Truth and Resistance Dove Logo
Know what you should know!

Home     Categories     Search     Subscribe

Zelenskyy to meet Trump in Washington after Alaska summit

saudigazette.com.sa -- Saturday, August 16, 2025, 9:56:19 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Categories: U.S.–Russia Relations, Foreign Policy & International Relations, Social Media & Public Statements
Zelenskyy to meet Trump in Washington after Alaska summit

KYIV -- Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy will meet U.S. President Donald Trump on Monday in Washington, following the U.S.-Russia summit in Alaska that ended without an agreement to halt the war in Ukraine.

The summit produced what Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin called an "understanding," but no concrete commitments.

On Saturday, Trump shifted his position, saying a comprehensive peace deal -- not a ceasefire -- was now the preferred path to ending the war, aligning more closely with Moscow's long-standing stance.

"It was determined by all that the best way to end the horrific war between Russia and Ukraine is to go directly to a Peace Agreement, which would end the war, and not a mere Ceasefire Agreement," Trump posted after holding calls with Zelenskyy and European leaders.

The European leaders, in a joint statement, welcomed Trump's efforts but stopped short of endorsing his preference for a peace agreement over a ceasefire. They reiterated their support for "just and lasting peace" and Ukraine's sovereignty.

Trump had previously pushed for a ceasefire as a prerequisite to talks. But analysts say his new approach could empower Russia to continue military operations during negotiations.

Zelenskyy, who was not invited to the Alaska summit, said he had a "long and substantive" call with Trump and looked forward to discussing "all of the details regarding ending the killing and the war" in their Monday meeting.

It will be Zelenskyy's first U.S. visit since a tense Oval Office meeting in February, where Trump accused him of being disrespectful.

Trump also held calls with leaders from France, Germany, Italy, the U.K., Finland, Poland, and the European Union. The group expressed readiness to support a trilateral summit involving Ukraine, Russia, and the U.S.

In the statement, the leaders underscored that "Ukraine must have ironclad security guarantees," and that "international borders must not be changed by force." EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas noted that Russia launched fresh attacks on Ukraine even as the delegations met in Alaska.

Zelenskyy said he welcomes the idea of a three-way summit and emphasized that European involvement is essential to any future guarantees. "Key issues can be discussed at the level of leaders, and a trilateral format is suitable for this," he said.

However, Kremlin adviser Yuri Ushakov said the topic of a trilateral meeting "has not been touched upon yet."

Zelenskyy said he told Trump that sanctions on Russia should be strengthened if Moscow avoids honest talks.

Meanwhile, Russian officials described the summit as a symbolic end to Putin's isolation. Former President Dmitry Medvedev called it a "breakthrough," and Russian media portrayed Putin as reemerging on the world stage.

Despite the diplomatic theater, violence continued overnight. Ukraine's air force reported that it shot down 61 of 85 Shahed drones launched by Russia, which also fired a ballistic missile. Russian forces struck regions including Sumy, Dnipropetrovsk, Donetsk, and Chernihiv. Russia claimed it downed 29 Ukrainian drones over its territory and the Sea of Azov.

The 1,000-kilometer (620-mile) front line remains active, with Russian forces capturing more territory in recent months.

"Putin came to the Alaska summit with the principal goal of stalling any pressure on Russia to end the war," said Neil Melvin of the Royal United Services Institute. "He will consider the outcome a mission accomplished." -- Agencies

Expand

Sign Our Petition


Opinion:

The recent meeting between Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and U.S. President Donald Trump in Washington, following the inconclusive U.S.-Russia summit in Alaska, underscores the complexity of international diplomacy in times of conflict. The backdrop of this meeting is not merely a bilateral maneuver; it represents the intricate web of historical grievances, power dynamics, and the ongoing struggle for sovereignty that defines Ukraine's relationship with both its neighbors and global powers. The lack of a firm commitment from the summit in Alaska highlights a broader pattern of diplomatic failures that have plagued efforts to resolve the conflict in Ukraine since its inception in 2014, following Russia's annexation of Crimea.

Historically, Ukraine has been caught in the crosshairs of larger geopolitical struggles, primarily between Russia and the West. The 2014 revolution, which was largely driven by widespread discontent with the Yanukovych administration’s pivot toward Russia, ignited a national identity crisis that has persisted. The ongoing conflict, now in its ninth year, serves as a stark reminder of the fragility of national sovereignty when external powers assert their influence. Trump's recent pivot toward a peace agreement rather than a ceasefire echoes the historical trend of powerful nations prioritizing their strategic interests over the immediate needs of the nations caught in conflict. This situation calls into question the sincerity of diplomatic overtures and the extent to which they serve the interests of those most affected by the violence.

Moreover, Trump's evolving position on the nature of the agreement reflects a dangerous inclination to align with Moscow’s narrative. While he suggests that a comprehensive peace deal is the preferred path, this could inadvertently empower Russia to continue its aggressive military strategies under the guise of negotiation. Analysts have raised concerns that by prioritizing a peace agreement, Trump risks legitimizing Russia's actions and undermining Ukraine's sovereignty. As the European leaders emphasized in their joint statement, any solution must prioritize Ukraine's territorial integrity and international borders. The historical precedent of appeasement in the face of aggression serves as a cautionary tale for contemporary leaders: conceding to strongmen often invites further destabilization rather than resolution.

Zelenskyy's insistence on strengthening sanctions against Russia is a crucial point that reflects the ongoing struggle for accountability on the international stage. The call for reinforced sanctions underlines a vital aspect of social justice in international relations: the need to hold aggressors accountable for their actions. History has shown that economic sanctions can be an effective tool for curbing aggressive behavior when they are part of a broader strategy that includes diplomatic engagement and a commitment to supporting the affected populations. The plight of Ukrainians, caught in the crossfire of geopolitical maneuvering, underscores the importance of international solidarity and support, particularly from allies who share commitments to democratic principles and human rights.

In the context of contemporary geopolitical affairs, the events surrounding Zelenskyy’s meeting with Trump should prompt a deeper reflection on the role of the United States in global conflicts. The U.S. has historically positioned itself as a champion of democracy and human rights, yet its actions often reflect a complex interplay of interests that can undermine these principles. The discussions of a trilateral summit between Ukraine, Russia, and the U.S. highlight the importance of inclusive dialogues that respect the agency of all involved parties. As the situation develops, it is essential for advocates of peace and justice to remain vigilant in their calls for equitable solutions that prioritize the voices and rights of those directly impacted by the conflict.

Ultimately, the ongoing struggle in Ukraine serves as a microcosm of broader global issues, including nationalism, the fight for self-determination, and the quest for stable governance in the face of external pressures. It is imperative for those engaged in these discussions to emphasize the historical lessons learned from similar conflicts, underscoring the need for a principled approach that prioritizes human dignity and sovereignty. Engaging right-wing narratives requires an awareness of these complexities, challenging them to consider the long-term implications of their stance on peace and justice in global affairs. The path to a lasting resolution remains fraught with challenges, but it is essential that the voices of those seeking justice and peace in Ukraine are not drowned out by the political posturing of powerful leaders.

Action:

The recent developments surrounding the Ukraine conflict and the diplomatic engagements between U.S. President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy are emblematic of the complex geopolitical landscape that has persisted since Russia's annexation of Crimea in 2014. In this latest instance, we witness a significant shift in U.S. foreign policy, as Trump’s newfound preference for a comprehensive peace agreement over a ceasefire raises critical concerns. The historical context of this conflict, rooted in deep-seated territorial and political disputes, reveals the precariousness of the situation, particularly for Ukraine, which continues to grapple with the ramifications of Russian aggression and the ongoing violation of its sovereignty.

Trump's alignment with Moscow’s stance—favoring a peace agreement that could be construed as legitimizing Russia's ongoing military actions—demands scrutiny. The lack of a robust commitment from the U.S. and its allies not only jeopardizes Ukraine’s national security but also emboldens an aggressor that has repeatedly disregarded international norms. The fact that Trump has shifted his rhetoric, now advocating for negotiations that could allow Russia to consolidate its territorial gains, highlights a troubling inconsistency in U.S. policy that has historically aimed to uphold Ukraine’s sovereignty. This inconsistency poses a challenge for the international community, particularly for European allies who have committed to supporting Ukraine through sanctions and military aid.

As concerned citizens, we must engage in a multifaceted approach to advocate for a foreign policy that robustly supports Ukraine and counters any leniency towards Russian aggression. One of the primary actions we can take is to leverage our voices in favor of humanitarian assistance and military support for Ukraine, ensuring that our representatives understand the importance of a strong, unified stance against Russia. Additionally, we should demand increased sanctions against Russia, particularly in response to any military escalation. This includes encouraging our legislators to push back against any proposals that would ease sanctions without significant concessions from Moscow regarding its actions in Ukraine.

Furthermore, educational initiatives aimed at raising awareness about the historical and political implications of the Ukraine conflict are essential. Providing resources and fostering discussions within our communities can help create a more informed electorate that recognizes the urgency of supporting democratic nations resisting authoritarianism. By creating platforms for dialogue and collaboration, we can mobilize grassroots efforts that pressure our government to prioritize international law and human rights in its foreign policy decisions.

Lastly, we must scrutinize the narratives presented in the media concerning this conflict. The portrayal of Ukraine as a mere pawn in a larger geopolitical game undermines its sovereignty and agency. By actively promoting accurate representations of the conflict and its implications, we enhance public understanding and support for a policy that prioritizes the principles of democracy and self-determination. Engaging in conversations with those who may hold opposing views, while emphasizing the importance of standing with Ukraine, can shift perspectives and foster a more compassionate and informed dialogue on this critical issue.

In conclusion, as Americans, our responsibility lies not only in holding our leaders accountable but also in actively participating in the discourse surrounding U.S. foreign policy. The situation in Ukraine is a call to action, urging us to advocate for a principled approach that honors international law and supports nations fighting against encroaching authoritarianism. By harnessing our collective voice, we can contribute to a global stance that seeks to uphold peace, security, and the fundamental rights of nations to determine their own futures.

To Do:

Analyzing the situation surrounding the meeting between President Zelenskyy and President Trump, as well as the broader implications of the U.S.-Russia summit, several actionable steps can be taken by individuals to advocate for a more just and peaceful resolution to the conflict in Ukraine. Here’s a detailed list of ideas and actions you can take:

### 1. Educate Yourself and Others - **Action**: Stay informed about the ongoing conflict and the geopolitical dynamics involved. Share articles, host discussions, or facilitate study groups focused on Ukraine's situation, the implications of U.S. foreign policy, and the importance of diplomatic solutions. - **Example**: Organize a local meetup or online webinar discussing the history of U.S.-Russia relations and Ukraine, inviting experts or activists to share their insights.

### 2. Advocate for Stronger Support for Ukraine - **Action**: Write to your local representatives urging them to support increased humanitarian and military aid for Ukraine, ensuring it is aligned with humanitarian principles and aimed at restoring peace. - **Who to Write To**: - Your local U.S. Representative (find contact information at [house.gov](https://www.house.gov)) - Your local U.S. Senator (find contact information at [senate.gov](https://www.senate.gov)) - **What to Say**: Express your support for Ukraine's sovereignty and territorial integrity. Encourage them to advocate for a diplomatic resolution that prioritizes human rights and security for civilians.

### 3. Sign and Promote Petitions - **Action**: Find and sign petitions that call for peace initiatives, stronger sanctions against any aggressors, or increased humanitarian aid. - **Example**: Use platforms like Change.org or MoveOn.org to find relevant petitions. You can also create your own petition if you have a specific call to action in mind. - **Real-World Example**: A petition could call for Congress to allocate funds specifically for humanitarian aid in Ukraine. You can start this petition on platforms like Change.org.

### 4. Engage with Activist Organizations - **Action**: Join or support organizations that focus on peacebuilding and international diplomacy. - **Examples of Organizations**: - **Amnesty International**: Focuses on human rights violations and advocacy. - **Human Rights Watch**: Monitors and reports on global human rights issues. - **Peace Action**: Works on promoting peace and disarmament. - **How to Engage**: Volunteer your time, donate, or participate in campaigns they organize.

### 5. Use Social Media for Advocacy - **Action**: Use your social media platforms to raise awareness about Ukraine and the importance of diplomatic efforts. - **What to Post**: Share articles, infographics, and calls to action. Engage in discussions about the importance of peace negotiations and the consequences of military escalation. - **Example Hashtags**: #StandWithUkraine, #PeaceInUkraine, #DiplomacyFirst

### 6. Contact and Hold Accountable Key Decision-Makers - **Action**: Directly contact key figures involved in U.S. foreign policy regarding Ukraine to express your views. - **Who to Write To**: - Secretary of State Antony Blinken - Email: contact@state.gov - Mailing Address: U.S. Department of State, 2201 C Street NW, Washington, D.C. 20520 - President Joe Biden - Email: contact form on [whitehouse.gov](https://www.whitehouse.gov/contact/) - Mailing Address: The White House, 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, D.C. 20500 - **What to Say**: Urge them to prioritize diplomatic solutions over military aggression, and highlight the importance of protecting human rights in Ukraine.

### 7. Participate in Local Demonstrations - **Action**: Join or organize peaceful protests advocating for peace in Ukraine and against the escalation of conflict. - **How to Find Events**: Check local community boards, Facebook groups, or event pages for gatherings focused on peace and Ukraine.

### Conclusion Every individual has the power to influence the conversation and push for more effective and compassionate policies regarding the conflict in Ukraine. By taking these actions, you can contribute to a broader movement advocating for peace, justice, and security in the region.


Sign Our Petition



10 Related Article(s):

High-Stakes Diplomacy in Anchorage: Trump and Putin to Meet | Politics

Putin has 'opportunity' to agree to Ukraine ceasefire during Trump talks

Ukrainian drones blows up Russian ship carrying Iranian UAV parts, hits oil refinery ahead of Trump-Putin meet

Russian troops make gains in Ukraine ahead of the Putin-Trump summit

Trump and Putin set for high-stakes Alaska summit amid Ukraine tensions

Lukashenko, Trump hold phone call

Zelensky says Kyiv 'counting on America' ahead of 'high stakes' meeting with Russia

European Leaders Unite in Support for Ukraine Post-Alaska Summit | Politics

Trump seeks US-Russia-Ukraine summit after Putin meeting fails to secure ceasefire | FOX 28 Spokane

Global Leaders React to Trump-Putin Summit | Politics


Updated very often
All Opinions and Actions are (C)opyright 2025 - TruthAndResistance.com