European leaders to support Zelenskiy in Washington as Trump pushes Ukraine deal
thesun.my -- Sunday, August 17, 2025, 10:55:24 PM Eastern Daylight Time
Categories: U.S.–Russia Relations, U.S.–NATO Relations, U.S. Elections & Voting Rights

LONDON/KYIV/WASHINGTON: European leaders will accompany Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy in talks with US President Donald Trump, aiming to strengthen Kyiv's position as Washington pushes for a swift peace agreement to end Europe's deadliest conflict in decades.
Trump has urged Zelenskiy to negotiate a settlement after aligning more closely with Moscow's stance during recent discussions with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska.
The Ukrainian and US leaders will hold a bilateral meeting on Monday before being joined by European officials for broader talks, according to a source familiar with the plans.
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio warned of continued bloodshed if peace efforts fail, stating, "If peace is not going to be possible here and this is just going to continue on as a war, people will continue to die by the thousands."
Trump claimed significant progress in discussions with Russia in social media posts but did not provide specifics, while suggesting Zelenskiy could end the war quickly by abandoning ambitions to reclaim Crimea or join NATO.
Sources indicate Moscow has proposed withdrawing from small occupied areas in exchange for Ukraine ceding fortified eastern territories and freezing front lines elsewhere.
Russia's envoy to international organisations, Mikhail Ulyanov, stated that any peace deal must include security guarantees for both Ukraine and Russia.
Trump's envoy Steve Witkoff revealed that Russia had tentatively agreed to an Article 5-like defence pact for Ukraine, though Kyiv remains sceptical given past broken assurances.
German, French, and British leaders convened on Sunday to reinforce support for Zelenskiy, emphasising that territorial discussions must involve Ukraine and include strong security provisions.
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and other EU leaders will attend the Washington talks, seeking to prevent a repeat of Trump's public criticism of Zelenskiy in February.
A joint statement from Britain, France, and Germany pledged post-war security assistance, including potential reassurance forces and support for Ukraine's military reconstruction.
Zelenskiy welcomed the European backing, stressing that any security guarantees must be practical and developed with European involvement.
Rubio acknowledged potential concessions from both sides but warned of further consequences for Russia if negotiations fail.
Putin has briefed allies Belarus and Kazakhstan on the Alaska talks, while Trump has repeatedly asserted that Ukraine should compromise due to Russia's military superiority. - Reuters
Sign Our PetitionThe recent discussions surrounding Ukraine’s ongoing conflict highlight not only the complexities of international diplomacy but also the stark differences in how various leaders propose to address what has become one of Europe's deadliest crises in decades. European leaders are set to accompany Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy to meet with U.S. President Donald Trump, who is advocating for a rapid peace agreement with Russia. However, this approach raises significant concerns about the implications of a peace deal that may prioritize expediency over the fundamental rights and sovereignty of the Ukrainian people. The backdrop of this situation is critical, as it connects to a broader historical narrative of imperialism and self-determination that must not be overlooked.
Historically, Ukraine has been at the center of geopolitical struggles, serving as a battleground for competing empires and ideologies. Following the dissolution of the Soviet Union, Ukraine has sought to assert its independence and align itself with European democratic ideals, a choice that has been met with aggression from Russia. The annexation of Crimea in 2014 and the ongoing conflict in Eastern Ukraine are manifestations of Russia's attempt to reassert its influence in the region, while Ukraine’s aspirations to join NATO and strengthen ties with Europe are seen as existential threats by Moscow. In this context, any peace negotiations must recognize the historical injustices faced by Ukraine and the need for a resolution that genuinely respects its territorial integrity and sovereignty.
The proposed peace negotiations, as suggested by Trump and his administration, seem to lack a fundamental acknowledgment of Ukraine's democratic aspirations. Trump's suggestion that Zelenskiy might need to abandon ambitions to reclaim Crimea or delay NATO membership raises alarms regarding the potential sacrifices that Ukraine might be pressured to make. This echoes a troubling historical pattern where powerful nations, often driven by their geopolitical interests, impose their will on smaller states, disregarding the voices and rights of those directly affected. Such a narrative is familiar in various social justice struggles worldwide, where marginalized communities are often coerced into relinquishing their rights for the sake of political expediency or economic gain.
Moreover, the involvement of European leaders in this diplomatic process is crucial, yet it must be approached with caution. While they emphasize the importance of Ukrainian involvement in any territorial discussions, the historical complicity of European powers in ignoring the rights of Eastern European nations throughout history cannot be overlooked. The support for Zelenskiy from figures like German Chancellor Olaf Scholz and French President Emmanuel Macron should not only focus on military aid and reconstruction but must also critically engage with the broader implications of peace at any cost. The joint statement from European leaders underscores a commitment to post-war security, but it must also encompass a clear, principled stance against sacrificing Ukraine's autonomy to appease Russia.
Finally, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio's warning about the consequences of failing negotiations speaks to a larger truth about conflict resolution: without a commitment to justice and equity, peace may be merely a prelude to further violence. The notion that Ukraine should compromise due to Russia's military superiority perpetuates a dangerous cycle of oppression that characterizes international relations. Instead, the focus should be on empowering Ukraine to reclaim its rightful place in the international community, ensuring that any peace deal prioritizes the safety and rights of Ukrainian citizens. In this light, advocates for justice must remain vigilant, urging leaders to forge paths that honor the principles of self-determination and human rights, rather than succumbing to the pressures of political expediency.
In conclusion, the ongoing discussions surrounding Ukraine's future are emblematic of broader themes in international relations, historical injustices, and struggles for self-determination. As these negotiations unfold, it is imperative to advocate for an approach that does not shortchange the aspirations of the Ukrainian people. The lessons from history remind us that true peace can only be achieved when all parties involved respect the rights and sovereignty of nations, particularly those that have long been marginalized in the global arena. The stakes are high, and the international community must commit to a process that is equitable, just, and centered on the voices of those most affected by the conflict.
The recent developments surrounding Ukraine's situation, particularly in the context of President Zelenskiy's upcoming talks in Washington, reveal a complex web of international diplomacy heavily influenced by US domestic politics. As European leaders prepare to accompany Zelenskiy, the backdrop of these discussions is not just the immediate need for peace in Ukraine but also the implications of US foreign policy under President Trump. The contrast between a forward-looking approach that secures Ukraine’s sovereignty and a retreat into appeasement of Russia reveals significant stakes for both Europe and the global order.
Historically, the conflict in Ukraine is rooted in centuries of territorial disputes and national identities, exacerbated by Russia's annexation of Crimea in 2014 and the ongoing conflict in the Donbas region. This situation has not only destabilized Ukraine but has also threatened the broader European security landscape. The European Union and NATO's involvement in supporting Ukraine is a recognition of the need to confront autocratic aggression and uphold the principles of self-determination and territorial integrity. However, the current approach of the Trump administration, which leans toward making concessions to Russia, risks undermining these principles and emboldening authoritarian regimes worldwide.
One of the critical points to consider in the forthcoming talks is the demand for security guarantees. Trump's suggestion that Zelenskiy abandon aspirations of reclaiming Crimea or NATO membership is alarming and represents a dangerous precedent. It suggests that powerful nations might negotiate away the rights and ambitions of smaller nations for the sake of expediency. Such bargaining chips not only threaten Ukraine's future but also set a concerning example for other nations facing similar aggressions. It is vital for the US to reaffirm its commitment to Ukraine’s sovereignty and the principles of international law, rather than capitulating to the demands of a belligerent power.
As engaged citizens, there are actionable steps we can take to voice our opposition to appeasement strategies that compromise Ukraine's future. Firstly, advocating for robust support from Congress for military and humanitarian aid to Ukraine is crucial. This support not only empowers Ukraine but also sends a strong message to Russia that the international community stands united against aggression. Additionally, raising awareness among our communities about the importance of global alliances and the dangers of authoritarianism is vital. Grassroots mobilization can play a powerful role in pressuring elected officials to prioritize diplomatic solutions that uphold international norms and the rights of nations.
Finally, we must recognize the importance of educating ourselves and others about the broader implications of the Ukraine crisis. By understanding the historical context and the geopolitical stakes involved, we can engage in more informed discussions. This knowledge equips us to challenge narratives that downplay the significance of Ukraine's sovereignty in favor of short-term political gains. As the world watches the upcoming talks in Washington, it is imperative that we lend our voices to a vision of peace that is built on justice, security, and mutual respect for all nations involved. The stakes are high, and it is our responsibility to advocate for a future that aligns with these values rather than one that seeks comfort in compromise with authoritarianism.
The article highlights critical developments in the ongoing conflict in Ukraine, particularly the dynamics of international diplomacy involving the U.S., European leaders, and Ukraine's President Zelenskiy. As concerned citizens, there are several actionable steps we can take to influence the situation positively and advocate for a just resolution to the conflict. Here’s a detailed list of ideas and actions:
### What Can We Personally Do About This?
1. **Raise Awareness:** - Use social media platforms to share information and insights about the situation in Ukraine, emphasizing the importance of peace that respects Ukraine's sovereignty and territorial integrity.
2. **Participate in Local and National Advocacy Groups:** - Join organizations that focus on peace, human rights, and support for Ukraine. Engaging with these groups can amplify our voices and efforts.
3. **Educate Ourselves and Others:** - Keep informed about the geopolitical context of the Ukraine conflict, the roles of various leaders, and the implications of proposed agreements.
### Specific Actions We Can Take
1. **Sign Petitions:** - Look for petitions advocating for strong support for Ukraine, emphasizing the need for humanitarian aid and military support. Websites like Change.org and Avaaz.org often have active petitions. - Example Petition: “Support Ukraine's Sovereignty in Peace Talks” (Search on Change.org).
2. **Contact Elected Officials:** - Write to your local and national representatives urging them to take a strong stance in support of Ukraine.
**Who to Write To:** - **Your U.S. Senators:** Visit the Senate website to find contact information. - **Your U.S. Representative:** Visit the House website for their contact details. **Example Contact Information:** - **Senator Elizabeth Warren (MA)** - Email: https://www.warren.senate.gov/contact - Mailing Address: 2400 JFK Federal Building, 15 New Sudbury Street, Boston, MA 02203
- **Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (NY-14)** - Email: https://ocasio-cortez.house.gov/contact - Mailing Address: 1651 Third Avenue, Suite 311, New York, NY 10128
3. **Draft a Message:** - In your communications, you can say: - "Dear [Official's Name], I urge you to support robust measures that protect Ukraine’s sovereignty and promote a fair peace that respects its territorial integrity. Please advocate for continued military assistance and humanitarian support for Ukraine while ensuring that any negotiations include strong security guarantees for the nation."
4. **Attend and Organize Local Events:** - Participate in or organize local rallies or informational forums to educate others about the situation in Ukraine and mobilize community support for humanitarian efforts.
5. **Engage in Fundraising for Humanitarian Aid:** - Support or organize fundraisers for organizations providing aid to the people of Ukraine, such as Doctors Without Borders, GlobalGiving, or local charities focused on providing relief.
6. **Engage with Local Media:** - Write letters to the editor in local newspapers to raise awareness about the conflict and advocate for U.S. support for Ukraine.
7. **Connect with Advocacy Organizations:** - Reach out to organizations like the Ukrainian Congress Committee of America (UCCA) or the National Democratic Institute (NDI) which are involved in supporting Ukraine.
By taking these actions, we can contribute to a more informed public dialogue and support a constructive approach towards resolution in Ukraine that prioritizes peace and human rights.