized alongside their foreign policy implications. Reports of declining inflation juxtaposed with rising crime rates in urban centers highlight a growing discontent among the electorate. The disconnection between Trump’s proclamations of success and public sentiment, as evidenced by polling data indicating that a significant portion of the population feels ashamed of his presidency, points to a broader crisis of legitimacy. As advocates for a balanced and equitable society, we must address the intersectionality of economic stability and national security, arguing that peace is not simply the absence of conflict but a holistic approach that addresses systemic issues within our own borders.
Finally, it is imperative to recognize the role of media literacy in shaping public opinion. The framing of events, such as the Alaska summit, plays a critical role in how policies are perceived and understood. By promoting media literacy and critical thinking, we can empower individuals to discern the motivations behind political narratives and engage with the complexities of international relations. Encouraging others to question the status quo, seek out diverse sources of information, and challenge the oversimplified portrayals of foreign policy can lead to a more informed electorate that demands accountability from its leaders. As we move forward, let us commit to fostering a political environment that prioritizes transparency, ethical diplomacy, and the well-being of both our nation and the global community.
In light of the recent developments regarding President Trump's summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin and his approach towards Ukraine, there are several proactive steps individuals can take to engage with the political landscape and advocate for a more peaceful and just resolution to the ongoing conflict. Here’s a detailed list of ideas and actions that can be undertaken.
### What Can We Personally Do About This?
1. **Stay Informed**: Educate yourself about the ongoing situation in Ukraine and Russia. Follow credible news sources and analyses to understand the complexities of the conflict.
2. **Advocate for Diplomatic Solutions**: Promote the idea that diplomacy should be prioritized over military intervention. Voice your support for peaceful negotiations.
3. **Engage in Community Discussions**: Create or participate in community forums to discuss the implications of U.S. foreign policy on global peace and security.
4. **Support Organizations**: Contribute to or volunteer with organizations that are dedicated to peace-building and humanitarian assistance in conflict zones.
5. **Contact Elected Officials**: Reach out to representatives to express your views on the importance of diplomatic solutions and responsible foreign policy.
### Exact Actions to Take
1. **Petition for Peace Initiatives**: - Create or sign petitions that call for the U.S. government to prioritize diplomacy in its foreign policy, particularly regarding Ukraine and Russia. Websites like Change.org or MoveOn.org can be platforms for such petitions.
2. **Write to Your Elected Officials**: - Identify your local representatives in Congress and reach out to them. You can find their contact information on the official [Congress.gov](https://www.congress.gov) website. - Example Contacts: - **Senator Elizabeth Warren** - Email: senator_warren@warren.senate.gov - Mailing Address: 2400 JFK Federal Building, 15 New Sudbury Street, Boston, MA 02203
- **Representative Adam Smith** - Email: adam.smith@mail.house.gov - Mailing Address: 1118 Longworth House Office Building, Washington, D.C. 20515
- **Message Template**: ``` Dear [Official's Name],
I am writing to express my concern over the current U.S. approach to the conflict in Ukraine. I believe that it is crucial for our government to prioritize diplomatic solutions and engage in meaningful negotiations to end the violence. I urge you to advocate for peace initiatives and to support policies that foster dialogue rather than division.
Thank you for your attention to this urgent matter.
Sincerely, [Your Name] [Your Address] [Your Email] ```
3. **Social Media Advocacy**: - Use social media platforms to raise awareness about the importance of peace initiatives in Ukraine. Share articles, engage in discussions, and use hashtags such as #PeaceInUkraine or #DiplomacyNotWar.
4. **Participate in Local Activism**: - Join or attend local rallies or meetings organized by peace advocacy groups. Communicating your support for peaceful resolutions in person can strengthen community action.
5. **Engage with Local Media**: - Write letters to the editor of your local newspapers expressing your views on U.S. foreign policy and advocating for a peaceful resolution to the conflict.
6. **Support Humanitarian Aid**: - Donate to reputable organizations providing humanitarian aid to those affected by the war in Ukraine. Organizations like the International Rescue Committee (IRC) and Doctors Without Borders are actively involved in providing assistance.
### Summary
By taking these actions, individuals can play a meaningful role in advocating for a peaceful resolution to the conflict involving Ukraine and Russia. Engaging with elected officials, supporting petitions, and actively participating in community discussions are vital steps towards fostering a culture of diplomacy and understanding in our foreign policy approach. Your voice matters—let it be heard.