James Gilmore to Newsmax: Ukraine, Russia Hold to Unchanged Demands
wgowam.com -- Saturday, August 16, 2025, 10:56:40 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Categories: U.S.–Russia Relations, Foreign Policy & International Relations, U.S.–NATO Relations
Russia and the United States are maintaining "diametrically opposed goals" for resolution in the ongoing war in Ukraine, former Virginia Gov. James Gilmore told Newsmax Saturday while commenting on Friday's summit in Alaska between President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin.
"They're in the same positions," Gilmore told Newsmax's "Wake Up America Weekend." "I'm not surprised that there was not a peace deal yesterday."
He added that he believes Trump "wishes that we would go to a peace deal immediately instead of a ceasefire."
"But my guidance to him this morning, if I were to advise him, would be to buckle up -- that this is going to be a challenge going forward, and the war, I think, will continue, at least for a while," Gilmore added.
Russia's demands include ceding territory, abandoning NATO membership for Ukraine, demilitarizing the country, implementing regime change, and addressing what Moscow calls "root causes," and remain unchanged, he said.
Meanwhile, Gilmore said Ukraine and Trump want a ceasefire but primarily aim to have Russian forces leave Ukrainian territory, stop the war, pay reparations, and return displaced children.
GET TODAY :
is the fastest-growing cable news channel in America with more than 30 million people watching!
Reuters Institute reports is one of the top news brands in the U.S.
You need to watch today.
Get it with great shows from Rob Schmitt, Greta Van Susteren, Greg Kelly, Carl Higbie, Rob Finnerty - and many more!
Find the channel on your cable system -
Sign up for and get , our streaming channel and our military channel World at War.
Find hundreds of shows, movies and specials.
Even get Jon Voight's special series and President Trump's comedy programs and much more!
Watch on your smartphone or home TV app.
Sign Our PetitionThe recent comments made by former Virginia Governor James Gilmore regarding the ongoing conflict between Ukraine and Russia provide a critical lens through which to examine not only the geopolitical realities at play but also the historical context that shapes these dynamics. Gilmore’s assertion that the two countries hold “diametrically opposed goals” is not merely an observation about the present moment; it reflects a long-standing tension rooted in historical grievances, national identities, and international alignments. Understanding these factors is essential, as they inform our perspective on the conflict and the broader implications for global peace and security.
Historically, Ukraine has been caught in the crosshairs of larger geopolitical rivalries, particularly between Western powers and Russia. The dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991 marked a significant turning point for Ukraine, as it sought to establish its sovereignty and align itself more closely with Western institutions like NATO and the European Union. This shift has been met with fierce opposition from Russia, which views Ukraine’s Western orientation as a direct threat to its own national security. The annexation of Crimea in 2014 and the subsequent conflict in Eastern Ukraine are stark reminders of how historical narratives and territorial disputes can escalate into violent confrontations, with both sides entrenching their positions. Gilmore’s comments highlight the stagnation in negotiations, reflecting a broader pattern where historical grievances often override diplomatic efforts.
The ongoing demands from Russia, including calls for regime change and the abandonment of NATO aspirations, reveal an unwillingness to compromise on fundamental issues of national identity and sovereignty. For many Ukrainians, NATO membership represents a safeguard against Russian aggression and a commitment to democratic values. Conversely, Russia's insistence on demilitarization and territorial concessions aligns with its historical strategy of exerting influence over neighboring states. This tug-of-war over Ukraine serves as a microcosm of broader global power struggles, where the stakes are not merely local but resonate with international implications for security and governance.
In the context of current social struggles, the situation in Ukraine also raises questions about the role of international solidarity and humanitarian intervention. The plight of displaced children and the need for reparations underscore the human cost of conflict, reminding us that behind the political rhetoric lies the suffering of ordinary people. As we engage with these discussions, it is vital to advocate for a peace process that prioritizes the voices of those most affected—the civilians caught in the crossfire. This perspective challenges the often militaristic narratives that dominate discussions around national security, urging us to consider the ethical dimensions of our foreign policy.
Moreover, Gilmore's comments echo a broader sentiment within certain political spheres that emphasizes a swift resolution to the conflict through negotiations. However, such a resolution must not come at the expense of justice for the Ukrainian people or the principles of self-determination. A genuine peace process requires acknowledging and addressing the root causes of the conflict, which include historical injustices, economic disparities, and geopolitical maneuvering. As advocates for social justice and peace, it is imperative to push for solutions that are not only politically expedient but also just and equitable.
In conclusion, the ongoing conflict between Ukraine and Russia is a complex interplay of historical narratives, national identities, and geopolitical interests. Gilmore’s remarks serve as a reminder of the deep-seated challenges that lie ahead in achieving lasting peace. As we navigate this landscape, we must remain vigilant in promoting a narrative that prioritizes human rights, justice, and the voices of the marginalized. Engaging with these issues critically allows us to build a more informed and compassionate framework for understanding the intricacies of modern conflict, ultimately fostering a more just world.
The ongoing conflict in Ukraine has become a focal point of international relations, revealing the deep-seated geopolitical tensions that have persisted since the end of the Cold War. The statements made by James Gilmore reflect a simplistic understanding of a complex situation, one that requires a nuanced analysis rather than a binary view of "good" versus "evil." While Gilmore underscores the "diametrically opposed goals" of Russia and the United States, it is essential to unpack the historical and political backdrop that informs these positions. The consequences of this conflict are dire, not only for Ukrainians but also for global stability, as the interplay between national sovereignty and international diplomacy unfolds.
Historically, Ukraine has been at the crossroads of Eastern and Western interests. Its strategic location has made it a buffer state, but it is also a nation with its own rich identity and aspiration for self-determination. The dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991 was a pivotal moment for Ukraine, granting it independence and the chance to forge its own path. However, the subsequent years were marked by internal divisions and external pressures, particularly from Russia, which views Ukraine as part of its sphere of influence. The annexation of Crimea in 2014 and the ongoing conflict in the Donbas region are stark reminders of the fragility of Ukraine's sovereignty. Recognizing this history is crucial for understanding the motivations behind the current demands and positions of both Russia and Ukraine.
As Americans, it is imperative we engage with this issue beyond mere headlines and talk show soundbites. One actionable step is to promote awareness and understanding of the humanitarian implications of the conflict. Supporting organizations that provide aid to displaced persons and war-affected communities in Ukraine can help address the immediate needs of those suffering due to the war. Additionally, advocating for a diplomatic approach that prioritizes dialogue over military solutions is essential. This could involve urging representatives to support policies that foster negotiation rather than exacerbating tensions through military aid or aggressive posturing.
Furthermore, educating ourselves and others about the broader implications of U.S. foreign policy is vital. The rhetoric surrounding NATO expansion and military alliances often overshadows the need for a comprehensive understanding of how these decisions affect global peace. Engaging in discussions about the consequences of militarization versus diplomacy can provide a more balanced perspective that challenges the binary narratives often perpetuated in mainstream media. Encouraging critical thinking and informed discourse can empower individuals to advocate for policies that prioritize de-escalation and conflict resolution.
In conclusion, the situation in Ukraine is emblematic of the challenges that arise in a world shaped by competing national interests. The statements of figures like James Gilmore may reflect a certain political stance, but they also underscore the importance of taking a more profound and comprehensive view of international relations. By promoting humanitarian aid, advocating for diplomatic solutions, and fostering critical discussions about foreign policy, we can better equip ourselves to engage with right-wing perspectives while striving for a more peaceful and just global community. The path forward requires a commitment to recognizing the complexities of these issues, understanding their historical roots, and working toward meaningful solutions that respect the sovereignty and rights of all nations involved.
The ongoing conflict in Ukraine has far-reaching implications not just for the region, but for global peace, security, and international relations. As individuals, there are several concrete actions we can take to advocate for peace, support those affected by the conflict, and influence our leaders.
### Ideas on What We Can Do Personally
1. **Educate Yourself and Others:** - Stay informed about the ongoing conflict, its history, and the various stakeholders involved. Share this knowledge with your community through discussions, social media, or local forums.
2. **Support Humanitarian Organizations:** - Contribute to organizations providing support to those affected by the war in Ukraine. Examples include: - **Doctors Without Borders**: They provide medical assistance and support in conflict zones. - **International Rescue Committee (IRC)**: They focus on helping displaced individuals and communities.
3. **Advocate for Peace Initiatives:** - Engage with local representatives and urge them to support diplomatic efforts rather than military solutions. This can include writing letters or attending town hall meetings.
4. **Participate in Petitions:** - Sign and share petitions that call for peaceful resolutions and humanitarian aid for Ukraine. Examples include: - **Change.org**: Look for petitions focused on peace negotiations and support for Ukrainian refugees. - **MoveOn.org**: They often host petitions related to foreign policy and humanitarian issues.
5. **Contact Government Representatives:** - Write to your elected officials to express your concerns and push for a peaceful resolution. Here’s how you can do that: - **U.S. Congress**: - **Senate**: Contact your state senator. You can find their information at [www.senate.gov](http://www.senate.gov). - **House of Representatives**: Reach out to your representative at [www.house.gov](http://www.house.gov). - **Sample Email Content**: ``` Subject: Urgent Call for Peace in Ukraine
Dear [Representative's Name],
I am writing to urge you to advocate for a peaceful resolution to the conflict in Ukraine. The ongoing violence affects not only those in the region but has global repercussions. I believe that diplomatic efforts should be prioritized over military interventions.
Please support initiatives that promote dialogue and humanitarian assistance for those affected by the conflict. It is essential to work towards a future where all parties can coexist peacefully.
Thank you for your attention to this pressing matter.
Sincerely, [Your Name] [Your Address] [Your Email] ```
6. **Engage in Local Activism:** - Join or support local peace groups or organizations that focus on international relations and humanitarian aid. This could involve attending rallies, talks, or workshops.
7. **Use Social Media for Advocacy:** - Leverage platforms like Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram to raise awareness about the situation in Ukraine. Share articles, infographics, and personal insights to inform your network.
8. **Promote Refugee Assistance Programs:** - Advocate for local programs that help Ukrainian refugees resettle. This can include volunteering your time, donating resources, or providing support for integration initiatives.
9. **Encourage Media Accountability:** - Engage with media outlets to demand responsible reporting that emphasizes the humanitarian aspects of the conflict and avoids sensationalism. Write letters to the editor or participate in media watchdog groups.
10. **Support Peaceful Protests:** - Participate in or organize peaceful demonstrations advocating for a ceasefire and diplomatic solutions. Make sure to comply with local regulations and prioritize safety.
By taking these actionable steps, we can collectively work towards a more peaceful resolution to the conflict in Ukraine, supporting both the immediate needs of those affected and the broader goal of global stability.