Truth and Resistance Dove Logo
Know what you should know!

Home     Categories     Search     Subscribe

Trump knows the dangers of addiction -- he must reject Big Weed's...

nypost.com -- Sunday, August 17, 2025, 9:57:35 PM Eastern Daylight Time
Categories: Fundraising & Political Donations, Supreme Court & Judicial Appointments
Trump knows the dangers of addiction -- he must reject Big Weed's...

You know it's a bad idea if Joe Biden was for it. That's the case with the mad push for marijuana reform, which Biden promised in a cynical grab for young voters in his State of the Union address last year.

But now President Trump is reported to be open to fulfilling Biden's promise to reclassify marijuana as a less dangerous Schedule III drug, which would benefit the $33 billion industry by giving them tax deductions and expanding their market.

According to The Wall Street Journal, Trump told donors he was considering the "de-scheduling" of marijuana at a $1 million-a-plate fundraiser at his Bedminster golf club in New Jersey this month that was attended by Kim Rivers, the chief executive of one of the largest marijuana companies, Trulieve.

Trulieve and its ilk pretend that marijuana reforms are for altruistic medical reasons rather than about growing their profits.

Medical marijuana was the bait-and-switch trap when states started legalizing pot more than a decade ago.

Now recreational use has exploded to the point where it has overtaken alcohol, and there's still no sound science on the benefits of medical marijuana.

'Complicated subject'

The president confirmed last week to reporters at the White House that his administration is "looking at reclassification" and intends to make a decision soon.

"Some people like it. Some people hate it," he said. "Some people hate the whole concept of marijuana because if it does bad for the children, it does bad for people that are older than children.

"It's a very complicated subject base," he said. "I've heard great things having to do with medical and bad things having to do with just about everything else."

Trump is a teetotaler.

He credits his late older brother Fred Trump Jr., with his decision not to drink or take drugs. Fred struggled with alcoholism, and died in 1981, aged 42, as a consequence of his disease.

"He was a very handsome guy," Trump told me on "Pod Force One." "He had an unbelievable personality, but the booze got to him . . . He'd always say, 'Don't drink, don't smoke.' Now in those days, there were no drugs, or I guess there were, but you didn't know about it. But he would have added drugs in there. He said, 'Don't ever smoke and don't ever drink.'

"He was a great guy, you know, he was terrific. Could have done anything. He could fly airplanes unbelievably well," Trump added. "He had a great talent for that, but alcohol was a killer for him."

Trump learned from his brother's mistakes: "I never had a drink of alcohol. I don't smoke, and I'm a hard worker. Well, he worked, but he just had the curse, you know, and it was tough."

Marijuana is a disaster. It's infinitely worse than alcohol on every metric, especially mental health. The scientific evidence is incontrovertible that marijuana triggers psychosis in susceptible people.

For example, a large-scale Danish study published in the American Journal of Psychiatry in 2017 found that up to 30% of young men's schizophrenia could have been prevented if they had not used pot.

Even one psychotic episode triggered by marijuana use was associated with a 47% chance of a person developing schizophrenia or bipolar disorder, with the highest risk for those aged 16-to-25, according to the study of 6.9 million Danes between 1972 and 2021.

Another longitudinal study of 50,000 Swedes that began in 1987 found that marijuana users were twice as likely as non-users to develop psychotic disorders such as schizophrenia. Heavy users had a six times greater risk.

A more potent problem

And it was a far less potent drug than it is now.

Marijuana of 40 years ago had about a 5% concentration of THC, the intoxicating component of cannabis, but today's industrial products such as gummies, vapes and pre-rolled joints can be as high as 99% THC.

The stench of pot wafting through blue cities like New York is a hallmark of chaos and disorder. It's the opposite of President Trump's law and order image.

So it is hard to believe he would bow to Big Weed and normalize this insidious drug further.

Unlike his predecessor, Trump understands on a personal level the perils of addiction.

You'd think with the drug problems that have afflicted the lives of both his adult children, Hunter and Ashley, Biden might have had more sense, but pandering to Big Weed was a running theme of his presidency, with executive orders and performative pardons for federal marijuana possession (not one person was in jail for possession alone).

Thankfully, wise heads inside the Drug Enforcement Administration dragged the chain long enough to stop Biden's plan to reclassify marijuana.

The drug lobby has redoubled efforts under Trump, but the signs don't look good for them with the confirmation last month of the new DEA administrator, Terrance Cole.

Much to the disappointment of pot advocates, marijuana was nowhere to be seen on his list of "strategic priorities" announced after he took office, which included combating drug trafficking, Mexican cartels, fentanyl and drug-fueled violence.

Even better, in a post on LinkedIn last year, he wrote: "Everybody knows my stance on marijuana after 30 plus years in law enforcement, so don't even ask!" He added anti-drug hashtags #justsayno, #disorders, #notlegal4distribution, #healthissues, #thinblueline and #backtheblue.

Every week, Post columnist Miranda Devine sits down for exclusive and candid conversations with the most influential disruptors in Washington. Subscribe here!

Cole, who worked at the DEA for 21 years, has made no secret of his concerns about marijuana. sharing a link last year to an article titled "NOT 'Just Weed': Four Times More Dangerous in Three Decades" that found that higher THC levels are "linked to increased problems with memory and learning, distorted perception, difficulty in thinking and problem-solving, and loss of coordination."

Cole's attitude is a good sign.

3 states 'just say no'

So is the fact that three states -- Florida, North Dakota and South Dakota -- last November rejected marijuana legalization measures on the ballot: reversing the trend of the past decade in which 24 states have now approved the drug for recreational use and 40 for medical use, which of course is just the Trojan horse.

In Florida, Big Weed, mainly Trulieve, spent a reported $153 million lobbying for legalization and still lost, despite outspending opponents almost five to one.

It was the third time in four years that poor old North and South Dakotans rejected the ballot measure. But Big Weed just won't take no for an answer, believing that it will eventually wear voters down.

Another good sign is that even The New York Times is starting to tell the truth about marijuana, reporting that 18 million people -- nearly a third of adult users -- reporting symptoms of "cannabis use disorder."

The Times points out that only two states cap the levels of THC, with lobbyists busy preventing any new state health restrictions.

Let's hope that the Trump administration puts the brakes on the headlong rush to legalize this dangerous drug.

Expand

Sign Our Petition


Opinion:

The recent discourse surrounding marijuana reform, particularly the potential reclassification of the drug from Schedule I to Schedule III, highlights the intersection of public health, social justice, and economic equity. While opponents often frame the discussion around addiction and mental health, it is essential to place this conversation within the broader context of drug policy in the United States, where racial disparities in enforcement, the historical stigma associated with cannabis, and the economic potential of legalization create a complex landscape for reform.

Historically, the War on Drugs has disproportionately affected marginalized communities, particularly Black and Brown individuals. Despite similar usage rates across racial groups, data consistently show that these communities face higher rates of arrest and incarceration for marijuana-related offenses. This systemic injustice is rooted in historical prejudices and continues to perpetuate cycles of poverty and disenfranchisement. As such, discussions of marijuana reform must involve not just the economic implications of legalization for corporations but also the urgent need to rectify the harms caused by decades of punitive drug policies. This is a crucial point to raise in debates with those who may not recognize the social justice implications of legalization.

Moreover, it is important to consider the evolving landscape of public sentiment around marijuana. Support for legalization has grown significantly over the past two decades, as more people recognize the medicinal benefits of cannabis and the economic opportunities it presents. The cannabis industry is projected to generate billions in revenue and create thousands of jobs, particularly in states that have successfully implemented legalization. Yet, as evidenced by the recent comments from former President Trump, there is a tendency among some politicians to prioritize corporate interests over community needs. This presents an opportunity to advocate for a model of legalization that emphasizes social equity, ensuring that those communities hardest hit by the War on Drugs have a stake in the emerging cannabis economy.

Furthermore, the argument that marijuana is "infinitely worse than alcohol" is often rooted in stigma rather than scientific consensus. While it is crucial to address concerns about mental health and substance use, it is essential to approach the conversation with nuance and an understanding of the broader context. Studies indicate that alcohol is associated with a range of health issues and social problems, including addiction, violence, and mortality. This comparison underscores the need for a comprehensive approach to substance use that prioritizes harm reduction rather than punitive measures. Advocates can leverage this point to challenge opponents of marijuana reform to reconsider their positions in light of the evidence.

Finally, as discussions around marijuana reform continue to unfold, it is vital to emphasize the role of community voices in shaping policy. Grassroots organizations and advocacy groups have long fought for drug policy reform, often emphasizing the need for equitable access to medical and recreational cannabis. Engaging with these groups not only strengthens the movement for reform but also ensures that the policies enacted do not repeat the mistakes of the past. By fostering a dialogue that includes the voices of those most impacted, advocates can work toward a future where drug policy is guided by principles of justice, equity, and public health, rather than profit motives or outdated moral judgments.

In conclusion, the push for marijuana reform presents a unique opportunity to address longstanding social injustices while promoting economic growth and public health. By framing the conversation around equity, community involvement, and evidence-based policy, advocates can counter the narratives perpetuated by opponents who may cling to outdated stigmas and fear-based arguments. As we navigate this critical moment in the history of drug policy, it is imperative that we work towards a vision of reform that uplifts marginalized communities, promotes health equity, and dismantles the remnants of a failed punitive approach to substance use.

Action:

The debate over marijuana legalization and reform is emblematic of wider cultural and political tensions in American society. While the current political climate may seem to suggest a potential compromise in the path toward marijuana decriminalization, the implications of such policies deserve careful examination. President Trump’s recent comments regarding the possible reclassification of marijuana as a less dangerous Schedule III drug highlight a crucial moment in this ongoing discourse. This move appears to cater to the interests of a burgeoning cannabis industry, yet it raises significant ethical questions about the motivations behind such reforms, particularly when considering the historical context of marijuana prohibition and its disproportionate impact on marginalized communities.

Historically, the criminalization of marijuana has roots deeply embedded in systemic racism and socio-political control. The “War on Drugs” declared in the 1980s disproportionately targeted Black and Latino communities, leading to mass incarceration and generational trauma. As we consider the potential de-scheduling of marijuana, it is vital to advocate for policies that not only legalize but also rectify the injustices of past prohibitions. A comprehensive approach would involve expunging the records of those previously convicted for marijuana-related offenses, ensuring that the benefits of the legal cannabis market are equitably distributed. This means supporting initiatives that prioritize small businesses and social equity in the industry, rather than allowing it to be dominated solely by corporate interests.

The article points to the skepticism surrounding the purported medical benefits of marijuana, emphasizing a need for concrete scientific evidence. While the complexities of marijuana’s effects on health are indeed nuanced, it is essential to recognize the broader implications of this discussion. Advocating for rigorous scientific research can help to dispel myths and provide a clearer understanding of the potential benefits and harms associated with cannabis use. We must push for federal funding and initiatives focused on comprehensive studies that assess both the medical applications of cannabis and its social implications. This will not only inform policy but also engage the public in a more educated dialogue, countering misinformation that often fuels opposition to reform.

Moreover, it is crucial to address the narrative that pits marijuana against alcohol in terms of public health implications. Both substances carry risks, and framing the discussion solely around their relative dangers can detract from the broader issue of substance abuse in America. The focus should shift toward promoting overall mental health and wellness, emphasizing harm reduction strategies and access to mental health resources. By advocating for policies that prioritize holistic health approaches, we can foster an environment where individuals are equipped to make informed decisions about their substance use, rather than criminalizing those decisions.

As citizens, we have the power to influence this conversation through activism and community engagement. Engaging in local advocacy groups, writing to elected officials, and participating in town hall meetings can amplify the voices calling for sensible drug reform. It is essential to educate ourselves and others about the historical injustices tied to drug prohibition and the economic opportunities that a regulated cannabis industry can provide for disenfranchised communities. By building coalitions that span across various sectors of society—including health professionals, educators, and social justice advocates—we can create a united front that champions equitable reform and dismantles the lingering stigmas associated with marijuana use.

In conclusion, the potential reclassification of marijuana by the Trump administration presents both opportunities and challenges. While it may signal a step toward reform, we must remain vigilant in ensuring that any legalization efforts do not merely serve corporate interests but instead promote justice and equity. By fostering informed discussions, advocating for comprehensive research, and engaging in activism, we can push for a future where the benefits of marijuana are enjoyed by all, rather than perpetuating cycles of harm. The path forward requires collective action, grounded in a commitment to social justice, public health, and the dismantling of archaic drug policies that have long harmed our communities.

To Do:

In light of the article discussing the potential reclassification of marijuana and the ongoing debate around its implications, there are several proactive steps individuals can take to engage in this issue effectively. Here’s a detailed list of ideas and actions to consider:

### Personal Actions and Engagement

1. **Educate Yourself and Others** - Read scientific studies and articles about marijuana use and its effects, both positive and negative. Share this information with your social circles to foster informed discussions.

2. **Join Local Advocacy Groups** - Get involved with organizations that support responsible marijuana reform. For example, groups like the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws (NORML) or local chapters can provide resources and community support.

3. **Attend Town Hall Meetings** - Participate in local government meetings or town halls where drug policy is discussed. Engaging with your local representatives can create awareness and influence decision-making.

4. **Promote Mental Health Awareness** - Advocate for mental health resources and support systems in your community, emphasizing the importance of addressing addiction and mental health concerns related to substance use.

### Specific Actions

1. **Sign Petitions** - Look for petitions on platforms like Change.org addressing marijuana reform that aligns with your views. For instance, you can search for petitions aimed at ensuring stringent regulations on marijuana sales.

2. **Contact Elected Officials** - Write to your local and state representatives to express your opinions on marijuana reform. Here’s how to structure your outreach:

- **Who to Write To:** - U.S. Senators and Representatives - State Legislators - Local Council Members

- **Example Contacts:** - **Senator Elizabeth Warren** - Email: senator_warren@warren.senate.gov - Mailing Address: 2400 JFK Federal Building, 15 New Sudbury St., Boston, MA 02203 - **Representative Ayanna Pressley** - Email: contact@pressley.house.gov - Mailing Address: 2400 Rayburn House Office Building, Washington, DC 20515

- **What to Say:** - Express your views on marijuana reform, focusing on public health and safety. Highlight the importance of responsible legislation that prioritizes evidence-based practices and community welfare.

3. **Engage on Social Media** - Use platforms like Twitter and Instagram to raise awareness about marijuana reform issues. Share educational content, engage in discussions, and tag local representatives to get their attention.

4. **Organize Community Events** - Host community forums or discussions about marijuana use, mental health, and addiction. Invite experts to speak and provide a platform for open dialogue.

5. **Support Local Businesses** - If you live in a state where marijuana is legal, consider supporting local businesses that prioritize responsible use and community engagement. This could include dispensaries that contribute to mental health initiatives.

### Conclusion

The conversation surrounding marijuana and its potential reclassification is complex and multifaceted. By taking actionable steps—whether through education, advocacy, or community involvement—you can contribute to a more informed and responsible dialogue about this important issue.


Sign Our Petition


Updated very often
All Opinions and Actions are (C)opyright 2025 - TruthAndResistance.com