Truth and Resistance Dove Logo
Know what you should know!

Home     Categories     Search     Subscribe

British personnel ready to arrive in Ukraine once fighting on hold - Government

somersetcountygazette.co.uk -- Friday, August 15, 2025, 7:57:13 PM Eastern Daylight Time
Categories: U.S.–Russia Relations, Foreign Policy & International Relations, U.S.–NATO Relations
British personnel ready to arrive in Ukraine once fighting on hold - Government

Russian President Vladimir Putin has met his US counterpart Donald Trump in Anchorage, Alaska, where they discussed the conflict after more than three years of fighting in eastern Europe but failed to strike a deal.

After talking for nearly three hours, they refused to answer questions from reporters, but both made statements, with Mr Trump saying "some great progress" was made with "many points" agreed to, and "very few" remaining.

The UK Government earlier this summer backed international efforts to set up a "Multinational Force Ukraine", a military plan to bolster Ukraine's defences once the conflict eases, in a bid to ward off future Russian aggression.

"Planning has continued on an enduring basis to ensure that a force can deploy in the days following the cessation of hostilities," an MoD spokesperson said.

According to the Government, "along with securing Ukraine's skies and supporting safer seas, the force is expected to regenerate land forces by providing logistics, armaments, and training expertise".

It "will strengthen Ukraine's path to peace and stability by supporting the regeneration of Ukraine's own forces", the spokesperson added.

Early designs for the Multinational Force Ukraine were originally drafted last month, after military chiefs met in Paris to agree a strategy and co-ordinate plans with the EU, Nato, the US and more than 200 planners.

Russian forces invaded Ukraine in February 2022.

Moments before Mr Trump touched down in Anchorage, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky wrote on X that Saturday "will start early for everyone in Europe" as leaders react to the Alaska summit.

"We continue co-ordinating with our partners in Europe," Mr Zelensky said, and added: "Russia must end the war that it itself started and has been dragging out for years.

"The killings must stop. A meeting of leaders is needed - at the very least, Ukraine, America, and the Russian side - and it is precisely in such a format that effective decisions are possible."

When he addressed the press, Mr Putin said he greeted Mr Trump on the tarmac as "dear neighbour" and added: "Our countries, though separated by the oceans, are close neighbours."

According to a translation carried by broadcasters, he claimed the "situation in Ukraine has to do with fundamental threats to our security".

Stood next to Mr Putin in front of the words "Pursuing Peace", Mr Trump said: "We haven't quite got there but we've made some headway."

He stressed "there's no deal until there's a deal" and added: "I will call up Nato in a little while.

"I will call up the various people that I think are appropriate, and I'll of course call up President Zelensky and tell him about today's meeting."

Concluding their exchange, the US president said: "We'll speak to you very soon and probably see you again very soon.

Mr Trump said: "That's an interesting one. I'll get a little heat for that one.

Expand

Sign Our Petition


Opinion:

The ongoing conflict in Ukraine is a stark reminder of how historical grievances can manifest into modern geopolitical strife. The recent meeting between Russian President Vladimir Putin and U.S. President Donald Trump in Anchorage, Alaska, signals a significant moment amidst the backdrop of the tumultuous war that began with Russia’s invasion in February 2022. The conflicting narratives around this meeting reflect deeper historical tensions, particularly the legacy of post-Cold War policies and the expansion of NATO, which have often been viewed through the lens of Western imperialism and its implications for global stability. Critics argue that rather than fostering peace, these policies have exacerbated conflicts and created environments ripe for authoritarianism, as seen in Russia's aggressive posturing.

The UK Government's announcement of preparations for a "Multinational Force Ukraine" highlights an emerging paradigm in global military cooperation, one that seeks to counterbalance perceived Russian aggression. However, this approach raises important questions about the effectiveness of military intervention in achieving long-term peace. Historical examples abound where military solutions have failed to address the root causes of conflict, leading instead to cycles of violence and further destabilization. In Afghanistan and Iraq, for example, international military interventions were initially framed as efforts to promote democracy and stability; yet, they resulted in decades of conflict and suffering. The plan to bolster Ukraine’s defenses may be seen as a necessary response to aggression, but it also risks entrenching a militarized solution in a region already on the brink of humanitarian catastrophe.

Moreover, the rhetoric surrounding the Anchorage summit, particularly Trump’s characterization of "great progress" and "many points" agreed upon, should be approached with skepticism. The historical context of U.S.-Russia relations is fraught with moments of diplomatic failure, often resulting in severe consequences for affected populations. The idea of engaging in dialogues while simultaneously preparing for military escalation reflects a troubling duality in international relations—one that prioritizes power dynamics over the humanitarian needs of those suffering in conflict zones. The call for a meeting among leaders, as emphasized by Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, underscores the critical need for genuine diplomatic efforts rather than superficial agreements that may provide temporary respite but do not address the underlying issues.

Social justice advocates often emphasize the importance of centering the voices of those directly impacted by conflict. In Ukraine, the civilian toll of the ongoing war is astronomical, with thousands killed and millions displaced. The push for greater military support must be balanced with a commitment to humanitarian aid and rebuilding efforts. This dual approach recognizes that peace cannot be achieved through force alone; it necessitates addressing the systemic injustices that lead to war in the first place. As the international community navigates these complex dynamics, it is imperative to prioritize the voices of Ukrainians who have suffered the consequences of geopolitical machinations and to advocate for solutions that prioritize human dignity over strategic gains.

Ultimately, the situation in Ukraine, alongside the rhetoric from global leaders, serves as a reminder of the interconnectedness of historical legacies, military strategies, and social justice. As the UK prepares to support a new multinational military force, it is essential to engage in discussions that critically analyze the ramifications of such actions. The challenge lies in fostering a genuine peace process that transcends military solutions and addresses the fundamental inequities that fuel conflicts. In doing so, advocates can better equip themselves with the historical insights and socio-political analyses necessary to engage meaningfully in conversations about war, peace, and the role of international power dynamics in shaping the world we inhabit.

Action:

The recent developments regarding the conflict in Ukraine and the international response highlight a complex interplay of geopolitical interests, military strategy, and humanitarian concerns. The proposal of a Multinational Force to support Ukraine indicates a significant shift in the West's approach to the ongoing crisis sparked by Russia's invasion in 2022. As the situation unfolds, it is critical to reflect on the historical context and the implications of such military strategies, especially in light of the moral and ethical stakes involved.

Historically, Ukraine has been at the crossroads of East and West, serving as a buffer state between Russia and NATO-aligned Europe. The tensions that led to the conflict can be traced back to a long history of Russian imperialism and the collapse of the Soviet Union, which left Ukraine in a precarious position. The 2014 annexation of Crimea by Russia and the ensuing war in Eastern Ukraine provided the backdrop for the current geopolitical landscape. The creation of the Multinational Force, therefore, is not merely a response to current hostilities but also a continuation of the West's long-standing commitment to European security and stability. The role of the United States and its allies in this context raises questions about the effectiveness of military solutions in achieving lasting peace.

In the face of such military engagements, it is imperative for citizens to engage critically with the narratives being presented. The rhetoric surrounding the Multinational Force and the discussions between leaders like Trump and Putin often simplify complex geopolitical issues into binary good-versus-evil narratives. This oversimplification risks masking the nuanced realities of war, where civilian casualties and humanitarian crises are often the most immediate consequences. As Americans, we have a responsibility to hold our leaders accountable, demanding transparency and a focus on diplomatic solutions that prioritize human rights and the welfare of affected populations.

So, what actions can we take to influence the course of this situation? First and foremost, we can advocate for a robust diplomatic approach to resolving the conflict. This includes supporting initiatives that promote dialogue among all parties involved, including Russia, rather than solely relying on military options. Grassroots movements and organizations can play a critical role in pushing for peace negotiations and humanitarian assistance, ensuring that the voices of the Ukrainian people and other affected communities are heard. Additionally, engaging with our representatives in Congress to prioritize international diplomacy over military escalation can create pressure to reconsider the current trajectory.

Furthermore, there is a need for educational initiatives aimed at raising awareness about the complexities of international conflict. Community forums, discussions, and workshops can help demystify the conflict in Ukraine and foster a more informed citizenry. This can empower individuals to engage in meaningful discussions, challenging the narratives presented by political leaders and mainstream media. By fostering a culture of informed conversation, we can create a constituency that demands more than just military interventions, advocating for comprehensive solutions that address the root causes of conflict.

In conclusion, the evolving situation in Ukraine serves as a critical reminder of the interplay between military engagement and diplomatic efforts in international relations. While the establishment of a Multinational Force may seem like a necessary step for some, it is essential to confront the broader implications of such actions. As engaged citizens, we must advocate for alternative strategies that emphasize diplomacy, humanitarian support, and the protection of human rights. By doing so, we not only contribute to a more peaceful resolution in Ukraine but also set a precedent for how we approach future conflicts around the globe.

To Do:

In light of the recent developments regarding the conflict in Ukraine and the international responses, there are several actions that individuals can take to advocate for peace, support humanitarian efforts, and push for diplomatic solutions. Here’s a detailed list of ideas and real-world examples for personal action:

### 1. **Advocate for Peace and Diplomacy** - **Write to Your Representatives**: Reach out to your local and national representatives to express your concerns about military involvement and advocate for diplomatic negotiations. - **What to Say**: Emphasize the importance of prioritizing diplomacy over military responses. Suggest that they support initiatives aimed at bringing all parties to the negotiating table. - **Who to Write**: - **Your local Congressman or Congresswoman**: Find their contact information at [house.gov](https://www.house.gov) or [senate.gov](https://www.senate.gov). - **Example Email**: ``` Subject: Urgent Call for Diplomatic Solutions in Ukraine

Dear [Representative's Name],

I am writing to urge you to support diplomatic initiatives aimed at resolving the conflict in Ukraine. The recent discussions between world leaders highlight the need for a negotiated peace, rather than increased military involvement. I believe it is imperative that our government prioritizes dialogue and seeks to bring all parties to the table to end hostilities and promote stability.

Thank you for your attention to this urgent matter.

Sincerely, [Your Name] [Your Address] ```

### 2. **Support Humanitarian Initiatives** - **Donate to Reputable Organizations**: Contribute to organizations providing humanitarian aid to affected areas in Ukraine. - **Example Organizations**: - **Doctors Without Borders (Médecins Sans Frontières)**: [donate here](https://www.doctorswithoutborders.org/donate). - **UNICEF**: Focused on supporting children and families in Ukraine. [donate here](https://www.unicef.org/donate). - **Volunteer Locally**: Many communities are organizing efforts to support refugees. Look for local NGOs or community organizations that are helping those displaced by the conflict.

### 3. **Raise Awareness** - **Organize or Participate in Local Events**: Join or organize community discussions, forums, or vigils that focus on peace-building and conflict resolution. - **Utilize Social Media**: Share information about the conflict, its humanitarian impacts, and promote peaceful resolutions. Use platforms like Twitter, Instagram, and Facebook to amplify voices that call for peace.

### 4. **Petitions and Campaigns** - **Start or Sign Petitions**: Platforms like Change.org or Avaaz allow individuals to create and sign petitions that call for specific actions from government officials. - **Example Petition**: Start a petition urging your government to prioritize diplomatic solutions in Ukraine rather than military escalation. - **What to Include**: A brief description of the situation, the importance of diplomacy, and a call to action for signatories.

### 5. **Engage with Local Media** - **Write Op-Eds or Letters to the Editor**: Express your views on the conflict and the need for a diplomatic approach in local newspapers or community newsletters. - **Contact Local Journalists**: Share your insights and encourage them to cover stories that highlight peace initiatives and humanitarian efforts.

### 6. **Join Advocacy Groups** - **Become a Member of Peace Advocacy Organizations**: Join groups that focus on peace-building and conflict resolution, such as: - **Peace Action**: [peaceaction.org](https://www.peaceaction.org) - **The International Peace Bureau**: [ipb.org](https://www.ipb.org)

### 7. **Educate Yourself and Others** - **Attend Workshops and Seminars**: Engage with educational events that focus on international relations, peace studies, and the specific dynamics of the Ukraine conflict. - **Read and Share Books or Articles**: Build a deeper understanding of the issues at hand and share your knowledge with your community.

By participating in these actions, individuals can contribute to a broader movement seeking peaceful resolutions to conflicts and advocating for humanitarian support in Ukraine. Each small effort can collectively amplify the call for peace and solidarity in these challenging times.


Sign Our Petition



10 Related Article(s):

Muslim & NATO Nations BOIL Over Netanyahu Minister's Israel Dare: 'If You Recognise Palestine...'

Putin-Trump summit: What each side wants | Fox 11 Tri Cities Fox 41 Yakima

No Zelensky, no Brussels, no problem: Here's how Putin and Trump's Alaska power move will play out, by Dmitry Suslov - Russia News Now

Trump and Putin to spar Ukraine peace and arms control at Alaska summit By Reuters

Trump and Putin to meet over Ukraine peace at Alaska summit

What's at stake at the Trump-Putin Ukraine peace summit?

Trump and Putin to spar Ukraine peace and arms control at Alaska summit

Putin heads to Alaska in heavily armoured limo

The Geopolitical Chessboard: Ceasefire Talks and Territorial Tensions | Law-Order

Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin to spar over Ukraine peace and arms control at Alaska summit


Updated very often
All Opinions and Actions are (C)opyright 2025 - TruthAndResistance.com