Truth and Resistance Dove Logo
Know what you should know!

Home     Categories     Search     Subscribe

'Not Acceptable': GOP Rep Ripped For Suggesting Trump Get Permanent Power 'As Long As He Wants'

mediaite.com -- Sunday, August 17, 2025, 6:47:52 PM Eastern Daylight Time
Categories: Social Media & Public Statements, Presidential Campaigns, Republican Party Politics
'Not Acceptable': GOP Rep Ripped For Suggesting Trump Get Permanent Power 'As Long As He Wants'

Tennessee Rep. Andy Ogles (R) got major blowback on social media Sunday after suggesting that President Donald Trump be given a hall pass to do whatever he wants.

Ogles posted to X Saturday, "Give Trump a third term, give him a Peace Prize, and let him run D.C. as long as he wants."

His writing was met with a "Community Note," stating, "The 22nd amendment of the constitution says No."

Nina Turner, former presidential campaign co-chair for Bernie Sanders, called for Ogles's outright ouster from Congress.

When conservative commentator Renatta Oxendine suggested that "Stating an opinion is not unconstitutional. Ever hear of the 1st amendment?" Turner replied, "This is a member of congress advocating against the constitution. Hence, unconstitutional."

Republicans Against Trump asked X's A.I. bot Grok what was wrong with the statement, and the bot set the record straight: "The tweet proposes unconstitutional actions: a third term violates the 22nd Amendment's two-term limit (Trump is serving his second). The Nobel Peace Prize is awarded by the Norwegian Committee, not "given" by the US. Allowing indefinite rule undermines democracy and the Constitution."

Expand

Sign Our Petition


Opinion:

The recent remark by Tennessee Representative Andy Ogles, suggesting that Donald Trump should be allowed to serve an indefinite number of terms and even run the country "as long as he wants," reflects a dangerous trend within contemporary Republican politics. In a nation where the rule of law and constitutional governance are foundational principles, such statements not only spark outrage but also raise pressing questions about the health of American democracy. Ogles's comments, which garnered significant backlash, serve as a reminder of the fragility of democratic norms, especially when they are co-opted by those in power for personal or political gain.

Historically, the U.S. has experienced shifts in democratic governance, often influenced by charismatic leaders who challenge established norms. The 22nd Amendment, ratified in 1951, was a direct response to Franklin D. Roosevelt's unprecedented four terms in office. This amendment reflects a collective decision by the American populace and their representatives to prevent the consolidation of power in the hands of any individual. Ogles's suggestion not only undermines this constitutional safeguard but also echoes a broader pattern where some politicians, in their quest for power, dismiss the very principles that uphold democracy. This historical context is crucial for understanding the implications of such rhetoric, as it highlights the repeated struggles against authoritarian impulses in American politics.

Moreover, the reaction to Ogles's statement underscores the importance of civic engagement and the role of social media in contemporary discourse. The backlash from figures like Nina Turner and the community response to Ogles’s tweet serve as a reminder that citizens are vigilant and willing to hold their representatives accountable. The interplay between public outrage and calls for accountability reflects a healthy democratic society where constituents assert their rights and challenge rhetoric that threatens the foundations of governance. This moment serves as an educational opportunity for individuals on both sides of the political spectrum to engage in meaningful discussions about the importance of constitutional limits and the dangers of unchecked power.

The broader implications of Ogles's rhetoric cannot be understated, as they bring into focus ongoing social struggles surrounding democratic integrity, civil rights, and the rule of law. The normalization of authoritarian sentiment among certain political figures raises concerns about the erosion of civil liberties and the potential for a chilling effect on dissent. It is essential to recognize that the fight against such anti-democratic tendencies is not merely political but deeply intertwined with social justice movements. The struggles for racial equity, women's rights, and LGBTQ+ rights all hinge on a robust and functioning democracy that respects and upholds the rights of all individuals, irrespective of their backgrounds.

In conclusion, Ogles's comments should serve as a wake-up call for all Americans to remain vigilant in protecting their democratic institutions. The reaction from various quarters highlights a commitment to uphold the Constitution and the democratic principles enshrined within it. Engaging in conversations about the rule of law, the importance of civic responsibility, and the potential dangers of unchecked political ambition is critical in ensuring that history does not repeat itself. As we confront these challenges, it is imperative to advocate for a political landscape that values democratic governance and inclusivity, fostering a society that reflects the will of the people rather than the whims of a single individual.

Action:

The recent comments made by Tennessee Representative Andy Ogles reveal a troubling trend within certain factions of the Republican Party that seeks to undermine the very foundations of American democracy. In suggesting that former President Donald Trump should be allowed to serve as long as he wishes—effectively advocating for a third term—Ogles not only dismisses the rule of law but also demonstrates a chilling disregard for the constitutional principles that have governed the United States for over two centuries. This incident serves as a stark reminder of the fragility of democracy and the need for vigilance in safeguarding our democratic institutions.

Historically, the 22nd Amendment was ratified in 1951 in response to Franklin D. Roosevelt's unprecedented four terms in office. This amendment was designed to prevent the concentration of power in a single individual and to promote a healthy turnover in leadership, thereby reinforcing the democratic process. Ogles' suggestion to bypass this constitutional safeguard represents a radical departure from the values that have long been upheld in American governance. It is essential to recognize that such rhetoric is not merely a joke or hyperbole; it reflects a growing sentiment among some conservatives to prioritize loyalty to a political figure over adherence to the Constitution.

The ramifications of endorsing such a view extend far beyond the realm of political discourse. If we, as a society, allow the normalization of these ideas, we risk opening the door to authoritarianism. History has shown us that when political leaders are afforded unchecked power, the consequences can be dire, often leading to the erosion of civil liberties and democratic norms. We must take this moment to remind ourselves of the lessons learned from past authoritarian regimes around the world, where leaders have manipulated legal frameworks to entrench their power. It is our responsibility as citizens to stand firm against any attempts to undermine the constitutional safeguards that protect our democracy.

In light of this situation, it is crucial for concerned citizens to take action. Engaging in grassroots activism, organizing community discussions, and raising awareness about the importance of constitutional protections are vital steps we can take to counter these dangerous narratives. Additionally, supporting organizations dedicated to defending democratic principles, such as the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) or Common Cause, can amplify our collective voice. We must also hold elected officials accountable, demanding that they adhere to the Constitution and uphold the values of democracy, rather than pandering to populist sentiments that threaten to erode democratic norms.

Furthermore, education plays a pivotal role in countering the misinformation and disinformation that often permeates political discussions. By fostering a greater understanding of the Constitution and the foundational principles of American democracy, we can empower individuals to critically assess the rhetoric of their representatives. Encouraging civic education in schools and communities is crucial in ensuring that future generations appreciate the significance of democratic governance and the importance of citizen engagement. In this era of political polarization, it is essential to foster respectful dialogue that emphasizes the core values of democracy, rather than allowing divisive rhetoric to take root.

In conclusion, the comments made by Representative Ogles serve as a clarion call for all Americans to engage actively in the defense of our democratic institutions. By recognizing the historical context of such rhetoric and understanding the potential consequences of normalizing such views, we can mobilize ourselves and our communities to resist the encroachments on democracy. It is our collective responsibility to uphold the Constitution and advocate for a political culture that prioritizes democratic values over individual personalities or partisan loyalty. Let us be vigilant and proactive in our efforts to preserve the foundations of our democracy for generations to come.

To Do:

The recent comments from Tennessee Rep. Andy Ogles, suggesting that former President Trump should be allowed to hold office indefinitely, have sparked significant outrage. This incident highlights the importance of vigilance in protecting democratic principles and the constitutional framework of our government. Here are some concrete actions we can take to respond effectively:

### Personal Actions:

1. **Educate Yourself and Others:** - Stay informed about the 22nd Amendment and the implications of unlimited presidential power. Share this information with friends and family to raise awareness.

2. **Engage in Conversations:** - Discuss the importance of upholding constitutional principles in your community, social media, and local gatherings. Use platforms to host discussions or debates about democracy and the rule of law.

3. **Participate in Local Government:** - Attend town hall meetings or local government sessions to voice your concerns about the political climate and the importance of constitutional adherence.

### Advocacy Actions:

1. **Sign Petitions:** - Explore platforms like Change.org or MoveOn.org for petitions opposing actions that undermine democratic principles. For example, searching for petitions regarding constitutional adherence or term limits can be a starting point.

2. **Create a Petition:** - If you can't find a petition that aligns with your concerns, consider starting one. Use platforms like Change.org to gather signatures. Make sure to clearly articulate the issue and potential consequences for democracy.

### Contacting Officials:

1. **Write to Your Representatives:** - Reach out to your local and federal representatives to express your concerns about the implications of comments like those made by Rep. Ogles. Here are some examples:

- **Senator Dick Durbin (D-IL)** - Email: durbin.senate.gov/contact - Mailing Address: 525 S. 8th St. Room 142, Springfield, IL 62703 - **Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY)** - Email: ocasiocortez.house.gov/contact - Mailing Address: 1236 Longworth House Office Building, Washington, DC 20515

- **What to Say:** - Express your concerns about the potential for undermining democracy, emphasizing the importance of the 22nd Amendment. Urge them to denounce such rhetoric and protect the integrity of our democratic institutions.

2. **Engage with Activist Organizations:** - Collaborate with groups like Indivisible or MoveOn, which often have ongoing campaigns related to protecting democracy. This can involve attending rallies, participating in phone banking, or joining local chapters.

### Social Media Advocacy:

1. **Use Social Media Platforms:** - Share articles, write your own posts, and engage in conversations about the importance of democratic values. Use hashtags related to democracy, constitutional rights, and political accountability to amplify your voice.

2. **Tag and Mention Influencers:** - Engage with political commentators and influencers on platforms like Twitter and Instagram. Tag them when discussing the importance of constitutional adherence, encouraging broader conversations.

### Conclusion: By taking these actions, we can collectively push back against rhetoric that threatens the foundation of our democracy. It’s essential to remain vigilant, informed, and proactive, ensuring that our representatives understand the value we place on our constitutional rights and democratic processes.


Sign Our Petition


Updated very often
All Opinions and Actions are (C)opyright 2025 - TruthAndResistance.com