Truth and Resistance Dove Logo
Know what you should know!

Home     Categories     Search     Subscribe

Russia strikes Ukraine on eve of talks in Washington -- follow live

thetimes.com -- Monday, August 18, 2025, 1:29:44 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Categories: U.S.–Russia Relations, State Politics & Governors, U.S.–NATO Relations
Russia strikes Ukraine on eve of talks in Washington -- follow live

"And I hope that our shared strength with America and with our European friends will compel Russia to real peace."

President Trump has dropped his demand for a ceasefire in Ukraine because so much progress had been achieved in negotiations with Russia, his special envoy Steve Witkoff has claimed.

Trump had insisted before his meeting with President Putin in Alaska that he would walk out if Russia did not agree to a ceasefire, and he faced widespread criticism in the United States over the weekend for apparently backing down from this demand.

Witkoff, who was present at the meeting, claimed Trump "pivoted" to seeking a peace deal after Putin made significant concessions in their meeting regarding land swaps and Nato-style security guarantees for Ukraine, Witkoff told CNN.

"The thesis of a ceasefire is that you'd be discussing all of these issues that we resolved in Alaska," he said. "We cut through all kinds of issues that would have to be discussed and agreed to during a ceasefire period."

* Read in full: Trump dropped ceasefire demand 'because so much progress was made'

Russia claimed on Sunday that its forces captured the villages of Popiv Yar and Ivano-Darivka in the Donetsk region, as it was accused of exaggerating its gains in the strategically crucial region before a potential freezing of the front line.

Ukraine, for its part, has been accused of underplaying its losses in Donetsk, the fiercest and most deadly front line in Ukraine, which has been thrown into the spotlight as it becomes a central bargaining chip in negotiations to end the war.

Both sides are in a race to secure what they can before a possible cessation of hostilities. President Putin reportedly expects Ukrainian troops to withdraw from the parts of Donetsk it still controls in return for peace -- an idea seemly backed by President Trump, but so far shunned by the Ukrainian president.

A Russian overnight drone strike on a residential area in Kharkiv killed three people, including a child, and injured 17 people, according to Ukrainian authorities.

The attack killed the two-year-old boy early on Monday, Oleh Synehubov, the governor of the wider Kharkiv region, said on Telegram. The number of the injured from the Kharkiv attack was "continuously increasing", he added.

The city's mayor Ihor Terekhov said on Telegram: "As of now, three people died, including a small child. Another 17 people have been wounded, including six children."

The city near the Russian border was also hit hours earlier by a ballistic missile that injured at least 11 people, he said.

Two people were injured in Russia's strikes on the adjacent region of Sumy that damaged at least a dozen homes and an educational institution, authorities said.

President Zelensky will be supported by seven European leaders, including Sir Keir Starmer, at talks with President Trump in Washington on Monday.

The Ukrainian leader and the "coalition of the willing" want to hear details of Nato-style security guarantees pledged by Trump to respond to future Russian aggression before abandoning any territory to Moscow.

Starmer will join President Macron of France, Friedrich Merz, the German chancellor, and Giorgia Meloni, the Italian prime minister, with the aim of avoiding a repeat of the public browbeating Zelensky received from Trump and JD Vance, the vice-president, at an Oval Office meeting in February.

They will also be joined by Mark Rutte, Nato secretary-general, Ursula von der Leyen, head of the European Commission, and President Stubb of Finland, who has struck up a rapport with Trump over rounds of golf.

Expand

Sign Our Petition


Opinion:

The ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine, particularly as it unfolds amid diplomatic negotiations, underscores the complexities of international relations and the often precarious balance of power. The recent article highlights a pivotal moment where President Trump, in his discussions with President Putin, seemingly abandoned the call for a ceasefire, opting instead for a peace deal framed around territorial concessions. This turn of events is emblematic of a broader historical pattern in which powerful nations negotiate terms that can overlook the sovereignty and voice of smaller states.

Historically, Ukraine has been caught in the crossfire of larger geopolitical struggles, particularly since the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991. The region has deep-seated historical ties to both Russia and the West, making it a flashpoint for tensions. Ukraine's aspirations for integration with Western institutions such as NATO and the European Union have been met with fierce resistance from Russia, which perceives such moves as direct threats to its sphere of influence. The current conflict, ignited by Russia's annexation of Crimea in 2014 and the subsequent war in Eastern Ukraine, is thus not merely a bilateral issue, but a reflection of the broader struggles over power and hegemony in a multipolar world.

The implications of negotiations that prioritize territorial swaps over a genuine ceasefire are profound, particularly for the citizens of Ukraine. The tragic loss of life, as noted in the article with the drone strike in Kharkiv that included the death of a child, highlights the human cost of these political maneuvers. Such violence is a stark reminder that every decision made in Washington or Moscow has real-world consequences for ordinary people. The bombing of civilian areas not only exacerbates humanitarian crises but also hardens public sentiment against negotiation processes perceived as unjust. It is crucial to remember that peace cannot be achieved merely through political bargaining; it must also involve a commitment to the protection and respect for human life.

Moreover, the article points to the reaction of Ukrainian President Zelensky, who is supported by a coalition of European leaders in Washington. This coalition signifies an important solidarity with Ukraine but also raises questions about the nature of that support. Are these leaders advocating for Ukraine's right to self-determination, or are they primarily concerned with their geopolitical interests? The presence of leaders like Sir Keir Starmer indicates a strategic alignment in the West, yet it must be scrutinized whether these alliances uphold the principles of justice or merely serve as tactical responses to Russian aggression.

As we consider the ongoing negotiations and the shifting dynamics between Russia, Ukraine, and the West, it becomes essential to reflect on the need for a discourse that prioritizes equity and justice. The conversation around peace should not only focus on borders and military agreements but also on the rights and voices of those directly affected by the conflict. Advocating for a ceasefire that genuinely addresses the needs of civilians, ensures the protection of human rights, and fosters a sustainable peace process is crucial. It is imperative that any resolution includes the perspectives of Ukrainians and acknowledges their sovereignty, rather than simply accommodating the demands of larger powers.

In conclusion, the situation in Ukraine exemplifies the intricate interplay between diplomacy, military action, and human rights. Historical injustices continue to shape the present reality, and the negotiations currently taking place could either pave the way for a lasting peace or deepen existing divisions. It is vital for advocates of social justice to remain vocal and active in this discourse, ensuring that the narrative does not become solely about power dynamics but instead centers on the fundamental rights and dignity of all individuals involved. As the world watches these negotiations unfold, it is a moment to amplify calls for peace that are rooted in justice, rather than mere political expediency.

Action:

The ongoing conflict in Ukraine, exacerbated by Russia's latest military actions and the shifting dynamics in international negotiations, highlights both the fragility of peace in Eastern Europe and the complex interplay of global politics. The article describes a critical moment where diplomatic attempts, led by figures such as President Trump and his envoy Steve Witkoff, appear at odds with the ground realities in Ukraine. The backdrop of these developments is a protracted war that has seen significant loss of life and displacement, particularly among civilians. Understanding the historical context of this conflict is essential to grasp its current implications, particularly for American citizens who may find themselves in discussions about foreign policy and national security.

The roots of the Ukraine-Russia conflict extend back to the 2014 annexation of Crimea and the subsequent ongoing hostilities in the Donbas region. For many years, Russia has engaged in strategies that undermine Ukraine's sovereignty, relying on a combination of military aggression and disinformation campaigns. This historical backdrop underscores the urgency of American involvement and the need for a robust response to Russian aggression. However, the current administration's approach, as indicated by Trump's recent pivot away from demanding a ceasefire, raises questions about the sincerity and effectiveness of U.S. diplomatic efforts. The apparent readiness to trade away crucial territorial integrity for a peace deal is alarming and suggests a troubling willingness to prioritize short-term political gains over long-term stability in the region.

As citizens of the United States, we have a responsibility to engage critically with our government’s foreign policy decisions, particularly when they involve the lives of innocent civilians in conflict zones. Advocacy for a clear and uncompromising stance on supporting Ukraine’s sovereignty is vital. This means calling for increased military aid to Ukraine and ensuring that diplomatic negotiations do not come at the cost of ceding territory or compromising Ukraine's right to self-determination. Engaging with local representatives, participating in peaceful demonstrations, and utilizing social media platforms to raise awareness can amplify the voices advocating for a steadfast commitment to Ukraine.

Furthermore, it is crucial to address the broader implications of U.S. foreign policy that prioritize geopolitical maneuvering over humanitarian concerns. The article highlights the devastating impact of Russia's military strikes on civilian areas, resulting in tragic casualties, including children. This reality serves as a stark reminder of the human costs of conflict, a narrative that often gets lost in discussions of strategy and power. By framing conversations around the human consequences of foreign policy decisions, we can advocate for a more compassionate approach to international relations that emphasizes diplomacy, conflict resolution, and support for those affected by war.

Lastly, educational outreach is essential in fostering a well-informed public discourse about these issues. Encouraging discussions about the historical context of the Ukraine-Russia conflict within communities can help debunk myths and misinformation that often surround such complex subjects. Utilizing resources from reputable organizations that specialize in conflict resolution, international relations, and historical analysis can provide citizens with the necessary tools to engage thoughtfully and effectively in conversations about foreign policy. By empowering ourselves and others with knowledge, we can cultivate a more informed citizenry that demands accountability and compassion from our leaders in addressing international conflicts.

To Do:

In light of the developments in Ukraine and the ongoing negotiations surrounding the conflict, there are several actions that individuals can take to engage with the situation and advocate for peace, support for victims, and a more humanitarian approach to foreign policy. Here is a detailed list of ideas and actions that can be pursued:

### Personal Actions to Take

1. **Educate Yourself and Others**: Stay informed about the conflict and its implications. Share reputable articles, videos, and discussions on social media and among your community to raise awareness.

2. **Support Humanitarian Organizations**: Donate to or volunteer with organizations that provide aid to those affected by the conflict. Examples include: - **Doctors Without Borders**: Provides medical support in conflict zones. - **International Rescue Committee**: Offers emergency aid to refugees and displaced people. - **UNICEF**: Works to protect children's rights and provide them with essential services.

3. **Engage with Elected Officials**: Contact your representatives to express your views on the conflict and urge them to support humanitarian efforts and a peaceful resolution.

### Exact Actions and Real-World Examples

1. **Petition for Humanitarian Aid**: - **Action**: Start or sign petitions advocating for increased humanitarian assistance to Ukraine. - **Example**: Use platforms like Change.org to create or support petitions focused on sending aid to civilians affected by the conflict.

2. **Write to Elected Officials**: - **Who to Write To**: - **Your U.S. Senators**: - Senator Dick Durbin (IL) - Email: https://www.durbin.senate.gov/contact - Mailing Address: 230 S. Dearborn St., Suite 3900, Chicago, IL 60604 - Senator Tammy Duckworth (IL) - Email: https://duckworth.senate.gov/contact - Mailing Address: 230 S. Dearborn St., Suite 3900, Chicago, IL 60604 - **Your House Representative**: Find your representative's contact information through [House.gov](https://www.house.gov/representatives/find-your-representative). - **What to Say**: - Express your concern about the humanitarian impact of the conflict in Ukraine, emphasizing the need for peace negotiations that prioritize civilian safety and the well-being of those affected by the war. Urge them to support increased funding for humanitarian aid and to push for diplomatic solutions rather than military escalation.

3. **Join or Support Activist Groups**: - **Action**: Become active with organizations that focus on peace and humanitarian efforts. - **Examples**: - **Peace Action**: Join campaigns advocating for peace and conflict resolution. - **Amnesty International**: Get involved in local chapters that work on human rights issues related to war and conflict.

4. **Participate in Local Events**: - **Action**: Attend rallies, vigils, or discussions focused on the Ukraine conflict and peace efforts. - **Example**: Look for community events hosted by local NGOs or peace organizations to show solidarity and raise awareness.

5. **Utilize Social Media**: - **Action**: Use platforms like Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram to share information about the conflict, highlight humanitarian needs, and call for action. - **Example**: Create posts that inform your network about organizations providing aid, upcoming events, or ways to contact elected officials.

By engaging in these actions, we can contribute to the dialogue surrounding the conflict, advocate for the rights and needs of those affected, and foster a movement towards peace. Each small effort can contribute to a larger collective impact.


Sign Our Petition



1 Related Article(s):

Russia hits Kharkiv with ballistic missile, as Trump presses Ukraine to accept peace deal


Updated very often
All Opinions and Actions are (C)opyright 2025 - TruthAndResistance.com