Ukraine: European allies to back Zelenskyy in Trump meeting
dw.com -- Monday, August 18, 2025, 12:26:13 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Categories: Foreign Policy & International Relations, U.S.–Russia Relations, U.S.–NATO Relations

US President Donald Trump said late Sunday that Ukrainian leader Volodymyr Zelenskyy could decide to end the war with Russia "almost immediately."
"President Zelenskyy of Ukraine can end the war with Russia almost immediately, if he wants to, or he can continue to fight," Trump posted on his Truth Social platform, on the eve of a White House meeting with the Ukrainian president and European leaders.
Trump seemed to indicate that Zelenskyy should give up retaking Crimea, which Russia has illegally occupied, and joining NATO.
"No getting back Obama given Crimea (12 years ago, without a shot being fired!), and NO GOING INTO NATO BY UKRAINE. Some things never change!!!" he added.
Russia launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. Trump has incorrectly accused Ukraine of starting the conflict in the past.
Sign Our PetitionThe recent comments made by former President Donald Trump regarding Ukraine and its ongoing conflict with Russia reveal a troubling perspective that undermines both historical context and the principles of international law. Trump's assertion that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy could "end the war almost immediately" by conceding to Russian demands reflects a simplistic view of a deeply complex situation. It disregards the sovereignty and agency of Ukraine as a nation that has been the target of unprovoked aggression since Russia's annexation of Crimea in 2014 and the subsequent invasion in 2022. Such statements not only distort the narrative but also fail to acknowledge the longstanding struggles for self-determination that have characterized Ukraine's history.
Historically, the conflict between Ukraine and Russia is rooted in centuries of intertwined politics, culture, and national identity. The collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991 allowed Ukraine to assert its independence, a move supported by a significant portion of its population. However, Russia's annexation of Crimea and the support of separatist movements in Eastern Ukraine marked a blatant violation of international law, specifically the principles outlined in the United Nations Charter, which emphasizes the inviolability of national borders. Trump's suggestion that Ukraine should simply surrender its territorial integrity to appease Russia echoes the appeasement strategies of the 1930s, which have been widely criticized for their failure to prevent further aggression.
Furthermore, Trump's comments resonate with a trend among certain political factions that seek to undermine Ukraine's right to self-defense. By framing the conflict as one that can be resolved through negotiation at the expense of Ukrainian sovereignty, such statements diminish the sacrifices made by the Ukrainian people, who have shown remarkable resilience in the face of overwhelming odds. The spirit of resistance against imperial aggression is not new; it draws parallels with historical struggles for liberation across the globe, from the anti-colonial movements of the mid-20th century to contemporary fights for democracy in authoritarian regimes. The notion that peace can be achieved through capitulation ignores the lessons learned from those who have fought for their rights and freedoms.
Moreover, Trump's insistence that Zelenskyy should abandon aspirations for NATO membership reflects a misunderstanding of the security dynamics in Eastern Europe. The expansion of NATO is not merely a political maneuver but a strategic response to a real threat posed by Russian expansionism. Countries in the region have historically been vulnerable to Russian influence, and NATO serves as a deterrent against further encroachments. To suggest that Ukraine should forgo its aspirations for collective security is to disregard the experiences of other nations that have faced similar threats and found safety in alliance. This perspective not only risks the safety of Ukraine but also emboldens authoritarian leaders who may feel empowered to pursue aggressive actions without repercussions.
In the broader context of international relations, Trump's comments can be seen as part of a larger narrative that undermines the principles of multilateralism and collective security that have been established since the end of World War II. The belief that powerful nations can dictate terms to smaller, sovereign countries without regard for their rights is antithetical to the ideals of democracy and justice. It is crucial for those who support Ukraine's sovereignty and the rule of law to articulate the importance of standing firm against such rhetoric. Engaging in informed discussions about the implications of appeasement and the necessity of supporting vulnerable nations is essential in countering narratives that seek to diminish the importance of global solidarity in the face of aggression.
Ultimately, as the situation in Ukraine continues to evolve, it is paramount to remember the stakes involved and the lessons from history. Ukrainian sovereignty is not just a matter of national pride; it is a critical component of a global order that champions the right to self-determination and opposes imperialism. It is incumbent upon all of us to advocate for a world where nations can coexist peacefully and where the voices of the oppressed are heard and respected. In this light, discussions surrounding the conflict should not only focus on immediate political solutions but also engage with the broader implications for democracy, justice, and international cooperation.
The recent remarks made by former President Donald Trump regarding the ongoing conflict in Ukraine raise significant concerns about the narrative surrounding international diplomacy and the responsibilities of state actors in times of war. By suggesting that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy could end the war "almost immediately" if he capitulates to Russian demands, Trump not only oversimplifies a complex geopolitical conflict but also undermines Ukraine's sovereignty and the principles of self-determination that have been hard-fought throughout history. This perspective echoes a troubling trend in political discourse that favors appeasement over accountability, particularly regarding authoritarian regimes.
Historically, the consequences of appeasement have been dire. The interwar period provides a cautionary tale, where European powers initially failed to confront the ambitions of Nazi Germany, allowing it to expand unchecked. This led to catastrophic consequences, including World War II. In the context of Ukraine, capitulating to Russia's demands, such as relinquishing Crimea or abandoning aspirations to join NATO, would not only validate unlawful territorial claims but could also embolden other nations with expansionist ambitions. This is particularly relevant today, as global power dynamics shift and authoritarian regimes seek to exploit perceived weaknesses in democratic nations.
As citizens of a democracy, we have a responsibility to advocate for a foreign policy that upholds international law and supports nations fighting for their autonomy. Engaging with our elected representatives about supporting Ukraine through military, economic, and humanitarian aid is crucial. This can be done by contacting congressional offices, participating in town halls, and supporting policies that promote robust international alliances. Additionally, grassroots movements can amplify the voices of those advocating for a principled stance on foreign policy, ensuring that the narrative does not shift towards appeasement.
Moreover, educational initiatives that provide insight into the importance of international solidarity and the historical context of conflicts can empower citizens to engage meaningfully in the conversation. Workshops, community discussions, and partnerships with organizations that focus on global diplomacy can foster a deeper understanding of the stakes involved. By equipping ourselves with knowledge, we can counter narratives that seek to delegitimize Ukraine's struggle for sovereignty and independence, reinforcing the message that the fight against aggression is not merely a regional concern but a global responsibility.
In the face of Trump's remarks, it is vital to not only challenge the misleading assertions about Ukraine's role in the conflict but also to frame a more constructive dialogue around the principles of democracy and human rights. As we engage with those who may hold differing opinions, emphasizing the values of self-determination, respect for international borders, and the consequences of appeasement will help foster a more informed public discourse. The stakes are high, and as we navigate these discussions, we must remain united in advocating for a world where nations can thrive independently, free from coercion and aggression.
Analyzing the recent statements made by former President Trump regarding the ongoing conflict in Ukraine reveals pressing concerns surrounding international support for Ukraine, the integrity of national sovereignty, and the need for a unified stance against authoritarianism. Here is a comprehensive list of actions we can take as individuals to support Ukraine and advocate for peace and justice in this context.
### What Can We Personally Do About This?
1. **Educate Ourselves and Others**: Understanding the complexities of the Ukraine-Russia conflict is essential. Organize or participate in community discussions, webinars, or study groups focusing on international relations, historical context, and current developments.
2. **Support Humanitarian Efforts**: Contribute to reputable organizations providing aid to those affected by the conflict.
3. **Advocate for Political Action**: Push for legislative measures that support Ukraine's sovereignty and territorial integrity.
4. **Engage on Social Media**: Use platforms to raise awareness about the situation in Ukraine, debunk misinformation, and promote a narrative of support for peace and democracy.
5. **Contact Elected Officials**: Urge politicians to take specific actions regarding Ukraine and to resist narratives that undermine the country's sovereignty.
### Exact Actions We Can Take
1. **Sign Petitions**: - **Petition to Support Ukraine’s Sovereignty**: Find petitions on platforms like Change.org or Care2 that advocate for military and humanitarian aid to Ukraine. - Example: [Stand with Ukraine](https://www.change.org/p/stand-with-ukraine) petition.
2. **Write to Elected Officials**: Reach out to your local and national representatives to express your support for Ukraine. Here’s how you can do that:
- **U.S. Senators**: - **Senator Chuck Schumer (NY)** Email: [schumer.senate.gov/contact/email-chuck](https://www.schumer.senate.gov/contact/email-chuck) Mailing Address: 322 Hart Senate Office Building, Washington, D.C. 20510
- **Senator Mitch McConnell (KY)** Email: [mcconnell.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/contact](https://www.mcconnell.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/contact) Mailing Address: 361-A Russell Senate Office Building, Washington, D.C. 20510
- **U.S. House of Representatives**: Find your representative via [House.gov](https://www.house.gov/representatives/find-your-representative) and contact them with similar messages.
3. **Write to the White House**: - **President Joe Biden** Email: [contact form](https://www.whitehouse.gov/contact/) Mailing Address: The White House, 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, D.C. 20500.
### What to Say
When writing to your representatives or the White House, consider including the following points:
- **Support for Ukraine**: Emphasize the importance of supporting Ukraine's right to sovereignty and territorial integrity. Mention specific actions, such as backing military aid and economic support. - **Condemnation of Russian Aggression**: Request a firm stance against Russia’s actions and any narratives that suggest Ukraine should concede territory.
- **Humanitarian Aid**: Advocate for increased humanitarian assistance to displaced Ukrainians and those affected by the war.
- **Need for Diplomatic Solutions**: While supporting Ukraine, urge a commitment to seek diplomatic solutions that prioritize peace and security for all involved parties.
### Example Message Template
Subject: Support for Ukraine’s Sovereignty and Peaceful Resolution
Dear [Official's Name],
I am writing to express my strong support for Ukraine as it defends its sovereignty against Russian aggression. Recent statements suggesting that Ukraine should concede territory undermine international law and the principles of democracy.
I urge you to advocate for continued military and humanitarian assistance to Ukraine and to promote diplomatic efforts that respect its territorial integrity. The people of Ukraine deserve our unwavering support in their struggle for freedom.
Thank you for your attention to this urgent matter.
Sincerely, [Your Name] [Your Address] [Your Email]
By taking these actions, we can collectively make a difference and advocate for a just resolution to the conflict in Ukraine.