What is President Donald Trump's current approval rating? See the most recent polls
azcentral.com -- Saturday, August 16, 2025, 9:29:15 PM Eastern Daylight Time
Categories: Public Opinion & Polling, Foreign Policy & International Relations, U.S.–Russia Relations

President Donald Trump called the Alaska summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin "very productive," but said "there's no deal."
President Donald Trump's approval ratings continue to sink near record lows as he faces a week marked by tense diplomacy, legal battles and partisan fights over political maps.
On Friday, Trump met with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska, hoping to reach a deal to end the three-year war in Ukraine.
While Trump called the talks "extremely productive," the summit ended without a resolution on the most important issue. "We had an extremely productive meeting and many points were agreed to," Trump said in a short statement to the media without taking questions. "One is probably the most significant. ... We didn't get there, but we have a very good chance of getting there."
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy had urged President Trump to take a strong stance. Trump said before the meeting he might consider U.S. security guarantees for Ukraine and has in the past threatened economic penalties on Russia. He was yet to speak with Zelenskyy after the summit.
Also on Friday, the District of Columbia filed a lawsuit against Trump over his federal takeover of the city's police force, calling the move "brazen" and saying it has caused "operational havoc" within the department.
Meanwhile, Trump's political operatives continue to pressure Republicans in Texas, Florida and Ohio to redraw congressional maps in ways that could favor Republicans ahead of the 2026 elections. The strategy has drawn pushback from California Gov. Gavin Newsom, who announced Thursday a special election to advance his own redistricting plan and renewed calls for a national ban on partisan gerrymandering.
Here's what to know about Trump's approval rating, including how they are decided and how Trump's ratings compare with his first term and past presidents.
What is Donald Trump's approval rating?
Here are the latest approval ratings released about Trump's administration:
* A state-by-state survey released on Aug. 12 by the Morning Consult showed that while Trump's approval rating nationally remains historically low, he still holds a positive approval rating in 27 states.
* According to the New York Times' daily average of polls, last updated on Aug. 15, Trump held a 44% approval and 53% disapproval ratings.
* A Reuters/Ipsos poll reported that, as of July 20, 40% of those surveyed gave him a favorable approval rating of his performance in office.
* The Economist shows that 42% of people are favorable of Trump and 54% are unfavorable of him, according to the latest update from Aug. 15.
* A Rasmussen Reports poll from Aug. 15 showed 49% approval and 49% disapproval of Trump.
* A Morning Consult poll updated Aug. 11 showed 45% approve and 51% disapprove.
* The American Research Group poll from July 17-20 showed 38% approve and 59% disapprove.
Trump has a positive approval rating in 27 states
Trump's approval rating is above water in 27 states, according to an Aug. 12 update from Morning Consult, which gathers polls over the course of three months to get a look at state-level data among registered voters. The number of states who approve of Trump is unchanged from July's update.
Trump is most popular by Morning Consult in Wyoming, where 66% of voters approve of his job performance, and least popular in Vermont, where 64% disapprove of his job performance.
What is Trump's approval rating in Arizona?
Arizona was the only state in the Morning Consult's survey with a neutral net approval rating, meaning exactly half of the voters who were surveyed approve of his job performance, and the other half don't.
How does Trump's approval rating compare with his 1st term?
Trump had a final approval rating of 34% when he left office in 2021. His approval average during his first term was 41%.
How does Trump's approval rating compare with past presidents?
* Joe Biden - 40%
* Donald Trump (first term) - 34%
* Barack Obama - 59%
* George W. Bush - 34%
* Bill Clinton - 66%
* George H.W. Bush - 56%
* Ronald Reagan - 63%
* Jimmy Carter - 34%
* Gerald Ford - 53%
* Richard Nixon - 24%
Are presidential approval ratings accurate?
Data agency Gallup notes that these approval ratings are a "simple measure, yet a very powerful one that has played a key role in politics for over 70 years."
A president's approval rating reflects the percentage of Americans polled who approve of the president's performance. Anything can impact a president's rating, such as legislation passed, actions and elections.
According to ABC News, an approval rating doesn't just represent how well the administration is doing for the general public, but could determine the outcome of an upcoming election for a politician or how much they get done during their time in office.
While these ratings are easy to understand, Quorum says some analysts believe they are not as useful as they once were due to extreme partisanship and the polarized political climate.
"Presidential approval ratings have always been partisan, with members of the president's party offering more positive assessments than those in the opposing party," according to the Pew Research Center. "But the differences between Republicans and Democrats on views of the president have grown substantially in recent decades."
USA TODAY Network reporter Maria Francis contributed to this article.
Sign Our PetitionThe current political climate in the United States is a reflection of deep-seated divisions that have historical roots and social implications. Recent reports about President Donald Trump’s approval ratings and his summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska provide a lens through which we can examine these fractures. As Trump navigates a series of legal challenges, diplomatic tensions, and partisan skirmishes, his approval ratings hover near historically low levels, revealing a populace grappling with questions about governance, accountability, and the integrity of democratic processes.
The meeting between Trump and Putin, framed as "very productive" by the former president, raises pertinent questions about the nature of U.S.-Russia relations and the implications of international diplomacy on domestic perceptions of leadership. While Trump expressed optimism about potential agreements, the absence of concrete outcomes underscores a recurring theme in his presidency: the tendency to prioritize spectacle over substantive policy. This is not merely a matter of political theater; it reflects a broader truth about the nature of power in global politics, where the interests of the elite often overshadow the pressing needs of ordinary citizens. The ongoing war in Ukraine remains a critical issue, and the lack of a decisive stance from the U.S. administration not only undermines the plight of the Ukrainian people but also raises concerns about the credibility of American leadership on the world stage.
Moreover, Trump's approval ratings serve as a barometer for public sentiment, revealing a nation increasingly polarized along partisan lines. While some polls indicate that he maintains favorable ratings in several states, a deeper analysis reveals the complexities of voter sentiment. Trump’s base remains loyal, often driven by cultural and political grievances that have historically marginalized certain groups. This loyalty, however, exists within a broader context of declining trust in institutions, where the erosion of social cohesion can be traced back to decades of economic inequality, racial injustice, and political disenfranchisement. The current political struggles are not just about one man’s presidency; they are emblematic of a systemic failure to address the underlying injustices faced by marginalized communities.
The recent legal challenges faced by Trump, particularly the lawsuit from the District of Columbia regarding federal oversight of the police, illuminate the tensions between governance and accountability. The description of the takeover as "brazen" speaks to a larger narrative about the militarization of police forces and the challenges of maintaining civil liberties in the face of authoritarian impulses. This situation is a reminder of the ongoing struggle for police reform in America, a movement that has gained momentum in recent years amidst widespread calls for racial justice and systemic change. The resistance from figures like California Governor Gavin Newsom to partisan gerrymandering further highlights the fight against entrenched political power, signaling that attempts to manipulate electoral maps to favor a party are not merely tactical maneuvers but strikes against the very foundation of democracy.
The juxtaposition of Trump's approval ratings with the push for redistricting reform illustrates a key issue in contemporary politics: the importance of fair representation. Gerrymandering, a tactic used to entrench power by manipulating district boundaries, is an affront to democratic principles and disproportionately affects communities of color and low-income populations. By advocating for national standards against partisan gerrymandering, leaders like Newsom are not only addressing the immediate political landscape but are also responding to a historical legacy of exclusion and disenfranchisement. This conversation about representation is critical in the context of ongoing social struggles, where the fight for equitable political power is intrinsically linked to the quest for social justice.
In conclusion, the developments surrounding Trump’s presidency, his interactions with foreign leaders, and the ongoing legal and political battles paint a complex picture of American democracy. The historical context of these events reveals that the challenges faced today are not merely the result of one administration's policies but are deeply intertwined with centuries of social and political struggles. As individuals engage in discussions about these issues, it is essential to frame them within the broader narrative of accountability, representation, and justice. By connecting current events to historical injustices and ongoing social movements, we can foster a deeper understanding of the stakes involved and work towards a more equitable and just society.
The current political landscape, as evidenced by President Trump's fluctuating approval ratings and his controversial diplomatic engagements, offers a fertile ground for critical analysis and action. The recent summit in Alaska with Russian President Vladimir Putin serves as a poignant example of the complexities surrounding U.S. foreign policy, particularly in relation to Ukraine. While Trump described the meeting as "extremely productive," the absence of a concrete deal raises questions about the effectiveness of his diplomatic approach. This situation is not merely a reflection of one president's approval rating but encapsulates a broader struggle over U.S. foreign policy, national security, and the democratic processes within our own country.
Historically, the relationship between the United States and Russia has been fraught with tension, particularly concerning Ukraine, where Russian aggression has resulted in a protracted conflict. The lack of resolution at the Alaska summit signals a continuation of this troubling status quo, with the stakes incredibly high for the citizens of Ukraine who are in dire need of support and tangible security guarantees. President Zelenskyy's call for a robust U.S. stance emphasizes the urgency of this situation, and it is imperative that we, as a nation, hold our leaders accountable for standing firm against authoritarian aggression.
Moreover, the ongoing legal challenges faced by Trump, including the recent lawsuit from the District of Columbia regarding his federal takeover of the city's police force, highlight the troubling intersection of politics and governance. The characterization of this action as "brazen" underscores a worrying trend of federal overreach that undermines local autonomy and can lead to operational chaos within essential public services. In this context, it is critical for citizens to engage in local governance, to advocate for community-focused solutions that prioritize the needs and voices of those most affected by these decisions. Engaging in local activism, attending town halls, and supporting candidates who prioritize community rights can act as a counterbalance to federal overreach.
The manipulation of congressional district maps by political operatives, as noted in the article, is another area where civic engagement is crucial. The push for redistricting in favor of Republicans is not merely a political strategy; it undermines the very fabric of our democratic process. The response from figures like California Governor Gavin Newsom, who is advocating for a national ban on partisan gerrymandering, serves as a reminder that there are actionable steps we can take to protect the integrity of our electoral system. Grassroots movements advocating for fair redistricting processes can help ensure that all voices are represented in our democracy. By pushing for transparency and fairness in how districts are drawn, we can combat the entrenched power structures that seek to marginalize certain populations.
In light of the current political climate, there are several actions that concerned citizens can undertake. First, educating oneself and others about the implications of partisan gerrymandering and foreign policy decisions can foster a more informed electorate. Hosting community discussions, sharing articles, and utilizing social media platforms to raise awareness can help mobilize public opinion against anti-democratic practices. Additionally, supporting organizations that advocate for electoral reform, foreign policy accountability, and local governance can magnify our collective voice. Engaging with local representatives, demanding transparency, and holding them accountable are essential steps in ensuring that our democracy remains responsive to the needs of its constituents.
In conclusion, while President Trump's approval ratings may reflect a momentary snapshot of public sentiment, they are indicative of deeper issues within our political system. As citizens, we must recognize our role in shaping the political narrative and influencing the actions of our leaders. By fostering community engagement, advocating for fair practices in governance, and demanding accountability on both domestic and foreign fronts, we can work towards a more equitable and just society. It is through these actions that we can challenge the status quo and promote a political discourse that truly reflects the values of democracy.
The current political climate, as highlighted in the article, presents numerous avenues for concerned individuals to take meaningful action. Here’s a detailed list of ideas focused on what we can personally do, along with specific actionable steps:
### Personal Actions: 1. **Stay Informed and Educate Others** - **Action**: Regularly read updates from reputable news sources and share insights with friends and family. - **Example**: Create a small discussion group to talk about political issues and share perspectives.
2. **Engage in Local Politics** - **Action**: Attend town hall meetings and local government sessions to voice concerns about issues like police reform and gerrymandering. - **Example**: Research your local government schedule and attend meetings to stay updated and vocal.
3. **Contact Elected Officials** - **Action**: Write to your representatives about the importance of addressing gerrymandering and supporting Ukraine. - **Example**: - **Who to contact**: Your local Congressional representatives. - **How to find**: Use [House.gov](https://www.house.gov/) to locate your representative. - **What to say**: Express your concerns about partisan gerrymandering and urge them to support legislation that promotes fair redistricting.
4. **Support Petitions** - **Action**: Sign and share petitions that align with your values. - **Example**: - **Petition**: Search on platforms like Change.org or MoveOn.org for petitions against gerrymandering or in support of Ukraine. - **What to say**: Add a personal note about why the issue matters to you when sharing or signing.
5. **Engage in Advocacy Groups** - **Action**: Join or support organizations that work towards fair elections and international human rights. - **Example**: - **Organizations**: The League of Women Voters or the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU). - **Contact Info**: - **League of Women Voters**: Email - info@lwv.org - **ACLU**: Email - info@aclu.org - **What to say**: Inquire about volunteer opportunities or ways to support their initiatives.
6. **Utilize Social Media** - **Action**: Use platforms like Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram to raise awareness about critical issues. - **Example**: Share articles, create posts about your views on gerrymandering, and encourage others to engage. - **What to say**: Write a post about the importance of fair representation and tag local and national politicians.
7. **Participate in Local Campaigns** - **Action**: Volunteer for local candidates who prioritize reform and transparency. - **Example**: Identify candidates in your area running against gerrymandering and support them through canvassing or phone banking. - **Contact**: Check local candidate websites for volunteer information.
8. **Organize or Join Community Events** - **Action**: Participate in marches, rallies, or community forums focused on political reform and international issues. - **Example**: Look for events online or through local activist groups. - **What to say**: Use these platforms to share your thoughts on the importance of democracy and accountability.
### Contact Information for Elected Officials: - **Sample Senate Contact**: - **Senator [Name]** - **Email**: [Find email on Senate.gov] - **Address**: [Insert local office address from Senate.gov]
- **Sample House Contact**: - **Representative [Name]** - **Email**: [Find email on House.gov] - **Address**: [Insert local office address from House.gov]
### Conclusion: By taking these steps, we can actively participate in shaping our political landscape. Whether through contacting elected officials or engaging in community events, every voice counts. The time to act is now—let’s make our concerns heard and work towards a more equitable and just society.