After a freeze, Trump administration reluctantly agrees to fund EV chargers
gpb.org -- Sunday, August 17, 2025, 2:25:27 PM Eastern Daylight Time
Categories: Media Coverage & Press Relations, Presidential Campaigns, State Politics & Governors
The Trump administration is reopening a federal program to fund the installation of high-speed EV chargers along freeways nationwide, after a six-month freeze in funds and a legal battle with states.
President Trump has repeatedly denounced the multibillion dollar program, called the National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure (or NEVI) program, as wasteful. It was created in 2021 through a bipartisan act of Congress, and unlike many other Biden-era climate measures, that law remains on the books; Congress has not reversed it.
The Department of Transportation froze the funds in February, and months passed with no indication of when funding would be restarted. A coalition of more than a dozen states sued the federal government, alleging that the administration was violating the law and defying the will of Congress. A federal judge issued a preliminary injunction in the states' favor.
Now, the DOT has started the process of unfreezing the money by releasing new guidance that will allow the funds to flow again -- while removing a number of Biden-era requirements.
Officials made it clear they haven't changed their minds about the merits of funding chargers -- but they're acknowledging the separation of powers that give Congress, not the executive branch, authority over spending decisions.
"While I don't agree with subsidizing green energy, we will respect Congress' will and make sure this program uses federal resources efficiently," Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy wrote in a statement posted on the department's website.
Colorado Attorney General Phil Weiser, who is leading the states' lawsuit against the freeze, said it was "encouraging" news that the administration is restarting the program. But, he said, it's not an automatic end to the legal challenge.
"It is promising that we're seeing some responses to our lawsuit and we're seeing some effort to give us the money that Congress has mandated," he told NPR. "We're going to stay focused on making sure that all the monies that are promised across this multi-state coalition are, in fact, given out appropriately."
Charging companies and EV advocates have celebrated the end of the freeze, and in many cases praised the streamlining of the rules -- even as they chafe at the long pause.
"It's ironic that this guidance was sold as cutting red tape, yet all it has accomplished is more than half a year of needless delay," Katherine García, the director of the Sierra Club's Clean Transportation for All program, wrote in a statement.
The NEVI program earmarked $5 billion for high-speed EV chargers along highway corridors, designed to serve the needs of long-distance EV drivers. To access the funds, states had to submit a plan for where and how they would build chargers. Once the plan was approved, each state's department of transportation would work with companies to install chargers, and then get reimbursed by the federal government.
It took more than two years after the law's passage for the first chargers to open to the public. As of August 16, some 4,000 ports have been funded but only 382 are open, according to the EV States Clearinghouse data project. But after the slow start, the same dataset shows that funding awards were accelerating through 2024 -- until the Trump administration hit the brakes.
The slow speed of the rollout has been criticized by both conservative critics of the NEVI program and by some EV advocates who supported the program but wanted it to move faster. Alex Laska, with the center-left think tank Third Way, co-authored a report earlier this year that said the Biden-era NEVI program suffered from "a morass of government red tape, roadblocks, and bureaucracy."
The new guidance from the Trump administration strips out a number of requirements added under Biden. States will no longer be required to engage with rural or underserved communities while planning charger locations. They do not need to direct benefits toward disadvantaged communities. They don't need to demonstrate that they've factored in labor or safety standards, or provided opportunities for minority-owned businesses. They won't need to address evacuations, snow removal or extreme weather in their plans.
Charging stations will also no longer be required to be less than 50 miles apart -- a concern for some large rural states -- or within a mile of a freeway. States will have more discretion on charger locations.
The DOT didn't respond to NPR's requests for an interview. But in a statement posted on the department's website, Duffy said this new guidance would speed things up. "If Congress is requiring the federal government to support charging stations, let's cut the waste and do it right," he wrote. "The Biden-Buttigieg Administration failed to deliver EV chargers despite their promises. Our revised NEVI guidance slashes red tape and makes it easier for states to efficiently build out this infrastructure."
Some of these changes -- in particular, the flexibility about site location -- have been celebrated by EV advocates and charging companies.
"We appreciate the Department's overall efforts to cut red tape," wrote Levi Kamolnick, the director of federal policy at CALSTART, a nonprofit that works with companies and governments to promote clean transportation. "Streamlining the program will unlock more financial gains -- including good jobs."
The executive director of the Electrification Coalition, a pro-EV nonprofit, wrote in a statement he was "encouraged by the Department's commitment to removing unnecessary barriers."
"We're optimistic," says Ryan McKinnon, the spokesman for the Charge Ahead partnership, which represents gas stations and retailers who want to add chargers. "They sort of cut through a lot of red tape that had slowed down the original program." He says the new guidance will particularly help states like Wyoming and Montana -- with big open space.
Of course, removing some requirements won't eliminate the need to find locations and contract with builders and pull permits, all of which takes time.
And there's a common refrain in the EV charger world: While people don't mind the changes to the guidance, they are frustrated by the delay and disruption they caused.
Alex Laska of Third Way -- who had been sharply critical of the inefficiencies of the Biden program -- gave mixed reviews to the Trump administration revisions. He noted that some forms of "red tape," like requirements about the type of charger, remain.
And other requirements have been deleted after states had already completed the work to meet them, meaning it won't actually save any time or effort.
Aside from loosening the requirements on location, the change is "kind of a nothingburger," he says. "This guidance was not worth holding up the program for, you know, now over half a year."
Andrew Bennett, the CEO of DRIIVZ, a company that builds software for charging stations, says the freeze disrupted a lot of projects that might have gotten greenlit this year.
In the meantime, while chargers have been built with private money, Bennett says, it's not enough: "We need about six times more just to keep up."
Sign Our PetitionThe recent decision by the Trump administration to unfreeze funding for the National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure (NEVI) program highlights the complex interplay between federal authority, state rights, and the urgent need for sustainable infrastructure development in the United States. Initially created through bipartisan legislation in 2021, this program aims to allocate $5 billion for the installation of high-speed electric vehicle (EV) chargers across the nation’s freeways. This initiative is particularly significant in the context of the growing climate crisis and the need for a transition away from fossil fuels. However, the six-month freeze and the subsequent legal battles underscore a deeper ideological divide and raise critical questions about governance and accountability in addressing climate change.
Historically, infrastructure projects have often been areas of bipartisan agreement, reflecting a collective acknowledgment of their fundamental role in economic growth and societal well-being. The NEVI program is no exception; it was born out of a recognition that transitioning to electric vehicles is vital for reducing greenhouse gas emissions and promoting energy independence. The Trump administration’s initial reluctance to fund this program reveals a tension between political ideology and legislative intent. The characterization of the NEVI program as "wasteful" by Trump and his administration starkly contrasts with the scientific consensus on climate change, which emphasizes the urgent need for investment in renewable energy and sustainable infrastructure. This ideological opposition to green initiatives often stems from a misunderstanding of the long-term economic and environmental benefits of such investments.
The legal challenge by a coalition of states, which ultimately pressured the administration to restart funding, exemplifies the importance of state advocacy in the face of federal inertia. This coalition, led by Colorado Attorney General Phil Weiser, underscores the role of state governments as critical actors in the fight against climate change. Their willingness to challenge the federal freeze demonstrates a commitment to upholding the will of Congress and ensuring that federally allocated funds are used as intended. The legal victory, though partial, highlights the power of grassroots activism and inter-state collaboration to drive policy change, particularly in a political climate where federal leadership may waver on climate commitments.
Moreover, the implications of this funding extend beyond merely providing charging stations for electric vehicles. The NEVI program represents a vital step towards transforming the U.S. transportation system from one reliant on fossil fuels to one that embraces sustainability and innovation. This transition is not just critical for environmental reasons but is also an opportunity to create jobs, stimulate economic growth, and foster technological advancements in clean energy. The Sierra Club and various EV advocates have recognized that while the streamlining of rules may have alleviated some bureaucratic delays, the broader goal remains: to invest in a future where clean transportation is accessible and widespread.
Finally, the reopening of the NEVI funding process, albeit with altered requirements, invites a larger conversation about the role of federal and state governments in combatting climate change. It raises questions about how policies must evolve to meet the demands of an increasingly urgent environmental crisis while respecting legislative frameworks. Advocates for climate justice must continue to hold leaders accountable, emphasizing that the fight for sustainable infrastructure is not merely a regulatory matter but a moral imperative. As this situation develops, it is essential that citizens remain informed and engaged, leveraging these discussions to challenge narratives that dismiss the importance of green initiatives and to champion the collaborative efforts necessary for a sustainable future.
The recent decision by the Trump administration to unfreeze funding for the National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure (NEVI) program represents a significant, albeit reluctant, acknowledgment of the necessity of electric vehicle (EV) infrastructure in the face of climate change. This program, established in 2021 through bipartisan legislation, aims to install high-speed EV chargers across the nation, a crucial step toward reducing greenhouse gas emissions and transitioning to sustainable energy. While the administration had previously dismissed the program as wasteful, the mounting pressure from states and the judicial system has compelled a change in stance. However, this episode underscores the ongoing tensions between state and federal authority over environmental policy and emphasizes the need for a more robust and coherent energy strategy.
Historically, the U.S. has seen a fluctuating commitment to environmental initiatives, often swayed by the political winds of the moment. The NEVI program is a product of a growing recognition that electric vehicles are essential to combat climate change, a sentiment that has gained traction as the impacts of global warming become more evident. The legal confrontation initiated by states against the Trump administration's funding freeze highlights a crucial aspect of American governance: the principle of checks and balances. In this case, states are asserting their rights to enforce the legislative mandates set forth by Congress, demonstrating the power of organized coalitions to influence federal policy. This realization is vital for advocates of climate action who wish to leverage legal frameworks to push for progressive environmental policies.
The reopening of the NEVI funding is undoubtedly a step in the right direction, but it is not without its complications. The administration's decision to strip away certain Biden-era requirements while resuming funding raises questions about the integrity and effectiveness of the program. Streamlining regulations can often lead to unintended consequences, especially when it comes to environmental safeguards. Activists and advocates must remain vigilant to ensure that the rollback of these requirements does not undermine the overall goals of the program. For those who support comprehensive climate action, it is imperative to hold both states and the federal government accountable to the highest standards of environmental stewardship.
As engaged citizens, there are several actions we can take to influence the discourse surrounding electric vehicles and renewable energy. First, it is crucial to educate ourselves and others about the benefits of EV infrastructure and the importance of robust climate action. By fostering informed conversations, we can challenge misconceptions propagated by those who resist change. Engaging with local representatives to advocate for the expansion of EV charging networks and renewable energy investments can also amplify our voices. Moreover, supporting grassroots organizations that focus on climate justice can create a ripple effect, as these groups work tirelessly to push for systemic change at various levels of government.
In conclusion, the partial resurrection of the NEVI program illustrates the complexities of climate policy in the U.S. While the funding freeze was a setback, it sparked a legal battle that emphasized the importance of accountability and collaboration between states and the federal government. As we move forward, it is essential to capitalize on this momentum to advocate for comprehensive climate solutions that transcend partisan divides. By remaining engaged, educated, and proactive, Americans can drive the conversation toward a more sustainable future, ensuring that future generations inherit a planet capable of supporting life, prosperity, and equity.
The recent news regarding the reopening of funding for the National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure (NEVI) program is an important development in the push for sustainable transportation. While the reinstatement of funding is a positive step, the ongoing challenge of ensuring that these funds are utilized effectively and equitably remains. Here are actionable steps individuals can take to advocate for the expansion of electric vehicle (EV) infrastructure and ensure accountability in its implementation.
### Personal Actions to Consider
1. **Educate Yourself and Others:** - Stay informed about EV infrastructure and climate policy. Share knowledge within your community to raise awareness about the importance of sustainable transportation.
2. **Engage with Local Representatives:** - Contact your local and state representatives to express your support for the NEVI program and urge them to prioritize EV charger installations in their plans.
3. **Support Advocacy Organizations:** - Join or donate to environmental organizations such as the Sierra Club or the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC), which advocate for clean transportation policies.
### Specific Actions to Take
#### 1. **Petition for EV Infrastructure Expansion:** - **Petition Example:** Start or sign a petition on platforms like Change.org urging local governments to allocate funds for EV chargers in underserved areas. - **What to Say:** "I support the expansion of electric vehicle charging infrastructure in our community to promote cleaner air and sustainable transportation options. I urge our local government to prioritize this initiative."
#### 2. **Contact Local Officials:** - **Who to Write To:** - **Governor's Office:** Contact your state's governor to express support for the NEVI program. - Example: - **Governor Jared Polis (Colorado)** - Email: governorpolis@state.co.us - Mailing Address: 136 State Capitol, Denver, CO 80203 - **State Transportation Department:** Write to your state’s Department of Transportation to advocate for the effective use of NEVI funds. - Example: - **CDOT (Colorado Department of Transportation)** - Email: cdot_info@state.co.us - Mailing Address: 4201 East Arkansas Avenue, Room 200, Denver, CO 80222
#### 3. **Join Public Meetings and Forums:** - Attend town hall meetings or public forums regarding transportation planning. Voice your support for EV infrastructure and ask questions about funding and implementation.
#### 4. **Engage in Digital Advocacy:** - Use social media platforms to amplify your support for EV chargers. Tag local officials and use hashtags related to climate action and sustainable transportation.
#### 5. **Write Opinion Pieces:** - Submit op-eds or letters to the editor in local newspapers advocating for the installation of EV chargers and the importance of green infrastructure.
### Messaging Guidance
When reaching out to officials or participating in public discussions, consider the following points to emphasize:
- **Environmental Benefits:** Highlight the necessity of transitioning to electric vehicles to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and combat climate change. - **Economic Opportunities:** Discuss how investing in EV infrastructure can create jobs and stimulate local economies. - **Equity in Access:** Stress the importance of ensuring that EV charging stations are accessible in all communities, particularly underserved areas. - **Accountability:** Urge officials to ensure transparency and accountability in how NEVI funds are utilized, and advocate for community input in planning processes.
By taking these actions, individuals can play a significant role in supporting the expansion and effective implementation of the NEVI program and contribute to a more sustainable future.