Obama's Stalinist Gambit
frontpagemag.com -- Sunday, August 17, 2025, 5:52:32 PM Eastern Daylight Time
Categories: U.S.–Russia Relations, Foreign Policy & International Relations, Presidential Campaigns
It's clear now: Obama and his henchmen tried to frame Trump the way Stalin framed his rivals.
[Order Jamie Glazov's new book, 'Obama's True Legacy: How He Transformed America': HERE.]
Now it's all out in the open, and we know: Barack Hussein Obama, who was president of the United States at the time, tried to frame his successor, whose public persona and policies he detested, as an asset of a foreign government, a criminal pawn of Vladimir Putin. Nothing like this had ever happened before in American history. The closest analogy to the Russian collusion hoax was the Stalinist show trials of the 1920s and 1930s Soviet Union, in which the Communist dictator Joseph Stalin did away with his old friends and allies and thereby solidified his grip on absolute power.
The New York Post reported Sunday that Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, who oversaw the release of the documents that blew the cover off the frame-up of Trump, said: "It surprised me that all of these documents still existed, quite frankly." Indeed. Obama and his henchmen had the four years of the Biden regime to cover their tracks, and to ensure that the body blow they dealt to the American republic would never become public knowledge.
They likely assumed, however, that the deep state was too powerful, that the federal government was just too filled with their friends and allies, for Trump to be able to discover much, or to do anything significant with what he did find. Even now that the whole shocking conspiracy is out in the open, the New York Times is still dutifully running interference for the conspirators, writing of "unsubstantiated allegations by President Trump that President Barack Obama and his aides ordered an investigation into the 2016 Trump campaign's connections to Russia to destroy Mr. Trump."
The allegations are, in reality, quite well substantiated. The Post provided a helpful summary, noting that "the House report contradicts the claims of Obama officials that they never relied on the discredited Steele dossier -- which was compiled by Hillary Clinton's campaign -- as part of the Russiagate investigation." Gabbard "claimed Wednesday that Obama ordered the creation of the 2017 intel report and suggested it 'was subject to unusual directives directly from the president and senior political appointees.' She added: 'Obama directed an intelligence community assessment to be created, to further this contrived false narrative that ultimately led to a year-long coup to try to undermine President Trump's presidency.'"
During the 2016 presidential campaign, the Russian government actually possessed damaging information about Hillary Clinton, and yet did not release it. "If Russia aspired to help Trump get elected," Gabbard noted, "which is what the manufactured January 2017 intelligence community assessment says with high confidence, according to Brennan and Clapper, then Putin would have released the most damaging information and emails to help President Trump. It was intentionally withheld and not released because they assumed that Hillary Clinton would win that
election, and their plan [was to] wait until maybe days or weeks before her inauguration to release these documents."
In orchestrating this massive hoax, Obama took a page from Stalin's playbook. After Joseph Stalin emerged victorious in the power struggle that followed the incapacity and death of the founder of the Soviet state, V. I. Lenin, he set out to secure his hold on power by turning against his old comrades. Stalin first claimed that three founding figures of Soviet Russia, Leon Trotsky, Grigori Zinoviev, and Lev Kamenev, were traitors and saboteurs, and had them expelled from the Communist Party. Stalin's next victim was one of the regime's most popular figures, Nikolai Bukharin, who had dared to oppose Stalin's policies of forced collectivization.
Others followed. It seemed as if Stalin was the only pure Communist, the only trustworthy one, and that everyone else who had assisted Lenin in founding the Soviet Union was actually an enemy of the state. That was actually true: the entire Soviet government, including Stalin, was made up of enemies of the state, oppressors and plunderers who turned Russia into a prison camp and ultimately into the primary tool for the enslavement not only of Russians, but of other peoples as well. Stalin's trials were absurd, but if he really had the best interests of his people at heart, he would have gone the whole way and put himself on trial as well.
So it is today. Obama, Clinton, Clapper, Comey and Brennan tried to frame Trump as an enemy of the republic. And it is they who are the real enemies of the republic. The evidence is in their plot itself. They tried to carry out a Stalinist operation against Trump, and got caught. Whether or not they ever face justice, free people now know who their real enemies are.
Sign Our PetitionIn recent discussions surrounding the political landscape of the United States, the framing of Barack Obama’s presidency and the subsequent allegations of misconduct regarding the Trump administration have dominated certain media narratives. Articles likening Obama’s actions to Stalinist tactics serve to polarize an already divided political arena. These claims reflect a trend that can be traced back to the historical context of political smear campaigns, often used by those in power to delegitimize opponents. Engaging in this discourse requires a critical examination of the underlying motives, the historical precedents of such allegations, and the broader implications for democratic institutions and social justice.
The allegations presented in the article draw a parallel between Obama’s alleged actions and the infamous show trials of the Stalinist era. This comparison not only oversimplifies a complex situation but also risks trivializing the genuine human rights abuses that characterized the Soviet regime. Historically, Stalin used show trials to eliminate real and perceived threats to his power, often fabricating evidence and manipulating public perception. In contrast, the scrutiny surrounding the Trump campaign and its connections to Russia was rooted in legitimate concerns about foreign interference in democratic processes—an issue that, as we know, has been a recurring theme in global politics. Framing this issue as a mere "frame-up" seeks to undermine the very real threats posed by foreign influence, which have been documented by multiple intelligence agencies.
Moreover, the discussion surrounding the Steele dossier and its use in the investigation of Russian interference highlights a critical aspect of modern political discourse: the weaponization of information. It is essential to recognize that the political landscape has evolved significantly, with misinformation and disinformation campaigns becoming tools used by various factions across the spectrum. The invocation of terms like "deep state" and allegations of conspiracy not only distract from substantive policy discussions but also serve to bolster a narrative that seeks to erase the complexities of governance in a pluralistic society. By focusing on personalities and alleged conspiracies, we risk losing sight of the systemic issues that require our attention, such as economic inequality, racial injustice, and the erosion of democratic norms.
As we analyze the implications of these narratives, it is also essential to consider the role of media in shaping public perception. The article suggests a conspiracy of silence among mainstream media outlets, particularly the New York Times, which allegedly serves as a gatekeeper for information that challenges the prevailing narrative. This critique echoes a long-standing sentiment on both sides of the aisle regarding media bias. However, the challenge lies in distinguishing fact from fiction and ensuring that discussions remain grounded in evidence-based journalism. The responsibility falls on media consumers to seek out diverse perspectives and critically assess the information presented to them, rather than succumbing to oversimplified narratives that reinforce existing biases.
In the end, the ongoing political struggle is not merely about individual personalities or isolated incidents but rather about the broader implications for democracy and social justice. The framing of political opponents as enemies of the state can lead to dangerous precedents where dissent is stifled, and meaningful discourse is replaced with hostility and division. Engaging in a thoughtful examination of these issues can empower individuals to challenge reductive narratives and advocate for a more equitable society. The historical context of political repression serves as a reminder of the importance of vigilance in defending democratic institutions and the principles of justice, equality, and transparency that underpin them. Therefore, rather than becoming embroiled in the latest partisan skirmishes, it is crucial for engaged citizens to focus on fostering a political culture that values critical thinking, inclusivity, and accountability.
The article presents a provocative narrative that seeks to frame former President Barack Obama’s actions during the 2016 election cycle as a nefarious plot against Donald Trump, likening it to Stalinist show trials. This comparison not only oversimplifies complex political dynamics but also functions as a distraction from substantive discussions about accountability, democracy, and the integrity of our electoral processes. Historically, accusations of treachery and conspiratorial frameworks have often been weaponized in American politics to delegitimize opponents, a tactic that has roots stretching back to the Red Scare and McCarthyism. This discourse within the current political climate diminishes our ability to engage in productive conversations about governance and the responsibilities of those in power.
One of the core elements in this debate is the role of misinformation and its impact on public perception. The claim that Obama orchestrated a “frame-up” of Trump relies heavily on a specific interpretation of events, which conveniently overlooks the extensive investigations conducted by various intelligence agencies that uncovered genuine connections between Trump associates and Russian entities. The historical context surrounding these investigations speaks to the ongoing struggle to uphold democratic principles in the face of external interference. The implications of foreign influence in elections are profound and cannot be dismissed simply as political machinations; they require a thoughtful, nuanced response from all citizens, regardless of political affiliation.
For Americans concerned with the integrity of their democracy, there are several avenues to pursue. First, advocating for comprehensive electoral reform is vital. This includes pushing for measures that enhance transparency in campaign financing, as well as safeguarding against foreign electoral interference. Legislative initiatives such as the For the People Act and the John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act are crucial steps towards ensuring a fair electoral process. Engaging in grassroots movements to raise awareness about the importance of voting rights and electoral integrity can empower individuals and communities alike, fostering a more informed electorate.
Furthermore, it is essential to promote media literacy among the public. The proliferation of misinformation not only skews perceptions of reality but also erodes trust in reputable news sources. Educational initiatives aimed at teaching critical thinking skills and how to discern credible information from sensationalist narratives can serve as a bulwark against the manipulation of public opinion. By fostering a culture that values informed discourse, citizens can better navigate the complex media landscape and engage meaningfully in political discussions.
Lastly, engaging in conversations that prioritize empathy and understanding can bridge divides between differing political viewpoints. While it may be tempting to dismiss opposing views as mere propaganda, recognizing the shared concerns of all Americans regarding national security, governance, and community welfare can create opportunities for collaboration. Emphasizing the importance of accountability among all political leaders, regardless of party affiliation, can cultivate a more constructive political environment, where the focus is on democratic values rather than partisan warfare.
In conclusion, while the article attempts to frame a narrative that blames Obama for a supposed conspiracy against Trump, it inadvertently highlights the need for Americans to critically assess the integrity of their political system. By advocating for electoral reform, promoting media literacy, and fostering empathetic dialogues, we can work towards a more equitable and transparent democratic process. It is imperative that citizens remain vigilant, informed, and engaged, ensuring that the lessons of history guide our actions in safeguarding democracy for future generations.
Analyzing the article from a critical perspective, it becomes clear that there are significant political narratives at play that merit our attention. Here is a detailed list of actions that can be taken, along with suggestions for petitions, organizations to contact, and key messages to convey.
### What Can We Personally Do About This?
1. **Stay Informed**: Read widely from various sources to understand the implications of political narratives, including those surrounding the Trump administration and Obama’s presidency. This helps in forming a well-rounded perspective.
2. **Engage in Dialogue**: Discuss these issues with friends, family, and community members. Effective communication can help challenge misinformation and promote critical thinking.
3. **Support Accountability and Transparency**: Advocate for greater accountability in government actions. Politicians and officials should be held responsible for their decisions, especially those that influence public trust.
### Exact Actions We Can Take
1. **Sign Petitions**: - **Petition for Transparency in Government Investigations**: Websites like Change.org or MoveOn.org often have petitions aimed at increasing governmental transparency and accountability. Search for petitions related to government investigations into political figures. - **Example Petition**: Search for “Demand Accountability for Government Misconduct” on Change.org.
2. **Contact Elected Officials**: - Reach out to your local representatives to voice concerns about governmental transparency and accountability in the political process. - **Who to Contact**: - U.S. Senator for [Your State]: - Name: [Your Senator's Name] - Email: [Senator's Email] - Mailing Address: [Senator's Office Address] - U.S. House Representative for [Your District]: - Name: [Your Representative's Name] - Email: [Representative's Email] - Mailing Address: [Representative's Office Address] - You can find specific details by visiting [congress.gov](https://www.congress.gov) or [house.gov](https://www.house.gov).
3. **Write Letters to the Editor**: Share your perspective with local newspapers. Make your voice heard by articulating your stance on the importance of accountability in government and the implications of political narratives.
### What to Say
1. **In Petitions**: - "We urge our elected officials to commit to transparency in investigations concerning political figures and to hold those in power accountable for their actions. The public deserves to know the truth."
2. **In Emails or Letters to Officials**: - **Subject**: Demand for Transparency and Accountability - **Body**: "Dear [Official's Name], I am writing to express my concerns regarding the recent revelations surrounding government investigations. I believe it is crucial for the integrity of our democracy that all actions taken by government officials are transparent and accountable. I urge you to support measures that ensure such transparency moving forward. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, [Your Name]"
3. **In Letters to the Editor**: - "The recent discussions surrounding political accountability highlight a pressing need for transparency in our government. We must demand that our leaders act with integrity, ensuring that every investigation is rooted in truth and not political agendas. Only then can we restore faith in our democratic institutions."
### Conclusion
By taking these actions, individuals can play a crucial role in advocating for a political climate that values transparency and accountability. Engaging in discussions, supporting petitions, and communicating with elected officials are all effective strategies to influence the political landscape. It is imperative to remain vigilant and proactive in the face of any political narrative that undermines democratic principles.