Trump leaves Alaska summit with Putin empty-handed
maitlandmercury.com.au -- Friday, August 15, 2025, 11:29:33 PM Eastern Daylight Time
Categories: Foreign Policy & International Relations, U.S.–Russia Relations, Media Coverage & Press Relations
Donald Trump has failed to secure an agreement from Vladimir Putin to end Russia's war in Ukraine, falling short in his most significant move yet to stop the bloodshed, even after rolling out the red carpet for the man who started it.
"There's no deal until there's a deal," the US president said, after Putin claimed they had hammered out an "understanding" on Ukraine and warned Europe not to "torpedo the nascent progress".
Trump said he would call Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy and European leaders to brief them on the talks.
Trump, who for years has baulked at American support for Ukraine and expressed admiration for Putin, had pledged confidently to bring about an end to the war on his first day back in the White House.
Seven months later, after berating Zelenskiy in the Oval Office and staunching the flow of some US military assistance to Kyiv, Trump could not bring Putin even to pause the fighting, as his forces make gains on the battlefield.
The US president had offered Putin both a carrot and a stick, issuing threats of punishing economic sanctions on Russia while also extending a warm welcome at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage, but he appeared to walk away without any concrete progress on ending the war in Ukraine, now in its fourth year.
Instead, he handed Putin long-sought recognition on the international stage, after years of Western efforts to make him a pariah over the war and his crackdown on dissent, and forestalled the threat of additional US sanctions.
In a sign that the conversations did not yield Trump's preferred result, the two leaders ended what was supposed to be a joint news conference without taking questions from reporters.
During a subsequent interview with Fox News before leaving Alaska, Trump insisted the onus going forward might be somehow on Zelenskiy "to get it done", but said there would also be some involvement from European nations.
That was notable since Zelenskiy was excluded from Trump and Putin's meeting.
The US president had wanted to show off his deal-making skills, while Putin wanted to negotiate a deal that would cement Russia's gains, block Kyiv's bid to join the NATO military alliance and eventually pull Ukraine back into Moscow's orbit.
"We had an extremely productive meeting, and many points were agreed to," Trump said while standing next to Putin.
"And there are just a very few that are left. Some are not that significant. One is probably the most significant, but we have a very good chance of getting there."
He continued: "We didn't get there."
Putin says Trump 'shows understanding' that Russia has its own interests.
For Putin, just being on US soil for the first time in more than a decade was validation after being ostracised following his invasion of Ukraine.
His meeting with Trump may stall economic sanctions the US presiden promised unless Moscow worked harder to bring the fighting to a close. It also may simply lead to more meetings, giving his forces more time to make progress on the battlefield.
Putin said Russia and the US should "turn the page and go back to co-operation".
He praised Trump as someone who "has a clear idea of what he wants to achieve and sincerely cares about the prosperity of his country, and at the same time shows understanding that Russia has its own national interests".
"I expect that today's agreements will become a reference point not only for solving the Ukrainian problem, but will also mark the beginning of the restoration of businesslike, pragmatic relations between Russia and the US," Putin said.
Despite not reaching any major breakthrough, Trump ended his remarks by thanking Putin and saying, "we'll speak to you very soon and probably see you again very soon".
When Putin smiled and offered, "next time in Moscow", Trump said "that's an interesting one" and said he might face criticism but "I could see it possibly happening".
When Trump and Putin arrived in Alaska, they greeted each other with a warm handshake, chatting almost like old friends, and gripped hands for an extended period on a red carpet rolled out at the military base.
As they chatted, Putin grinned and pointed skyward, where B-2s and F-22s -- military aircraft designed to oppose Russia during the Cold War -- flew overhead.
The two then shared the US presidential limo for a short ride to their meeting site, with Putin offering a broad smile as they rolled past the cameras.
It was the kind of reception typically reserved for close US allies and belied the bloodshed and suffering in the war Putin started in Ukraine.
Although not altogether surprising considering their longtime friendly relationship, such outward friendliness likely raised concerns from Zelenskiy and European leaders, who fear Trump is primarily focusing on furthering US interests and not pressing hard enough for Ukraine's.
Sign Our PetitionThe recent summit between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin in Alaska has revealed a profound paradox at the heart of contemporary international relations, particularly in terms of America's role as a global leader. Trump’s inability to secure any substantial progress towards ending the ongoing war in Ukraine, which has now entered its fourth year, raises critical questions about the effectiveness of U.S. foreign policy and the implications for Ukraine and global democratic movements. Historically, American leadership has been characterized by its commitment to supporting allies in the face of aggression, yet this summit showcased a retreat from that tradition, as Trump appeared to validate Putin’s ambitions rather than challenge them.
The backdrop of this meeting is marked by the historical relationship between the U.S. and Russia, shaped by decades of Cold War tensions and ideological battles. Since the dissolution of the Soviet Union, the West has largely viewed Russia with suspicion, especially in light of its annexation of Crimea in 2014 and its ongoing military aggression in Ukraine. The stark reality is that the current conflict is not merely a territorial dispute; it represents a larger struggle for democracy, sovereignty, and self-determination against authoritarianism. By failing to hold Putin accountable, Trump not only undermines Ukrainian sovereignty but also sends a dangerous message to other authoritarian regimes that aggression can be met with impunity.
Moreover, the summit's outcomes reflect a concerning trajectory in U.S. foreign policy under Trump, which has often prioritized personal diplomacy over strategic alliances and multilateral coalitions. Trump’s previous rhetoric, which frequently cast doubt on U.S. support for NATO and American commitments to global democracy, has emboldened adversaries like Putin, who thrive in environments where democratic institutions are weakened. The notion that Zelenskiy, the democratically elected leader of Ukraine, should bear the burden of negotiating peace is not only an abdication of American responsibility but also a stark reminder of how the voices and rights of those fighting for democracy can be marginalized.
The ramifications of this summit extend beyond the immediate geopolitical context; they resonate deeply with ongoing social struggles within both the United States and Ukraine. For many in the U.S., Trump’s actions signify a broader trend of disengagement from international humanitarian responsibilities, one that parallels domestic issues such as the fight for racial justice and economic equality. Just as marginalized communities in America are often silenced or overlooked in policy discussions, so too are the voices of those resisting tyranny abroad. This parallels the struggle for global solidarity, where the fight for justice requires a unified front that acknowledges the interconnectedness of democratic movements worldwide.
In light of these developments, it is imperative for those concerned with social justice and democratic integrity to critically evaluate and challenge the narratives surrounding U.S. foreign policy. The failure to hold authoritarian leaders accountable not only risks the erosion of democratic norms abroad but also feeds into a narrative that undermines the very fabric of democratic governance at home. As Trump leaves the summit without a fruitful outcome, it becomes increasingly clear that the path to a just and peaceful resolution in Ukraine—and more broadly, the fight for democracy—requires a recommitment to solidarity, accountability, and the recognition that the struggles for justice around the world are inextricably linked.
The recent summit in Alaska between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin reveals a troubling reality in U.S. foreign policy and the broader implications for global stability. While the Trump administration has often touted its ability to negotiate, the outcome of this meeting illustrates a lack of genuine commitment to resolving one of the most pressing conflicts of our time: Russia's ongoing war in Ukraine. The absence of a tangible agreement, despite Trump's overtures to both Putin and European leaders, steers us deeper into a quagmire where the stakes include not only the lives of Ukrainians but the fundamental principles of international law and democracy.
Historically, the United States has prided itself on being a champion of democratic values and a bulwark against autocratic regimes. However, Trump's warm reception of Putin, a leader notorious for his authoritarian tendencies and military aggression, raises important questions about the U.S.'s role in promoting democracy and human rights worldwide. The meeting serves as a reminder that past administrations have navigated complex geopolitical landscapes without compromising these values. The juxtaposition of Trump's rhetoric with his actions suggests an alarming departure from a principled stance, creating a vacuum that can only further embolden authoritarian figures like Putin.
This situation calls for proactive measures by concerned citizens and advocacy groups. Americans can leverage this moment to engage in meaningful conversations about foreign policy, emphasizing the importance of supporting Ukraine not just as a matter of national interest, but as a moral imperative. Grassroots campaigns aimed at raising awareness about the consequences of Russian aggression can galvanize public support for continued military and humanitarian aid to Ukraine. Furthermore, engaging with local representatives to advocate for policies that prioritize human rights and democratic integrity in U.S. foreign relations can help reshape the narrative surrounding our international commitments.
Moreover, as the international community grapples with the implications of this summit, it is imperative to recognize that diplomacy must be rooted in accountability. The U.S. should not only hold Russia accountable for its actions but also reaffirm its commitments to NATO allies and other nations under threat. Citizens can mobilize to support policies that impose economic sanctions on Russia until it ceases its aggression and respects Ukraine's sovereignty. Creating coalitions with like-minded organizations and activists can amplify the demand for strong action against autocracy, fostering a collective voice that cannot be ignored.
Lastly, education plays a crucial role in shaping public perception and policy. Americans must be informed about the intricacies of U.S.-Russia relations, including the historical context of the Ukraine conflict and the implications of appeasement strategies. Educational initiatives that focus on international relations, democracy promotion, and human rights can empower citizens to advocate effectively for a foreign policy grounded in ethical considerations rather than transactional diplomacy. By disseminating knowledge and fostering critical discussions, we can equip ourselves and others to challenge narratives that favor authoritarianism and undermine democratic values.
In summary, the recent developments from the Alaska summit should serve as a clarion call for action. By promoting dialogue, advocating for accountability, and prioritizing education, we can work together to ensure that U.S. foreign policy reflects our core values and actively supports democratic movements worldwide. The responsibility lies with all of us to engage, inform, and advocate for a future where autocracy does not prevail over democracy, and where the United States stands firm in its role as a defender of human rights and international justice.
In light of the recent developments surrounding the Trump-Putin summit and the ongoing conflict in Ukraine, it’s crucial to mobilize and take meaningful action. Here’s a list of ideas on how we can personally contribute to addressing these pressing issues.
### What Can We Personally Do About This?
1. **Educate Ourselves and Others**: Understanding the complexities of the Ukraine conflict and U.S. foreign policy can help us engage more effectively in discussions around these topics. - **Action**: Organize or participate in community discussions or book clubs focused on international relations and the Ukraine conflict. Share articles, documentaries, and expert analyses with friends and family.
2. **Advocate for Strong Support for Ukraine**: It is essential to maintain and strengthen U.S. support for Ukraine, both militarily and economically. - **Action**: Write letters to your representatives expressing your support for continued assistance to Ukraine. Emphasize the importance of standing against aggression and supporting democratic nations.
3. **Engage in Grassroots Movements**: Join or support organizations that advocate for peace, democracy, and human rights in Ukraine. - **Action**: Volunteer for or donate to groups like the **Ukrainian National Women's League of America** (UNWLA) or **World Central Kitchen**, which provide humanitarian assistance.
### Exact Actions We Can Take
1. **Petition for Congressional Action**: - **Action**: Start or sign petitions urging Congress to increase military and humanitarian aid to Ukraine. - **Example**: Use platforms like **Change.org** to start a petition that calls for increased sanctions on Russia and support for Ukraine.
2. **Contact Your Elected Officials**: - **Who to Write To**: Your local congressional representatives and senators. You can find their contact information on [Congress.gov](https://www.congress.gov/). - **Example Contacts**: - **Senator [Name]** (insert your state's senator) - Email: [insert email] - Phone: [insert phone number] - **Representative [Name]** (insert your congressional representative) - Email: [insert email] - Phone: [insert phone number] - **What to Say**: - "Dear [Senator/Representative Name], I am writing to express my concern regarding the ongoing conflict in Ukraine and the recent summit between President Trump and President Putin. I urge you to support robust military and humanitarian aid to Ukraine and impose stringent sanctions on Russia to deter further aggression. It is vital that the U.S. stands firm in its commitment to democratic values and international law. Thank you for your attention to this pressing matter."
3. **Social Media Advocacy**: - **Action**: Use your social media platforms to raise awareness about the situation in Ukraine and call for action. - **Example**: Share statistics, personal stories, and calls to action using hashtags like #StandWithUkraine or #SupportUkraine.
4. **Organize a Fundraiser**: - **Action**: Host an event to raise funds for organizations providing assistance to Ukraine. - **Example**: Organize a dinner, bake sale, or online auction, with proceeds going to reputable organizations like **Direct Relief** or **International Rescue Committee**.
5. **Attend Local Events and Rallies**: - **Action**: Participate in local demonstrations or discussions focused on foreign policy and support for Ukraine. - **Example**: Look for events through platforms like **Eventbrite** or local community boards, and consider organizing your own event to raise awareness.
By taking these actions, we can collectively contribute to a more informed and proactive response to the ongoing crisis in Ukraine. Every effort counts, and together we can make a difference.