AP News Summary at 10:41 a.m. EDT
bakersfield.com -- Saturday, August 16, 2025, 10:57:36 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Categories: U.S.–Russia Relations, Foreign Policy & International Relations, Social Media & Public Statements

Ukraine's Zelenskyy to meet Trump on Monday after US-Russia summit secured no halt to fighting
KYIV, Ukraine (AP) -- Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy says he will meet U.S. President Donald Trump in Washington on Monday after a Russia-U.S. summit concluded without an agreement to stop the fighting in Ukraine after 3 1/2 years. In a reversal only few hours after meeting Russian President Vladimir Putin, Trump said an overall peace agreement, and not a ceasefire, was the best way to end the war. That statement echoed Putin's view that Russia is not interested in a temporary truce, and instead is seeking a long-term settlement that takes Moscow's interests into account. Trump and Ukraine's European allies had been calling for a ceasefire ahead of any negotiations.
Sign Our PetitionThe ongoing conflict in Ukraine has profound implications not only for the region itself but for international relations and global power dynamics. As we see President Zelenskyy preparing to meet with President Trump after a US-Russia summit that yielded little more than rhetoric, it is essential to unravel the broader historical and political context of this situation. The fighting in Ukraine, now in its fourth year, is the result of multiple factors, including the legacy of the Soviet Union, the geopolitics of Eastern Europe, and the machinations of both the U.S. and Russia. This backdrop is critical in understanding why a ceasefire, which would allow for humanitarian relief and stability, is essential for the people of Ukraine, but appears elusive in the current political climate.
The historical roots of the Ukraine conflict can be traced back to the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991. Ukraine's independence was celebrated, yet it also left a power vacuum in Eastern Europe, which Russia is keen to fill. The annexation of Crimea in 2014 and the ongoing conflict in Eastern Ukraine are manifestations of Russian attempts to reassert its influence in what it considers its sphere of influence. For the Ukrainian people, this struggle is not just a territorial dispute; it is a fight for sovereignty, democracy, and their right to align with European institutions. The international community, particularly the West, has a moral obligation to support Ukraine in its quest for self-determination and nationalism free from foreign dominance.
President Trump's recent comments, in which he downplayed the necessity of a ceasefire in favor of a more comprehensive peace agreement, align ominously with a pattern of rhetoric that often prioritizes geopolitical strategy over humanitarian needs. By echoing President Putin, Trump not only undermines the urgent calls for a ceasefire from Ukraine's allies but also reveals a troubling inclination to equate American interests with those of authoritarian regimes. This perspective not only dismisses the realities on the ground for the Ukrainian populace but also perpetuates the idea that peace is negotiable without immediate cessation of violence—an idea that history has shown to be dangerously naive.
The absence of a ceasefire is particularly concerning given the dire humanitarian situation in Ukraine. Civilians continue to bear the brunt of the conflict, with countless families displaced, infrastructure destroyed, and basic services in jeopardy. The international community must recognize that a ceasefire is not merely a tactical pause; it is an essential step towards negotiations that can lead to a sustainable peace. Advocating for a ceasefire is not just a political stance; it is a stance rooted in a commitment to human rights and dignity, reflecting the global obligation to protect vulnerable populations from the ravages of war.
Moreover, the ongoing conflict in Ukraine serves as a reminder of the complexities of international relations and the necessity for a coherent, principled foreign policy. The U.S. has historically positioned itself as a champion of democracy and human rights, yet recent actions suggest a departure from these values. A commitment to supporting Ukraine's sovereignty and advocating for an immediate ceasefire would not only align with longstanding American ideals but also serve as a counter-narrative to the rising tide of authoritarianism globally. As citizens engaged in the discourse around these critical issues, we must urge our leaders to prioritize peace and human rights over short-term geopolitical gains, and to recognize that the path to justice often begins with acknowledging and addressing the immediate needs of those affected by conflict.
The ongoing conflict in Ukraine has drawn significant attention on the international stage, particularly as it involves major global powers such as the United States and Russia. The recent meeting between Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and U.S. President Donald Trump, following a summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin, underscores the complexity of the geopolitical landscape in which the fate of Ukraine is entwined. With the war dragging on for over three and a half years, the absence of a meaningful resolution reflects the historical tensions between NATO and Russia, as well as the sometimes contradictory stances adopted by the U.S. government.
Historically, Ukraine has been a focal point of East-West tensions, particularly since the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991. The annexation of Crimea by Russia in 2014 and its support for separatist movements in Eastern Ukraine marked a significant escalation in hostilities, prompting a response from the West, including sanctions against Russia and military support for Ukraine. However, the U.S. approach has often been characterized by inconsistency and a failure to engage with the needs and demands of all parties involved. Trump's recent statements, which align with Putin's emphasis on a long-term settlement, illustrate this dichotomy and raise questions about U.S. foreign policy priorities.
For Americans looking to address the situation in Ukraine, it is crucial to advocate for a diplomatic approach that prioritizes peace and stability over military escalation. This can be achieved through grassroots activism, lobbying for policies that support conflict resolution, and promoting discussions around the importance of international law and sovereignty. Additionally, raising awareness about the consequences of the U.S. military-industrial complex, which often benefits from prolonged conflicts, can help shift public opinion towards a more peaceful resolution. Engaging in conversations about the humanitarian impact of the war, particularly on civilians in Ukraine, can also encourage a more compassionate and informed perspective among those who may be more aligned with right-wing views.
Moreover, it is essential to consider the role of European allies in this conflict. The European Union has historically played a crucial role in mediating tensions between Russia and Ukraine, and fostering a collaborative approach among Western nations can amplify efforts for a united response. In discussions with those who may be skeptical of U.S. involvement, highlighting the benefits of cooperative diplomacy and the need for a multilateral approach to peace can serve as powerful arguments. By bridging the divide between political ideologies, advocates for peace can stress that a secure and stable Ukraine is in the best interest of the West, as it would contribute to regional security and economic stability.
Lastly, understanding the historical context and the motivations of each party involved is vital in shaping a constructive dialogue. The interests of Russia must be acknowledged, while simultaneously advocating for Ukraine's sovereignty and the rights of its people. Recognizing that long-term solutions require compromise and mutual respect can guide discussions toward viable paths for resolution. By educating ourselves and others on these complex dynamics, we can contribute to a more informed citizenry that demands effective action from our leaders. It is only through informed dialogue, advocacy for peaceful resolutions, and recognition of shared interests that we can hope to foster an environment conducive to lasting peace in Ukraine and beyond.
In light of the ongoing conflict in Ukraine and the recent meeting between President Zelenskyy and President Trump, there are numerous actions individuals can take to advocate for peace and support Ukraine. Here’s a detailed list of ideas that individuals can pursue:
### Personal Actions to Support Peace in Ukraine
1. **Educate Yourself and Others:** - Stay informed about the conflict, its historical context, and current developments. Share this information within your community to foster understanding and action. - Utilize reputable sources such as international news outlets, human rights organizations, and academic journals.
2. **Support Humanitarian Organizations:** - Contribute to organizations providing humanitarian aid to affected populations in Ukraine. Consider supporting: - **Doctors Without Borders** (Médecins Sans Frontières) - [Donate here](https://www.doctorswithoutborders.org/donate) - **International Committee of the Red Cross** - [Donate here](https://www.icrc.org/en/donate) - **UNICEF** - [Support children in Ukraine](https://www.unicef.org/donate) 3. **Engage in Local Activism:** - Attend local activist meetings or protests advocating for peace in Ukraine. Connect with organizations such as: - **Peace Action** - Check for local chapters and events: [Peace Action](https://peaceaction.org/) - **Amnesty International** - Local branches often hold events to raise awareness and mobilize support.
4. **Sign Petitions for Peace:** - Look for and sign petitions aimed at advocating for a ceasefire and diplomatic negotiations. Websites like [Change.org](https://www.change.org/) and [Care2 Petitions](https://www.thepetitionsite.com/) often have active petitions. - Example petition to support peace efforts: "Call for Immediate Ceasefire in Ukraine."
5. **Contact Elected Officials:** - Write to your local representatives to express your stance on the conflict and advocate for diplomatic resolutions. - Example contacts (U.S. Senators): - **Senator Elizabeth Warren**: (202) 224-4543, [email form](https://www.warren.senate.gov/contact) - **Senator Bernie Sanders**: (202) 224-5141, [email form](https://www.sanders.senate.gov/contact/) - Suggested message: - "Dear Senator [Name], I urge you to support diplomatic efforts to secure a ceasefire in Ukraine and to prioritize humanitarian aid for those affected by the ongoing conflict. The situation requires immediate attention to prevent further loss of life."
6. **Social Media Advocacy:** - Use your social media platforms to raise awareness about the conflict and share resources for humanitarian support. - Create posts that highlight actions people can take, tag relevant organizations, and use hashtags like #StandWithUkraine and #PeaceForUkraine.
7. **Host Educational Events:** - Organize or participate in community discussions, webinars, or forums focused on understanding the Ukraine conflict and exploring peaceful solutions. - Collaborate with local universities, community centers, or activist groups to host these events.
8. **Support Ukrainian Culture:** - Attend cultural events, film screenings, or art exhibitions that highlight Ukrainian heritage. This can help foster solidarity and raise awareness about the impact of the conflict on Ukrainian identity.
By taking these actions, individuals can contribute to a broader movement advocating for peace and support for the people of Ukraine. The key is to remain informed, engage with others, and use our voices to demand a cessation of hostilities and a commitment to humanitarian assistance.