Truth and Resistance Dove Logo
Know what you should know!

Home     Categories     Search     Subscribe

'High-stakes' Putin summit could fail, says Trump

dawn.com -- Thursday, August 14, 2025, 11:47:17 PM Eastern Daylight Time
Categories: U.S.–Russia Relations, Foreign Policy & International Relations, U.S. Elections & Voting Rights
'High-stakes' Putin summit could fail, says Trump

* Rules out any Ukraine deal without Zelensky's involvement

* Kremlin says Russian, US presidents to hold 'one-on-one' talks in Alaska

ANCHORAGE: US President Donald Trump on Thursday acknowledged his high-stakes summit with Vladimir Putin may fail, and said any Ukraine deal would come through a future three-way meeting with Kyiv to "divvy things up".

Russian President Vladimir Putin flies to Alaska on Friday at the invitation of Trump in his first visit to a Western country since he ordered the 2022 invasion of Ukraine that has killed tens of thousands of people.

The Kremlin said that the two presidents planned to meet one-on-one, heightening fears by European leaders that Putin will cajole Trump into a settlement imposed on Ukraine.

Trump, on the eve of the summit, insisted that he would not finalise any deal with Putin and that he would include Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in any decisions.

"This meeting sets up the second meeting, but there is a 25 per cent chance that this meeting will not be a successful meeting," Trump told Fox News Radio.

"The second meeting is going to be very, very important, because that's going to be a meeting where they make a deal. And I don't want to use the word 'divvy' things up. But you know, to a certain extent, it's not a bad term," Trump said.

Zelensky has refused any territorial concessions to Russia, which has ramped up attacks and made sharp gains on the battlefield just ahead of the summit.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio said any future deal needed to ensure Ukraine's security. "To achieve peace, I think we all recognise that there'll have to be some conversation about security guarantees," Rubio told reporters in Washington, adding that he was "hopeful" about the summit.

Trump has previously ruled out letting Ukraine join Nato and backed Russia's stance that Kyiv's aspirations to enter the transatlantic alliance triggered the war.

Ukraine and most of its European allies reject Putin's narrative and point to his remarks denying the historical legitimacy of Ukraine.

Putin welcomes US efforts

Meanwhile, Putin on Thursday welcomed US efforts to end the conflict and said that talks could also help yield an agreement on nuclear arms control.

"The US administration... is making quite energetic and sincere efforts to end the fighting," Putin told a meeting of top officials in Moscow.

The talks are set to begin at 11:30am (1930 GMT) on Friday at the Elmendorf Air Force Base, a major US military installation in Alaska that has been crucial in monitoring Russia.

"This conversation will take place in a one-on-one format, naturally with the participation of interpreters," Kremlin aide Yuri Ushakov told reporters in Moscow.

He said that delegations would continue discussions over a working lunch and that Putin and Trump would hold a joint news conference.

The White House has not confirmed any plans for a joint press appearance.

Trump faced heated criticism over his joint news conference after his 2018 summit with Putin in Helsinki where he sided with Russia over US intelligence in accepting Putin's denials of interfering in the 2016 US election to help Trump.

European support for Zelensky

Zelensky, who will not join Friday's summit in Alaska, on Thursday met British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, after talks a day earlier in Berlin.

Starmer greeted the Ukrainian leader with a warm hug and handshake on the steps of his Downing Street residence and later voiced solidarity.

European leaders expressed relief after a call with Trump on Wednesday, saying he appeared focused on a ceasefire rather than concessions by Ukraine.

A day before the summit, Ukraine fired dozens of drones at Russia, wounding several people and sparking fires at an oil refinery in the southern city of Volgograd.

Expand

Sign Our Petition


Opinion:

The recent summit between U.S. President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska has sparked intense discussions regarding the future of Ukraine and international relations. As the two leaders prepare for their one-on-one talks, it is essential to analyze the geopolitical stakes involved, the historical context of U.S.-Russia relations, and the potential implications for Ukraine and its sovereignty. This summit is not just another diplomatic encounter; it reflects the ongoing struggles over national identity, territorial integrity, and the global balance of power.

Historically, the relationship between the U.S. and Russia has been fraught with tension, shaped by events such as the Cold War, the dissolution of the Soviet Union, and the expansion of NATO. The 2022 invasion of Ukraine by Russia is a critical moment that has reverberated through international politics, evoking memories of the territorial disputes that have plagued Eastern Europe for decades. The Kremlin's rationale for its actions often hinges on historical narratives that undermine Ukraine's sovereignty, which is a strategy reminiscent of imperial justifications used throughout history. This context is vital for understanding why Trump’s comments about potentially “divvying up” Ukraine disturb not only Ukrainians but also advocates for international law and self-determination.

Trump’s insistence on including Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in any discussions about Ukraine's future is a double-edged sword. On one hand, it acknowledges Ukraine's agency in the negotiations, but on the other, it raises concerns about the effectiveness of such a strategy when the power dynamics are heavily skewed in favor of Russia. The reality is that Zelensky has consistently rejected any territorial concessions, a stance that aligns with the aspirations of a majority of Ukrainians who view their territory as sacred and non-negotiable. This highlights the importance of grassroots support for national sovereignty, which is often overshadowed by high-level diplomacy that can lead to compromises detrimental to the people directly affected.

Moreover, the rhetoric surrounding the summit reveals deeper ideological divisions on both sides of the Atlantic. U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio's comments hint at a growing recognition that any peace deal must involve robust security guarantees for Ukraine. However, this position contrasts sharply with Trump’s past assertions that Ukraine's NATO aspirations were provocations that justified Russian aggression. Such statements do not only reflect a misunderstanding of the geopolitical landscape but also serve to legitimize aggressive expansionism under the guise of security concerns. This sends a troubling message to authoritarian regimes worldwide, reinforcing the notion that might makes right in international affairs.

The implications of the summit extend beyond the immediate concerns in Ukraine. The interplay between U.S. foreign policy and the actions of authoritarian leaders like Putin can have long-term consequences for global democracy and human rights. Leaders who dismiss the sovereignty of nations based on historical grievances or geopolitical calculations undermine the principles of international law and self-determination that have been hard-won through decades of struggle. The outcome of the Trump-Putin meeting could signal to the world whether the U.S. will uphold its commitments to democratic values or turn a blind eye to aggression in favor of expedient political deals.

In conclusion, the upcoming summit between Trump and Putin is a pivotal moment that encapsulates not only the immediate crisis in Ukraine but also broader themes of power, sovereignty, and international justice. As events unfold, it is crucial for advocates of peace and democracy to remain vigilant, emphasizing the importance of self-determination for nations like Ukraine. This summit serves as a reminder that the historical forces at play are not merely relics of the past, but living challenges that continue to shape our world today. Engaging with these themes thoughtfully can provide a strong foundation for meaningful discussions on the future of international relations and the ongoing struggles for justice and equality globally.

Action:

The recent summit between Presidents Trump and Putin, framed as a high-stakes meeting aimed at addressing the ongoing conflict in Ukraine, underscores a pivotal moment in international diplomacy. The implications of this encounter extend far beyond the personalities involved; they touch upon deeply entrenched geopolitical dynamics, historical grievances, and the vital importance of inclusive dialogue in conflict resolution. As observers of this event, it is essential to analyze its potential outcomes and consider what actions we, as engaged members of society, can take to influence a more just resolution to the crisis.

To understand the significance of this meeting, we must reflect on the historical context that has shaped the relationship between Russia, Ukraine, and the West. The 2014 annexation of Crimea by Russia marked a watershed moment, igniting tensions that have only escalated with the 2022 invasion. This conflict is not merely a territorial dispute; it is rooted in a complex history of national identity, colonialism, and imperialism. For many in Ukraine, the fight against Russian aggression is a struggle for sovereignty and self-determination. In the face of such historical injustices, it is crucial for international actors to respect the voices and aspirations of those most directly affected—namely, the Ukrainian people.

The approach taken by Trump, which involves potentially inviting Zelensky to future negotiations while emphasizing the importance of a three-way dialogue, raises important questions about the efficacy of such diplomacy. While it is commendable that Trump acknowledges the necessity of including Ukraine in discussions, the reality is that meaningful peace cannot be brokered by simply "divvying things up" without genuine consideration of Ukraine's security and territorial integrity. The historical tendency for powerful nations to impose settlements on weaker states only perpetuates cycles of conflict. As citizens, we must advocate for a diplomatic framework that prioritizes Ukrainian sovereignty and respects the right of its people to determine their own future.

One critical area of focus for American citizens is to actively engage in raising awareness about the realities of the conflict in Ukraine. This includes educating ourselves and others about the historical context and the implications of international decisions on the ground. Grassroots movements can play a significant role in influencing public opinion and pressuring elected officials to take a stand that supports human rights and self-determination. By organizing forums, discussions, and outreach programs, we can foster a deeper understanding of the nuances of the Ukraine crisis and galvanize collective action toward a peaceful resolution.

Moreover, the role of the media cannot be understated in shaping public discourse surrounding international affairs. As concerned citizens, we should demand responsible journalism that accurately portrays the complexities of the Ukrainian conflict rather than reducing it to mere political theater. Encouraging media outlets to provide in-depth analysis and diverse perspectives on the situation can help counteract harmful narratives that oversimplify or misrepresent the stakes involved. By holding the media accountable, we can contribute to a more informed public that is better equipped to advocate for a just resolution.

Lastly, we must not overlook the importance of supporting organizations that work directly with affected populations in Ukraine. Humanitarian aid, conflict resolution initiatives, and advocacy for human rights are vital components of a multi-faceted approach to peacebuilding. By contributing to and collaborating with NGOs and community organizations focused on Ukraine, we can help ensure that the voices of those most impacted are amplified and that their needs are met in the face of ongoing aggression. In these challenging times, our collective action can make a significant difference in shaping a future where peace, justice, and dignity prevail for all.

To Do:

The news article highlights the complexities surrounding the upcoming summit between US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin, particularly regarding the ongoing conflict in Ukraine. As concerned citizens, it’s vital to engage actively in advocating for peace and supporting Ukraine's sovereignty. Here’s a detailed list of actions we can take to make a difference:

### Personal Actions to Advocate for Peace in Ukraine

1. **Educate Yourself and Others**: - **Goal**: Understand the complexities of the Ukraine conflict and share that knowledge. - **Action**: Read credible sources on the Ukraine conflict, attend webinars, and share articles with your network.

2. **Support Ukrainian Organizations**: - **Goal**: Provide financial and moral support to organizations directly aiding Ukraine. - **Action**: Donate to reputable organizations like: - **Razom for Ukraine** (https://razomforukraine.org/) - **GlobalGiving Ukraine Crisis Relief Fund** (https://www.globalgiving.org/projects/ukraine-crisis-relief-fund/) - **Example**: Organize a fundraising event or online campaign to raise awareness and funds.

3. **Petition for Stronger US Support for Ukraine**: - **Goal**: Encourage the US government to provide consistent and robust support for Ukraine. - **Action**: Sign and share petitions such as: - **Change.org Petition**: "Support Ukraine's Right to Self-Defense" which calls for military aid and humanitarian assistance. - Link: [Change.org Petition](https://www.change.org/p/support-ukraine-s-right-to-self-defense) - **Example**: Create a local petition drive or online petition to gather more signatures.

4. **Contact Elected Officials**: - **Goal**: Urge your representatives to take concrete actions supporting Ukraine. - **Action**: Write letters or emails to Congress members. Here are examples of representatives to contact: - **Senator Bob Menendez** (Chairman, Senate Foreign Relations Committee) - Email: [menendez.senate.gov/contact](https://www.menendez.senate.gov/contact) - Mailing Address: 528 Hart Senate Office Building, Washington, DC 20510 - **Senator Marco Rubio** (Ranking Member, Senate Foreign Relations Committee) - Email: [rubio.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/contact](https://www.rubio.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/contact) - Mailing Address: 284 Russell Senate Office Building, Washington, DC 20510 - **What to Say**: Emphasize the importance of supporting Ukraine’s sovereignty, call for humanitarian aid, and express opposition to any territorial concessions.

5. **Engage in Community Advocacy**: - **Goal**: Mobilize local support for Ukraine through community initiatives. - **Action**: Organize community meetings or rallies focused on promoting peace in Ukraine. - **Example**: Collaborate with local human rights organizations to host events highlighting the situation in Ukraine.

6. **Utilize Social Media**: - **Goal**: Raise awareness and create a support network for Ukraine. - **Action**: Use platforms like Twitter, Instagram, and Facebook to share information and mobilize support. - **Example**: Create a campaign using hashtags like #SupportUkraine #PeaceForUkraine to spread awareness.

7. **Participate in Peaceful Demonstrations**: - **Goal**: Show solidarity with the Ukrainian people. - **Action**: Attend rallies or protests advocating for peace and the protection of Ukraine’s sovereignty. - **Example**: Check local listings for events organized by peace and human rights groups.

8. **Promote Diplomatic Solutions**: - **Goal**: Advocate for diplomatic measures to resolve the conflict. - **Action**: Write opinion pieces or letters to the editor in local newspapers emphasizing the need for diplomatic negotiations rather than military solutions. - **What to Say**: Highlight the potential consequences of military escalations and the importance of international cooperation.

9. **Engage with Local Media**: - **Goal**: Increase coverage of the Ukraine situation and public opinion. - **Action**: Reach out to local journalists to discuss the importance of covering the conflict and its implications for global security. - **Example**: Offer to provide insights or connect them with experts on the issue.

Through these actions, individuals can contribute to a broader movement advocating for peace in Ukraine and supporting the rights of its citizens against aggression. It’s essential to remain informed, engaged, and active in promoting a compassionate and equitable resolution to the conflict.


Sign Our Petition



10 Related Article(s):

Trump vows not to be intimidated ahead of Putin summit | News

Prospects for Trump & Putin in Alaska

Trump to meet Putin in high-stakes Alaska summit

5 Things To Know Ahead Of The Trump-Putin Summit

Trump, Putin soon to sit down for high-stakes Ukraine talks in Alaska

Who's With Trump in Alaska

Trump and Putin shake hands in Alaska for high-stakes summit

Trump Rolls Out the Red Carpet for Putin in Alaska

Trump and Putin locked in face to face talks after US leader's show of force

Trump, Putin cite progress but no Ukraine deal at summit | FOX 28 Spokane


Updated very often
All Opinions and Actions are (C)opyright 2025 - TruthAndResistance.com