Sydney Sweeney's 'Americana' bombs at box office amid American Eagle controversy
arynews.tv -- Sunday, August 17, 2025, 4:27:55 PM Eastern Daylight Time
Categories: Presidential Campaigns

Hollywood star Sydney Sweeney's 'Americana' opened to a disastrous start at the box office after controversy over her American Eagle Ad.
Directed by Tony Tost, the film co-stars Sweeney with Paul Walter Hauser, Eric Dane and singer Halsey.
'Americana' debuted in 1,123 theatres across the US on July 15, and collected just $500,000 for a sixteenth-place finish, according to a report by The Hollywood Reporter.
Despite the dismal box office opening, Lionsgate maintained that the film was not a disappointment, financial or otherwise.
The crime-heist movie film arrived in cinemas amid the controversy surrounding the American Eagle Ad, featuring Sydney Sweeney.
The Ad, released on July 23, triggered a media firestorm after the apparel company included the "Sydney Has Great Jeans" line in the campaign.
Several social media users suggested that the comments in the American Eagle Ad promoted eugenics since Sydney Sweeney was white.
The criticism on the Hollywood actor intensified after reports emerged that she was a registered Republican in Florida.
Following the reports, US President Donald Trump joined the debate, saying, "If Sydney Sweeney is a registered Republican, I think her ad is fantastic."
It is worth noting here that the Hollywood actor was heckled at the film's premiere over her American Eagle Ad earlier this month.
US media outlets reported that a woman called the actor names as soon as she arrived at the event in Los Angeles.
As she stepped out of her vehicle and went towards the theatre, a woman shouted, "Stop the ad, that is being racist!"
Currently running in theatres, 'Americana' sees Sweeney playing an aspiring country singer and South Dakota waitress called Penny Jo Poplin.
Sign Our PetitionThe recent box office performance of Sydney Sweeney's film "Americana" reflects more than just ticket sales; it encapsulates the intersection of celebrity culture, social justice, and political identity in contemporary America. The dismal opening weekend, where the film grossed $500,000 and finished sixteenth, is not solely a reflection of audience preference but rather an indictment of the cultural climate that has become increasingly polarized. The controversy surrounding Sweeney's American Eagle advertisement, which was criticized for allegedly promoting eugenics, serves as a lens through which we can examine broader societal issues, including the ongoing struggles against systemic racism, and the responsibilities of public figures in an age of heightened scrutiny.
Historically, the connection between advertising, race, and social identity has been fraught with tension. The backlash against Sweeney's ad is a reminder of how advertising is not merely a sales pitch but a cultural statement that reflects and shapes societal values. The suggestion that a phrase like "Sydney Has Great Jeans," uttered by a white actress, carries implications of eugenics speaks to a deeper societal reckoning with race. This incident underscores the need for brands to be acutely aware of the historical context of their messaging and the potential impact of their portrayals. Such awareness is critical as we continue to grapple with the legacy of eugenics in America, a movement that has historically targeted marginalized communities and is built on pseudoscience and discrimination.
The role of celebrity in shaping political discourse cannot be understated, and Sweeney's situation illustrates the complexities involved. The emergence of her political affiliations as a registered Republican sparked intense debate, revealing how celebrity identities can complicate public perception. The fervor surrounding her political stance and its implications on her brand and projects speaks volumes about the current state of American politics, where celebrity culture intertwines with grassroots movements and political ideologies. This scenario is emblematic of a broader struggle within the entertainment industry, where artists are often pressured to align with specific political narratives or risk alienating audiences.
The heckling Sweeney faced at the premiere of "Americana" points to the challenges artists encounter when navigating public discourse around race and politics. The outburst, calling her advertisement "racist," signals a growing intolerance for perceived insensitivity in public life. It is a reflection of a society that increasingly demands accountability from public figures, particularly on issues of race and representation. This moment serves as a teachable instance about the power dynamics at play in discussions of race, privilege, and the expectations placed on individuals within the entertainment industry to either conform to or challenge societal norms.
In conclusion, the controversy surrounding "Americana" and Sweeney's American Eagle ad signifies a critical moment in the ongoing dialogue about race, privilege, and responsibility in America. As audiences become more discerning and vocal about social justice issues, the film industry must adapt to these changing expectations. This case serves as compelling ammunition for discussions about accountability, representation, and the responsibilities of public figures—a reminder that in today's socio-political landscape, every message, whether in film or advertising, carries weight and consequences. Engaging in these conversations not only promotes awareness but also encourages a more nuanced understanding of the intersections between race, politics, and culture in shaping our collective future.
The recent failure of Sydney Sweeney's film *Americana* at the box office not only highlights the complexities of celebrity culture but also serves as a reflection of the broader societal tensions surrounding race, identity, and political affiliation in America. The film's lackluster performance, coupled with the uproar over the American Eagle ad campaign featuring Sweeney, underscores how deeply intertwined these issues have become in contemporary discourse. In a nation where culture is often a battleground for ideological conflicts, the reactions to Sweeney's ad and her political alignment speak volumes about the current state of American society, revealing how public figures can become focal points for larger debates about race and representation.
Historically, the entertainment industry has been a microcosm of American society, often mirroring the larger sociopolitical landscape. The backlash against Sweeney's ad, which some perceived as racially insensitive, can be traced back to a long-standing tradition of scrutinizing representation in media. As America grapples with its complex racial history, from systemic racism to the ongoing struggle for equality, any perceived misstep by public figures is magnified under the microscope of social media. The fact that Sweeney is a registered Republican, combined with the ad's controversial messaging, placed her squarely in the crosshairs of a cultural critique that is increasingly polarized. This incident illustrates how celebrity personas are not merely personal but are often co-opted into larger narratives about belonging and identity in a diverse society.
In the face of such controversies, it is crucial for audiences to engage critically rather than reactively. As Americans, we must navigate these discussions thoughtfully, understanding that the interpretations of Sweeney's ad are not merely reflections of her individual choices but resonate with broader societal anxieties about race and politics. For those who identify with leftist values, it is essential to advocate for a more nuanced understanding of representation—one that acknowledges the historical context of race while also recognizing the complexities of personal identity. Engaging in dialogue that emphasizes empathy and understanding can help bridge the divides that controversies like this often exacerbate.
Moreover, the incident surrounding *Americana* serves as a reminder of the power of consumer influence in the entertainment industry. Audiences have the ability to shape narratives by opting to support or boycott projects based on their ethical considerations. As consumers, we should wield this power responsibly by advocating for diversity in storytelling and representation in Hollywood. By supporting films and projects that challenge stereotypes and promote inclusivity, we can send a clear message to the industry about the kind of narratives we wish to see. This involves not only attending films that feature diverse voices but also amplifying those voices through social media and grassroots advocacy.
Lastly, the involvement of political figures like Donald Trump in the discourse surrounding Sweeney’s ad highlights the intersection of celebrity, politics, and public perception. It is essential to remain vigilant against the ways in which public figures can exploit these situations for political gain. The left must continue to challenge the narratives surrounding race and representation, ensuring that discussions are not derailed by partisan rhetoric. Instead, we should strive for a culture that holds celebrities accountable while also fostering an environment where healthy dialogue can flourish. By doing so, we can create a more inclusive society that values the diverse perspectives of all its members, ultimately leading to a richer cultural landscape.
In light of the controversy surrounding Sydney Sweeney's film "Americana" and its association with the American Eagle Ad, there are several steps we can take as individuals to address the issues raised in the article and promote a more inclusive and aware media landscape. Here are some actionable ideas:
### What Can We Personally Do About This?
1. **Engage in Discussions**: Talk to friends, family, and peers about the implications of advertising and representation in media. Engaging in constructive dialogue can help raise awareness about the impact of such ads and the discussions surrounding them.
2. **Support Inclusive Media**: Actively seek out and support films and media that promote diversity and inclusion. This includes watching and sharing content created by marginalized groups.
3. **Promote Representation**: Advocate for better representation in media by supporting initiatives and organizations that focus on diversity in film and television.
4. **Educate Ourselves and Others**: Read articles, books, and studies on the effects of media representation and eugenics. Share this knowledge with your community to foster a more informed public discourse.
### Exact Actions We Can Take
#### 1. Sign Petitions - **Petition for Diversity in Advertising**: Search for or create petitions that advocate for diversity and sensitivity in advertising. Websites like Change.org often have active petitions. - Example: [Change.org](https://www.change.org) - Search for "diversity in advertising."
#### 2. Write to Relevant Organizations - **American Eagle Outfitters**: Express concerns about the messaging in their advertising campaigns. - **Email**: custserv@ae.com - **Mail**: American Eagle Outfitters, 77 Hot Metal Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15203
- **Lionsgate**: Share your thoughts on the responsibility of film studios in promoting inclusive narratives. - **Email**: info@lionsgate.com - **Mail**: Lions Gate Entertainment Corp., 2700 Colorado Ave, Santa Monica, CA 90404
#### 3. Contact Legislators - Reach out to your local representatives to advocate for policies that promote media literacy and diversity in media. - Visit [GovTrack.us](https://www.govtrack.us/) to find your representatives and their contact information.
#### 4. Use Social Media - Use your platforms to raise awareness about the issue. Create posts discussing the importance of diversity in advertising and media representation, tagging brands and using relevant hashtags like #DiversityInMedia and #RepresentationMatters.
### What to Say
When communicating your concerns, consider the following points to ensure your message is constructive and impactful:
- **Express Your Concerns**: Clearly state what you found problematic about the ad and its potential implications. For example: "I believe that the messaging in the recent American Eagle ad featuring Sydney Sweeney could perpetuate harmful stereotypes and fail to represent the diversity of our society."
- **Advocate for Change**: Suggest that the company or organization takes steps to ensure more inclusive messaging in their future campaigns. "I urge you to consider the impact of your advertising and make a commitment to promote diversity and inclusion in your marketing efforts."
- **Encourage Dialogue**: Invite them to engage in discussions about the importance of responsible advertising and representation. "I would appreciate a dialogue on how your company plans to address these concerns in the future."
By taking these actions, we can collectively contribute to a shift in how media is produced and consumed, fostering a more inclusive environment that values diverse voices and perspectives.